BVY 13-061, VY-RPT-12-00019, Revision 1, Vermont Yankee Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Page 370 of 505 of Attachment C Through 82 of 198 of Attachment D

From kanterella
(Redirected from BVY 13-061)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VY-RPT-12-00019, Revision 1, Vermont Yankee Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Page 370 of 505 of Attachment C Through 82 of 198 of Attachment D
ML13200A163
Person / Time
Site: Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png
Issue date: 06/20/2013
From: Buckley S
Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
BVY 13-061 VY-RPT-12-00019, Rev 1
Download: ML13200A163 (218)
v • d • e


Text

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 370 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Shoot I of 5 Status: YZ NEI U-'

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 087 Equipment ID No. RATS-.A Equip. Class1 20 - Instr.& Conrol Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description DG-1A RM Thermostat Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 252 Room, Area EDGR A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Honeywell Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an Item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraae

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? P1k (0/rn
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[@ NEI UC N/AC'
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NC-] UrC N/AC oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y;i NC UC- N/ACT anchors?

Crack 6" under top wall anchor- Will not affect pullout, seismically acceptable.

  • . A-,qc-WL1. W6 1O6 -7,S--l Z

' Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

A.

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 f Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 371 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y0 NO UCl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 087 Equipment ID No. RATS-1A Equip. Class' 20 - Insfr. & Conrol Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description DG-1A RM Thermostat I VW /J/1102-

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y'NCI UD] N/A;9, /v* 10orft r, (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.) f See drawing A46/IPEEE- SSEL Line No. 001355
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN N[]UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO N['- U[-D N/AD"
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yv NOI U[D- N/Ar" and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y9 NEI UrD N/A-Both the thermostatand line are anchoredto wall. The line Is not flexible, however, both components will move as one, seismically acceptable..
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO N[-]U[:

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 372 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y0 NEl UrL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 087 Equipment ID No. RATS-1A Equip. Class' 20- Instr. & Conrol Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description DG-1A RM Thermostat Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO N[i Ul]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Reference Documents:

A46/IPEEE - SSEL Line No. 001355, andAttachment A Evaluated by: Marcus Hecht-Nisen, . Date: 10-01-2012 Raymond Tworek - o!1 b'e it. 10-01-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 373 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FoRM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YE0 NEI UO]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 087 Equipment ID No. RATS-tA Equip. Class' 20- Instr. & ConrolPanels & Cabinets Equipment Description DG-1A RM Thermostat Photographs NO PHOTO Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 374 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y] Nil U0' Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 087 Equipment ID No. RATS-1A Equip. Class1 20 - Instr. & Conrol Panels& Cabinets Equipment Description DG- lA RM Thermostat NO PHOTO NO PHOTO Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 375 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: Yg NE] UM]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 088 Equipment ID No. SE-113-2022 Equip. Class1 08B Equipment Description DG RM B DAMPER SOV Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 252' Room, Area EDGR B Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraue

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YD NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI Ut] N/AL]

Same as above

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI Ut] N/A[-]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEI Ut] N/A[:

anchors?

'Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 376 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y0 NEI UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 088 Equipment ID No. SE-1 13-2022 Equip. Class1 08B Equipment Description DG RM B DAMPER SOV

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y["] NEI U3 N/AS (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[] UO]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YV NEI U3 N/A[']
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0 N[-] U[: N/A[:

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y0D NOI U'] N/A--
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NCi UEO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 377 of 505 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U[-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 088 Equipment ID No. SE-113-2022 Equip. Class1 08B Equipment Description DG RM B DAMPER SOV Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NI] U[t]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Referenced Documents:

A46/IPEEE- Screening Evaluation Work Sheet, SSEL Line No. 001375 Evaluated bv: Kirit Parikh ýU- 2- Date: 10/03/2012 Randv SteDheas F '* . S (4S*j20,'L 10/03/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 378 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Shoot 4 of 5 Status: Y0* Nilj UL-]

SWELl- 088 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. SE-i 13-2022 Equip. Class1 06B Equipment Description DG RM B DAMPER SOV Photographs NO PHOTO Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 379 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y0 NQ U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 088 Equipment ID No. SE- 113-2022 Equip. Class1 08B Equipment Description DG RM B DAMPER SOV NO PHOTO NO PHOTO Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 380 of 505 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NEI UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 089 Equipment ID No. Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description DG RM B CONTACTOR CAB Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 252' Room, Area EDGR B Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y19 NEI of the 50%/6 of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y0 N[D] UD- N/AD1
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UID N/ADl oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YFI NEI U1 N/AS anchors?

Equipment is anchored to steel.

' Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 381 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKIuST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YED NEI U[3 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 089 Equipment ID No. Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description DG RM B CONTACTOR CAB

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YIZ NO-- Ur-] N/A[]

(Note: This question only applies if the item Is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The plant documentation calls out W" diameterbolts, but the as built condition is 3/8" diameter. Perthe SEWS SSEL line no. 001387 rule of the box is used. Given the seismic loading andbracing,the system is okay by engineeringjudgment.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NOI UD]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NO UO] N/AE'
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NrO U0 N/A[D and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UrI N/A[-
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U-of potentially adverse seismic Interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019

,I Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 382 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKuST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ N[I UEJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 089 Equipment ID No. -- Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description DG RM B CONTACTOR CAB Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo N[] ur]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Referenced Documents:

A46/IPEEE - Screening Evaluation Work Sheet, SSEL Line No. 001387 Evaluated by: Marcus Hecht-Nielsen Date: 10-03-2012 Raymond Tworek R&f Me--ýýc 1;0-j- M I's [I%- 10-03-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 f

Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 383 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOwN CHECKLIST FORM Shoet 4 of 5 Status: YO NE] UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 089 Equipment ID No. Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description DG RM B CONTACTOR CAB Photographs Note: A EN-DC-168 REV 0

e Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 4F Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 384 of 505 ATTAcHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Shoot 5 of 5 Status: YO NO Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- I Equipment ID No. Equip. Class1 Equipment Description DG RM B CONTACTOR CAB EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 385 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ NQ1 UrQ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 090 Equipment ID No. Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description DG-1-B RM B INSTRUMENT PANEL Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 252' Room, Area EDGR B Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraae

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken,. missing or loose hardware? YO NEI U- N/A-
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y0 NO UE- N/A-oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YO- NO ur- N/AZ anchors?

Equipment is anchoredto steel.

' Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 i Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 386 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Yv NO U" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 090 Equipment ID No. Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description DG-1-B RM B INSTRUMENT PANEL

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NC U[i N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See A461IPEEE- Screening Evaluation Work Sheet, SSEL Line No.

001388

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y0 NC UDl potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YS NC U- N/AC
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YS NO U[-] N/A[C]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

YO NO UON

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019

/ Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 387 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[] Nr- U[-J (SWC) SWELl- 090 Seismic Walkdown Checklist Equipment ID No. Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description DG-1-B RM B INSTRUMENT PANEL Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y19 N[l U("]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Referenced Documents:

Drawing 5920-3991 Drawing G-191566 A46/IPEEE- Screening Evaluation Work Sheet, SSEL Line No. 001388 Evaluated by: Marcus Hecht-Nielsen ' Date: 10-03-2012 Raymond Tworek 10-03-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 388 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YN NE] UE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 090 Equipment ID No. Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description DG-1-B RM B INSTRUMENT PANEL Photographs NO PHOTO Note: DG-1. wnel Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

A

.1 Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 389 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y0 NEI U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 090 Equipment ID No. _ __ __ Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description DG-1-B RM B INSTRUMENT PANEL NO PHOTO NO PHOTO Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

@,4 if Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 390 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NEI Ur-Seismic Walkdown. klist (SWC) SWELl- 091 Equipment ID No. *O jJV o-15'- Equip."-Class' 17 Z..-

Equipment Description DG RM B EQUIPSKID Location: Bldg. T8 Floor El. 252' Room, Area EDGR B Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., Is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yv NC" U[-l N/AD
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y5 NO UD- N/A[-]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YO NEI U[-D N/A['

anchors?

~; o4 .&'W~L -o*7 Iyb etýt/Po1VT7

+ ba-a4-4e-o 1511I-"Psi& F iO/21r/,, 2 SEnter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 391 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YED NO Un Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 091 Equipment ID No. 7 A I ,IZ5.1z. Equip. Class' Z7 Equipment Description DG RM B EQUIP SKID

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NCI U'] N/ADI (Note: This question only applies if the item Is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See 5920-3991

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y0 N'] UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YS NrI U[-D N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U"] N/AD]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ N[3 UD N/AD"]
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y9 NEI Ur]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Of Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 392 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YO NCI UEI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC1 SWELl- 091 Equipment ID No. ,D:FV2V1-zr-1z Equip. Class1 17 Equipment Description DG RM B EQUIPSKID Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO No U[-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Referenced Documents:

Drawing 5920-3991 andG- 191566 A46/IPEEE- Screening Evaluation Work Sheet, SSEL Line No. 01389 Evaluated by: Marcus Hecht-Nielsen * *-Z-<i

  • J,_

w )ate: 10-03-2012 Raymond Tworek - t "I " 10-03-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

'I Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-1 2-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 393 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y] NEI UL-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 091 Equipment ID No. A 4oVZ;F-4ZEquip. Class' 17 Equipment Description DG RM B EQUIPSKID Photographs EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 394 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YN NEI UED Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 091 Equipment ID No. Z./i L-z-'l. Equip. Class 17 Equipment Description DG RM B EQUIP SKID NO PHOTO NO PHOTO Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 395 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NEI ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 092 Equipment ID No. T-L.P-IL Equip. Class' 04 Equipment Description TRANSFORMER FOR CABLE VAULT ROOM Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 262' Room, Area EAST WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Jto y- 17-

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? 7
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YER NEI UE] N/Ar-Frontanchorageon transformersupport rod not visible due to protective foam coverage. But the entire frame seems to be very sturdy without any swing on the structuralrod. No seismic impact, no CR required.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y0 No uF-I N/AEJ oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NCI u[i N/A[

anchors?

