ML17332A823

From kanterella
Revision as of 06:04, 4 June 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises That Safety Review of Proposed Cancellation of Commitment Re Blocked Alarms Concluded That Cancellation Would Be Beneficial & Prudent & Therefore Justified
ML17332A823
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 06/26/1995
From: FITZPATRICK E
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
AEP:NRC:00106B, AEP:NRC:106B, NUDOCS 9507030124
Download: ML17332A823 (5)


Text

PRIORZTY1(ACCELERATEDRZDSPROCESSING)REGULATORYINFORMATIONDISTRIBUTIONSYSTEM(RIDS)ACCESSIONNBR:9507030124DOC.DATE:95/06/26NOTARIZED:NODOCKETFACIL:50-315DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit1,IndianaM05000315P'0-316DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit2,IndianaM05000316AUTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATIONFITZPATRICK,E.IndianaMichiganPowerCo.(formerlyIndiana&MichiganEleRECIP.NAMERECIPIENTAFFILIATIONDocumentControlBranch(DocumentControlDesk)I

SUBJECT:

Advisesthatsafetyreviewofproposedcancellationofcommitmentreblockedalarmsconcludedthat,cancellationwouldbebeneficial:&prudent&thereforejustified.DISTRIBUTIONCODE:AOOIDCOPIESRECEIVED:LTRJENCL.~SIZE:TITLE:ORSubmittal:GeneralDistributionNOTES:RECIPIENTIDCODE/NAMEPD3-1LAHICKMAN,JINTERNAL:~P~~E~R01HRR/DRCH/HICBNRR/DSSA/SRXBOGC/HDS2IEXTERNAL:NOACCOPIESLTTRENCL111.1RECIPIENTIDCODE/NAMEPD3-1PDNRR/DE/EMCBNRR/DSSA/SPLBNUDOCS-ABSTRACTNRCPDRCOPIESLTTRENCLY,DNNOTETOALL"RIDS"RECIPZENTS:PLEASEHELPUSTOREDUCEWASTE!CONTACTTHEDOCUMENTCONTROLDESK,ROOMOWFNSD8(415-2083)TOELIMINATEYOURNAMEFROMDISTRIBUTIONLISTSFORDOCUMENTSYOUDON'TNEED!c3TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:LTTR12ENCL S\I~550P4i'ItIUl IndianaMichiganPowerCompanyP.O.Box16631Coiumbus,OH43216June26,1995AEP'NRC:00106BDocketNos.50-31550-316U.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionATTN:DocumentControlDeskWashington,D.C.20555Gentlemen:DonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2NOTIFICATIONOFCANCELLEDCOMMITMENTONBLOCKINGALARMSThislettersupersedesletterAEP:NRC:00106A,datedJune12,1995,whichwasanearlierversionoftheletterstoredinthecomputer,printed,andmailedinerror.Itisworthnotingthatneithertheinitialconditionsnortheendpointincludedinthesuperseded00106Aarealteredbythisrevisedsubmittal.Weregretanyinconveniencethiserrormaycause.Duringreviewofaproposedchangetoaplantprocedureregardingactionstobetakeninresponsetoblockedcontrolroomalarms,acommitmentmadetotheNRCseventeenyearsagowasuncovered.Ourevaluationfoundthat,whilethecommitmenthadbeensatisfiedintheplantproceduresatthattime,thecurrentprocedurerevisionwasnotinfull,literalcompliancewiththeoriginalcommitment.Actualcurrentplantpracticewas,however,consideredtobeequivalentorsuperiortotheintentofthecommitment.Thepurposeofthisletter,therefore,istoinformyouofourplantocancelthepreviouscommitment.Specifically,thepreviouscommitmentwasmadeinresponsetoaNoticeofViolationfromIEInspectionReportsNo.50-315/78-27and50-316/78-31.Inthosereports,afindingidentifiedthatthelowtemperaturealarminthecontrolroomfortheUnit2RWSTwasblockedwithoutbeingapprovedorlogged.AEPSCrespondedtothisNoticeofViolationonDecember21,1978,inletterAEP:NRC:00106.TheinitialcorrectiveactionincludedaproceduralrequirementthattheUnitSupervisor,whoisinchargeoftheControlRoom,removeallblockedalarmspriortoturningovertotherelievingshift.Thepracticeinrecentyearshasbeentorequiremorethoroughtechnicalreviewanddocumentationforblockedalarms.Thetechnicalreviewsareindependentlyverifiedaspartofthedocumentationprocess.Thenumberofproblemalarmsisalso9507030124950b2bPDRADOCK05000315PPDR U.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionPage2AEP:NRC:00106BfollowedbyplantmanagementandbyAEPSCrepresentativesinamorningstatusmeeting.Inaddition,the1995AEPNOProductionWorkPlan-PerformanceStandardsspecifythathighprioritystandingannunciatorsbeclearedwithin14daysduringoperation,andwithin14daysofparallelfollowingoutages.Theincreasedattentionbymanagement,aswellasbythesystemengineersatCookNuclearPlant,andthe"fulldeck"equipmentoperatingphilosophy,hasgenerallyresultedinfewerblockedalarms,forshorterperiods,thanexistedatthetimetheoriginalcommitmentwasmadein1978.Theoverallmanagementofalarmshassignificantlyimproved,withoutdependenceonthecommitmentthatwillbecancelled.BothCookNuclearPlantunitcontrolroomsoperatedwithoutasingleannunciatorlitonApril16,1995.Thisisthefirsttimethatthisperformancemeasurewasachievedintheoperatinghistoryoftheplant.Reachingthisoperatingrecordisevidenceoftheeffectivenessofourpoliciesonannunciatoralarmsandunderlyingdesign,engineering,andmaintenanceissues.ThecommitmentwemadeinAEP:NRC:00106,datedDecember21,1978,concerningblockedalarmsisnotneededandcanbecancelled.Underourcurrentpractice,theUnitSupervisorreviewsalistofthecurrentlyblockedalarmspriortocomingondutyeachshift.Technicalreviewsarealsoperformedwhenanalarmisblocked,underourcurrentpractice.Regularoversightofblockedalarmsbymanagementandsystemengineersprovidesadditionalassuranceofsafeoperation.InaccordancewithourproceduresandNRCregulations,asafetyreviewwascompletedfortheproposedcancellationofthiscommitment.Thissafetyreviewconcludedthatthechangewouldbebeneficialandprudentandwouldhavenodeleteriouseffectonthehealthandsafetyofthepublic.Therefore,basedupontheabovereview,webelievethatthereistechnicaljustificationtosupportcancellationofthecurrentcommitment.

U.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionPage3AEP'NRC'00106BAsaresultofourreview,webelievethatthecancellationofthecommitmentwillresultincontinuedeffectivecontrolofblockedalarms.Sincerely,E.E.FitzpatrickVicePresidentcadCC:A.A.BlindG.CharnoffJ.B.Martin-RegionIIINFEMSectionChiefNRCResidentInspectorJ.R.Padgett