ML20249B940
| ML20249B940 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah  |
| Issue date: | 06/18/1998 |
| From: | Collins S NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20249B941 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9806250078 | |
| Download: ML20249B940 (6) | |
Text
-
~
7590-01-P UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION in the Matter of
)
)
Tennessee Valley Authority
)
Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328
)
Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2
)
CONFIRMATORY ORDER MODIFYING LICENSE A
EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY 1.
Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA, or the Licensee) is the holder of Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-77 and DPR-79, which authorizes operation of Sequoyah TJuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 located in Hamilton County, Tennessee.
1 II.
The staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has been concemed that Thermo-Lag 330-1 fire barrier systems installed by licensees may not provide the level of fire endurance intended and that licensees that use Thermo-Lag 330-1 fire barriers may not be meeting regulatory requirements. During the 1992 to 1994 t{meframe, the NRC staff issued Generic Letter (GL) 92-08, "Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Barriers" and subsequent requests for additional information that requested licensees to submit plans and schedules for resolving the Thermo-Lag issue. The NRC staff has obtained and reviewed all licensees' corrective plans and schedules. The staff is concerned that some licensees may not be making adequate i
progress toward resolving the plant-specific issues, and that some implementation schedults may be either too tenuous or too protracted. For example, severai licensees informed the NRC 9806250078 980618 l
l PDR ADOCK 05000327 l
P.
PDR_
o
-q 2
staff that their completion dates had slipped by 6 months to as much as 3 years. For plants that have completion action scheduled beyond 1997, including Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, the NRC staff has met with the licensees to discuss the progress of the licensees' corrective actions and the extent of licensee management attention regarding completion of Thermo-Lag corrective actions. In addition, the NRC staff discussed with licensees the possibility of accelerating their completion schedules.
TVA was one of the licensees with which the NRC staff held meetings. At the May 30, 1997, meeting, the NRC staff reviewed with TVA the schedule of Thermo-Lag corrective actions for the Sequoyah units described in the handout presented to the NRC during that meeting.
Based on the information provided during the meeting, as well as a subsequent letter dated June 25,1997, the NRC staff has concluded that the schedules presented by TVA are reasonable. This conclusion is based on (1) the amount of installed Thermo-Lag, (2) the complexity of the plant-specific fire barrier configurations and issues, (3) the need to perform I
certain plant modifications during outages as opposed to those that can be performed while the 1
)
plant is at power, and (4) integration with other significant, but unrelated issues that TVA is addressing at its plant. In order to remove compensatory measures such as fire watches, it has l
been determined that resolution of the Thermo-Lag corrective actions by TVA must be 1
- completed in accordance with current schedules. By letter dated April 29,1998, the NRC staff notified WA of its plan to incorporate WA's schedule commitment into a requirement by l
issuance of an order and requestod consent from the Licensee. By letter dated May 13,1998, TVA provided its consent to issuance of a Confirmatory Order.
Ill.
The Licensee's commitment as set forth in its letter of May 13,1998, is acceptable and is necessary for the NRC to conclude that public health and safety are reasonably assured.
1 1
= _ _. = ~
i 3
To preclude any schedule slippage and to assure public health and safety the NRC staff has determined that the Licensee's commitment in its May 13,1998, letter be confirmed by this Order. The Licensee has agreed to this action. Based on the above, and the Licensee's consent, this Order is immediately effective upon issuance.
IV.
Accordingly, pursuant to sections 103,161b,1611,161o,182, and 186 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's regulations in 10 CFR 2.202 and 10 CFR Part 50, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, effective immediately, that:
The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) shall complete final Implementation of Thermo-Lag 330-1 fire barrier corrective actions at the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 as described in the TVA submittal dated June 25,1997. Walkdowns, evaluations, and upgrades will be completed by June 30,1999.
The Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, may relax or rescind, in writing, any l
provisions of this Confirmatory Order upon a showing by the Licensee of good cause.
V.
Any person adversely affected by this Confirmatory drder, other than the Licensee, may request a hearing within 20 days of its issuance. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the time to request a hearing. A request for extension of time must be made in writing to the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, and include a statement of good cause for the extension. Any request for a hearing shall be submitted to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff, Washington, D.C.