L o/4 r(--1 ,:5

.4-4

' Enter the equipmcnt class name from EPRI 1025286. Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 396 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y0 NEIJ UF Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 092 Equipment ID No. T-LP-IL Equip. Class1 04

'- t-Equipment Description TRANSFORMER FOR CABLE VAULT ROOM .......

I"

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Af:NQI UQI N/

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.) 'oIrfl Ref. work sheet SSEL Line no. 001396, Drawing no. G- 191323

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEIUE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ N[-] UEr N/AQ
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0 Nr- U[- N/A[3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI U- N/A
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ N[3UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 397 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ Nil] U"]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 092 Equipment ID No. T-LP-1L Equip. Class' 04 Equipment Description TRANSFORMER FOR CABLE VAULT ROOM Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZI N[] U[]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Note: Originalinspection completed 10/15/2012. Photo taken 10/16/2012.

Referenced Documents:

A46/IPEEE- Screening Evaluation Work Sheet, SSEL Line No. 001396, Drawing G-191323 See comment on line item 2 Evaluated by: Kirit Parikh w ~tII (2 Date: 10/16/2012 Randy Stephens Pc 4 tjL (lW12-,z 10/16/2012 EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 398 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YER NrL Ur1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 092 Equipment ID No. T-LP-1L Equip. Class' 04 Equipment Description TRANSFORMER FOR CABLE VAULT ROOM Photographs EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-1 2-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 399 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUsT FORM Sheet S of 5 Status: Yv NI] Ur]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 092 Equipment ID No. T-LP-IL Equip. Class' 04 Equipment Description TRANSFORMER FOR CABLE VAULT ROOM EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

. I Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 400 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: Yv N[3 U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 093 Equipment ID No. ES-1-156-5 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description POWER SUPPLY FOR LSL- 107-5B Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 272' Room, Area CONTRM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklistmay be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YDJNO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEJ NEI UEi N/AO
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YlI NEl UEi NWAS oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[! NEI UE-] NWA anchors?

I Enter Ihe equipment class name from EPRI 102-5286. Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DCo168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 401 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y0 NE] uF-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 093 Equipment ID No. ES-I-156-5 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description POWER SUPPLY FOR LSL- 107-5B

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE] u[] N/A0 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y0 NE"] UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE] U["] N/AE]
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE"] uE] N/AC" and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE"] U['1 N/AE]
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NC] UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 402 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Yv NE] UL-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 093 Equipment ID No. ES-1-156-5 Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description POWER SUPPLY FOR LSL- 107-SB Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NEI UE]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Referenced Documents:

Drawings: 5920-3770 A46/IPEEE - Screening Evaluation Work Sheet, SSEJ, Line No. 001514 Evaluated by: Marcus Hecht.Nielse Date: 10-15-2012 Ravmond Tworek Ravmond Tworek to IIT/I 10-15-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

P Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 403 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Yv NO Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 093 Equipment ID No. ES-1-156-5 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description POWER SUPPLY FOR LSL-107-5B Photographs Note: Note:

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 404 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YN NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 093 Equipment ID No. ES-1-156-5 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description POWER SUPPLY FOR LSL-107-5B Note: Note:

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 405 of 505 ATTrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ NI:] U" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 094 Equipment ID No. RK25-50A Equip. Class 1 18 INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description HPCIINST. RACK (A)

Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 213' Room, Area HPCI Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO N[l of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NE] UQ- N/AC"
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y0 N[-] U[-] N/A--

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YO NEI UC N/A--

anchors?

IEnter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286. Appendix B: Classes or Equipment.

EN-DC-1 68 REVO0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 406 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NEI u-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 094 Equipment ID No. RK25-50A Equip. Class1 18 INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description HPCI INST. RACK (A)

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO Nr- Ur"] N/AC" (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See SSEL Line No. 001522, drawing No. 5920-3044/3045 and Sketch SK-VY-9441 1-1.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, Is the anchorage free of YO No UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NEI U0 N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NOI uO N/AD]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y9 NDl Ur] N/AD"
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YV NEI UD"J of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 407 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YV NE] U[0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 094 Equipment ID No. RK25-50A Equip. Class' 18 INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description HPCIINST. RACK (A)

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[] U[]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Referenced Documents:

A46/IPEEE - Screening Evaluation Work Sheet, SSEL Une No. 00152 Drawing No. 5920-3044/3045 Sketch SK-VY-9441 1-1 Evaluated by: Kirit Panikh 1011el 2012- Date: 10/09/2012 Randy Steohe~ns~g Q5 - tb4 JUJA (1 1L 10/09/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 408 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y; NO] UM]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 094 Equipment ID No. RK25-50A Equip. Class' 18 INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description HPCI INST. RACK (A)

Photographs A Is the left section of rack.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 409 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y0 NEI U[J Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 094 Equipment ID No. RK25-50A Equip. Class1 18 INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description HPCI INST. RACK (A)

NO PHOTO NO PHOTO Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 410 of 505 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ NOI UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 095 Equipment IDNo. RK25-50B Equip. Class' 18- INSTRUMENTS ON THE RACK Equipment Description HPCI-INSTRUMENT RACK B Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 213' Room, Area HPCI Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y NO" of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y; NOI UFI N/ArI
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NO" uO- N/AO oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y; NEI Ur N/AO anchors?

AEnter Ihe equipment class name from EI'RI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 411 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YIZ NEI UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 095 Equipment ID No. RK25-50B Equip. Class' 18- INSTRUMENTS ON THE RACK Equipment Description HPCI-INSTRUMENT RACK B

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Yo NO) Ur] N/AC!

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See SSEL Line No. 001523, drawing 5920-3045/3044 and sketch SK-VY-9441 1-1.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y0@ NE) UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y0 NEi UCi N/AEI
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y{ NE) U-- N/Ar" and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE) UCi N/A--
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NO U-I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 412 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN NO' UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 095 Equipment ID No. RK25-508 Equip. Class' 18- INSTRUMENTS ON THE RACK Equipment Description HPCI-INSTRUMENT RACK B Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEl UE[I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Pump dischargepressurepanelno.23-81 has one missing metal screw (lowerleft). No seismic impactsince it is firmly secured on its mounting with 3 of 4 screws. See CR- VTY-2012-05118.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Referenced Documents:

A46/IPEEE - Screening Evaluation Work Sheet, SSEL Line No. 001523, Drawing 5920-3045/3044 Sketch SK-VY-9441 1-1 Evaluated by: Kirit Parikh 101tl~of2.. Date: 10/09/2012 Randy Sleohens i6~s- A1  ? AJ. I~i~'ZIZ. 10/0912012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. I Attachment C Page 413 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YO NEI UM' Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 095 Equipment ID No. RK25-50B Equip. Class 1 18- INSTRUMENTS ON THE RACK Equipment Description HPCI-INSTRUMENT RACK B Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 414 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FoRM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NF1 Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 095 Equipment ID No. RK25-50B Equip. Class' 18- INSTRUMENTS ON THE RACK Equipment Description HPCI-INSTRUMENTRACK B NO PHOTO Nowe: Lent tower screw missing Mrom Vump Note:

Discharge Pressureno. 23.81.

No seismic impact. See CR-VTY-2012-05118 EN-DC-168 REV 0

t Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 415 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKuST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YN N[Q UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 096 Equipment ID No. RK25-52A Equip. Class' 18 -INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description JET PUMP INST. RACK (52A)

Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 252 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y] NEI UD N/AD
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UD" N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y0 N[-D U-' N/A--

anchors?

The concrete floor is covered with a protective coating. However, there are no visible cracks in the coatingand/oraround the rack. By engineeringjudgment the concrete is okay.

' Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

J, Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 416 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALK(OWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YO NO UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl - 096 Equipment ID No. RK25-52A Equip. Class' 18 - INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description JET PUMP INST. RACK (52A)

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEE NEI UCi N/AC--

(Note: This question only applies If the Item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See A461lPEEE - SSEL Line No. 001526 and sketch SK-VY.9441 1

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, Is the anchorage free of YN NCi uC]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NC: UC3 N/AC-There is a cabinetnext to the rack with a gap ranging from 1/3" at the bottom to 1-1/4" at the top. Per the originalSEWS and engineering judgment the system is seismically okay.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NCI UC N/AC-]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NC:1 UC3 N/AC]
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NCi Ur of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 417 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Yi* N-] UD'-

(SWC) SWELl- 096 Seismic Walkdown Checklist Equipment ID No. RK25-52A Equip. Class' 18 - INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description JET PUMP INST. RACK (52A)

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U"]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Reference Documents:

A46/IPEEE- SSEL Line No. 001526 Drawings 5920-3055, RIO and 5920-3057, R4 Sketch SK-VY-9441 1-1 Evaluated by: Marcus Hecht-Nielsen - /*,'Z Date: 10-04-2012 Raymond Tworek (?AW-3 V q-" W1 gill'.- 10-04-2012 EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

P Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 418 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Yv0 N3 url Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL1- 0*6 Equipment ID No. RK255'52A Equip. Class1 18- INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description JET PUMPINST. RACK (52A)

Photographs Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 419 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 096 Equipment ID No. RK25-52A Equip. Class' 18 - INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description JET PUMP INST. RACK (524)

Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 420 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NEI U5' Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 097 Equipment ID No. RK25-52B Equip. Class1 18 - INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description JET PUMP INST. RACK (52B)

Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 252 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y0 N["

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ Nr"] UFI N/A[]
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y; NE] UC- N/Ar]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NE] U[] N/A["]

anchors?

The concrete floor is covered with a protective coating. However, there are no visible cracks in the coating and/oraroundthe rack. By engineeringjudgment the concrete is okay.

IEnter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

P.

