Letter Sequence Request |
|---|
|
Results
Other: ML14282A094, ML14282A102, ML14338A612, ML14343A883, ML15002A166, ML15051A282, ML15065A112, ML15111A411, ML15188A379, RA14-059, Applicants Environmental Report, Operating License Renewal Stage, Appendix C - End
|
MONTHYEARRS-12-084, Request for a License Amendment, Technical Specification 3.7.3, Ultimate Heat Sink2012-07-12012 July 2012 Request for a License Amendment, Technical Specification 3.7.3, Ultimate Heat Sink Project stage: Request ML12242A2742012-08-28028 August 2012 NRR E-mail Capture - Draft - LaSalle UHS LAR Supplement Request Project stage: Draft Approval ML12240A1942012-09-14014 September 2012 Supplemental Information Needed for Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Request for License Amendment to Technical Specification 3.7.3 Ultimate Heat Sink (TAC Nos. ME9076 and ME9077 Project stage: Acceptance Review ML12269A0732012-09-17017 September 2012 Attachment 3 - LaSalle County Station Calculation L-002457, Revision 7, LaSalle County Station Ultimate Heat Sink Analysis Project stage: Request ML12269A0192012-09-17017 September 2012 Attachment 2 - Heat Transfer Calculations Used to Develop Attachment 5 and Table A5-1 in the July 12, 2012, License Amendment Request Project stage: Request ML12277A1632012-10-22022 October 2012 Acceptance of Request for License Amendment to Technical Specification 3.7.3 Ultimate Heat Sink Project stage: Acceptance Review ML12320A4222013-01-0909 January 2013 Request for Additional Information Related to License Amendment to Technical Specification 3.7.3 Ultimate Heat Sink (ME9076 and ME9077) Project stage: RAI RS-13-002, Response to Request for Additional Information Related to License Amendment Request to Technical Specification 3.7.3, Ultimate Heat Sink2013-01-18018 January 2013 Response to Request for Additional Information Related to License Amendment Request to Technical Specification 3.7.3, Ultimate Heat Sink Project stage: Response to RAI RS-13-051, Additional Information Supporting License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.7.3, Ultimate Heat Sink2013-02-11011 February 2013 Additional Information Supporting License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.7.3, Ultimate Heat Sink Project stage: Request ML13099A2062013-06-27027 June 2013 Request for Additional Information Related to License Amendment Request to Technical Specification 3.7.3 Ultimate Heat Sink Project stage: RAI ML14030A0462014-02-20020 February 2014 Letter from Eric J. Leeds Supplemental Information Related to Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Seismic Hazard Reevaluations for Recommendation 2.1 Project stage: RAI ML14113A0902014-04-11011 April 2014 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Revision 20, Chapter 6.0, Engineered Safety Features Project stage: Request ML14196A3182014-07-17017 July 2014 Summary of June 11, 2014, Meeting with Exelon Generation Company, LLC Regarding LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2, License Amendment Request to Revise the Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limits Project stage: Meeting ML14282A0942014-10-22022 October 2014 Request to Withdraw Documents Related to the License Amendment Request to Revise the Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Project stage: Other ML14287A4782014-11-14014 November 2014 Request for Additional Information Regarding Request to Revise Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limits Project stage: RAI ML14282A1022014-12-0404 December 2014 Request to Withhold Information Related to the License Amendment Request to Revise the Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limits Project stage: Other RA14-059, Applicants Environmental Report, Operating License Renewal Stage, Appendix C - End2014-12-0909 December 2014 Applicants Environmental Report, Operating License Renewal Stage, Appendix C - End Project stage: Other ML14343A8832014-12-0909 December 2014 Applicants Environmental Report, Operating License Renewal Stage, Title Page - Appendix B Project stage: Other ML14338A6122014-12-16016 December 2014 Request for Additional Environmental Information Regarding Request to Revise Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limits Project stage: Other ML14352A1902014-12-18018 December 2014 7491-318563-HAO-1, Rev. 2, LaSalle Requested Documents Project stage: Request ML15002A1662015-01-0808 January 2015 Request to Withhold Information Related to the License Amendment Request to Revise the Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limits Project stage: Other RS-15-010, Response to Request for Additional Environmental Information Regarding Request to Revise Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limits2015-01-23023 January 2015 Response to Request for Additional Environmental Information Regarding Request to Revise Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limits Project stage: Request ML15051A2822015-02-18018 February 2015 NRR E-mail Capture - LaSalle UHS Amendment - Request for Withholding Project stage: Other 05000374/LER-2015-002, Regarding Two Main Steam Safety Relief Valves Failed Inservice Inspection Pressure Test2015-04-15015 April 2015 Regarding Two Main Steam Safety Relief Valves Failed Inservice Inspection Pressure Test Project stage: Request ML15111A4112015-05-15015 May 2015 Request to Withdraw Documents Related to the License Amendment Request to Revise the Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limits Project stage: Other ML15065A1122015-05-15015 May 2015 Denied Request to Withhold Information Related to the License Amendment Request to Revise the Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limits Project stage: Other ML15188A3792015-07-24024 July 2015 Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Related to Ultimate Heat Sink Modification (TAC Nos. ME9076 and ME9077)(RS-12-084) Project stage: Other ML15202A5782015-11-19019 November 2015 Issuance of Amendment to Revise the Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limits Project stage: Approval 2014-12-18
