ML20065F095

From kanterella
Revision as of 19:52, 16 December 2024 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Response Opposing DE River Basin Commission Motion to Quash Subpoena.Intervenor Does Not Seek Addl Testimony from G Hansler But Believes Deposition Inadmissible.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence
ML20065F095
Person / Time
Site: Limerick  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 09/27/1982
From: Sugarman R
DEL-AWARE UNLIMITED, INC., SUGARMAN & ASSOCIATES
To:
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
References
ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8210010244
Download: ML20065F095 (3)


Text

- _ _ _ _

cWLATED CORRESPONDEIM 00(KETEC UISI UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

'82 SEP 30 p1 :35 In the Matter of

)

(

)

Vl).;] U W;;: h.

Philadelphia Electric Company )

Docket No'.'"50k.3:$ 2-OL fo

)

503fS3 COL (Limerick Generating Station, )

Units 1 and 2)

)

RESPONSE OF DEL-AWARE UNLIMITED, INC. TO MOTION OF THE DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION TO QUASH SUBPEONA Del-AWARE Unlimited, Inc. answers the Motion of the General Counsel of DRBC as follows:

1.

A subpeona has been issued to Gerald Hansler, which is being served on him on September 23, 1982, pursuant to order of the Board.

2.

Del-AWARE Unlimited does not seek any additional testi-mony from Mr. Hansler other than that provided at his deposition and in his subsequent responses.

However, under the rules of evidence, Del-AWARE does not believe that the deposition of Mr.

Hansler can be admitted as such, and therefore, absent stipu-lation from the parties as to the admissibility of his deposition, required to produce his live testimony at the hearings.

Clearly, if other parties (PECo and Staff) are willing t,o agree to the admission of the portions of Mr. Hansler's deposition testimony sought by Del-AWARE, will agree that Mr. Hansler need not appear.

3.

The weight of Mr. Hansler's testimony is for the Commission, but Del-AWARE submits that his understandings and evidence are relevant to the decision on the issues before the Board.

0210010244 820927

{DRADOCK05000 3

_ / A/

s

~

~

1

~j WHEREFORE, De'l-AWARE urges that the Board not quash the subpoena' heretofore' issue'd to Mr. Hansler.

4

\\

\\

t

\\

~

1,

. T

- 4 _ g -.

Robert J.,Su Mrm p t

~

v.

3 4

Of Counsel:

'... SUGARMAN & DENWORTH

~

121 South Broad Street, Suite 510 q

Philadelphia, PA 19107 T'

(215) 546-0162 September 27, 1982 u

~

e s

f e

e k

a k

O w-W e

{

7 s

A N

s n

n-

.,,e-

-e,-e,

,-v,,,-,,nm--,-

,m,_

,n-

a L'

DIX KETED U3!:RC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

'82 SEP 30 P1 :16 OFil'. : 0F Si. i e. -

DCCHEi:,':G & Sriar r I hereby certify that I have served copiesNDf the foregoing Response of Del-AWARE Unlimited, Inc. to Motion of the Delaware River Basin Commission to Quash Subpeona by mailing a copy this 27th day of September, 1982, to the following persons:

1 Lawrence Brenner, Esq., Chairman Administrative Judge U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 Dr. Richard F. Cole Administrative Judge U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 Dr. Peter A. Morris Administrative Judge U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 Stephen H. Lewis, Esquire Counsel for NRC Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 Troy B, Conner, Jr., Esquire Conner and Wetterhahn 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C.

20006 Mr. Edward G. Bauer, Jr.

Vice President & General Counsel Philadelphia Electric Company 2301 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19101 Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeals Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 WOW Robert JM S garman

.