ML20011D123
| ML20011D123 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 10/06/1989 |
| From: | Chilk S NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| To: | Taylor J NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20011D107 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-89-542 NUDOCS 8912180135 | |
| Download: ML20011D123 (18) | |
Text
'
ED8TAvis
[
NUCLEAR RE00LATORY COMMISSION O k
- /
s oasanov6=.oe. m.
- E, Eo l'
e a oetwa October 6, 1989 00 N
h i
sacastany l
MEMORANDUM FOR:
James M. Taylor, Acting Executive Director for Operations FRON:
(
el J. Chilk, Secretary
SUBJECT:
SECY-89-251 - STAFF REQUIREMENTS MEMORANDUM i
DATED JANUARY 19, 1989, REGARDING SECY-88-334
- IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE FOR AGREEMENTS 70 PROVIDE FOR STATE PARTICIPATION IN NRC INSPECTION ACTIVITIES
'I This is to advise you that the Commission (with all Commissioners agreeing) has approved the Model State Resident Engineer Agreement as modified in the attached copy.
The model agreement proposed by the staff appears to contemplate two separate inspection plans -- one for the NRC and one for the State.
spirit of our Policy Statement in this area suggests that there The I
should be a much closer, more coordinated relationship between the NRC and the States.
Accordingly, a number of changes to the model agr atzent (attached) integrated inspection plan for the site.are aimed at promoting a conce
- single, Under this approach, the State would not have its own inspection plan, but would instead provide recommendations for inclusion in a single, [
integrated site inspection plan, to be prepared by the NRC (the NRC plan).
that plan.
The State would then " assist" the NRC in carrying out g
f Section VI. C.9 states that the "(State) will hold the MIP in confidence and will not release _.i s
b1 exce in accordance with.. "
n Section VI. D.6 the a agreene es sensitive information to the extent..NRC and (State) will protect 0 u6 Freedom of Information Ac information in this record was deleted in accordante with the freedom of Information Act, cAemptions #
n.J9 N3-h NW8/36~
)Qor
.g.
l O
e Commission agrees that th'is Agreement is an excellent vehicle to insure uniform implementation of the Policy statement and it 4r fshouldbeusedinconcludingournegotiationswiththeStateofHowever, the Agree i
to be used with other states whose inspection programs are less comprehensive and do not involve placing state Residents at commercial nuclear facilities.
Accordingly, the first MOU based j
upon this model agreement should clearly state that.this form of agreement is not appropriate for states desiring less com r< hens.ve ;- -<: tas or with less extensive resourc:
m g,,;:.. y < 3' s ',9 c. ; f _ a c..
'~.. - -
l 1,& '. i.%RA: 'i ',. 7 _.
'w
^"
~i
': ).
^
N +{ ?. ' f,f ll$_ : (*,,j'* '
9
, 'l
- .?$
h k
f.
hh' fl.
g h,'t
,~
I Additional comments of the Commissioners have been provided to you with their vote sheets.
M'
Attachment:
As Stated i
i cc Chairman Carr Commissioner Roberts i
Commissioner Rogers i
Commissioner Curtiss OGC j
GPA GPA/SLITP l
t e
I i
1 l
l 1
1 l