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 421 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Yv NEI Ur]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 097 Equipment IDNo. RK25-52B Equip. Class' 18 - NSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description JET PUMPINST. RACK (52B)

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Yv NEI U[] N/AO (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See A461IPEEE- SSEL Line No. 001526 and sketch SK- VY.94411

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y0D NEI U-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NO-' UO- N/A[l
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, VYZ NEI U(-] N/A[-]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y0 NOI ur- N/AC-

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

YC NOI U[NA

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 422 of 505 ATTACHMENU 9.6 SEISMIC WALKOOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEL UrJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 097 Equipment ID No. RK25-52B Equip. Class1 18 - INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description JET PUMPINST. RACK (52B)

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NEIUQ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Reference Documents:

A46/IPEEE- SSEL Line No. 001527 Drawings 5920-3055, RIO and 5920-3057, R4 Sketch SK-VY-9441 1-1 Evaluated by: Marcus Hecht-Nielsen - Date: 10-04-2012 Raymond Tworek (*N,061'-Z.. to 171,3 10-04-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

ý4 Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 423 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FoRM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 097 Equipment ID No. RK25-52B Equip. Class' 18 -INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description JET PUMPINST. RACK (528)

Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 424 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKOOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YO NEI Uo-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 097 Equipment ID No. RK25-52B Equip. Class1 18 - INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description JET PUMPINST. RACK (52B)

Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 425 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKOOWN CHECKuST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 098 Equipment ID No. RK25-6A Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description REACTOR PROT. & NSSS INST. RACK Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 280' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YJZ N[3 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YNI NEI U- N/A[-]
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[9 NEI U"] N/AF-oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y1Z NEI U0 N/AEr anchors?

There is a protective cover on the concrete and the concrete is not visible. However, the protective cover shows no signs of stress or cracking andis seismically okay by engineeringjudgment.

'Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Fquipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 426 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKOOWN CHECKLIST FORM Shoot 2 of 5 Status: YN NEI Ur]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 098 Equipment ID No. RK25-6A Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description REACTOR PROT. & NSSS INST. RACK

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[9 NC- UC-] N/AC-'

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See A464IPEEE - Screening Evaluation Work Sheet, SSEL Line No.

01534 and SK-VY-9441 1-1

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y9 NC U-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y; NCI UC N/AO
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0 NC UC N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y0 NCI UrC N/AC
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y* NEI UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 427 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN N[3 U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 098 Equipment ID No. RK25-6A Equip. Class1 18 Equipment Description REACTOR PROT. & NSSS INST. RACK Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y(@ N[] Ur]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The guardrail is missing anchorbolts. This same issue was brought up in the originalSEWS. It is not a seismic issue; the hand rail will not fall over during an earthquake.

Referenced Documents:

Drawings: 5920-3016, 5920-3017, 5920-3018, and sketch no. SK-VY-944 11-1 A46/IPEEE - Screening Evaluation Work Sheet, SSEL Line No. 01534 Evaluated by: Marcus Hecht-Nielsen Date: 10-09-2012 Raymond Twnrak LoIVhfit- 10-09-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 428 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Shoot 4 of 5 Status: YO Nil] U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 098 Equipment ID No. RK25-8A Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description REACTOR PROT. & NSSS INST. RACK Photographs Note: Instrument rack Note: Instrument rack EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 429 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y0 NEl UO-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 098 Equipment ID No. RK25-6A Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description REACTOR PROT. & NSSS INST. RACK NO PHOTO NO PHOTO Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 F Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 430 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YO NM- ULJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 099 Equipment ID No. RK25-6B Equip. Class1 18 Equipment Description REACTOR PROT. & NSSS INST. RACK Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 280' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YV NF"C of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y9 NEI UQ N/AC-1
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UC[ N/A-'

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YO NEI UI- N/A[]

anchors?

There is a protective cover on the concrete and the concrete is not visible. However, the protective cover shows no signs of stress or cracking and is seismically okay by engineeringjudgment.

'Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 i Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 431 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U' Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 099 Equipment ID No. RK25-6B Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description REACTOR PROT. & NSSS INST. RACK

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y; NQ-] U0 N/AE-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See A461IPEEE- Screening Evaluation Work Sheet, SSEL Line No.

01535 and SK-VY-944 11-1

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YV9 N[-- U[_

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE0 NEI Ur] N/AD-
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI uE] N/Ar" and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y; ND"] UE- N/AD"
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ N[-] Ur-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

.V.

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 i Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 432 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NE) UL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 099 Equipment ID No. RK25-6B Equip. Class 1 18 Equipment Description REACTOR PROT. &NSSS INST. RACK Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 N[] U[3 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The guard railis missing anchor bolts. This same issue was brought up in the originalSEWS. It is not a seismic issue; the hand rail will not fall over during an earthquake.

Referenced Documents:

Drawings: 5920-3016, 5920-3017, 5920-3018, andsketch no. SK- VY-944 11-1 A46/IPEEE- ScreeningEvaluation Work Sheet, SSEL Line No. 01535 Evaluated by: Marcus Hecht-Nielsen Date:. 10-09-2012 Dn,,n i/nnnt "riaunrnL, L.1 ft 10-09-2012 ICVIflf U ILL isV 20cl " ~ 1CU EN-DC-168 REV 0

r Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 433 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y9 NEI uEJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 099 Equipment ID No. RK25-6B Equip. Class1 18 Equipment Description REACTOR PROT. & NSSS INST. RACK Photographs Note: Instrumentrack Note: Instrumentrack EN-DC-168 REV 0

I Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 434 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y0 NO U0-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 099 Equipment ID No. RK25-6B Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description REACTOR PROT. &NSSS INST. RACK NO PHOTO NO PHOTO Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 435 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YNI NEI U[-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 100 Equipment ID No. RK-25-66 Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description CST INST. RACK Location: Bldg. CST Floor El. 252' Room, Area INSIDE Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y0 Nr"1 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y0; Nrl U-] N/AE]
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y0 NEI U[] N/Arl oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NE" U-' N/A[]

anchors?

IEnter the equipmnut class name front EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Cla.sses of Eiuipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 436 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[0 NO- UL-'

(SWC) SWELl- 100 Seismic Walkdown Checklist Equipment ID No. RK-25-66 Equip. Class 1 18 Equipment Description CST INST. RACK

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y09 NCI U-] N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See drawing 5920-6041 (SSEL Line No. 01566)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NO] UO]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YV NO UO] N/AO
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YV NOI urO N/A[-

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NOi UE] N/AO-
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NOI U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 437 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YU NEL UFL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 100 Equipment ID No. RK-25-66 Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description CST INST. RACK Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y(0 N[] U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

A small temporarypower supply cart is nearby (about 12' away) unchained.Has no seismic impact on any component. See the attachedpicture.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Referenced Documents:

Drawings: 5920-6041 A46/IPEEE- Screening Evaluation Work Sheet, SSEL Line No. 01566 Evaluated by: Kirit Parikh tqýýP'Y-C- I011812-012- Date: 10/02/2012 Randy Stephenls RqOAm= z e(9 ;Z2- ,zt-.

(d. 10/02/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 438 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NEI-' U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 100 Equipment ID No. RK-25-66 Equip. Class1 18 Equipment Description CST INST. RACK Photographs FI -W rvoxe: unsecurea remporary power equipment mounted to wheel carnear CST INST. RACK. Not a seismic interactionconcern considering its mass, low centerof gravity and distance from instrument rack.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 439 of 505 ATTACHMEI 5T 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YN NEIJ Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 100 Equipment ID No. RK-25-66 Equip. Class1 18 Equipment Description CST INST. RACK EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 440 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YIN NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 101 Equipment ID No. ES-24DC-2 Equip. Class1 16 Equipment Description POWER SUPPLY FOR ECCS PANEL B Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 248' Room, Area SWGR EAST Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraae

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NEI UI] N/Anl
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ N] U-] N/A[C]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YN NC1 U-] N/A[]

anchors?

'IEbter the equipment class niame from EPRI 1025286. Appendix B: Classes of Eqiuipmcnt.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 441 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NEI urE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 101 Equipment ID No. ES-24DC-2 Equip. Class' 16 Equipment Description POWER SUPPLY FOR ECCS PANEL B

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YOI NEI Ur] N/A[-

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See VYC-2165

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, Is the anchorage free of Y0@ N[] U[-_]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI U[j N/A[']
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI uC- N/A["]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y0 N[] ur-] N/AEF Rigid connections, however, connection of lines is close to anchorage (nearthe wall) seismically okay.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UM of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 442 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y0R NEI U["

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 101 Equipment ID No. ES-24DC-2 Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description POWER SUPPLY FOR ECCS PANEL B Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO N-] U-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Reference Documents:

VYC-2165, Rev.0 Evaluated by: Marcus Hecht-Nielsen "Date: 10-09-212 Raymond Tworek pon.! 15/ g,i~ 10-09-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 443 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YN NI] UM]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 101 Equipment ID No. ES-24DC-2 Equip. Class1 16 Equipment Description POWER SUPPLY FOR ECCS PANEL B Photographs NO PHOTO Note:

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 444 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKuST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U"l Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 101 Equipment ID No. ES-24DC-2 Equip. Class1 16 Equipment Description POWER SUPPLY FOR ECCS PANEL B NO PHOTO NO PHOTO Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 445 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NEI UEI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 102 Equipment ID No. CYL-72-1A Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description NITROGEN BOTTLE FOR BACKUP SRV SUPPLY Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 252' Room, Area NORTH Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YD NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y9 Nil U[- N/A-
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NIl U-] N/A[]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YO N["l UL- N/A[-]

anchors?

' Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 446 of 505 AIIACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE0 NO Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 102 Equipment ID No. CYL-72-1A Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description NITROGEN BOTTLE FOR BACKUP SRV SUPPLY

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YQ" NO UO N/Au3 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[] U[]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Inleraction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NOI UO N/AD-
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NOI UO- N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI uD- N/Ar"
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE-I uO -

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Three loose nuts exist on the cylinder u-bolts. Alf other nuts are tight.

See AWC-029. Not a seismic concern.

