0CAN089803, Forwards fitness-for-duty Program Performance Data for Jan-June 1998
| ML20237D219 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 08/20/1998 |
| From: | Vandergrift J ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| 0CAN089803, CAN89803, NUDOCS 9808250163 | |
| Download: ML20237D219 (6) | |
Text
_
.m Entergy Operations, Inc.
[.
[
1448 S.R. 333 RusselMle, AR 72801 Tel 501858 5000 10CFR26.71(d)
August 20,1998 OCAN089803 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Mail Station OPI-17 Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
Arkansas Nuclear One - Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-313 and 50-368 License Nos. DPR-51 and NPF-6 Fitness-For-Duty Performance Data Gentlemen:
In accordance with 10CFR26.71(d), attached is the Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO) fitness-for-duty (FFD) program performance data for the period January - June 1998.
V Truly Yours, /
i D. Vanderg Director, Nuclear Safety JDV/SLP Attachments p.
' ]\\
W 9808250163 980820 PDR ADOCK 05000313 R
U. S. NRC August 20,1998 OCAN089803 Page 2 1
cc:
Mr. Ellis Merschoff Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-8064 l
NRC Senior Resident Inspector Arkansas Nuclear One l
P.O. Box 310 London, AR72847 Mr. William D. Reckley NRR Project Manager Region IV/ANO 1 & 2 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRR Mail Stop 13-H-3 i
One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852 l
l l'
l l
t
Attachment to OCAN089803 Page1of4 FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA PERSONNEL SUBJECT TO 10CFR26 Entergy Operations, Inc. - Arkansas Nuclear One June 30,1998 Company 6 Month Ending 1448 S. R. 333, Russellville, AR 72801-0137 Location Steve Kaufmann, Coordinator, FFD (501) 858-7846 Contact Name 1" sone Cutoffs: Screen / Confirmation (ng/ml)
O Appendix A to 10CFR26 Marijuana 50/15 Amphetamine 1000/500 N/A N/A Cocaine 300/150 Phencyclidine 25/25 N/A N/A Opiates 300/300 Alcohol (%BAC) 0.04 %
N/A N/A Testing Results Licensee Employees Long-Term Contractor Short Term Personnel Contractor Personnel Average Number with 1226 N/A 717 Unescorted Access
- Tested
- Positive
- Tested
- Positive
- Tested
- Positive Categories Pre-Access 47 0
N/A N/A 1175 15/9 For-Cause 1
0 N/A N/A 0
0 Post Accident For-Cause 2
1/0 N/A N/A 1
1/0 Observed Behavior Random 341 0
N/A N/A 173 1/2 Follow-up 21 0
N/A N/A 4
0 Other 0
0 N/A N/A 5
0 Total 412 1/0 N/A N/A 1358 17/11 I
i
N N
N N
SE A
A A
A C
4
/
/
/
/
N N
N N
NA A
A A
A 3
/
/
/
/
T N
N N
N SB A
A A
A 2
/
/
/
/
U N
N N
N S
C A
A A
A 1
/
/
/
/
I N
N N
N F
I l
t C
a s s e A
uT 0
/
4 4
E fe o N
P RT S
l R
o h
A o
0
/
5 5
O c
N l
F 8
A S
9 e
T 9
n id S
1 n
A i
E e
y 0
/
0 0
l c
N T
n ne h
E u
P V
J I
e.
T y
A I
m-S r
1
/
3 4
N O
a f
P u
ii i
i n
A D
a E
J se A
t M
a 0
/
1 1
ip N
R O
I F
e n
A N
i a
0
/
0 0
co N
O C
C a
F n
au A
2 2
O j
0
/
1 1
/
/
N 9
9 i
r N
M a
W O
D K
s s
r r
o o
o3 A
t t
0 s
c c
t e
a a
t 8 4 E
n e
r r
e9f y
t t
m0 0 R
8 o
n n
o o
lp C
C hN 2 B
m c
n m
e aAg E
n r
t Ca e
e e
tAOP T-T-
esn g
t l
t a
e n
o t
c o
h o
iL L
S T
l.
l Attachment to OCAN089803 Page 3 of4 l
l
SUMMARY
OF MANAGEMENT ACTIONS GeneralInformation During the first 6-month period of 1998, the average population granted unescorted access at ANO was 1943 individuals. A total of 514 random drug tests were performed during the testing period which equated to a random testing rate of 26.5%.
There were 1770 individuals drug tested from which 31 substances were confirmed as positive.
Including 4 refusals, the testing failure rate (% positive) was 1.98%.
When interpreting the overall results, note that two individuals confirmed positive for more than one substance, and one of the four individuals who refused a drug screen also first confirmed positive for alcohol. 'Although the number ofindividuals remained fixed, for reporting substances this situation resulted in counting three additional positives.
There were five (5) for-cause drug tests. Two Entergy employees had negative test results and one of them was referred for a management mandated EAP evaluation. A third Entergy employee showed presence of a substance and a fourth confirmed positive for a substance. They were both referred for mandatory EAP evaluation. One had previously been a temporary foreman, but not during the period under investigation. A contractor confirmed positive for two substances, was denied access, and referred to his management.
Four (4) contractors refused drug testing. After a posnive alcohol test during pre-access testing, one individual then refused to provide a urine sample for chemical testing. A second individual during pre-access testing provided an unacceptably low temperature urine sample and refused to l
provide a second sample. A third individual during in-processing refused to cooperate and provide a for cause test specimen. The founh individual, which already had unescorted access, l
was required to report to FFD and submit a for cause specimen due to supervisory concerns; the individual refused to cooperate and left site.
l.
One of the suspicious samples investigated on a contractor resulted in an ANO policy violation L
when Limit ofDetection (LOD) testing confirmed the presence of an illegal substance.
I Pronram Initiatives l
Plans were initiated with Human Resources to clarify overlapping areas of responsibility for EAP issues and to construct a teaching module that better prepares supervisors when faced with decisions about employee behavior.
l
Attochment to OCAN089803 Page 4 of 4 An improvement for dipstick testing suspicious and presumptive positive samples was made in March.- In addition to testing nitrates, newly purchased AdultaCheck strips test for creatine, glutaraldehyde, and pH.
Appeals During this period there were three appeals all of which were denied.
NRC Reportable Events There were no FFD events that met the NRC 24-hour telephonic reporting requirement.
l l
l t
l l
l I
4