ML19341B180

From kanterella
Revision as of 17:15, 24 December 2024 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Unofficial Transcript of Commission 810115 Meeting in Washington,Dc Re Affirmation Session 81-2 to Discuss Waste Confidence Rulemaking.Pp 1-6
ML19341B180
Person / Time
Issue date: 01/15/1981
From:
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To:
Shared Package
ML19341B181 List:
References
FRN-44FR61372, REF-10CFR9.7, RULE-PR-50, RULE-PR-51 NUDOCS 8101300405
Download: ML19341B180 (8)


Text

s NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g

COMMISSION MEETING 5

(

In the Mattar of:

AFFIRISTION SESSION 81-2 f

(

DATE:

Januar'y 15, 1981 PAGES:

1-6 AT:

Washington, D. C.

9a

/$'

i~'

e g

did.,I') Y s

67 JAN 211981* 3 h u.s.ggs,yga

?

V l

c y!

3

. M NT M TG

(

f.

j I

400 Vir:#.sia Ave., S.W. W==h 4 ncp::sa, D. C. 2002 4 Telephone : (202) 554-2345 810180n Oh

Henarn/r&t 1

1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 2

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3

4 AFFIRMATION SESSION 81-2 n

5 S

3 6

R Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7

Room 1130 s

1717 H Street, N.W.

j 8

Washington, D.C.

d ci 9

Thursday, January 15, 1981 x

h 10 The Commission met, pursuant to notice, at 3:25 p.m.

11 BEFORE:

D I

12 JOHN F. AHEARNE, Chairman of the Commission

=3 5

13 JOSEPH HENDRIE, Commissioner u

m 14 VICTOR GILINSKY, Commissioner

~$

15 PETER BRADFORD, Commissioner g

16 STAFF PRESENT:

as N

17 JOHN Hoyle, Assistant Secretary

{

18 LEONARD BICKWIT, General Counsel n;

19 a

20 21 22 23,

i 24 25 ;

1 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.

DISmm 1

31s is an unofficia.L ::ansc=1pc of a. maeHas of cha Uc1':ad Scatas Nuclear Regulaccry Cc= mission held on / f _Imone /W/

in tha commisston's officas.a: 1717 E Screec, N. W., Wash 1hstan, D. C.

La meet 1=g was opea No public at:andanca and obserracion.

This.==ans@c has see been raviewed, corrac:ad,. or edi.ad, and ic :say contain i= ace-=M me.

The c:anse:1pc is incandad solely for ganaral info:=ational pu:r.aposes.

As provided by 10 CZ19.103,1: is sat par: of the for=al or 4 darmal record of decision of the mat:ars discussed.

Expressions of opdados in -Jits ::anse:13e da sac secessarily reflect final decarzinacions or be11afs.

No p1==dd or other paper may ba filad vi:h the Commission in,any p cceeding as tha resul: of or addrassed to any stacamane or a.gumane conta1=ad 5

harmin, arcape as the Commission say au:ho:fza.

6 O

e l

l l

l O

O

.,,,-_.m

i s

2 I

EEEEEEE1EEE 2

CHAIRMAN AHEARNE:

The meeting starts again as an 3

affirmation discussion session.

John?

4 MR. HOYLE:

Mr. Chairman, if I could begin, perhaps, e

5 with the order first circulated to you by Marshall Miller's

~

b 6

memorandum dated December 19th.

A revised version was circulated R

6, 7

on January 14th.

Al 8

I have obtained the approval of that of yourself and d

ci 9

Commissioners Gilinsky and Hendrie.

Mr. Bradford, I have not heard Y

10 from you.

El 11 COMMISSION C BRADFORD:

All right.

3:

(

12 MR. HOYLE:

Would you affirm your votes, please?

E y

13 (Chorus of ayes.)

u i

l 14 MR. HOYLE:

The other item is the EDO Delegations of i

l 2

15 Authority paper.

I circulated a matrix for that and I can see l

j 16 there are several areas on which you all agree.

as l

fj 17 CHAIRMAN AHEARNE:

Could I just for clarification, John, l

18 say, s.ince there are still some fundamental areas of disagreement, E

y 19 the reason it is coming up today is?

n 20 MR. HOYLE:

The reason it is comihg up today is, knowing 21 the General Counse1~had re-issued a paper, we scheduled it on l

22 the basis of hopeful approval and did not take it of'f the schedule l

23,

when we found that we did not have it all locked up.

l l

24 CHAIRMAN AHEARNE:

I see'.

l 25,

MR. HOYLE:

I am prepared to withdraw it, sir, since l

I ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.

3 1

thare is no full agreement.

l 2

CHAIRMAN AHEARNE:

I think there are some fundamental 3

areas of disagreement that I don't think we have really resolved.

4 MR. HOYLE:

All right, I shall pull it back, then.

g 5

COMMISSIONER HENDRIE:

Is it clear that we would do N

6 better with further discussion in some form, which I don't see E

7 at the moment, rather than just voting?

Al 8

CHAIRMAN AHEARNE:

Well, let me ask you a different way.

d 2

9 There are some sections here which we all agree on.

10 COMMISSIONER GILINSKY:

Why don't we siinply affirm all E

11 these on which we are unanimous?

m j

12 CHAIRMAN AHEARNE:

All right, we can certainly do that.

=3 5

13 COMMISSIONER GILINSKY:

I mean, I don't even know which u

l 14 section is which.