See CR-VTY-2012-05006 for correctiveaction.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 447 of 505 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y0 NEI ur-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 102 Equipment ID No. CYL-72-1A Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description NITROGEN BOTTLE FOR BACKUP SRV SUPPLY Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[] U-'

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

A cylinder cart is nearthe existing nitrogen cylinder (less than 6"). It is chained, but very close to the cylinderbottles. See A WC -029. Cartis very light. Not a seismic concern.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Reference Documents:

Drawing 5920-12740, RO CR-VTY-2012-05006 Evaluated by. Kirit Parikh k - . I C), I I&/ P-0 ( 2- I Date: 10/11/2012 Randy SteDhens

  • _ 1&"*

li2A'C*3. 0/'*- 10/11/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 448 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YO NIl UFi Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 102 Equipment ID No. CYL-72-1A Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description NITROGEN BOTTLE FOR BACKUP SRV SUPPLY Photographs

-W Note: ID# CYL-72-IA next to cylindercart.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 449 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y0D NE] UEo Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 102 Equipment ID No. CYL-72-1A Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description NITROGEN BOTTLE FOR BACKUP SRV SUPPLY EN-DC-168 REV 0

0 Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 450 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: Y0 NO U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 001 Equipment ID No. RK-1OAA Equip. Class' 18 - INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description RACK Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 303 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraqe

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YOI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YET NOI U-1 N/AC
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO N(-] UCI N/AJ-I oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YO NOi uO- N/AC anchors?

There is a protective cover on the concrete and the concrete is not visible. However, the protective cover shows no signs of stress or cracking and is seismically okay by engineeringjudgment.

Enter ihe equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

I-Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 451 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEIsMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y'0 NEI UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 001 Equipment ID No. RK-fO1AA Equip. Class1 18- INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description RACK

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NEI U-] N/A[D (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO] UE" potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NOI Ur] N/AD"]
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y19 N[-O UD" N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NOI ur- N/AD-
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI UE-O of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 452 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y0 NEI UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 001 Equipment ID No. RK-1OAA Equip. Class' 18 - INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description RACK Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ N[] U[:]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL2 PHOTOS Evaluated by: Marcus Hecht-Nvelsen - Date: 10- 10-2012 Raymond Tworek ~ -~~-iIJ~l 10-10-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

r Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 453 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ N[- U" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 001 Equipment ID No. RK-1OAA Equip. Class1 18 - INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description RACK Photographs NO PHOTO Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 454 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NEI uL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 001 Equipment ID No. RK-10AA Equip. Class1 18- INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description RACK EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 f Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 455 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: Y0 NO UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 002 Equipment ID No. dPT-19-76A Equip. Class' 18 - INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE TRANSMITTER (RK-10AA)

Location: Bldg. RM . Floor El. 303 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraae

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO U[:I N/A[A
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NO UI N/A[

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YD NE UF' NIAO anchors?

Attached to rack.

' Enter ihe equipment class namne front EPRI 1025286. Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 f Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 456 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NOI UEr Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 002 Equipment IDNo. dPT-19-76A Equip. Class1 18- INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE TRANSMITTER (RK-1OAA)

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI U- N/AS (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y(@ NE] U[-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y0 NEI U[-O N/A[J
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U[-] N/AO-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO N[O] U[- N/AE-
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y9 NEI U[-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 fl Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 457 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y0;; NE-- ur-I (SWC) SWEL2- 002 Seismic Walkdown Checklist Equipment ID No. dPT-19-76A Equip. Class' 18- INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE TRANSMITTER (RK-10AA)

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo N[" Ut-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL2 PHOTOS Evaluated by: Marcus Hecht-Nielsen zvL Date: 10-10.2012

" 'Ray ...... ....... I 10-10-2012 Ravmond Tworek EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 f Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 458 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y NI--] UF-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 002 Equipment ID No. dPT-19-76A Equip. Class' 18- INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE TRANSMITTER (RK-1OAA)

Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-1 2-00019

/

Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 459 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKOOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y] NO U-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 002 Equipment ID No. dPT-19-76A Equip. Class1 18- INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE TRANSMITTER (RK-1OAA)

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 460 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Shoot I of 5 Status: YZ NEI U0-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 003 Equipment ID No. PT-19-81A Equip. Class' 18 - INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description PRESSURE TRANSMITTER (RK-10AA)

Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 303 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YOI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent; broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UOi N/AD
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO- U[iJ N/AU oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YO NF- ur N/AS anchors?

Attached to rack.

' Enter (he equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 461 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NO- UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEI.2- 003 Equipment ID No. PT-19-81A Equip. Class1 18 - INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description PRESSURE TRANSMITTER (RK-1OAA)

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UF] N/A0 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[] U[I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YED N[-] UE] N/AED
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ N[:] uED N/A[:

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y0 NE] UE3 N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yo N[] UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 462 of 505 ATTACHMEINT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[ N[I U[I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 003 Equipment ID No. PT-19-81A Equip. Class' 18 - INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description PRESSURE TRANSMITTER (RK-10AA)

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[3UU adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL2 PHOTOS Evaluated by: Marcus Hecht-Nielsen *' ... jz ,L Date: 10-10-2012 Raymond Tworek MHOiAf-J 4- 10-10-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 463 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKuST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UM]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 003 Equipment ID No. PT-19-81A Equip. Class1 18 -INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description PRESSURE TRANSMITTER (RK-1OAA)

Photographs Note: PT-19-81A Note: PT-19-81A EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 464 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKuST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y0 NE] U0]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 003 Equipment ID No. PT-19-81A Equip. Class1 18- INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description PRESSURE TRANSMITTER (RK-10AA)

NO PHOTO NO PHOTO Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 465 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: Y[* Nfl UD-SWEL2- 004 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. PS-19-BOA Equip. Class' 18 - INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description PRESSURE SWITCH (RK-1OAA)

Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 30 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SW EL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraae

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YDlNO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NIl U["] N/A[]
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y0 NIl UE- N/Af' oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Yr' NE] U[- N/AS anchors?

Attached to rack.

'Enter the equip,,nt, class name front EPRI 1025286. Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

/ Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 466 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UL-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 004 Equipment ID No. PS-19-80A Equip. Class1 18 -INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description PRESSURE SWITCH (RK- lOAA)

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y-] N["] U[] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y9 NE] ur-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI U[-] N/A--
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U'] N/AE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE] UE] N/Ar"
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y0 NE] UM" of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 467 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FoRM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UL]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 004 Equipment ID No. PS-19-80A Equip. Class1 18 - INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description PRESSURE SWITCH (RK-10AA)

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[] U[]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL2 PHOTOS Evaluated by: Marcus Hecht-Nielsen

  • Date: 10-10-2012 Raymond Tworek 10-10-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 468 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NEI Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 004 Equipment ID No. PS-19-80A Equip. Class1 18 - INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description PRESSURE SWITCH (RK-IOAA)

Photographs Note: PS.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C

  • Page 469 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKuST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YI] NI U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 004 Equipment ID No. PS-19-80A Equip. Class1 18- INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description PRESSURE SWITCH (RK- 1OAA)

NO PHOTO NO PHOTO Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 0 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 470 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: Y[O NI[3 U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 005 Equipment ID No. PI-19-84A Equip. Class1 18 - INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description PRESSURE INDICATOR (RK-IOAA)

Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 303 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraee

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y-I NC@

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NOI Uj N/AD--
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y0 NEI Ur- NIAr-]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[:] NEI ur:1 NIA0 anchors?

Attached to rack.

IEnter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286. Appendix B: Classes ofEquipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 471 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[] NE] UE-]

(SWC) SWEL2- 005 Seismic Walkdown Checklist Equipment ID No. PI-19-84A Equip. Class1 18- INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description PRESSURE INDICATOR (RK-1OAA)

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y-I N[-] U-D N/AC9 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO N3 U["]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NEI ur N/A[E
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0 NEI Ul] N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y0 NE] U'- N/AE]
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y N-] UM" of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-1 2-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 472 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE NEl UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 005 Equipment ID No. PI-19-84A Equip. Class' 18 - INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description PRESSURE INDICATOR (RK-1OAA)

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ N[] Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL2 PHOTOS Evaluated by: Marcus Hecht-Nielsen--__-ý Date: 10- 10-2012 RRvrnnnd Twn)rnk 10-10-2012 Ra-ond 7-nrek EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 d1 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 473 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y0 Nr- Ur]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 005 Equipment ID No. PI-19-84A Equip. Class1 18- INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description PRESSURE INDICATOR (RK-10AA)

Photographs NO PHOTO Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 474 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y0 NE] U[-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 005 Equipment ID No. PI-19-84A Equip. Class' 18 -INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description PRESSURE INDICATOR (RK-1OAA)

NO PHOTO NO PHOTO Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 475 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YN NEI UL]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 006 Equipment ID No. FI-19-73 Equip. Class1 0 Equipment Description FLOW INDICATOR Location: Bldg. RB Roor El. 303 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI] N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y0 N["] U[-] N/Ar]
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NE] UE] N/A[l oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE] NEI U-' N/AO anchors?

Attached to rack.

Enter zhe aquipmnen class nane from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipmem.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 476 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YO NEI- U[

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 006 Equipment IDNo. FI-19-73 Equip. Class1 0 Equipment Description FLOW INDICATOR

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEr N'-' UEj N/A0 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y0 N[-'] UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UE! N/AQ
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y; NEI U- N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI UE- N/A[]
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 477 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y0* NO- UL-I (SWC) SWEL2- 006 Seismic Walkdown Checklist Equipment ID No. FI-19-73 Equip. Class1' 0 Equipment Description FLOW INDICATOR Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[] U[]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL2 PHOTOS Evaluated by: Marcus Hecht-Nielsen 6' ' Date: 10-10-2012 Rat'Tworiek iA- IDhi 10-10-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 478 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YN NEL U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 006 Equipment ID No. FI-19-73 Equip. Class 1 0 Equipment Description FLOW INDICATOR Photographs NO PHOTO Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 479 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMiC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[D NEI ULJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 006 Equipment ID No. FI-19-73 Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description FLOW INDICATOR NO PHOTO NO PHOTO Note: Note:

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 480 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKuST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NO- U-'

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 007 Equipment ID No. V70-257B Equip. Class1 BA Equipment Description SW MOV SFPC Hx OUTLET Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 303 Room, Area FP Hx RM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraae

1. Isthe anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YI- N[-' U- NWAS 0 This is an inline valve
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YCJ NCI UF NIAJO oxidation?

