ASLBP 20-966-02-LA-BD01, Order (Adopting Transcript Corrections)
| ML20181A301 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 06/29/2020 |
| From: | Paul Ryerson Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| To: | Citizens' Resistance at Fermi 2 (CRAFT), DTE Electric Company, NRC/OGC |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| 50-341-LA, ASLBP 20-966-02-LA-BD01, License Amendment, RAS 55726 | |
| Download: ML20181A301 (7) | |
Text
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Before Administrative Judges:
Paul S. Ryerson, Chairman Dr. Sue H. Abreu Dr. Gary S. Arnold In the Matter of DTE ELECTRIC COMPANY (Fermi 2)
Docket No. 50-341-LA ASLBP No. 20-966-02-LA-BD01 June 29, 2020 ORDER (Adopting Transcript Corrections)
Before the Board is a joint motion submitted by the oral argument participantsDTE Electric Company; Citizens Resistance at Fermi 2; and the NRC Staffrequesting that corrections be made to the transcript of the June 10, 2020 oral argument concerning standing and contention admissibility.1 Because all participants agree on the proposed corrections, the Board adopts them. The transcript of the oral argument held on June 10, 2020 is revised per Appendix A to this Order.
It is so ORDERED.
FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Paul S. Ryerson, Chairman ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE Rockville, Maryland June 29, 2020 1 See Joint Motion for the Correction of the Official Transcript of the Oral Argument Held on June 10, 2020 (June 26, 2020).
/RA/
APPENDIX A CORRECTIONS TO THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON JUNE 10, 2020 DOCKET NO. 50-341-LA Page Line Now Reads Should Read Speaker 2
11 Jon Christinidis, Esq.
Jon P. Christinidis, Esq.
N/A 4
12 at that Ryerson 4
13 as has Ryerson 6
2 that might than might Ryerson 8
22 respondent responding Matthews 9
8 Francis Frances Woods 10 16-17 walk-dogging watch-dogging Collins 10 19 Hedwid Hedwig Collins 10 20 Prince Township Frenchtown Township Collins 12 1
MO ML Sherman 12 4
circulation.
circulation loss.
Sherman 12 7-8 these materials at the these aging materials as the Sherman 12 10 always already Sherman 12 14 the panels the snap in panels Sherman 12 24 the front loads the drop loads Sherman 13 2
incinerator diesel generator Sherman 13 4
could be an issue by could be initiated by Sherman 13 8
scenario. Decreased scenario, and decreased Sherman 13 10 (Telephonic interference)
Degraded NAMs Sherman 13 12 cause filters to block clog filters and block Sherman 13-14 25-1 Just a few years later the Two years later NERC found the Sherman 14 1-2 violation. Writing of violation, writing:
Sherman 14 2
were incomplete were: Incomplete Sherman 14 3
records where records; Running Sherman 14 4
systems testing was ineffective. A systems to track testing were both ineffective; A Sherman 14 5
records failed to records; A failure to Sherman 14 7-8 and a failure to understand ethical standards in the environment.
- and A failure to understand applicable standards and requirements.
Sherman 14 10 analysis' conclusion analysis leading to the conclusion Sherman 15 4
degradation of the dam degradation of the NAM Deer In Water Page Line Now Reads Should Read Speaker 15 14 whether uncredited or not whether accredited or not Deer In Water 15 21 areal density areal Boron10 density Deer In Water 16 11-12 movement in storage to fuel movement and storage of fuel Deer In Water 16 18 filters in the filters, and the Deer In Water 17 5
the ponds (phonetic) were the coupons were Deer In Water 17 14 mess with - -
mess with the movement of rods Deer In Water 18 4
and (telephonic interference) and the inserts Deer In Water 19 18 Now each Notably, each Lighty 20 7
and an Lighty 20 10 LAR to be gleaned LAR could be gleaned Lighty 20 23 function, but more function, more Lighty 21 7
So Petitioner's overarching theory, it is Thus, Petitioner's overarching theory is Lighty 21 25 Francis Frances Woods 22 6
propose admissible propose an admissible Woods 22 16 left less Woods 22 24 and both in both Woods 23 23 inserts. All inserts, all Woods 24 11 spent fuel and a spent fuel pool spent fuel in a spent fuel pool Woods 24 16 of presumption presumption Woods 25 9
proceeding proceedings Woods 26 8-9 spent fuel and the spent fuel pool enduring spent fuel in the spent fuel pool and during Woods 28 5
margins margin Woods 28 8
supposed to be challenged proposed to be changed Woods 28 14 it does challenge it does not challenge Woods 28 15 licensing license Woods 31 2
Francis Frances Mertz 31 8
ISFSI construction to ISFSI construction and to Mertz 32 2
pools remain pool remains Mertz 32 3
- text, test Mertz 32 14-15 their source partners' decision Interim Storage Partners decisions Mertz 32 16 background that ground Mertz Page Line Now Reads Should Read Speaker 33 22 set aside demonstrate Wachutka 34 11 those of those are Wachutka 35 16 completing conflating Ryerson 35 17 establishing standard establishing standing Ryerson 37 15 precedence precedents Wachutka 39 11 their other two independent ACs our other two independent bases Wachutka 39 20 filing filings Wachutka 40 23 International Interim International and Interim Woods 41 18 or their or the Wachutka 44 19 unusable, discontinued due to unusable, due to Deer In Water 44 22-23 really think of scenarios --
really give you any scenarios because Deer In Water 44 25 is steadily irradiated by gets heavily irradiated by Deer In Water 45 1
gamma irradiated by and essentially gamma radiation and potentially Deer In Water 45 14 enough unknown and of known unknowns enough knowns and unknown knowns Sherman 45 15-16 and if this didn't rest and that this shouldn't rest Sherman 45 20 SUNI SUNSI Collins 46 9
been on been no Lighty 46 16 speculations contradict speculation contradicts Lighty 47 21 MR. WACHUTKA MR. SHERMAN N/A 49 12 Applicants Applicant's Arnold 49 13 Analysis Analyses Arnold 49 22-23 Boraflex there and shoving more debris and stuff in it, the criticality, Boraflex there and shoving more debris stuff in it, that's what the criticality, Collins 50 8
