ML19242C890

From kanterella
Revision as of 13:21, 4 January 2025 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to 790615 Info Request Re Emergency Medical Planning & Procedures in Event of Nuclear Accident
ML19242C890
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 07/17/1979
From: Eisenhut D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Jo Jacobs
CALVERT MEMORIAL HOSP., PRINCE FREDERICK, MD
References
NUDOCS 7908140093
Download: ML19242C890 (2)


Text

.

3

$\\[M D F; 7 Sa %

I I"

),,

UNITED STATES

+

vi g

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION y

j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

{

f

\\...../

July 17,1979 NJ f Dockets Nos.: 50-317 and 50-318 Mr. Joseph P. Jacobs, Administrator Calvert Memorial Hospital Prince Frederick, Maryland 20678

Dear Mr. Jacobs:

Your letter of June 15, 1979 has been referred to me for reply. The following is our response to each of your questions.

(1)

Is there a mandated requirement from your agency that one or more physicians be trained and available promptly in the care of the radioactively contaminated pitient?

Response

Yes; the Code of Federal Regulations 10 Part 50, Appendix E,Section IV requires an applicant in his Emergency Plan to describe:

"F.

Emergency first aid and personnel decontamination facilities, including:

4.

Arrangements for the services of a physician and other medical personnel qualified to handle radiation emergencies; and 5.

Arrangements for transportation of injured or con-taminated individuals to treatment facilities outside the site boundary.

G.

Arrangements for treatment of individuals at treatment facilities outside the site boundary."

(2)

Is the annual " radiation drill" in which a radioactive contaminated patient is intitduced in the hospital considered adequate?

Response

Yes, such a drill fulfills one of the training requirements of the aforementioned Appendix E to 10 CFR 50. We do not require that the patient be actively contaminated; simulation is considered sufficient for the training exer:ise.

, ~! U 0 d -)

790gi4

Mr. Joseph P. Jacobs (3) What guidelines are available to the hospital as well as the community which address themselves to a nuclear accident which would require evacuation of the hospital?

Response

Prince Frederick is approximately 13 miles from the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Station. The recently published NRC document NUREG 0396 recommends a 10-mile Emergency Planning Zone for the inhalation pathway for extremely severe and extremely remote accidents at a nuclear power plant. No planning for predetermined actions such as shelter or evacuation is recomended beyond the 10 mile distance.

Recommended planning beyond the 10 mile distance is related to con-tr. ' ling radioactivity in dairy and agricultural pathways.

No pianning of this sort need directly involve your hospital.

The Department of Energy has published the enclosed booklets on Emergency Handling of Radiation Accident Cases far Physicians, N yses, Ambulance-Rescue Squads, Hospital Administrators, which you may find to be of assistance.

I trust that this information responds to your needs.

",incerely, L

M L VI N. Eisbnhut, S

Darre c ing Director Division of Operating Reactors Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosures:

1.

10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E 2.

DOE /EV-0017, 0018, 0019, 0020 - October 19/8.

, no u

t