0 See Question 2

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks inthe concrete near the YI" NiO U- NWAS anchors?

0 See Question 2

' Enter the equipment class narne from EPRI 107-5286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 481 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[0 NO UE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 007 Equipment ID No. V70-257B Equip. Class' BA Equipment Description SW MOV SFPC Hx OUTLET

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UO-] N/A0 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
  • Not one of the 50% Items
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y0 NO UO' potentially adverse seismic conditions?
  • See Question 5 Interaction Effects
7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NOI U[-O N(AO
  • There is a conduit that passes within 2" of the valve. The conduit is seismically restrained and presents no adverse seismic concerns.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y13 NO3 uOI N/A['O and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
  • There is a Unistrut style support for the valve's conduit. Where the support mounts to the wall there is an abandoned nut in the Unistrut track. Ithas a spring retainer and a relatively small mass if it were to fall on the valve it would have no adverse seismic impact.
  • There are 2 Akteck hoist rings above the valve, they were inspected from the ground and appear to be securely mounted per manufacturer and plant requirements.
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y0 NO UO N/A[l 0 Lines were visually Inspected
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ N'] UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 482 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKuST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Yv NrI UL-'

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 007 Equipment ID No. V0-257B Equip. Class1 8A Equipment Description SW MOV SFPCHx OUTLET Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NIl] Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

0 Visual inspection was conducted Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL2 PHOTOS Evaluated by: Mike Rose  ; "g Date: 10/22/12 Dave Grimes --Zl *,.J-. 10/22/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. I Attachment C Page 483 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y0 N[3 UO-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 007 Equipment ID No. V70-257B Equip. Class' BA Equipment Description SW MOV SFPCHx OUTLET Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 484 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YN NEI UEI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 007 Equipment ID No. V70-257B Equip. Class1 BA Equipment Description SW MOV SFPCHx OUTLET No Photo No Photo Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 485 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YV N[] U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 008 Equipment ID No. P19-2A Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description SFPCPUMP Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 303 Room, Area FP Hx RM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YD NS of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NCI UCI N/AE3
  • Anchorage was visually inspected, all nuts and bolts were installed and securely engaged.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y0 NEI U[3 N/AC-oxidation?

0 Visually inspected

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NI" U[-] N/A-C anchors?
  • Visually inspected

' Enter the equipment. class name from EPRI 1025286. Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 486 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NEI] UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 008 Equipment ID No. P19-2A Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description SFPC PUMP

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[3 N-3 U[] NWAN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
  • Although not part of the 50% anchorage verification. All anchorage was inspected and verified to be consistent with plant documentation.
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[3 U[

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

  • See above responses.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ N[-] ur] N/A[]
  • Area was visually inspected and all soft targets a free from impact concerns that would create an adverse seismic condition.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y19 N[-1 UEI N/A[

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

  • Cable Trays above the pump are adequately supported.
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO N[3 UO N/AD]
  • Visually inspected
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO N[-] Ur-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

0 See above responses.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 487 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y10 NEI ur-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 008 Equipment ID No. P19-2A Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description SFPCPUMP Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo N[1 U-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

0 Area was visually inspected.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL2 PHOTOS Evaluated by: Mike Rose Date: 10/22/12 Dave Grimes 10/22/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 488 of 505 I

ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Shoot 4 of 5 Status: YN NED Ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- i Equipment ID No. P19-2A Equip. Class1 Equipment Description SFPCPUMP Photographs I

F EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 489 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of S Status: Yv NEI UO

' Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 008 Equipment ID No. P19-2A Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description SFPC PUMP No Photo Note: INote:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 490 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALIKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YIN N[] UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 009 Equipment ID No. E19-2A Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description SFPCHEAT EXCHANGER Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 303 Room, Area FP Hx RM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraae

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YV NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI UEI N/AD-
  • Anchorage was visually inspected, all nuts and bolts were installed and securely engaged.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UD- N/AD-oxidation?
  • Visually inspected
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NDI UDI N/AD anchors?

a Visually inspected IEnter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 491 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN NEI UEi Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 009 Equipment ID No. E19-2A Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description SFPCHEAT EXCHANGER

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO- Nil UEI N/A0@

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

  • Although not part of the 50% anchorage verification. All anchorage was inspected and verified to be consistent with plant documentation.
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO N[3 U-'

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

0 See above responses.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y0R NEI U-- N/AD
  • Area was visually inspected and all soft targets a free from impact concerns that would create an adverse seismic condition..
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO N[-- Ur- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
  • Cable Trays and piping above the heat exchanger are adequately supported.
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y0O NF uI N/AD-
  • Visually inspected
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NE-I Ur-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 492 of 505 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKULST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YI NEI UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 009 Equipment ID No. E19-2A Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description SFPC HEAT EXCHANGER Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO ND] U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

. Area was visually inspected Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL2 PHOTOS Evaluated by: Mike Rose Ii**  :;.r.- Date: 10122/12 .......

Dave Grimes * /*'-i - 10/22/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 493 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YIN N[] U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 009 Equipment ID No. E19-2A Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description SFPC HEAT EXCHANGER Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 494 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NEI] U]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 009 Equipment ID No. E19-2A Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description SFPCHEAT EXCHANGER EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

if Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 495 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: Y0 NEI UE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 010 Equipment ID No. CAD PANEL B Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 272' Room, Area CONT RM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] N[9 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE] NEI] uE N/AZ
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NE] UE] N/AS oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NEI uE] N/A[]

anchors?

IEnter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 01 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 496 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ N[ U[-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 010 Equipment ID No. CAD PANEL B Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YD NO UD N/AS (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which nchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NO uEJ potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ; Nr-I UF- N/Ar'-

YI NO uO N/AO

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

YN NO U" N/Af--

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

0ND ulNEIN

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

r Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 497 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y0 NEI UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 010 Equipment ID No. CAD PANEL B Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZI NQ] U[]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Marcus Hecht-Nielsen ýDate: 10-15-2012 Raymond Tworek 10-15-2012 Ravmond Tworek EN-DC-168 REV 0

/ Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 498 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKuST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YN NE:] UEr Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 010 Equipment ID No. CAD PANEL B Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description Photographs NO PHOTO Note: CAD PANEL B Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

-V Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 499 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ N[] UE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-Equipment ID No. CAD PANEL B Equip. Class1 Equipment Description EN-DC-168 REV 0

f.

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 500 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NiD UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 011 Equipment ID No. FT-104-80A Equip. Class 1 18 - INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description FLOW TRANSMITTER (RK-IOAA)

Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 303 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[3NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI U[] N/A-'
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Yr N[l u-I N/AC oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YO N[: U[J WIAS anchors?

Attached to rack.

' Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 501 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FoRM Sheet 2 Of 5 Status: Yv NEI ul-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 011 Equipment ID No. FT-104-80A Equip. Class 1 18 - INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description FLOW TRANSMITTER (RK- IOAA)

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO N3 Ur' N/AS (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI U[I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO* NEI UE- N/A[--

YI* N"- url NIAO-'

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI UD N/AO1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI ur- N/AEI
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NO-' U[3 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 502 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y0 NE] UO-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 011 Equipment ID No. FT-104-BOA.0,Equip. Class' 18 - INSTRUMENTWS ON RACKS Equipment Description FLOW TRANSMITTER (RK-1OAA)

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U[--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL2 PHOTOS Evaluated by: Marcus Hecht-Nielsen Date: 10-10-2012 RBvmond Tworek -,

10-10-2012 f

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 503 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Yv NEI UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 011 Equipment ID No. FT-104-80A Equip. Class1 18- INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description FLOW TRANSMITTER (RK-1OAA)

Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 504 of 505 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y0 NEI UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 011 Equipment ID No. FT-104-80A Equip. Class1 18- INSTRUMENTS ON RACKS Equipment Description FLOW TRANSMITTER (RK-1OAA)

NO PHOTO NO PHOTO Note: Note:

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment C Page 505 of 505 Items Deferred to RFO 30 (March 2013)

Drywell SWELl-029 V23-15 HPCI/STEAM SUPPLY MOV Drywell SWELl-041 TE-16-19-30A DW TEMP INDICATION Drywell SWELl-052 V2-80D MAIN STEAM/INBOARD MSIV Drywell SWELl-055 RV-2-71C MAIN STEAM/RELIEF VALVE Drywell SWELl-057 S-2-13A SAFETY RELIEF VALVE/NITROGEN SUPPLY ACCUMULATOR Drwell Steam Tunnel Steam SWELl-030 V23-16 HPCI/STEAM SUPPLY MOV Tunnel Steam SWELl-053 V2-86A MAIN STEAM/OUTBOARD MSIV Tunnel MAIN STEAM/OUTBOARD MSIV INST AIR SUPPLY Steam SWELl-054 S-2-6A ACCUMULATOR Tunnel Steam SWELl-073 TS-23-1 01A HPCI/STEAM LEAK DETECTOR Tunnel Steam SWELl-074 TS-23-102A HPCI/STEAM LEAK DETECTOR Tunnel Steam SWELl-075 TS-23-103A HPCI/STEAM LEAK DETECTOR Tunnel Steam SWELl-076 TS-23-104A HPCI/STEAM LEAK DETECTOR Tunnel Steam SWELl-077 SE-2-86A-1 MS/OUTBOARD MSIV SOLENOID AC/DC Tunnel

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 1 of 198 Attachment D Area Walk-By Checklists (AWCs)

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 2 of 198 AWC # SWELL# Page 001 1-014,085,087 3 002 1-006, 019, 066 8 003 1-008 13 004 1-034, 035, 100 17 005 1-051, 063, 064 23 006 1-007 (east half), 031, 089, 090, 091 28 007 1-007 (west half), 084, 086, 088, 091 33 008 1-009 38 009 1-010 43 010 1-011,065 48 011 1-060 53 012 1-002,033,050,096,097 58 013 1-001,003,004,033 63 014 1-027,028,068,094,095 68 015 1-020 73 016 1-036,037,038,039,040,042,043,044,045,046,047,048,049,098,099 78 017 1-025 83 018 1-012,021 88 019 1-022 93 020 1-023,101 98 021 1-016 103 022 1-017 108 023 1-015 113 024 1-013,024 118 025 1-056, 078, 080 123 026 1-067 128 027 1-018, 2-001, 002, 003, 004, 005, 006, 011 133 028 1-079 138 029 1-102 143 030 1-061,062 148 031 1-026 153 032 1-069 158 033 1-032,058 163 034 1-059 168 035 1-005 173 036 1-071, 072, 081 178 037 1-092 183 038 1-070, 082, 083, 093, 2-010 188 039 2-007, 008, 009 193

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 3 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 5 Status: Yv0 NiO UD-(AWC) AWC- 001 Area Walk-By Checklist Location: Bldg. TB Roor El. 252 Room, Area1 EDGR A - WEST SIDE OF ROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 014, 085, 087 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NOI urQl N/A[D potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be tree of Y0 NEI Ul N/A[-D significant degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE0 NO UO N/A" raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is ,ey large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 4 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YO NEI UO Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 001 Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 252 Room, Area' EDGR A - WEST SIDE OF ROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 014. 085. 087

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y] NO uO N/AQ spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lightirng)?

