HL-5344, Annual Environ Operating Rept for 1996
| ML20138F644 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1996 |
| From: | Sumner H SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| ENV-97-053, ENV-97-53, HL-5344, NUDOCS 9705060020 | |
| Download: ML20138F644 (3) | |
Text
Lew's Sumner Southern Nuclear Vice President Operating Company,Inc.
Hatch Project Support 40 invemess Parkway
.. g-Post Office Box 1295 Birmingham. Alabama 35201 Tel 205.992.7279 Fax 205.992 0341 k
April 25,1997 SOUTHERN h COMPANY Enery to Serve hurWorld" Docket Nos. 50-321 50-366 HL-5344 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Annual Environmental Onerating Report Gentlemen:
In accordance with the Plant Hatch Units 1 and 2 Environmental Protection Plan, Appendix B to Facility Operating Licenses DPR-57 and NPF-5, Section,5.4.1, Southern Nuclear Operating Company is submitting the enclosed Environmental Operating Report for 1996.
If you have any questions in this regard, please contact this office at any time.
Sincerely, s
6*td H. L. Sumner, Jr.
HLS/KWB/ahl ENV-97-053
Enclosure:
Annual Environmental Operating Report for 1996 cc: Southern Nuclear Overatine Companv Mr. P. H. Wells, Nuclear Plant General Manager NORMS U. S Nuclear Reeutatory Commission. Washineton. D.C.
1 Mr. K. N. Jabbour, Licensing Project Manager - Hatch C00 7
U. S. Nuclear Revulatorv Commission. Reelon 11 03 p p W Mr. B. L. Holbrook, Senior Resident Inspector - Hatch ll 11 lll lllllll l Ill lll Mr. L. A. Reyes, Regional Administrator l
9705060020 961231 PDR ADOCK 05000321 R
EDWIN I.11ATCII NUCLEAR PLANT-UNITS 1 AND 2 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPZRATING REPORT 1996 SPECIFICATION 2
This report is submitted in accordance with Section 5.4.1 of the Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear l
Plant Environmental Protection Plan, Appendix B to Facility Operating Licenses DPR-57 and NPF-5. The report summarizes the environmental activities for Units 1 and 2 for the 4
period.lanuary 1,1996, through December 31,1996.
By letter dated, December 19,1995, the NRC approved Georgia Power Company's request to replace the Environmental Technical Specifications with an Environmental Protection Plan (nonradiological) and to revise Operating Licenses DPR-57 and NPF-5 to reflect these J
changes. Amendment No.199 to Facility Operating License DPR-57 and Amendment No.
140 to Facility Operating License NPF-5 replaced the existing Appendix B," Environmental i
Technical Specifications," with a new Appendix B, " Environmental Protection Plan."
Implementation of the amendments was completed by February 16,1996, as required. The changes associated with the amendments are administrative in nature, altering only the format and location of programmatic controls and procedural details relative to
]
nonradiological environmental monitoring. Reporting for environmental matters occurring subsequent to February 16,1996, was performed in accordance with the requirements of the new Environmental Protection Plan. The format for the 1996 report has been modified l
to reflect the requirements of Section 5.4.1 of the Environmental Protection Plan.
REPORTING REOUIREMENTS A.
Summaries and Analyses of Results of Environmental Monitoring Activities for the Reporting Period There were no nonradiological environmental monitoring activities performed at Plant Hatch during the report period, beyond those performed in accordance with NPDES Permit No. GA0004120.
B.
Comparison of the 1996 Monitoring Activities with Preoperational Studies, Operational Controls, and Previous Monitoring Reports These programs were not required because no nonradiological environmental monitoring programs were conducted during the reporting period beyond those performed in accordance with NPDES Permit No. GA0004120.
11L-5344 ENV-97-053
^
i
., g...
2 1
Edwin I. IIntch Nuclear Plant - Units 1 and 2 l
Annual Environmental Operating Report Page 2 i
l i
C. Assessment of the Observed Impacts of Plant Operations on the Environment i
There were no significant adverse environmental impacts associated with plant operations during 1996.
i D. Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) Noncompliance and Corrective Actions i
i There were no EPP noncompliance: during 1996.
3 E.
Changes in Station Design or Operations, Tests, or Experiments Made in j
Accordance with EPP Subsection 3.1 Which Involved a Potentially Significant Unreviewed Environmental Question There were no changes, tests, or experiments in 1996 which involved a potentially significant unreviewed environmental question.
i j
F.
Nonroutine Reports Submitted in Accordance with EPP Section 5.4.2 4
4 There were no nonroutine reports submitted in 1996.
4 4
\\
l I
i r
e d
a i
l 1
4 i
1 q
HL-5344 ENV-97-053