[Table View] |
LER-2015-002, Regarding Two Main Steam Safety Relief Valves Failed Inservice Inspection Pressure Test |
| Event date: |
|
|---|
| Report date: |
|
|---|
| Reporting criterion: |
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function |
|---|
| 3742015002R00 - NRC Website |
|
text
10 CFR 50.73 RA 15-010 April 15, 2015 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 LaSalle County Station, Unit 2 Facility Operating License No. NPF-18 NRC Docket No. 50-374
Subject:
Licensee Event Report 2015-002-00, Two Main Steam Safety Relief Valves Failed Inservice Inspection Pressure Test In accordance with 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Exelon Generation Company (EGC), LLC, is submitting Licensee Event Report Number 2015-002-00 for LaSalle County Station Unit 2.
There are no regulatory commitments in this letter. Should you have any questions concerning this report, please contact Mr. Guy V. Ford, Regulatory Assurance Manager, at (815) 415-2800.
Harold T. Vinyard Plant Manager LaSalle County Station
Enclosure:
Licensee Event Report cc:
Regional Administrator - NRC Region III NRC Senior Resident Inspector - LaSalle County Station
NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 01/31/2017 (02-2014)
Estimated burden per response to comply with this mandatory collection request: 80 hours9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br />.
Reported lessons learned are incorporated into the licensing process and fed back to industry.
Send comments regarding burden estimate to the FOIA, Privacy and Information Collections LICENSEE VENT REPORT (LER)
Branch (T-5 F53), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by il t l f ll i
R Offi f I f t
t d t h
D k Offi i
d e-ma o n oco esource nrc.gov, an ormat n erne ects.
o t e es
- cer, ce o n
on an (See Page 2 for required number of Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-10202, (3150-0104), Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC digits/characters for each block) 20503. If a means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection.
- 3. PAGE LaSalle County Station, Unit 2 05000374 1
OF 3
- 4. TITLE Two Main Steam Safety Relief Valves Failed Inservice Lift Inspection Pressure Test
- 5. EVENT DATE
- 6. LER NUMBER
- 7. REPORT DATE
- 8. OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR SEQUENTIAL NUMBER REV NO.
MONTH DAY YEAR FACILITY NAME N/A DOCKET NUMBER N/A 02 14 2015 2015 -
002 00 04 15 2015 FACILITY NAME N/A DOCKET NUMBER N/A
- 9. OPERATING MODE
- 11. THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO T HE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR §: (Check ail that apply) q 20.2201(b) q 20.2203(a)(3)(i) q 50.73(a)(2)(i)(C) q 50.73(a)(2)(vii) q 20.2201(d) q 20.2203(a)(3)(ii) q 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A) q 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 5 q 20.2203(a)(1) q 20.2203(a)(4) q 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B) q 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) q 20.2203(a)(2)(i) q 50.36(c)(1)(i)(A) q 50.73(a)(2)(iii) q 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A)
- 10. POWER LEVEL q 20.2203(a)(2)(ii) q 50.36(c)(1)(ii)(A) q 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A) q 50.73(a)(2)(x) q 20.2203(a)(2)(iii) q 50.36(c)(2) q 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A) q 73.71(a)(4) q 20.2203(a)(2)(iv) q 50.46(a)(3)(ii) q 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B) q 73.71 (a)(5) 000 q 20.2203(a)(2)(v) q 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A) q 50.73(a)(2)(v)(C) q OTHER q 20.2203(a)(2)(vi)
[I 50 73(a)(2)(i)(B) 73(a)(2)(v)(D)
El 50 Specify r
ct below or in orm m 366
- 12. LICENSEE CONTACT FOR T HIS LER LICENSEE CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include Area Code)
Andrew Schierer, Programs Engineering Manager 815-415-3846CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANU FACTURER REPORTABLE TO EPIX
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANU-FACTURER REPORTABLE TO EPIX
- 14. SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED
- 15. EXPECTED MONTH DAY YEAR YES (If yes, complete 15. EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE)
F] NO SUBMISSION 07 17 2015 ABSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines)
During the February 2015 Unit 2 refueling outage L2R1 5, two main steam safety relief valves (SRV) did not pass Technical Specification Surveillance Requirement 3.4.4.1 and Inservice Testing Program lift pressure requirements.
