CLI-76-23, Order Granting Jf Doherty 800717 Amended Motion for Financial Assistance to Extent Permitted by CLI-76-23. Other Parties May Request Same.Fr Notice Re Procedural Assistance in Proceedings & Cert of Svc Encl
| ML19327A342 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Allens Creek File:Houston Lighting and Power Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 07/31/1980 |
| From: | Wolfe S Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| To: | Doherty J DOHERTY, J.F. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19327A339 | List: |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-CP, NUDOCS 8008060040 | |
| Download: ML19327A342 (9) | |
Text
t
\\9 4
gg UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
/
4 vt
>g.w%v
O NUCtEAR aEGuuTORT CO.mSSION s
t e
',hhe p
G[' A7/Sg %
h THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICE'ISniG BOARD
- f f,'"*4,MeQ.A C Sheldon J. Wolfe, Esquire, Chairman
- y
'Gustave A. Linenberger, Jr., Member Dr. E. Leonard Cheatum, Member
^
In the Matter of
)
)
HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY
)
Docket No. 50-466 CP
)
(Allens Creek Nuclear Generating Station, )
Unit 1)
)
ORDER (July 31, 1980)
On June 27, 1980, Mr. John F. Doherty, an intervening party, filed a Motion for Financial Assistance from NRC Funds Through The Board.
In his Motion, alleging indigency, Mr. Doherty requested financial assistance tor certain costs incurred or to be incurred by him as an intervenor in this proceeding.
These items of costs include:
(1) payment of FOIA copying fees; (2) the copying and
= ailing costs of testimony filed for the hearing; (3) copying and mailing costs of other items relevant to motions, replies, etc.;
(4) cost of the transcript; (5) cost of copying and certifying of evidence; (6) costs of copying Applicant's documents; (7) limited funds for NTIS documents relevant to his contentions; and (3) other i
costs reasonably related to developing-the record with regard to
)
his contentions.
In support of his motion. Mr. Doherty cited the Comptroller's decision Financial Assistance to Intervenors in Pro-ceedings et Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 3-92288, issued on l
8008060 0 40
. January 25, 1980.
Applicant and Staff respectively submitted opposing responses on July 11 and July 17, 1980.
In an Amendment, filed on July 17, 1980., Intervenor Doherty struck items-(6), (7) and (8) apparently because Applicant had cited two cases 1/ which reflected that the Commission, in the past, has declined to provide financial assistance to intervenors in NRC pro-ceedings and cited a recent case ! wherein, after noting that it favored intervenor funding, the Co= mission stated that it declined to consider funding intervenors in that case in light of the advice of the-Conptroller General (3-922S8) and its clear reading of the legislative history associated with the fiscal year 1980 appropria-tions legislation.
With regard to items (1) through (5), Mr. Doherty now asserts that he is not seeking direct financial assistance 1
(funding) but rather, as permitced in Financial Assistant to Partici-i pants in Comnission Proceedings, CLI-76-23, 4 NRC 494 (1976), is requesting that these enu=erated procedural cost burdens be reduced.
However, in that decision, the Commission only relieved certain participants in the GESMO proceeding of some procedural cost burdens --
it did not extend such relief to any participants in any other pro-ceeding, and merely-directed the Staff to undertake a detailed study of the subject matter.
1/ Financial Assistance to Particicants in Co= mission Proceedings, CLI-76-23, 4 NRC 494 (1976); Transnuclear, Inc., CLI-77-31, 6 NRC
-849 (1977).
'li Metrocolitan Edison Comoany (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1k). 1), CLI-8 0-19, 11 NRC (May 16, 1980).
1
. However, effective July 25, 1980, S S 2. 708 (d), 2.712 and 2.750 of our Rules of Practice have been amended to provide a one-year pilot program of procedural assistance in certain adjudicatory pro-ceedings.
A copy of 45 Federal Register 49535 (July 25, 1980) is attached hereto.
To the extent that items (1) through (5) are specifically encompassed within these amendments, Mr. Doherty's a= ended motion is granted -- to the extent said items are not specifically encompassed within these amendments, his amended motion is denied.
Other parties, exclusive of Applicant, may request the procedural assistance provided for in 552.712 and 2.750.
Section 2. 708 (d) automatically applies to all parties and the procedural assistance provided therein need not be requested.
