ML052570419
| ML052570419 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 09/22/2003 |
| From: | NRC Region 1 |
| To: | |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2004-0314, RI-2002-A-0113 | |
| Download: ML052570419 (1) | |
Text
g:kalleg\\panel\\20020113arb6.wpd ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DISPOSITION RECORD Allegation No.: RI-2002-A-0113 Branch Chief (AOC): Meyer Site/Facility: Salem & Hope Creek Acknowledged: Yes ARB Date: 9/22/03 Confidentiality Granted: No Issue discussed: The alleger was originally concerned with his ability to perform duties in accordance with the Transient Assessment Response Plan (TARP) team formation procedure. When contacted by 01 he chose not be interviewed and stated that he would try to resolve his concerns within the PSEG corrective action process. The NRC issued a conditional closeout letter to the alleger stating that the NRC will consider this allegation closed unless he contacts us within 30 days of the date of the letter. He did contact NRC in a November 20, 2002, letter and stated that he wanted the NRC to keep the issue open.
In a telephone call and subsequent letter dated 12/20102, the alleger wanted the NRC to pursue his H&l claim and wanted to address the TARP issue.
DRP reviewed a 2/19103 01 transcript (previously completed) and the final 01 Report (01 Case no.1-2003-010) and did not identify any new technical issues. In their final report, 01 did not substantiate that H&l took place.
In a 9/2/03 information package, the alleger indicated that PSEG is showing a continuing pattern of discrimination since he/she is taking medication that precludes him/her from being on the TARP team (Medical Department at PSEG is aware) but yet the individual received an unsatisfactory mid-year performance appraisal on 8/28/03.
Alleger contacted prior to referral to licensee (if applicable)?
Yes ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DECISIONS Attendees: Chair - Crleniak Branch Chief (AOC) - Barber SAC - Vito, Harrison 01 Rep. - Wilson RI Counsel - Farrar Others - Conte, Caron, Holody DISPOSITION ACTIONS:
- 1)
DRP completed review of the 9/3/03 information package and did not identify any new technical issues.
Responsible Person:
Barber ECD:
09/22/03 Closure Documentation:
Completed: 09/11/03
- 2)
O to review the 9/3/03 information package to determine if the unsatisfactory mid-year performance appraisal related to his/her engagement in protected activities.
Provide documentation of review to SAC by e-mail for file.
Responsible Person:
Wilson/Monroe ECD:
9/26/03 Closure Documentation:
Completed:_
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT:
PRIORITY OF 01 INVESTIGATION:
Alleger initially declined to have the NRC pursue his discrimination issue. Thus, the original 01 Case (1-2002-033) was closed since the alleger did not want to be interviewed and agreed no immediate safety issues existed when he was contacted by 01. In his 12/20 letter, no new technical information was provided to warrant raising Ol's priority on this case. Later, he/she requested that 01 pursue H&l. In their final report, 01 did not substantiate that H&l took place.
Regional Counsel made determination that prima facie case has been articulated.