Both SRVs lifted below their expected lift pressures. SRV 2B21-F013S was required to lift within plus or minus three percent of 1150 psi (i.e., 1150 psi plus or minus 34.5 psi) and actually lifted at 1099 psi. SRV 2B21-F013M was required to lift within plus or minus three percent of 1195 psi (i.e., 1195 psi plus or minus 35.8 psi) and actually lifted at 1145 psi.
Both SRVs were replaced during the outage. The cause of the event is under review by the vendor testing laboratory, and will be reported in a supplement to this LER upon completion.
NRC FORM 366 (02-2014)
LaSalle County Station Unit 2 is a General Electric Company Boiling Water Reactor with 3546 Megawatts Rated Core Thermal Power.
A.
CONDITION PRIOR TO EVENT
Unit(s): 2 Event Date: February 14, 2015 Event Time: 1530 CST Reactor Mode(s): 5 Mode(s) Name: Refueling Power Level: 0%
B.
DESCRIPTION OF EVENT
During the February 2015 Unit 2 refueling outage L2R15, two main steam safety relief valves (SRV)[AD] did not pass Technical Specification (TS) Surveillance Requirement 3.4.4.1 and Inservice Testing Program lift pressure requirements. Both SRVs lifted below their expected lift pressures. SRV 2B21-F013S was required to lift within plus or minus three percent of 1150 psi (i.e., 1150 psi plus or minus 34.5 psi), but actually lifted at 1099 psi. SRV 2821-F013M was required to lift within plus or minus three percent of 1195 psi (i.e., 1195 psi plus or minus 35.8 psi), but actually lifted at 1145 psi.
This condition was discovered while Unit 2 was outside the mode of applicability for TS 3.4.4, Safety/Relief Valves (Modes 1, 2 and 3); however, multiple test failures are reportable under 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B) as an operation or condition prohibited by the plant's Technical Specifications.
C.
CAUSE OF EVENT
The cause of the event is under review by the testing facility vendor and will be reported in a supplement to this LER upon completion.
D.
SAFETY ANALYSIS
The safety significance of this condition was minimal. The out-of-tolerance lift pressures were discovered while the plant was in Mode 5 during a refueling outage and the SRVs were not required to be operable. Both SRVs lifted prior to their expected lift pressures, which is conservative in regards to maintaining reactor pressure vessel overpressure limits.
The cause of the event is under review by the vendor testing facility. Upon completion of the review, the cause will be evaluated for any potential safety concerns and will be reported in a supplement to this LER.
E.
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
Both SRVs were replaced during the outage.
The cause of the event was placed under review by the vendor testing laboratory.
F.
PREVIOUS OCCURRENCES
A review of past events identified no reportable occurrences of out-of-tolerance safety relief valve pressures in the previous ten years.
G. COMPONENT FAILURE DATA
Crosby Safety Relief Valves for Main Steam Service, Style HB-65-BP, Size 6R10. ASME Section III, Class I
|
|---|
|
|
| | | Reporting criterion |
|---|
| 05000374/LER-2015-001, Regarding High Pressure Core Spray Inoperable Due to Division 3 Diesel Generator Cooling Water Pump Casing Leak | Regarding High Pressure Core Spray Inoperable Due to Division 3 Diesel Generator Cooling Water Pump Casing Leak | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000373/LER-2015-001, Regarding Secondary Containment Inoperable Due to Interlock Doors Open | Regarding Secondary Containment Inoperable Due to Interlock Doors Open | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(8) | | 05000374/LER-2015-002, Regarding Two Main Steam Safety Relief Valves Failed Inservice Inspection Pressure Test | Regarding Two Main Steam Safety Relief Valves Failed Inservice Inspection Pressure Test | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000373/LER-2015-002, Regarding Valve Control Power Breaker-Fuse Coordination Issue Results in Unanalyzed Condition | Regarding Valve Control Power Breaker-Fuse Coordination Issue Results in Unanalyzed Condition | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(b)(2)(ii)(B) | | 05000374/LER-2015-003, Regarding Reactor Recirculation Loop Discharge Isolation Valve Vent Line Leak Due to Weld Defect | Regarding Reactor Recirculation Loop Discharge Isolation Valve Vent Line Leak Due to Weld Defect | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(B) | | 05000373/LER-2015-003, Regarding Secondary Containment Inoperable Due to Interlock Doors Open | Regarding Secondary Containment Inoperable Due to Interlock Doors Open | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) |
|