15 CHAIRMAN AHEARNE:

As a starter, John, why don't we

j 16 do that?

wi f

17 COMMISSIONER GILINSKY:

Or at least the ones on which z

18 there is a majority, let's put it that way.

A" 19 g

MR. BICKWIT:

I think this ought to be reviewed to see n

20 whether it will survive in that form.

There are some limitation 21 sections.

If you are act in agreement on the limitation section, 22 then it's out as a result of your not being in agreement.

Then 23, you have delegated the authority without limitation.

24 l CHAIRMAN AHEARNE:

The point I was trying to make, I 25 cjuess,.would be first, there is some document that at this stage is i

l

_ j ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.

4 1. approaching completion.

As Vic has pointed out, there are some 2

issues that were unresolved.

We now have either all agreed - or 3

a majority has agreed - and those sections could be incorporated, 4

whoever is keeping the master document.

Those could theit be 5

g incorporated because they have been approved.

e 3

6 There are a couple of sections which we are in dis-Fi 7

agreement on, we are two to two.

I would propose that unless one l

8 of us is willing to change - and perhaps one of us is - if they c3 o;

9 are willing to change their position to make a majority, then we El 10 could go ahead.

If not, then I would defer to when we get a fifth

=

II Commissioner.

D j

12 I think that the EDO's delegation of authority is c"

5 13 sufficiently significant for a smooth operating of the agency u

b I4 that it ought to be a majority of the Commission that speaks to n

15 what the delegation ought to be.

d I0 COMMISSIONER GILINSKY:

Well, at any rate, you can set vi h

I7 those aside for today.

a:

IO CHAIRMAN AHEARNE:

Yes.

E I9 8

COMMISSIONER GILINSKY:

burther conversation may lead c:

20 to a majority, or may not.

2I CHAIRMAN AHEARNE:

Fine.

That is acceptable to me.

22 COMMISSIONER GILINSKY:

The one thing I don't know the 23 answer to is whether in agreeing once we are unanimous, or at 24 ) least once we have a majority, whether that produces some odd l

25 i result no one will be happy with.

ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.

5 1

MR. BICKWIT:

I think it should be reviewed.

2 COMMISSIONER HENDRIE:

Why don't we ask counsel to 3

review it.

4 COMMISSIONER GILINSKY:

Spend a day or two doing that.

e 5

So, I mean, we could give it kind of tentative approval subject E9 6

to counsel checking it.

E 7

CHAIRMAN AHEARNE:

Well, the document itself would not 3l 8

be approved in any event.

d q

9 COMMISSIONER BRADFORD:

I would just wait.

2o 10 e

MR. BICKWIT:

I can give you an example of why it would i

11 not work if you affirm, if you differ on what policy items ought 3

y 12 to come up to the Commission.

Some of you only want significant 5

13 policy items coming up; some want policy items coming up.

h 14 COMMISSIONER GILINSKY:

Where we don't come to agreement,

g 15 whatever the current rules are - if there are rules - would apply, z

g 16 would continue to apply until such time as a majority of the w

f d

17 l Commission comes up with a rule it supports.

l 18 CHAIRMAN AHEARNE:

In some of these areas there is

=

l 5

19 g

none.

n 20 COMMISSIONER GILINSKY:

Well, then it ought to just 1

21 be left to the good sense of all the participants, that's all.

22 l

CHAIRMAN AHEARNE:

Which is the way it is working now.

l l

23 COMMISSIONER GILINSKY:

Which is tha way it is 24 working now.

Let's have Len take a look at it.

25 l COMMISSIONER HENDRIE:

Why not ask Len to take a look at ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC.

t

6 1

it.

I would hope that at some point along the line - I don't know 2

whether you want to do it before we get the fif th member or wait 3

until afterwards - but I would hope that on that Issue 1, which is 4

a fairly significant policy, that is, which way you come,at the 5

EDO authority for matters that are not clearly laid out, I would e

3 u

8 6

hope we could have some discussion.

e Ng 7

You may all still feel the same way after the discussion, 8

8 in which case, fair enough.

n d

=i 9

CHAIRMAN AHEARNE:

I would be glad to have a discussion i

h 10 on it.

I would suggest we involve EDO in the discussion.

E 5

11 COMMISSIONER GILINSKY:

Well, why don't we have Len is d

12 take a look at it to see whether approving the parts for which E=

d 13 there is a majority results in an " odd beast."

E l

14 CHAIRMAN AREARNE:

All right.

2 15 COMMISSIONER GILINSKY:

If it doesn't, we wculd then be 5

g 16 in a position to proceed.

as p

17 CHAIRMAN AHEARNE:

You will formally let us know.

5 5

18 All right, that ends the affirmation session here.

We

=

b 19 adjourn.

20 (whereupon, at 3:30 p.m. the affirmation session was 21 closed.)

22 23 24 i

I 25 l

ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC.

C NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION This is to certify that the attached proceedings before the Commission Meeting in the :3atter of:

Affirmation Session 81-2

  • Date of Proceeding:

January 15, 1981 Docket flumber:

Place of Proceed.ing: Washington, D. C.

were held as herein appears, and. ths.: this is the original transcript thereof for the file of the Commission.,

M. E. Hansen Official Reporter (Typed) 1( =

hbn$'s Official Reporter (Signature)

.3

-