The light fixtures have a low mass and have positive retention features; therefore there Is no adverse seismic spatialinteractionconcern with other equipment.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y0 NO1 U[: N/A[-'

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y0 NOI Ui N/Ar" interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NO U- N/A" interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary Installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 5 of 198 ATrACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Yv0 NO" UO-(AWC) AWC- 001 Area Walk-By Checklist Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 25 Room, Area' EDGR A - WEST SIDE OF ROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 014, 085, 087

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NOI U[-O adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

1. Temporary scaffolding has wheels locked and is chained. Overhead Cranechain is properly secured.
2. Temporary test equipmentsecured; ok.
3. HVAC unit in northwest comer braced; ok.
4. Voltage rec compt in northwest comer has one loose thumbscrew that needs to be tightened on cabinetdoorpanel. The remainingthumbscrews are positive attachmentand are deemed sufficient to hold this door panel by engineeringjudgment. No seismic concern. -See CR-VTY-2012-04816 for correctiveaction.

Evaluated by: Marcus Hecht-Nielsen * /

1-0,77 Date, 10-1-12 Raymond Tworek Q4...i P 4ý ioel (0 1., 10-1-12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 6 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-By CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ Nf] u[]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 001 Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 252 Room, Area 1 EDGR A - WEST SIDE OF ROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 014. 085, 087 Photographs Note: Note:

i EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 7 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YO No U-'

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 001 Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 252 Room, Area' EDGR A - WEST SIDE OF ROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 014, 08M 087 No photo necessary Note:

EN-DC-I 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 8 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKUST Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YO NO] UE]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 002 Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 252 Room, Area' EDGR A - EAST SIDE OFROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 006, 019. 066 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YED N[l U" N/AQ potentially adverse seismic conditions (ifvisible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NO urI N/AQ significant degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NOI UO N/A]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 9 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YO N[] U[]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 002 Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 252 Room, Area 1 EDGR A - EAST SIDE OF ROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 006, 019,066

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y0S NOI U[-D N/A[-

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

The light fixtures have a low mass and have positive retention features; therefore there is no adverseseismic spatialinteractionconcern with otherequipment

5. Does it appear that the area is tree of potentially adverse seismic Y0 NEI UO N/A[]

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ N[3 UI-I N/AC interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y0 N[3 UCI N/A-I interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary Installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 10 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Yv0 Nr" U[-'

(AWC) AWC- 002 Area Walk-By Checklist Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 252 Room, Area 1 EDGRA-EASTSIDEOFROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 006, 019,066

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NO] UO-'

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

See comment #2 Commentas(Additional pages may be added as necessary) 1.Scaffolding tagged (Green) Log# 12-085 -ok. Ladderssecuredproperly - NO ISSUE WITH ADVERSE SEISMIC INTERACTION. cJL-

2. dischargeline clip was found to be partiallydisconnected (seephoto). Issue was correctedusing=
  • rJ-Yt2012-04870 J 1*,r1-ce/ ,o2,S.-- (1*

Evaluated by: Marcus Hecht-Nielsen ...... well!e 10.1-_12 Raymond Tworek  % ,JT I l'" 10-1-12 NCo,64y2-t:cZ0 (ý P, )qv JN(16 &fi-1 'O-?5T~--I a.

EN-DC-1168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 11 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YO NI U-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 002 Location: Bldg. TB Roor El. 252 Room, Area' EDGR A - EAST SIDE OFROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- O06. 019A 066 Photographs No photo necessary Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 12 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YO NEI UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 002 Location: Bldg.TB FRoor El. 252 Room, Area 1 EDGR A - EAST SIDE OF ROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 006, 019. 066 No photo necessary No photo necessary Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 13 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKUST Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NE] U[3 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 003 Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 252' Room, Area' DAY TKRMA. TB SWEL Components: SWELl- 008 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NEI UiO N/AE-potentially adverse seismic conditions (ifvisible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO N[3 UOi N/A["]

significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE] NI uO N/AS raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

No cable tray or HVAC ducts in the area.

' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 14 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-By CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YO N[] U[]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 003 Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 252' Room, Area' DAY TKRMA. TB SWEL Components: SWELl- 008

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y0 NEI ur-O NIAQ spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does It appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NO-I UO N/All interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y19 N[O U[-'D N/A[l interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ Nr'] U-I N/AD--]

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 15 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YI* Nil UO-(AWC) AWC- 003 Area Walk-By Checklist Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 252' Room, Area' DAY TKRMA. TB SWEL Components: SWELl- 008

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NO] U--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Conduit # 44258 SII Junctionbox B679 SI1, 2 screws missing on left side. Junctionbox is about 3' from the valve. Pictureis attached.

REFCR-VTY-2012-04870 Evaluated by: Kirit Parikh 0 19.c' Iol Date: 10/02/12 Randy Stenhens bl, (4 - &/2O1 2- 10/02/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 16 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKUST Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YED NO UO Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 003 Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 252' Room, Area 1 DAYTKRMA, TB SWEL Components: SWELl- 008 Photographs I1I90. Lull CILICI VIIUVl VI ff 0 V, resultingfrom missing screws.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 17 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UrD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 003 Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 252' Room, Area' DAY 7K RMA. T7B SWEL Components: SWELl- 008 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 18 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 5 Status: Y10 NO UO Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 004 Location: Bldg. CST Floor El. 252' Room, Area' CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK, YARD AREA SWEL Components: SWEL- 034. 035. 100 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL Items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NO uO N/AO potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZI NO UO N/AJ significant degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cablelconduit YO NO U' NWAS raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

No cable trays located in the Walk-By area.

' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 19 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YO NEI Uf]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 004 Location: Bldg. CST Floor El. 252' Room, Area' CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK, YARD AREA SWEL Components: SWEL- 034. 035.100

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO N[O UQ- N/A['I spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NF- UE- N/AO-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y0R NEI UO' N/A-'

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Yv NEI U[3 N/A]

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Temporarypower equipment andspare pump assy has a large low center of mass and is not a seismic Interacton concern.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 20 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y*; NO~ U["

(AWC) AWC- 004 Area Walk-By Checklist Location: Bldg. CST Floor El. 252' Room, Area' CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK, YARD AREA SWEL Components: SWEL- 034 035, 100

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[] U]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment In the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None.

Evaluated by: Kirit Parikh ICL.. f0 I 10." ZoIZ Date: 10/02/12 Randy Stephens j*LAA 1J* '4lIWZOIT2-10/02/12

' IDJ(

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 21 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-By CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YO NEI UO Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 004 Location: Bldg. CST Roor El. 252' Room, Area' CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK. YARD AREA SWEL Components: SWEL- 034. 035= 100 Photographs No photo necessary Note:

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 22 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y0 NO U]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 004 Location: Bldg. CST Roor El. 252' Room, Area' CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK, YARD AREA SWEL Components: SWEL- 034. 035, 100 No photo necessary Note:

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 23 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-By CHECKuST Sheet I of 5 S Status: Y[] Nr- uO-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 005 Location: Bldg. IS Floor El. 237 Room, Area 1 Whole Room SWEL Components: SWEL- 051. 063. 064 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NO U[ N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (ifvisible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y9( N[-1 U- N/A[-

significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YO NQl UDI N/A[]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 24 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YO NEI UEr Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 005 Location: Bldg. IS Floor El. 237 Room, Area 1 Whole Room SWEL Components: SWEL- 051. 063. 064

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE U[ N/AEQ spatial interactions with other equipment In the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Yv NEI U["l N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y0 NEl U'- N/AD-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Yv NC" U[- N/At interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 25 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YO NEI U" Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 005 Location: Bldg. IS Floor El. 237 Room, Area' Whole Room SWEL Components: SWEL- 051.063,064

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[@ N[] U[']

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

See comments.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Equipment hoist on west wall secured-noissue.

Ladders secured to north wall-no issue.

Pump groutpads exhibit minor cracks however otherwise intactand have no adverseseismic issue by engineeringjudgment.

Evaluated by: Marcus Hecht-Nielsen / Date: 10-2-12 Raqvrnnnd Tworek Rok.,,> ý- tall TI t-- 10-2-12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 26 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YO N(3 Ur]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 005 Location: Bldg. IS Floor El. 237 Room, Area' Whole Room SWEL Components: SWEL- 051. 063,064 Photographs No photo necessary No photo necessary Note: Note:

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 27 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NO UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 005 Location: Bldg. IS Floor El. 237 Room, Area 1 Whole Room SWEL Components: SWEL- 051, 063. 064 No photo necessary No photo necessary Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 28 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 5 Status: Y0] NO- UD-(AWC) AWC- 006 Area Walk-By Checklist Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 252 Room, Area' EDGR B -EAST SIDE OF ROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 007 (easthall), 031. 089. 090. 091 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NEI uF] N/AOI potentially adverse seismic conditions (ifvisible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NOI uO N/AO-significant degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YO NOI UQ- N/AO-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be Inside acceptable limits)?

' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is ve*y large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 29 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Yo NE u[-E Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 006 Location: Bldg. T8 Floor El. 252 Room, Area' EDGR B -EAST SIDE OF ROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 007 (easthalf). 031, 089O090. 091

4. Does Itappear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YS NO U[3 N/AE]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NO uQ N/Al Interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Yv NO U- N/AO interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NO UO N/AO interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 30 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKUST Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE0 NEI Ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 006 Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 252 Room, Area 1 EDGR B -EAST SIDE OF ROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 007 (easthalf), 031. 089. 090, 091

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO N["] U[-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Marcus Hecht-Nielsen V Date: 10-3-12 Raymond Tworek 10-3-12 Ravmwd Twotz EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 31 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YO N[:] Ur]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 006 Location: Bldg. TB Roor El. 252 Room, Area' EDGR B -EAST SIDE OF ROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 007 (easthalf), 031, 089, 090, 091 Photographs No photos necessary Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 32 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YO N[l urI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 006 Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 252 Room, Area' EDGR B -EAST SIDE OF ROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 007 (easthalf)t 031, 089, 090, 091 No photos necessary Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 33 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 5 Status: YO NiO UD]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 007 Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 252 Room, Area' EDGR B -WEST SIDE OF ROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 007 (west half). 084, 086. 088, 091 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI UE- N/All potentially adverse seismic conditions (ifvisible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y10 N[-] U[] N/A[-

significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YV N[-] U[- N/AD" raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be descnrbed.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 34 of 198 ATrACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKUST Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 007 Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 252 Room, Area 1 EDGR B -WEST SIDE OF ROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 007 (west half). 084. 086. 088. 091

4. Does it appear that the area Is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NOI UO N/AO spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[O U[-] N/AO interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6, Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NO-] UO N/Ar"]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N['- ur] N/A[C]

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-1 2-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 35 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-By CHECKLIST Shoot 3 of 5 Status: YO NO UO Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 007 Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 252 Room, Area 1 EDGR B -WEST SIDE OF ROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 007 (west half). 084. 086. 088. 091

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[@ N[-] UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Raymond Tworek I r" * " 1' 1"- Date: 10-3-12 Marcus Hecht-Nielsen / /"*//1L 10-3-12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 36 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YO NEI UO Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 007 Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 252 Room, Area1 EDGR B -WESTSIDE OFROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 007 (west half), 084. 086, 088, 091 Photographs No photos necessary No photos necessary Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 37 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YI* NO iDI" Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 007 Location: Bldg. TB - Floor El. 252 Room, Area1 EDGR B -WEST SIDE OF ROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 007 (west half). 084, 086, 088. 091 No photos necessary No photos necessary Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 38 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YO NEI UC Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 008 Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 2-V Room, Area 1 EDG B DAY TANKROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 009 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NOI U[: NIAQ potentially adverse seismic conditions (Ifvisible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NO] UCi N/AC]

significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Yv NCl uC- N/A[C raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is i'ery large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 39 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKUST Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YO NO] Ur]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 008 Location: Bldg. TB3 Floor El. 2,52 Room, Area 1 EDG BA D Y TANK ROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 009

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UO- N/AD spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Yv NEI U-' NIADI interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NO U- N/AD-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y" NOi UrJ N/A[']

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary Installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 40 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKUST Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UDI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 008 Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 252 Room, Area 1 EDG B DAY TANKROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 009

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0@ N[] UC" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Marcus Hecht-Nielsen Date: 10-3-12 Raymond Tworek

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 41 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YO NEI uDE Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 008 Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 252 Room, Area' EDG B DAY TANK ROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 009 Photographs No photos necessary No photos necessary Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 42 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YO NEI U-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 008 Location: Bldg. TB Floor El. 252 Room, Area' EDG B DAY TANK ROOM SWEL Components: SWEL- 009 No photos necessary No photos necessary Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 43 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKUST Sheet I of 5 Status: YO NC3 UC-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 009 Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 252' Room, Area' OUTSIDE FUEL OIL STORAGI TANK.(FOST)

SWEL Components: SWELl- 010 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NC-] U[] N/A[

potentially adverse seismic conditions (Ifvisible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NO UC N/AC significant degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y; NEI u- N/AC-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

1If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 44 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-By CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ No U[3 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) Awc- 009 Location: Bldg. YARD Floor B. 252' Room, Area1 OUTSIDE FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK.(FOST)

SWEL Components: SWELl- 010

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NO UI N/A-1 spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does It appear that the area Is free of potentially adverse seismic YS NEI ur] N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Yv N[3 UD- N/AD interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI Unl N/AD' interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary Installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 45 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YO NI U-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 009 Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 252' Room, Area' OUTSIDE FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK.(FOST)

SWEL Components: SWELl- 010

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO] U-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comment(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Kirit Parikh rC2RA-,.... I0 Iý 20.o Date: 10/03/2012 Randy Stephens MJI_ O (I1010322-01** 012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 46 of 198 ATrACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Yo N[3 U['

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 009 Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 252' Room, Area' OUTSIDE FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK.(FOST)

SWEL Components: SWELl- 010 Photographs NO PHOTO NECESSARY Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 47 of 198 ATlACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKUST Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Yv0 NOl urO Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 009 Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 252' Room, Area 1 OUTSIDE FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK.(FOST)

SWEL Components: SWELl- 010 NO PHOTO NECESSARY NO PHOTO NECESSARY Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 48 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-By CHECKUST Sheet I of 5 Status: Y0* NOl UO Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 010 Location: Bldg. FUEL OIL Floor El. 241' Room, Area' FUEL OIL PUMP. OUTSIDE IN THE YARD NEAR FOS. REFDWGG G191142 SWEL Components: SWELl- 011, 065 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NOI uFI N/AO" potentially adverse seismic conditions (ifvisible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Yv NOl U[-] N/Ar-significant degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual Inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YI N[l U[-I N/AI-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be describel.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 49 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-By CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y0* NO" UD-(AWC) AWC- 010 Area Walk-By Checklist Location: Bldg. FUEL OIL Floor El. 241' Room, Area 1 FUEL OIL PUMP, OUTSIDE IN THE YARD NEAR FOS. REF DWG G 191142 SWEL Components: SWELl- 011. 065

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NO UO N/AO spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does It appear that the area Is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NOI UOI N/AOI interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UO N/AOI interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO N[Q u[-] N/A[-O interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 50 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKUST Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YO NEI- UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 010 Location: Bldg. FUEL OIL Floor El. 241V Room, Area 1 FUEL OIL PUMP, OUTSIDE IN THE YARD NEAR FOS, REFDWGG 191142 SWEL Components: SWELl- 011. 065

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEIUE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Kit Parikh Vt, tO 10 I 18 2*0*2- Date: 10/03/2012 Randy Stephens h l C,( (

L>C,,!i 2-E 10/03/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 51 of 198 ATrACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKUST Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UO Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 010 Location: Bldg. FUEL OIL Floor El. 241' Room, Area 1 FUEL OIL PUMP.OUTSIDE IN THE YARD NEAR FOS. REF DWG G 191142 SWEL SWEL Components: SWIELl- 011. 065 Photographs Photographs NO PHOTO NECESSARY NO PHOTO NECESSARY Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 52 of 198 ATrACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Shoet 5 of 5 Status: Y0* ND- UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 010 Location: Bldg. FUEL OIL Floor El. 241' Room, Area 1 FUEL OIL PUMP. OUTSIDE IN THE YARD NEAR FOS, REFDWG G 191142 SWEL Components: SWELl- 011,065 NO PHOTO NECESSARY NO PHOTO NECESSARY Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 53 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 5 Status: y0~i NOl UD" (AWC) AWC- 011 Area Walk-By Checklist Location: Bldg. ,RB . Floor El. 252 Room, Area' SWEL Components: SWELl- 060 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y0 NC U[" N/AQ potentially adverse seismic conditions (ifvisible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y0R N' U- N/AD significant degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y0 NO U-I N/A[-'

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

IIf the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 54 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YO NI] U-'

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 011 Location: Bldg. R8 Floor El. 252 Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl- 060

4. Does Itappear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[R NI] U[l3 N/AI"]

spatial interactions with other equipment In the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NI] U[] N/A[-D interactions that could cause flooding or spray In the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI Ui- N/AQ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YV Ni] u[-Q1 N/AI"]

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 55 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YO Nr] U[]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 011 Location: Bldg. RB Roor El. 25 Room, Area' SWEL Components: SWELl- 060

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NC] U[]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Marcus Hecht-Nielsen Z,/S/,6/,L Date: 10-4-12 Raymond Dvorek Q4-- 10-4-12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 56 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ N[3 U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 011 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 252 Room, Area' SWEL Components: SWELl- 060 Photographs No photo necessary No photo necessary Note: Note:

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 57 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YO N[l UrI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) -- AWC- 011 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 252 Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl- 060 No photo necessary No photo necessary Note: Note:

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 58 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 5 Status: YO NEI UEr Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 012 Location: Bldg. R l Floor El. 25M Room, Area' NORTHWESTAREA OF ROOM- WEST OF CRD HYD CONTROL UNITS SWEL Components: SWELl- 002. 033, 050,096. 097 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEIUE] N/AF potentially adverse seismic conditions (Ifvisible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ Nn] UED NIAE significant degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YO N[_1 UEI N/AQI raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports Is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is ery large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 59 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YO Ni- Ut]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 012 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 252 Room, Area' NORTHIWEST AREA OF ROOM - WEST OF CRD HYD CONTROL UNITS SWEL Components: SWELl- 02. 033. 050. 096. 097

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI U[- N/AE-spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YIS NEI Ut] N/At-]

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y0 N'- U[] N/At]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y0 NEI Ur-1 N/At]

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary Installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

EN-DC.168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 60 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YO NEl U[I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 012 Location: Bldg. REB Floor El. 252 Room, Area' NORTHIWESTAREA OF ROOM- WESTO0 CRD HYD CONTROL UNITS SWEL Components: SWELl- O02. 033, 050.096. 097

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI NIl UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

See comment #2.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

1. Scaffold has blue tag- Dated 10/31/11-okay
2. Bolt missing on guard rail-has5 of 6 bolts remaining, therefore no seismic issue. Okay by engineering judgment.

