2CAN079208, Monthly Operating Rept for June 1992 for Ano,Unit 2

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Monthly Operating Rept for June 1992 for Ano,Unit 2
ML20101T391
Person / Time
Site: Arkansas Nuclear 
Issue date: 06/30/1992
From: James Fisicaro, Whitt M
ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
2CAN079208, 2CAN79208, NUDOCS 9207210092
Download: ML20101T391 (7)


Text

<

gg{gmu Entergy Operadona. inc.

837

.i;.,

Qperations 4

July 15, 199; 2CANuT9208 U. G. Nuclear Regulatory Cunmission Document Control Desk Mail Stop P1-137 Washington, D.C.

20555 S'JBJECT: Arkansas Nuclear One - L' Tit 2 Docket No. 50-368 License No. NPF-6 Monthly Operatin; Report Gentlesnan:

Monthly Operating Report statistics for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit-2, for June, 1992 is atti.ched.

This report is submitted in accordance with ANO-2 Technical Specification 6.9.1.6.

Very truly yours.

ull..$1 A E

<-~s.

b,JamesJ Ficicato Director, Licencing JJF/ S AS/ sj f Attachmeat

.1

  • 1 a p t ',

a,

(,

5 i9 I

9207210092 920P3tS

/,f 1

DR ADocg 050003$9 PDR f

.. -n IU. B.-NRC.

July 15. 1992-gs Page 2-oi

- 4 cc:

Mr. James I.. Hilboan Regionni Administrator

.0. S. Nucinar Regulatory Commission Region'JV' 611.Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington,.TX-76011-8064 NPC Senior Resident !!nspector Arkansaa Nuclear One - ANO-1 & 2 Nunber 1, Nucionr Plant' Road Russellville, AR 72801 Mr. Thomas W. AlexJon NRR Project Manager, Region IV/ANO-1 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRR Hall Stop 13-M-3

.One White Flint North 1

111"5 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852 P

!!s. Shari Peterson NRR Project Manager, Region IV/ANO-2 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRR Mail Stop 13-11-3 One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Piko

.Rockville, Maryland 20852

?:

l::

1

_~

p t

OPERATING DATA REPORT

]

DOCKET NO:

50-366 Jity,l _1992 l

DATE:

a COMPLETED itY:H. S. Whitt TELEPil0NE:

1501) 964-5560

QfERATING STATUS l '. - - -Unit.Name: 'Atkansas Nuclear one - Unit 2 2.

Reporting Period: J,une 1-30 d y92 13.

Licensod Thermal Power (MWL):

2,015

>4.

Nameplato_ Rating (Gicas MWe):

942.57 5.

Design Electrical Rating (Not MWe):

912

6.

~ Maximum-Dependable Capacity (Gross MWe):

897 7.

^ Maximum Dependsble Capacity-(Not MWo):

858 8.

If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (Items Number 3 Through 7) Since Last

~ Report, Give Reasons:-

5.

Power-Level To Which Restricted.

If Any (Not MWe): None 10.-

Reasons for Restrictions. 'If Any: Nono

+

MONTil YR-TO-DATE CUMULATIVE

11.

'llours in Reporting Period...

720.0 4,367.0 107,519.0

' i 12.

Number of Ilours Reactor was Critical.....................

720.0-3,077.6 81,055.0 13.

Rosct'or Reserve Shutdown Ilours:........................

0.0 0.0 0.0

- 14.

llours Gonorator On-Lino......

720.0 3,062.2 79.249.4 L'

15. - 1 Unit Reserve Shutdown llours..

0.0 0.0 0.0

-16.

Gross The'rmal. Energy Generated 1,943,546.0 8,420,749.0 208,679,857.0 L

(MWil) z

17.

Gross Electrical Energy G en e r a t ed ( MWil)..............

636,520.0 2,785,310.0 68,638,141.0

=18.-

Snot Electrical; Energy Gonorated - (MWil) 607,527.0 2,651,867.0 63,279,680.0

. 19.-

Unit' Service' Factor..........

100.0 70.1 73.7 u

~20.

Unit Availability Factor.....

100.0 70.1 73.7 21.-

Unit _Capecity Factor L

(Using HDC Net) 98.3 70.8 70,8

--- 2 2.

_-Unit. Capacity factor p

.(Using DEC Not)..............

92.5 66.6 66.6 2 3.- - _ Unit Forced Outagn Rato......

0.0 29.9 12.6 4

24 Shutdowns Scheduled Over Next 6 Months (Type, Dato, and Duration of Each):

2R9 refuelinJ outaxe _is scheduled to begin September 4.1992, th.o unit is a

i scheduled to' restart _0ctober 26, 1992 (~ duration 52 days)

-25.

If-Shut Down At= End of Renort Period.

Estimated Date of

'Startup:

4

-26.

Units'in Test Status (Prior to Commercial lperation):

t Forecast Achieved INITIAL CRITICALITY 12/05,_l78

' INITIAL ELECTRICITY 12/26[78 COMMERCIAL OPERATION 03L2fff;0 I

.=

m.

... _. _ - - _ -.. _... -.. _ _.,_ ~.. _.. _.

a mn, c.1 w y.

x.

4 AVERAGE DAll.Y UNIT POWER LEVEL-DOCKCT NO:

50-368"

(;

UNIT:

lyo 6"

DATE:

i,u),y 1. 1992

_ COMPLETED B'.':

M. S. Whitt TELEPil0NE:.

Q0_1) 964-5560:

I

' MONTH. June;.1992

- DAYI AVERAGE DAli.Y~ POWER LEVEL (HWe-Net) s 1~..............

