ML18204A120
| ML18204A120 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 03018363 |
| Issue date: | 07/10/2018 |
| From: | Piskura D A NRC/RGN-III |
| To: | Brownell L State of MO, Dept of Transportation |
| References | |
| IR 2018002 | |
| Download: ML18204A120 (2) | |
Text
NRC FORM 591M PART 1 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (07-2012) 10CFR2.201 SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT AND COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
- 1. LICENSEE/LOCATION INSPECTED:
Missouri Department of Transportation 105 West Capital Avenue P.O. Box270 Jefferson City, MO 65102 REPORT NUMBER(S) 2018002 3. DOCKET NUMBER(S) 030-18363 LICENSEE:
- 2. NRG/REGIONAL OFFICE 4. LICENSE NUMBER(S) 24-20415-01 Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210 Lisle, IL 60532-4352
- 5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION July JO, 2018 The inspection was an examination of the activities conducted under your license as they relate to radiation safety and to compliance with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRG) rules and regulations and the conditions of your license. The inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.
The inspection findings are as follows: Based on the inspection findings, no violations were identified.
~1. D 2. Previous violation(s) closed. D 3. D 4. The violations(s), specifically described to you by the inspector as non-cited violations, are not being cited because they wen~ self-identified, non-repetitive, and corrective action was or is being taken, and the remaining criteria in the NRG Enforcement Policy, to exercise discretion, were satisfied.
Non-cited violation(s) were discussed involving the following requirement(s):
During this inspection, certain of your activities, as described below and/or attached, were in violation of NRG requirements and are being cited in accordance with NRG Enforcement Policy. This form is a NOTICE OF VIOLATION, which may be subject to posting in accordance with 10 CFR 19.11. (Violations and Corrective Actions) Statement of Corrective Actions I hereby state that, within 30 days, the actions described by me to the Inspector will be taken to correct the violations identified.
This statement of corrective actions is made in accordance with the requirements of 1 O CFR 2.201 (corrective steps already taken, corrective steps which will be taken, date when full compliance will be achieved).
I understand that no further written response to NRG will be required, unless specifically requested.
TITLE PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE DA TE LICENSEE'S REPRESENTATIVE NRG INSPECTOR BRANCH CHIEF Deborah A. Piskura, Senior Health Physicist Aaron T. McCraw, Chief, MIB NRC FORM 591M PART 1 (07-2012)
I ,
NRC FORM 591M PART 3 (07-2012) 10 CFR 2.201 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Docket File Information SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT AND COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
- 1. LICENSEE/LOCATION INSPECTED:
Missouri Department of Transportation 105 West Capital A venue P.O. Box270 Jefferson City, MO 65102 REPORT NUMBER(S) 2018002 3. DOCKET NUMBER(S) 030-18363
- 6. INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED 87124 2. NRG/REGIONAL OFFICE 4. LICENSE NUMBER(S) 24-20415-01 Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210 Lisle, IL 60532-4352
- 5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION July 10, 2018 7. INSPECTION FOCUS AREAS 03.01 -03.07 SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTION INFORMATION
- 1. PROGRAM CODE(S) 03121 2. PRIORITY 5 D Main Office Inspection
- 3. LICENSEE CONTACT Lydia Brownell, RSO Next Inspection Date: [{] Field Office Inspection St. Charles, St. Louis & Chesterfield, MO D Temporary Job Site Inspection
- 4. TELEPHONE NUMBER (573) 406-7985 no change --------------------
PROGRAM SCOPE This was a routine, unannounced inspection (in continuation of inspection efforts of IR 2018001) of a large state government DOT agency authorized to use portable moisture/density gauges for road construction projects.
The licensee was authorized by License Condition 10 to designate and maintain a list of its field offices in the State of Missouri.
This inspection reviewed the licensee's field offices in St. Louis, Chesterfield and St. Charles. Each field office had a designated individual who served as the local RSO. The licensee did not perform any service or maintenance activities on its gauges; these services were performed by the manufacturer.
Each gauge unit was stored utilizing two barriers in accordance with the requirements in 10 CFR paragraph 30.34(i).
Gauge users were issued the keys to the gauges from the respective field office RSO. Each gauge user must also complete the utilization out sheet which informed the office of the location of the job site where the device would be used. The licensee specifically instructed the gauge users not the leave the device unattended while at a job site. Gauges were also required to be returned to the office upon completion of the shift. During this inspection, the NRC inspector toured the storage area at each field office where the gauges were kept when not in use; performed radiation surveys around the devices; reviewed selected records; and interviewed selected licensee personnel.
The gauge users confirmed that the shipping papers were visible and within reach during transport.
The gauge users informed the inspector how the devices were blocked and braced in the rear of the vehicle and confirmed that the devices were not transported within the passenger compartment.
At the time of this inspection, the gauges were not in use therefore, no field inspection was performed.
No violations ofNRC requirements were identified during this inspection.
NRC FORM 591M PART 3 (07-2012)