FOR TEE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
]d&
k Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this 31st day of July 1980.
9
Fedaial Resp. ster / Vol. 45. No.145 / Friday July S.1980 [ Rules and Regulations 49535 action is taken as a result of an days prior to the anniversary date of the to reduce cost burdens for parties in -
ad=inistratrve decston.
note.
Commisson adjudicatory licensing proceedings on applications forlie*naan tyracTrvt oATE: July *3.1980.
and amendments thereto. Several po, mn.a yo uano, ca men gg proposals were considered in the Cad O. Opstad. Farm Real Estate Loan Neo-nis doen nu"st has Wen remmd centext of the S-3 rulemaking on the-Division. Farmers Home A A m'=tration.
, th
'sb.sf-uranium fuel cycle. See 42 FR 12803..
USDA.14th and Indevendence Avenue.
"c '-$y (March 13.,1977). 43 FR 8915 (April 14.
SW. Washington. DC =:50. Telephone:
the determmation of F..HA 'ht *6e preposed
(*C2) 447-4572.
action does not constitute a major Fedemi 1978), and 44 FR 45382 (August 12.3979)..
De FinalImpect Statement acnon sismBantly afecting therquality of From that psx. ding the Comm==mn describing the opdons consxiered in ' - human envu==-- andin accordanc= with - hoped to gam speciSc expenence with..-
the National Enviramnantal Pancy-Act of prc,viding free service of cocuments and.
dcveloping this Enal mie and the impact m PC.M-tsu, an E.-
r.al knpact free transenpts and to use the'.n :;_:. '
f of implementing each opdon is available 8** ***' " **" '*98"*d ' m.- 9. -
experience to develop general policyM on request from the Of5cm of the Chaef.
(7 U.Sc sees daieganon of methanty by the. with respect to aAjad**~y
- c.. c;w=
Diactives Managemant Branch Fsaners Home Adm:ntstration. Room 6346 South Q*f,,%tCh proceedings..u u.v.s--c - t :rY Y Assc=it-e m 14* =d.:.;;:::: oeveiop ucm:m. H*2 m;: rugibinty fa,sen.i.=;r"=#e
==
mT..
- W--
' ' ~
- id ~
Incepenoena Avenue.SW. 4 *h
- g N""# * ::W:t'W'hn1N Assistan**O'M'"'"-E'
~ ~ ~ ' '
M 2
Washington.DC.ac250. $y3-tr: GerdamCavanaugh.
.Ig g
. One altemative withTespect to mC 3y gy
'd8m8"f #8"8 8 " ta=-- ' ~ procedursi assistance is to provide it to -'..
Snal acdon has been rmewed undeI', A
- ""- v e w.c a -, fun participants;t.e;. parties. who sebmrt USDA pmcederes estabushed in ~-. - -.
gg y's Memorandmn *.955 to ~~~ ~ #* "'*'*"d **" ****"M *?"*^ - '. an afEdavit to the Hearing Board <
2; I
'"**"8*""E8**-"
m~
'em stating.~ with brief factual support.that -
implement Executive Orderi:'D44.and -.
their ability to participate would be
'T has been e!= weed "not eaw+""af"
~
3 sigm candyimpMwdutMe nis action will save tune andzw ned " NUCK'E5k NEGb5. h0R
~
P assistance. Under this alternative thew paperwork. I! $e nWt were to stayin-M" i:M C N ^ -
Commission would have had to pmvi,de-h.
de Federal Reg: ster. warb time 6e,,_.,.f. COMMM
~7-the Boards and parties with some76??
.m.
bierest rate cnengeditwould be "". ; ' 10 CFR Pa,g' N' r Nf' * " guidance as to who wouldordmanWY, W cecessary to bung ti.s -Mrt up-to. T ?.
- ~. - -
date. Removi g this nh'htt and==W([ Proceduril Assist $nce OdNd'Icatory ~ qualify for assistance under this 4 v..