867 2~.......,.......

. 885-1

- 3..............

865

- 4'.....-......,-...

.885 S:..............-

869 1

6

............e.

224

'7..............-

412-l-

81..............

865 E

9.............'.

880 W

"10.....,.......

882 H

T11

..c..........

885

"-12............~.

805

'13-.............

884 14...............

. 884 115

...r.....4...

. 882

.16....'....'....

876...

877

-18.............

875

'.19-.............

879 r

.20'....W........

. 683 211.............

890

- 22.............

890 L

23............

883

\\

24............

' 877

, 25..'...........-

880 26.............

879 27.....,.......

883 L

28:.........'...~

. 883 j

' 29.............

-883 p

30:.............

- 882

?-

L.

o V;

' AVGS: '644 l:

D i.-

. INSTRUCTION p

On this format, list the average daily unit power level in MWe-Net for each p,

day in reporting month. _ Compute to the nearest whole megawatt, 4

o f

l - '- g )

h-,

e,.

W

=t t

g'Tp y-ry g

4,w, g-y.-

y y

p g-1r-c1--

ps


c

't Dr'#

y p -

r';

r-

~

j, ;[hl Q :4

)l.?

L v-y

,3 ; +

g, g_,

7 u

t 1

( la., i ))

W

HONTiiLY:0PERATING FEPORT~.

l$M.

- OPERATING ' SUMARY.

e w'

i i

de

- JUNE, 1992-

' f/

UNIT WO

kig: 4

.1 i

Ma

- f,il j /. E '

' The; unit.' bcgan t.he month _opatat ing_ at - 100% power.

At 2105 hours0.0244 days <br />0.585 hours <br />0.00348 weeks <br />8.009525e-4 months <br /> on tA,

fif th',-_ the system dispatcher requested the start of a power reduction to

]l, 30%. 'The dispatcher released the ur.it from the poder=reduct.Jor. at 0800

-; hours'on the seventh, and a pour ~ oscalation to 100% was initiat*3d.

'th a jg 9: y

" unit reached 1007, pever at 0714 hours0.00826 days <br />0.198 hours <br />0.00118 weeks <br />2.71677e-4 months <br /> on the eighth, and operated at full q.=

' power for.the: rewainder of : the inonth..

4 4

?

{'.

,. ;5 ;.-

~

L.

5 4

J "k._~.

p t

I a

i

-'.t l:

i-t ag (r, ?

3

)

e L.

{

s.

t 8

^ h F]4

,v "p' t c

j r,

t l-I t

_(,',

l--W, f,y 1

,,,v,y m.e-

---, ~, - -. _

. _ [-

~y

,g 7-m q'. ' '[

_ _ l. 7 j. '

s z..

.w UNIT SHUTD0'JNS AND POWER REDUCTICNS REPORT FOR JUNE 1992 DOCKET 10.

50-368 A O Unit Two-N UNIT NAME DATE July 7.

1942 COMPLETED BY M.

S. Whitt TELEPHONE (501) 964-5560 Cause & Corrective Method of Licensee Duration Shutting Event System Component Action to No.

Date Troe

( !'ours )

Reason Down Reactor' Repo;t e Code' Code' Prevent Recurrence 2

2 i

92-02 920605 S

H 3

N/A ZZ ZZZZZZ Fower reduction to 30% per system

{

dispatcher.

4 3

0 3

F: Forced Reason:

Method:

Exhibit G - Instructions I

l S:

Scheduled A-Equipment Failure (Explain) 1-Maaual for Preparation of Data B-Maintenance or Test 2-Manual Sccas.

Entry Sheets for Licensee C-Refueling 3-Automatic Scram.

Event Report (LER) File (NUREG-D-Regulatory Restrictien 4-Continuation 1022)

E-Gperator Training 6 5-Lcad Reduction 5

License Examination 9-Other Exhibit I - Same Source F-Administrative G-Operational Error (Explain)

H-Other (Explain) l

... ~__.

^

DATE: June, 1992 REFUEldNG INFORt!ATION 1.

Name of facility:

Arkansam_ Nuclear one - Un11 2 2.

Scheduled date for next refueling shutdown.

September 4, 1992.

3.

Scheduled date for restart following refueling. October 26. 1992 4.

Will refueling or resumption of operation thercefter require a technical specification change or other license amendment? If answer is yes, what, in general, will there be? If answer is no, has the reload fuel' design and core configuration been reviewed by your Plant L

Safety Review Committee to determine whether any unreviewed safety

. questions are associated with the core reload (Ref. 10 CFR Section

'50.59)?.

No Technical Specification changes or license amendments are anticipated as a result of the reload.

However, changes due_to-other-issues such as RCS pressure reduction, containment pressure changnout, steam generator sleeving, and ECCS analy_sie assumptions are anticipated.

--5.

Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action and supporting information.

July, 1992 If required 64 I,nportant licensing considerations associated with refueling, e.g., new or different. fuel; design or supplier, unreviewed design or performanca analysis methods, significant changes in fuel design, new operating L

. procedures, p

None-

7..

The number of fuel assemblies (a) in the core and (b) in the spent fuel p

storage pool, a) 177 b) 489 l'
8. -

The present licensed spent fuel pool stotage capacity and the size of f-Jany increase in. licensed storage capacity that has been requested or is L

planned in number of. fuel assemblies.

I prescut 988 increase size by.0

=9.

. The projected date of the last refueling that can be discharged to the p

spent fuel pool assuming the present licensed capacity.

L.

l DATE: 1997 (Loss of fu11 core offload capability)-

M b

t-'

-'W tr7 m

v 4-4

.m m

.