end and Arnold 51 23 4
6 Collins 51-52 25-1 know that answer.
know the answer.
Collins 52 11 graded degraded Sherman 52 19 exasperating exacerbated Sherman 52 22 and changing the
, in changes in Sherman 52 23 marking.
margin.
Sherman 53 5
discussion discussing Arnold 54 7
it's not a this is not even a Deer In Water 55 15 0.95K Effective 0.95 K effective Lighty 55 19 1.5 and above 1.0 and above Lighty 56-57 25-1 Shutdown is Is Arnold Page Line Now Reads Should Read Speaker 57 2
such than such that Arnold 57 5
energy NRC Wachutka 57 9
10 CFR 50.6(a) 10 CFR 50.68 Wachutka 57 15 roll so Wachutka 58 8
GTE DTE Lighty 58 14 specifically that the specifically the Lighty 58 16 must not be challenged have not been challenged Lighty 59 8
MS. WOODS:
(UNKNOWN SPEAKER):
N/A 59 10 MS. WOODS:
(UNKNOWN SPEAKER):
N/A 59 23-24 that's been determined with CRAFT
, it's Jim Sherman with
- CRAFT, Sherman 59 25 GTE DTE Sherman 60 13 a bid has to look they should look Sherman 61 19 learn from see from Sherman 62 2
really be specific really specifically Deer In Water 62 5
going to do that going to create, react--
Deer In Water 62 7
DE DTE Deer In Water 62 11 want (telephonic interference) want it necessarily to be dissected Deer In Water 63 17 iterate reiterate Woods 64 10 contention and admissibility contention admissibility Ryerson 65 9
contention, admissibility contention admissibility Ryerson
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of
)
)
DTE ELECTRIC COMPANY
)
Docket No. 50-341-LA
)
(Fermi 2)
)
)
(License Amendment)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing ORDER (Adopting Transcript Corrections) have been served upon the following persons by Electronic Information Exchange.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication Mail Stop: O-16B33 Washington, DC 20555-0001 ocaamail.resource@nrc.gov U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop: T-3F23 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Paul S. Ryerson, Chairman Administrative Judge paul.ryerson@nrc.gov Dr. Sue H. Abreu Administrative Judge sue.abreu@nrc.gov Dr. Gary S. Arnold Administrative Judge gary.arnold@nrc.gov Ian Curry, Law Clerk ian.curry@nrc.gov Taylor Mayhall, Law Clerk taylor.mayhall@nrc.gov Stephanie B. Fishman, Law Clerk stephanie.fishman@nrc.gov U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the Secretary of the Commission Mail Stop: O-16B33 Washington, DC 20555-0001 hearingdocket@nrc.gov U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop: O-14A44 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Reginald Augustus, Esq.
David E. Roth, Esq.
Jeremy L. Wachutka, Esq.
Mary F. Woods, Esq.
Nicolas P. Mertz, Esq.
Brian Newell, Senior Paralegal Stacy Schumann, Paralegal reginald.augustus@nrc.gov david.roth@nrc.gov jeremy.wachutka@nrc.gov mary.woods@nrc.gov nicolas.mertz@nrc.gov brian.newell@nrc.gov stacy.schumann@nrc.gov
FERMI 2 (Docket No. 50-341-LA)
ORDER (Adopting Transcript Corrections)
DTE Energy Company One Energy Plaza, 1635 WCB Detroit, MI 48226 Jon P. Christinidis, Esq.
christinidisj@dteenergy.com Morgan, Lewis & Bockius 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Thomas C. Poindexter, Esq.
Timothy P. Matthews, Esq.
Ryan K. Lighty, Esq.
Scott D. Clausen, Esq.
thomas.poindexter@morganlewis.com timothy.matthews@morganlewis.com ryan.lighty@morganlewis.com scott.clausen@morganlewis.com Citizens Resistance at Fermi 2 (CRAFT) 17397 Five Points Street Redford MI 48240 Jessie Pauline Collins Jessie James DeerInWater James Russell Sherman jessiepauline2003@yahoo.com changethelifeoftheworld@gmail.com jimsherman@comcast.net Office of the Secretary of the Commission Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 29st day of June, 2020 Krupskaya T. Castellon Digitally signed by Krupskaya T. Castellon Date: 2020.06.29 12:01:49 -04'00'