It available in any FmHA of5m is the - Ucensing Proceedings
~~
standard. However, ofermg procedmsl most pmmpt way to provMe mhmsdan
' -: -4. -^ -. assistance to allintervenors without.,.
on intenst rate chans-=
t.'. - ~,.;, AcancytII.S. Nuclear-Regulatory ~ (
qualiScation might ' offer enough savings.;
-h -
from not having to decide who was ; '.i The Farmers Hame.a h =tian;.. Com=isews (NRC); - 6 ~
- qualiSed to receive assist== to bd,,.,J amends de Table of th-+= and ^" '~ AcTicwe-E5ective r=le. -
worth the extra expense of assisting a ~.-~_
sect:en is51 5(aX:)imd deletes WWt few additionalIntervencrs. On the oth'er *.
sumuAny NRC.is =a
,.-- Its. -
t A from Subpart A. part1951. Chapter rv'III. Title 7 in the Code af Federal ngulationsin order to provide a one-
' hand. it is inw.hs to charge an?(.~ r..-
Regulations. J
-~~, year pilotprogram of pro =dmal -
applicant from S50.0Co to 31 mha fo it is the policy of $is Departme=t that asststance in adindicatory proceedings prucessing an application, and then to" ~
rules relating to public prcperty, loans.
on applications for heenses and '
offer it a fne transc:ipt, worth en the amendments thereta. except for ant 2 trust order of $1.000...
grants, beneSts, or contrac:s shallbe -
proceedings, to parties other dan the On balance. the Commissio'n has '
published for com~ t notwithstandbg the exe=ption in 5 U.S.C. 553 wth apphcant ey (a) upon a party's request.
decded that de better altemative is to respect to such rules. His action.
providing one transcript without. charge provide procedural assistance to all however, is not published for proposal, to that party and (b) upon a party's rulemaking since the purpose of the request, copying and serving without '
parties other dan an applicant in.
adjudicatory proceedim on
~
change is ad -*tratrve in nature and charge that party's testimony (including applications for licenses and ~ ~ '.
attachments), proposed Endings of fact ainend=ents thereto.
publication for comment is ""--y.
and conciusions oflaw, and responses Herefore. de Table of Contents and 1 t9512.5(a)(2) are==edad and Exhihit to discoverey requests. In addition the NRC Provision of Free Tr=medpts A is deinted a.iIcHows:
regulations are amended to require that N
. m ud!y wh Tao.e of Conennes parties, incinding an apphcant. file with esp y wnen gau copy b mquesg,.-
NRC an original plus two copies of each A typical transcipt for one day or a Eling in an adjudicatioc. rade:r than an pmces inGMm aD pagesae 7
' Euoit ?.--3 AvanaMe in any FmNA Ot'5ce) origmal and twenty copies.
origmal of such a transc1pt. provided..a.a.s EMNDaTEduly 23.1980.
the next mormng. costs about 31.000:
I195125 Revww c4 Larstad Renowcas FOR MTHER mFORMAT10M CONTACT:
Supplementary copies cost about MM Fo anc CL bene Romas F.Dorian.Esq. 05ce of the In the S-.s proceeding. transcr: pts wem (a) Frequency ofirriews.
Executive Legal Director. U.S. Nuclear requested by most public interest Regulatory lodsion. Washingtoc.
groups. industy representanves and (1)
- 1 -
)
(:) ne interest rate on FO in=u win D.C. %535 (Telephone: (301).-422-8690).
utilities. The princpal conclusion that i
be mcreased in ac=oreana with the susm EuENTARY WORMADC9C in order can be drawn from 6at proceeding is _
Sdedule in Exhibit A of this Suboart to help pames assist de Consion in almost se!.f-evident. namely, tnat NRC's l
(available in any FmHA ofSca.) De amving at its decistons 6.a, Commission offer to provide an expensive service. '
loans will then be reviewed at least on several occasions over the past (transcr: pts) is attractive to most pames.
or.e every two years. approvmt=My 80 several years has considered proposals nese parties. in turn. can better assist l
?
49S36 Federal y,-:ister / Vol. 45. No.145 / Friday July 25. 1980 / Rules 'and Reculations tne Commission in arnving at its Commission. Concem had been program of free copytng and service.
decisiens.
expressed that free service would Copying and service have been There is no reason why free encourage abuses in the form of requested by intervenors in a number of transenpts could not be made available overlong, unedited or unnecessary instances and the value of the in adjudications to parties. other than filings. In general. for those who assistance. both to intervenors and the the applicant. at the same time and ultimately requested copying and quality of Commission decisionmaking.