. 20555. Copies of the hearing request shall also be sent to the Director, Office of Nuclear
~ -
u..w a.-
- =- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4 Reactor Regulation, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D. C. 20555, to the Deputy Assistant General Counsel for Enforcement at the same address, to the Regional Administrator, NRC Region ll at the Atlanta Federal Center,23 T85,61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3415, tnd to the Licensee. If such a person requests a hearing, that person shall set forth with particularity the manner in which his/her interest is adversely affected by this Order and shall address criteria set forth in 10 CFR 2.714(d).
If a hearing is requested by a person whose interest is adversely affected, the Commission willissue an Order designating the time and place of any such hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to be considered at such hearing shall be whether this Confirmatory.
Order should be sustained.
In the absence of any request for hearing, or written approval of an extension of time in which to request a hearing, the provisions specified in Section IV above shall be final 20 days from the date of this Order without further order or proceedings. If an extension of time for requesting a hearing has been approved, the provisions specified in Section IV shall be final when the extension expires if a hearing request has not been received. An answer or a request for hearing shall not stay the immediate effectiveness of this Order.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMM;0S:O.N a
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 18thday of June 1998 t
4 Utne 15,1998 Reactor Regulation, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D. C. 20555, to the Deputy Assistant General Counsel for Enforcernent at the same address, to the Regional Administrator, NRC Region ll at the Atlanta Federal Center,23 T85,61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3415, and to the Licensee. If such a person requests a hearing, that person shall set forth with particularity the manner in which his/her interest is adversely affected by this Order and shall address criteria set forth in 10 CFR 2.714(d).
If a hearing is requested by a person whose interest is adversely affected, the Commission viillissue an Order designating the time and place of any such hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to be considered at such hearing shall be whether this Confirmatory Order should be sustained.
In the absence of any request for hearing, or written approval of an extension of time ir, which to request a hearing, the provisions specified in Section IV above shall be final 20 days from the date of this Order without further order or proceedings. If an extension of time for requesting a hearing has been approved, the provisions specified in Section IV shall be final when the extension expires if a hearing request has not been received. An answer or a request for hearing shall not stay the immediate effectiveness of this Order.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Originals!gnedby SamuelJ.Comns Samuel J. Collins, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Dated at Rockville, Maryland this day of June 1998
- See previous Concurrence OFC PM:PD ll-3 LA:PD 11-3 PD:PD 11-3 D:DRPE(A)*
OGC l
NAME RHernan*
BClayton*
FHebdon*
JZwolinski*
RHoefling*
DATE 6/1/98 6/1 C 6/8/98 6/8/98 6/11/98 OFC ADPR(A) # [D:
/
BBoger [b M
l NAME l
DATE 6/ /f/98 6/h ;98 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY w
4 June 15,1998 Reactor Regulation, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D. C. 20555, to the Deputy Assistant General Counsel for Enforcemer.t at the same address, to the Regional Administrator, NRC Region il at the Atlanta Federal Center,23 T85,61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3415, and to the Licensee, if such a person requests a hearing, that person shall set forth with particularity the manner in which his/her interest is adversely affected by this Order and shall address criteria set forth in 10 CFR 2.714(d).
If a hearing is requested by a person whose interest is adversely affected, the Commission willissue an Order designating the time and place of any such hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to be considered at such hearing shall be whether this Confirmatory Order should be sustained.
In the absence of any request for hearing, or written approval of an extension of time in which to request a hearing, the provisions specified in Section IV above shall be final 20 days from the date of this Order without further order or proceedings. If an extension of time for requesting a hearing has been approved, the provisions specified in Section IV shall be final when the extension expires if a hearing request has not been received. An answer or a request for hearing shall not stay the immediate effectiveness of this Order.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I
originaisionedby SamuelJ.Colfins Samuel J. Collins, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Dated at Rockville, Maryland this day of June 1998
- See previous Concurrence OFC PM:PD ll-3 LA:PD 11-3 PD:PD 11-3 D:DRPE(A)*
OGC NAME RHarnan*
BClayton*
FHebdon*
JZwolinski*
RHoefling*
DATE 6/1/98 6/1 C 6/8/98 6/8/98 6/11/98 OFC ADPR(A) / (D:
/
BBoger h l
NAME i
DATE 6/ /f/98 6/h /98 i
l OFF CIAL RECORD COPY l
l l
,____-____________m________