0CAN040803, Units 1 and 2, Fitness-for-Duty Performance Data
| ML081070121 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 04/15/2008 |
| From: | James D Entergy Operations |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| 0CAN040803 | |
| Download: ML081070121 (6) | |
Text
0CAN040803 April 15, 2008 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001
Subject:
Fitness-for-Duty Performance Data Arkansas Nuclear One - Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-313 and 50-368 License Nos. DPR-51 and NPF-6
Dear Sir or Madam:
In accordance with 10CFR26.71(d), attached is the revised Arkansas Nuclear One Fitness-for-Duty Program performance data for the period January - June 2007. The attachment was revised to correct a clerical error in the Short-Term Contractor Personnel column for the total number tested positive. The previous submittal stated 4 when the actual total was 5.
There are no new commitments contained in this submittal.
Sincerely, Dale E. James Manager, Licensing DEJ/dce Attachment Entergy Operations, Inc.
1448 S.R. 333 Russellville, AR 72802 Tel 479-858-4619 Dale E. James Manager, Licensing
0CAN040803 Page 2 cc:
Elmo Collins Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-8064 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Arkansas Nuclear One P.O. Box 310 London, AR 72847 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Alan B. Wang Mail Stop O-7 D1 One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Attachment to 0CAN040803 Fitness-for-Duty Program Performance Data
CL-021 Rev. 1 FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA PERSONNEL SUBJECT TO 10CFR26 Entergy Operations, Inc.
June 30, 2007 Company 6 Months Ending Arkansas Nuclear One Location S. A. Kaufmann, Security Coordinator (479) 858-7846 Contact Name Phone (Include Area Code)
Cutoffs: Screen / Confirmation Appendix A to 10CFR26 Marijuana 100 and 50 / 15 Amphetamines 1000 / 500 N / A
/
Cocaine 300 / 150 Phencyclidine 25 / 25 N / A
/
Opiates 300 / 300 Alcohol (%BAC) 0.04%
N / A
/
Testing Results Licensee Employees Long-Term Contractor Personnel Short-Term Contractor Personnel Average Number with Unescorted Access 979.52 N / A 295.50 Categories Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre-Access 41 0
N / A N / A 520 4
For-Cause (Post accident) 0 0
N / A N / A 1
0 For-Cause (Behavior) 0 0
N / A N / A 1
1 Random 327 0
N / A N / A 149 0
Follow-Up 4
0 N / A N / A 7
0 Other 8
0 N / A N / A 10 0
Total 380 1
N / A N / A 688 5
CL-021 Rev. 1 BREAKDOWN OF CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS FOR SPECIFIC SUBSTANCES January - June 2007 Marijuana Cocaine Opiates Amphetamines Phencyclidine Alcohol Refusal to Test 1
2 3
4 5
Licensee Employees 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
N / A N / A N / A N / A N / A Long-Term Contractor N / A N / A N / A N / A N / A N / A N / A N / A N / A N / A N / A N / A Short-Term Contractor 0/2 0
0 2
0 0
1 N / A N / A N / A N / A N / A Total 0/2 0
0 2
0 0
1 N / A N / A N / A N / A N / A 3/2
CL-021 Rev. 1 June 2007 PROGRAM
SUMMARY
The ANO annual random testing rate is 50 percent. During this reporting period, approximately 26.85 percent of the population has been randomly tested. The rate of positive tests from random testing during this period is 0.0 percent.
POSITIVE RESULTS:
During the 6 month reporting period, employees and contractors submitted 1068 samples for collection and testing. Four confirmed positive for illegal drugs. One contractor refused to test.
MANAGEMENT ACTIONS:
Two contractors submitted pre-access samples that tested positive for marijuana at the Entergy cut-off level and were denied unescorted access. Two contractors submitted pre-access samples that tested positive for amphetamines. All four contractors were denied unescorted access. Another contractor refused to submit to a behavioral for cause test and his unescorted access was revoked.
EVENTS REPORTED TO THE NRC:
During this reporting period, the HHS certified drug testing laboratory returned a negative result on a positive blind QA specimen. However, the investigation determined that the content of the blind sample had degraded and the result from the laboratory was actually correct.
PROGRAM EVALUATION:
No programmatic problems were identified during this reporting period.