ML24325A384
| ML24325A384 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 09/10/2024 |
| From: | NRC/RGN-III/DORS/OB |
| To: | |
| Gregory Roach | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML22336A014 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML24325A384 (1) | |
Text
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (continued)
(Y)es / (N)o a
b*
c#
4.
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
y 'I 5.
The sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to y 'J observe and evaluate applicant performance.
6.
If lime compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
y Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time
'I constraints. Cues are given.
- 7.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
- Y 'I 8.
The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to
'I 'I ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
- 9.
Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with ES-3.4.
i 'I
- 10. Scenarios (as grouped) allow each applicant to be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients, events, and evolutions specified on the version of Form 3.4-1 1 't submitted with the scenario set.
- 11. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across
'/ 'f scenarios, when possible.
- 12. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. " 'I Mes / (N)o TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES per Scenario (See ES-3.4) a b*
c#
- 1.
Malfunctions after emergency operating procedure (EOP)
Actual Attributes by Scenario No.
1/2/3/4/SPARE 2/1/2/2/2
'( 1 entry (1-2) 2.
Abnormal events (2-4) 5/4/4/4/3
'f 'I 3.
Major transients (1-2) 2/2/1 /1 / 1
'( 'I 4.
EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2/2/2/2/2
'I 'f 5.
Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions 1/1/1/0/0 y 'f 1 per scenario set; set is the entire set of scenarios prepared for the scheduled exam) 6.
Preidentified critical tasks 2) 2/2/2/2/2 y 'f Printed Name/
Date yi,4*1 "LZ,lUtf-a.
Author H.l b.
Facility Reviewer (*)
C..0(\\1\\o( A N\\11 \\(\\)(\\°¥ Q
°'Q
'v,/-;,o../u..
C.
NRC Reviewer (#)
NRC Chief Examiner NRC Supervisor
- The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
- An independent NRC reviewer performs the steps in column c. This may be the NRC Chief Examiner if he/she did not develop the operating test under review.
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Gregory M. Roach, Jr. / Gregory M. Roach, Jr. 7/12/2024 Gregory M. Roach, Jr. / Gregory M. Roach, Jr. 7/12/2024 PAUL ZURAWSKI Digitally signed by PAUL ZURAWSKI Date: 2024.09.10 20:02:57 -05'00'