!ccation as they are made available to service. there were no significant may be worth the modest delay entailed.
the NRC staff. If transcnpts are mailed differences in length or frequency A one-year pilot program would allow to the staff. they would also be mailed to between filings copied and served by NRC to obtain information on this effort intervenors. This service could replace the parties themselves and those copied and on any problems such a program present practice where members of the and served by NRC at a party's request.
may present, as well as answer whether staff or the Lcensmg Board frequently This experience suggests that a NRC copying and service of testimony is lend an intervenor an extra copy of the prograin of free NRC copying and an incentive to timely filing.
transcript. although on a necessanly service is not likely to be abused.The Filing of:0 Copies with the Commission irregular basis. Transcnpts are Commission does not wish to assume particularly important to the many this' responsibility for all classes of Parties in licensing proceedings, under intervenors who attempt to make their documents, smce this would create 10 CFR 2.7C8(d), file or serve documents cases on cross-exammation.
substantial delay. It has. however, as follcws: de ongmal and 20 copies Therefere. the Commiss:en has.
Identified several ca'egones of with the Commission. and one copy on decided to mitiate a one-year pilot documents which are bulky, but do not each party and on members of the program to provide free transcnpts on arise frequently. Their service by the hearing panelin question. The 20 copies the oasis previously desenbed.
Commission would thus relieve parties filed with Docketmg and Service are for Ucensing Boards will have the of a substantial burden without the Commission's convenience for discretion to control de distribution of introducing substantial delay. These intemal informational distribution: the transcnpts to par *ies-for example. to categories are: (1) testimony (including appropriate Board and the parties are limit distrbution to some but not a!I of a attachments). (2) proposed findings of served separately.
consolidated aroup ofintervenors, or to fact and conclusicas of law, and (3)
These 20 copies are not adequate for only those phases of a hearing in which responses to discovery requests.In intemal NRC distnbution needs. In an intervenor intends to part:cipate.
relative terms. service of these practice. Docketmg and Service documents need not be as rapid as items distnbutes some copies upon receipt:
NRC Provision of Free Copying and such as briefs or motions. A rough look making additional copies creates a time 3'
at filings in licensing proceedings, lag of up to several days. Since the Most licensmg proceedings produce indicates $at these documents tend to copies Docketing and Service sends out dozens of filings. :t should be noted that.
be relatively bulky. Also, documents are informational, the Commission frequently. parnes in complex containing testimony and exhibits perceives no tignt time constraint on proceedings routmely serve more people contain substantive contentions and are.
intemal information distribution: the an necessary. Particularly in those in effect the " essence'* of NRC normal time !sg necessary to allow NRC proceedings m which certam aspects of proceedings. By processing them. NRC to do all copying ofinternal distribution an issue have been heard before all would be copying and serymg a documents would not cause tevels of NRC adjudicatory boards, substantial amount of de number of inconvenience. Therefore, the parties tend to compile service lists pages filed. a service which would have Commission has decided that all parties, which reflect the entire history of the high payoffin terms of reducing costs to including applicants, need file with the proceeding. rather than being tailored to intervenors, without substantially Commission only an original and two the particular paper bems filed. Random impeding the progress of the copies: the original would go to the checks of service lists show that this adjudicatory process..
docket file, one copy would go directly sort of error accounts for between 3 and Copying and service of these to the Public Document Room, and the 7 extra copies made and distributed.
documents by the commission may other copy would be used for The Commission wishes to emphasi:e cause some very small delay in the reproducnon.
that parties should be aware that hearing process. A licensing proceeding
'\\ntitrust Proceedings service is required only on the may require several rounds of testimony Commission or tne pernnent and an opportunity to file proposed NRC will not provide free transcripts adiudicatory board and the parties, and findings of fact and conclusions oflaw.
and free copying and service in antitrast dat part:es endeavonng to hold down (Responses to discover / requests are proceedings.The studies of filings have their costs shouid carefully monitor Weir also filed. but not on a tight time been confined to health. safety. and service lists.
schedule.)
environmental licensing proceedings.