Evaluated by: Marcus Hecht-Nielsen * "j4',,$,, 4, Date: 10-4-12 Raymond Tworek , L b ( ' 10-4.12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 61 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKUST Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YO NOl U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 012 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 252 Room, Area 1 NORTHWEST AREA OF ROOM- WEST OF CRD HYD CONTROL UNITS SWEL Components: SWELl- 002W 033.050.096. 097 EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 62 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YO NEI UE" Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 012 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 252 Room, Area' NORTHWESTAREA OF ROOM - WEST OF CRD HYD CONTROL UNITS SWEL Components: SWELl- 002. 033. 050. 096, 097 No photo necessary No photo necessary Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 63 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKUST Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YE NEI UD]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 013 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 252' Room, Area' REACTOR BUILDING (SOUTH SIDE).COL LINES 12Y TO I1Z AND M TO HZ. ELEV 252'-6"DWG REFG191148 SHT 1 SWEL Components: SWELl - 001, 003. 004. 033 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space Is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ ND UD N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (ifvisible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI UD N/AD significant degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ ND UD N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

IIf the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 64 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YI- NEI uO Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 013 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 252' Room, Area' REACTOR BUILDING (SOUTH SIDE).COL LINES I2Y TO 11Z AND M TO HZ ELEV 252'.6"DWG REF G191148 SHT 1 SWEL Components: SWELl - 001. 003. 004,033

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UC' N/AC-spatial interactions with other equipment Inthe area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

See comment to question # 7.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NO U[Q- N/A[:

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y0 NOI UCI N/AC-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[O NOI UC] N/A[-]

Interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

A Gantry Cranelocatednear the South wall and East of PCV-3-326 is not tied but securedper procedureAP-O0 19.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 65 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKUST Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YDI NEI uM Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 013 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 252' Room, Area' REACTOR BUILDING (SOUTH SIDEL.COL LINES 12Y TO 11ZAND M TO HZ ELEV 252-6"DWG REFG191148 SHT 1 SWEL Components: SWELl - 001, 003. 004. 033

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO N-I UI]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Kirit Parikh r I 1'.- (11o 0 1 0 _--Date: 10/04/2012.

Randy Stephens & e)'C /4/I/OI It6 Zt/L 10/04/2012 Q-EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 66 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YO- NEI] UO Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 013 Location: Bldg. RB Roor El. 252' Room, Area 1 REACTOR BUILDING (SOUTH SIDE).COL LINES 12Y TO I1Z AND M TO HZ, ELEV 252.6"DWG REF G 191148 SHT I SWEL Components: SWELl - 0Ol. 003. 004. 033 Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 67 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-By CHECKUST Sheots of 5 Status: YO NC' Ur']

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 013 Location: Bldg. RO Roor El. 252' Room, Area' REACTOR BUILDING (SOUTH SIDE).COL LINES 12Y TO 1IZAND M TO HZ ELEV 252'-6 DIWG REF G 191148 SHT I SWEL ComDonents: SWELl - 001. 003.004.033 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 68 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YEI NO U" Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 014 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 213' Room, Area' HPCI ROOMFL ELEV213'-9"REF DWGG191148 SWEL Components: SWELl - 027,028,068,094,095 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space Is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NOI u"] N/A[r" potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NEI U-] N/A[O]

significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y0 NOl U- N/A[]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 69 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YO NOI U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 014 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 213' Room, Area' HPCI ROOM.FL ELEV213'-9"RF DWGG 191148 SWEL Components: SWELl - 027,028,068,094,095

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO N[] U[- N/A[]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

The light fixtures have low mass and good anchoragefeatures and therefore have no concern.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NOI u-[ N/AC-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NOI UC' N/AC" interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI U-] N/AC:

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Oily rags containersecurely tied off about 5' from the pump. No impact EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 70 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKUST Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Yr- NO UO-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 014 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 213' Room, Area' HPCI ROOMFL ELEV213X-9"REF DWGG 191148 SWEL Components: SWELl - 027.028=068,094.095

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: KiritParikh 4

  • t4o- 1/Zo 2.. Date: 10-09-2012 Randy -SteJhens a.- hT1 /8'6i2-.. 10-09-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 71 of 198 ATrACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Yv"O N[-] UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 014 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 213' Room, Area1 HPCI ROOM.FL ELEV21X3'-9REF DWGG 191148 SWEL Components: SWELl - 027.028&068.094,095 Photographs No photo necessary No photo necessary Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 72 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE] NI] U[]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 014 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 213' Room, Area' HPCIROOM.FL ELEV213'-9"REF DWGG191148 SWEL Components: SWELl - 027.028.068.094,095 No photo necessary No photo necessary Note:

Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 73 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 5 Status: YI* NDl ur-(AWC) AWC- 015 Area Walk-By Checklist Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 252' Room, Area' N.E CORNER. ELEV252'-6". COL LINE 12 Y TO AZ=o AND AZ=270 DEGREE.

DWG REF 0 191148 SHT 1 SWEL Components: SWELl- 020 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Yv NE] U[-] N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (ifvisible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y0 NEI U[-] N/A[D]

significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y0 N[D] u["] N/A[-D raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 74 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKUST Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Yv NE UO Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 015 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 252' Room, Area' N.E CORNER. ELEV2520-6, COL LINE 12 Y TO AZ--O AND AZ=270 DEGREE.

DWG REFG 191148 SHT 1 SWEL Components: SWELl- 020

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y0 NO UO N/AD spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UO N/AO interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does It appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO N] UD N/AD interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y01 NO uO N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

24' ladderis hanging on the wa#l 12' from the MCC 9D. Is securedat an angle and hangedas per industry practice.No seismic impact EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 75 of 198 ATrACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKUST Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YI* NOl UO" Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 015 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 252' Room, Area' N.E CORNER. ELEV252-6. COL LINE 12 '

TO AZ--O AND AZ--270 DEGREE, QWG REFG 1,91148 SHT 1 SWEL Components: SWELl- 020

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YC9 N[] ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment Inthe area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Kirit Parikh - l161A0 I - Date: 10-09-2012 Randv Stewhens Z( *t4 I Cl */2 2-40P-j', 10-09-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 76 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y* NOl UO Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 015 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 252' Room, Area 1 NE CORNER. ELEV 252"-6" COL LINE 12 Y TO AZ=O AND AZ=270 DEGREE DWG REF G 191148 SHT 1 SWEL Components: SWELl- 020 Photographs No photo necessary Note:

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 77 of 198 ATrACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKUST Sheet 5 of 5 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 015 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 252' Room, Area 1 N.E CORNER. ELEV252-6". COL LINE 12 Y TO AZ--O AND AZ=270 DEGREE, DWG REF G 191148 SHT 1 SWEL Components: SWELl- 020 No photo necessary No photo necessary Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 78 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-By CHECKLIST Sheet I of 5 Status: YN NO U-'

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 016 Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 280 Room, Area' LNORTHEAST QUADRANT OF ROOM SWEL Components: SWELl- 036, 037. 038.039. 040. 042. 043, 044.045. 046. 047, 048.049, 098. 099 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NO UO NIAQ potentially adverse seismic conditions (ifvisible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment In the area appear to be free of Y0 NO Ur N/A-significant degraded conditions?

See comment #1

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NO' uOl N/AO raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 79 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y*;* NO- UQJ (AWC) AWC- 016 Area Walk-By Checklist Location: Bldg. .B Floor El. 280 Room, Area 1 NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF ROOM SWEL Components: SWELl- 036. 037. 038. 039. 040. 042. 043, 044. 045, 046,047, 048a 049.

098, 099

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UO N/A-spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NO UO N/AO interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Yv NO Ur N/AO interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NO U- N/AO interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 80 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[] NF- U[-'J (AWC) AWC- 016 Area Walk-By Checklist Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 2 .0 Room, Area' NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF ROOM SWEL Components: SWELl- 036. 037. 038, 039. 040. 042. 043. 044,045 046 047. 048. 049.

098, 099

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

See comment #2 Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

1. Railing located in front of RK25-6A/B has a metal plate welded to each leg for connection to the floor; each plate has 2 bolted connections.One of the nuts is loose however the remainingnuts are sufficient to hold the railing-noseismic issue by engineeringjudgment.
2. Scaffolding support column attachedto railing(nearRK25-6A/B) no seismic issue by engineering judgement. One of the bolted connection hada missing nut however there is no seismic issue by engineeringjudgement.

Mi~nhl int, Al hi,.sAaeeaMy

. i ht.Alilaan /tas lO.

Ih..V.,~u*r~*

  • ., Y*

Raymond Tworek v.&.i Lurh 10-9-12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VTY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 81 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKUST Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[] Ni UC" (AWC) AWC- 016 Area Walk-By Checklist Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 280 Room, Area' NORTHEAST QUADRANT OFROOM SWEL Components: SWELl- 03*6 037. 038.039.040. 042.043.044.045.046.047.048.049.

098. 099 Photographs 1101i w Itimily OwuOty UVII vo I Prato EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. VrY-RPT-12-00019 Rev. 1 Attachment D Page 82 of 198 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheot 5 of 5 Status: YO NEI UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 016 Location: Bldg. FIB Floor El. ZP0Q Room, Area 1 NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF ROOM SWEL Components: SWELl- 036.037.038.039.040.042. 043,044.045.046,047.04&. 049.

098.099 Note: Railing near RK25-6A/B EN-DC-168 REV 0

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=BVY_13-061,_VY-RPT-12-00019,_Revision_1,_Vermont_Yankee_Seismic_Walkdown_Submittal_Report_for_Resolution_of_Fukushima_Near-Term_Task_Force_Recommendation_2.3:_Seismic,_Page_370_of_505_of_Attachment_C_Through_82_of_198_of_Attachment_D&oldid=2456142"