In December 197. the Commission At least five days would be required Whi!e the Commission believes that se audori:ed the Docketing and Service for each set of documents to reach the chan;es would substantia!!y assist Branch to caos and se ve submissions in Commission and be copied a :d mailed interrenors in dose proceedin;s wi2 cut Se S-3 proceeng. :f requested to do so to 6e parties and beard members.
intrndacing substantial delay,it does b:. parties to the proceedmg. Each party Therefore. de r;!e prov: des dat not know wheder dese conclusions can requestmg in:s assistance served an documents filed with Docketm; and be extended to antitn:st proceedmes.
cr;inal and two co;ies on NRC. Obers Service in the three categones There may be. in fact. substantial fel! owed normal procedures. namely, previously deseneec should be filed not differences in de extent and general service on otner partes and an or:gmal less than five days before de date at bu:k of discovery between the two kins
- plus 20 copies on NRC.
which they are subm:tted to an of preceedings. In add:t:en. the The results show that the availability adjudicatorf board. unless se presiding Commissicn does not know whethi r of free copying and semce had no cfficer provides otherwise.
parties in antitrust proceedin;s are discemible imoact on the length or Cn balance. the Commission has likely to need such assistan:e as frequency of fitegs with the decided to undertake a one-year pilot interrenors m heal &. safety. and
l Federal Register / Vol. 45. No.145 / Friday [uly 25, 1960 / Rules and Regulations 49537 t
}
license or an amendment thereto. the The national bank supervisory j
Consequently, the Commission will presiding officer may arrange for process, tcgether with the internal environmental proceedings.
administration of the Office. have investigate this area further befcre provision of one free transcript to a undergone sigmficant change smce party other than the applicant. upon
[
Because these amendments relate request by that party. The transcnpt will section 4.13 was last comprehe making any changes.
solely to agency procedure and practice. be made available to a party at the same reviewed in 1 the Comrmssion has found that good time and location as it is made available of the forms previously used have fall to the NRC staff, If a transcript is matled into disuse or have been found to be
,d.
cause exists for omitting notice of to the staff. it will also be mailed to the negligible value to the Office. Similarly.
proposed rulemaking. and public a number of new forrns have been requestmg party. A presiding officer has
.t precedure thereon. as unnecessary, and ~
for making the amendments effective the discretion to control the distribution adopted to accommodate new statutory immediately without the customary 30 of transcripta to parties.
requirements.and supervisory needs.
,f ORArr:NG INFORMATION:The principal j,
days notice.
(Sec, totp. Pub. L 83-r03. as amended. 68 drsiter of this document was Jonathan L Pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of Levin. Senior Attorney. Office of the 8
W54. as amended. the Energy Stat. 94ap, a s amended (4 U.S.C. ::01p.))
i Dated at Weshington. D C. this :tst day of Comptroller of the Currency.
Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended. July,1980 U.S.C. I 1. et seq.; 12 U.S.C. 93a: 5 U.S.C.
er l
and sections 552 and 553 of Tit!a 5 of the Rr the Nuctor Regulamy Ccmmssion.
11 :
s I
5321 United States Code de feifowing Samuell. ChA amendments to Title 70. Chapter 1. Code Secretory orthe Commission.
Adoption of Amendment:
i of Federal Regulations. Part 2 is e oor. m.as ra
- r..-n e.s.m 1 CFR 4.13 is amended to read as published as a document subject to sue.a caos 7sse4i-u g
rs codification.
Jr j 4.13 Forms and instructions.
PART 2-rut.ES OF PRACTICE FOR OCMESTIC LICENSING PROCEEDINGS CEP ARTMENT OF THE TREASURY (a) Numbered forms. The foi!owing numbered forms of the Office of the
- 1. Sect:en :.708(d) is amended to read: Office of the Comptroller of the Comptroller of the Currency are 12J08 Formal requirements f or Currency cu!Tently in use:
r CC 1400-OX:Officeri Direct and Indirect f *"'",'".
12 CFR Part 4 Indebiedness and/or other Banks CC 142.:-OX National Bank Examinefs Seal (d) Except as otherwise provided by (Dock ei No. 8o-41 CC 14:4-OX: Assets to be Chared Off by ie this part or,5y order, a pleading (or Nan nel Bank Exammer other document) other than Description of C1fice. Procedures.
CC,um CmM %m d 2t correspondence shall be filed in an Putriic Information; Forms and c.x m n e n CC 14:5-CL Examiners Checa, list for origmal and two conformed copies.2.Section 2.71:is amended by adding - Instructions a new paragraph (f) as followr:
actiscy: Office of the Comptrolier of the CC 1 :.EC aNep f
IC Currency.
Ewen nation ACTION: Final rule.
CC 14:5-OL Report of Exammahon an i 2.712 Service of papers.rnethods, proof.
CC 14:5-OL Confidential Memorandum to (f) Free copying and service. Except in SUMM ARv1This amendmerit revises 12 the Comptroiter of the Currency
- y*
an antitrust proceeding. in any CFR 4.13. the regulation which identtEes CC 14: -cX: Voluntary Charge. Offs of Instaltnent Loans j
adjudicatory proceeding on an all forms used by de Office of the CC 14:S-OL Report of V,sitanori i
Comptroller of the Currency (" Office").
application for a license or an,
I4
'E "
- * * " * " " ~
amendment thereto, the Commission.
The purpose of de amendt:.htt is to upon request by a party other than the update the officiallist of forms to reflect CC e rt'of the Condition of the applicant. will ccpy and serve without deletions and additions made m recent Trust Department CC 1450 OX: Elect ome Data Procesung cost to that party Sat party s testimony years.
Examination Report (inclucing attachments), proposed EFFECTtVE D ATE: july 7.5.1980.
CC 1451-OL Biographical Dela Work Sheet findings of fact and conclusions oflaw.
FoR FURTHER INFopMAT1oM CONTACT *.
CC145r-OL Recort of National Bank and responses to discovery requests.
These documents should be filed with Jonathan L Levin, Semor Attemey.
Exammer for Week Ending Office of de Comptreiler of de CC 1485-OX: Investment Sheet (Trust Docketmg and Service not less than five Currency. 4901.' Enfant P!aza East. S.W.
Depan nent) days before they are due to be Washington. D.C. 20:19. Teicphone:
, CC 1600-AX: Exammer s Cred:t Lee Sheet submitted to an adjudicatory bor d.
CC wot-OX. Perscnal. Farm or Ranch unless the presidir:3 officer provides (202)+47 117-t SUPPLEMENTARY INPoRM AT1oN:This CC1 :-
FiscalIntenor Statement otherwise.'
- 3. Sec. n 0.750 is amended by adc,:,ng amendment canict=s to tne requirement CC 402-0L Financial S:atement-Business 0"t a new paragraph (c) as fo!!aws:
cf 5 U.S C. 35: that each agency publish CC 15c3-OL Fiscal Interim in the Federal Register descr ptions of CC 1604-OL Rea! Es:ste Mortgage
- an i2J50 Official report ea; transenpt.
agency forms and instruction:, which are CC 1605-OL Consumer Finance Indirect (c) Free transc pt: Except in an the public. ne amen'dment revises -
CC AWOL Ccasamer Finance -Past D e available to. and may be obtained bv.
L:ans CC 1507-01 Fi:e Comments. Trade antitrust proceecmg. in any tdiudicatory those por' ions of 1:CFR 4.13 which !!st Checkmg. Credit investigations. Asers;e ads proceeing on an appdcatica for a de numbered and unnumbered forms currently used by de Office. Also. the CC NIsonds-Descnotion amendment provides more specific CC 1509 0L Collaters! Sheet SIm Es e$. eUeYIdhtne Information for obtaining Copies of CC 1610-01 Direct 12ase Financmg CC tot 1 CX: Coi!ateral Une Shp Cammission. Notice of as estension will arpear in Office forms.
me rniersi a cesier
5
=
7.+ -
s
- .=
UNITED STA'"IS 07 AMERICA j.:
NUCLEAR REGUI.ATORY C030 FISSION yp
.u In the Matter of
)
(
)
EE EOUSTON LIGHTING AND P0kT.R
)
Docket No. (s) 50-466 if; COMPANY 3,
)
E
)
E (Allens Creek Nuclear Generating )
{f Station, Unit }'o.1)
)
)
k;
)
5s CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing docu:acut(s)V upon each person designated on the official service list compiled by the Of fice of the Secretary of the Comission in this proceeding in accordance with the require =ents of Section 2.712 of 10 CFR Part 2-Rules of Practice, of the Nuclear Regulatory Cc=ission's Rules and Regulations.
g i]
Dated at '.'ashington, D.C. this
.E/M eay of n,th 0
17 _.
y V
I'.
E...
t t
~)//hh l.
NUWW Of fied df 'the Secretary of the Cg;i.=ission
,1 s
p i~.
5...
f;
-~
ThI ED STATES OF AMERICA
- C:1 EAR RI;CT.ATORY CO 0!!!SION a
!.n the Matter of
)
)
HOUST03 LIGHTI!G AND POWER
)
Docket No. (s)52-466 CC::FANY
)
)
(Allens Creek Nuclear Cenerating )
Station, Unit 1)
)
)
SIRVTCE LIST _
Sheldon J.
Vsife, Esq., Chairman Robert Lowenstein, Esq.
Atomic Safety and Licensing toard Levanstein, Reis, Newman, U.S.
- Tuclear Regulatory Concission Axelrad and Toll
'7ashington, D.C.
20555 1025 Connecticut Avenue, N.T.
Washington, D.C.
20037 ir. Gustavo A.
Linenberger Atocic Safety and Licensing Board J.
Gregory Copeland, Esq.
U.S.
iuclear Regulatory Coc=1ssion Baker and Sotts
'7a shin g to n,
D.C.
20555 One Shell Plaza Houston, Texas 77002 Or.
E.
Leonard Cheat.us 2oute 3, 6on 3S)A Houston Lighting & Power Company i'a t.in s v111e, Georgia 35077 ATT3:
I'r.
E.
A.
Turner Vice President Alan G.
nosenthal, Esq., Chair =an
?.0.
Zox 1730 Ate =ic Safety and Licensin?.'977eal Houston, Texas 77031
., c a r :.
L.S.
'acica: Laquiatory Connission Richard Loverre, Esq.
- 'a s hin,7 t o n,
D.C.
20535 Assistant Attorney General 2.0.
Box 12543, Capitol Station Dr.. John H.
Suck Austin, Texas 72711 Atomic Safety and Licensin; Appeal Board James Scott, Jr.,
Esq.
U.S. Nuclear leculatory Com ission 3302 Albacore Washington, D.C.
20555 Eouston, Texas Ilichael C.
Farrar, Esq.
!!s. Brenda A.
McCorkle Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal 6140 Oarnell Board Houston, Texas 77074 U.S.
Nuclear neSulatory Co::ission "ashington,_D.C.
20535 Carro Hinderstein 4739 Link Terrace Counsel for NRC Staff Houston, Texas 77025 Office of the Executive Legal Director Mr. Wayne E.
Rentfro U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O.
Box 1335 Washington, D.C.
20535 Rosenberg, Texas 77471 1
J i
4 r
1 y '
eg egg GS 9
G.
- $4
.4b 4e e
8 8
'9 8%
g
0 Board and parties - continued 50-466 Mr. John F. Doherty Ms. Robin Griffith Atmadillo Coalition of Texas, 1034 Sally Ann Houston Chapter Rosenberg, Texas '77471 4327 Alconbury Street Houston, Texas 77021 Ms. Carolina Conn 1414 Scenic Ridge Mr. Robert S. Framson Houston, Texas 77043 Ms. Madeline Bass Framson 4822 Waynesboro Drive Ms. Elinore P. Cumings Houston, Texas 77035 926 Horace Mann Rosenberg, Texas 77471 Dr. David Marrack 420 Mulberry Lane Ms. Leotis Johnston Bellain, Texas 77401 1407 Scenic Ridge Houston, Texas 77043 Mr. J. Morgan Bishop Mrs. Margaret Bishop Ms. Rosemary N. Lemmer 11418 Oak Spring 11423 Oak Spring Houston, Texas 77043 Houston, Texas 77043 Mr. Bryan L. Baker Mr. F.H. Potthoff, III 1923 Hawthorne 7200 Shady Villa, 1110 Houston, Texas 77098 Houston, Texas 77055 Mr. W. Matthew Perrenod Mr. *lillian J. Schuessler 4070 Merrick 5810 Darnell Houston, Texas 77025 Houston, Texas 77074 Stephen A. Doggett, Esq.
.Pollan, Nicholson and Doggett, Esq.
P.O. Box 57 Richmond, Tsxas 77469
.a
~.
_