0CAN078514, Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-313/85-13 & 50-368/85-13.Corrective Actions:Personnel Instructed to Ensure Fire Doors Close When Passing Through & Closure Mechanisms Modified on Doors 213 & 235

From kanterella
Revision as of 04:22, 12 December 2024 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-313/85-13 & 50-368/85-13.Corrective Actions:Personnel Instructed to Ensure Fire Doors Close When Passing Through & Closure Mechanisms Modified on Doors 213 & 235
ML20134H201
Person / Time
Site: Arkansas Nuclear  
Issue date: 07/27/1985
From: Enos J
ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Denise R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
Shared Package
ML20134H185 List:
References
0CAN078514, CAN78514, OCAN78514, NUDOCS 8508280314
Download: ML20134H201 (3)


Text

ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY POST OFFICE BOX 551 UTTLE ROCK. ARKANSAS 72203 (501) 371-4000 July 27, 1985

^1 n -

OCAN078514 AUG - 5 885

..).

Mr. Richard P. Denise, Director

~~~

Division of Reactor Safety and Projects U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i

Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, TX 76011

SUBJECT:

Arkansas Nuclear One - Units 1 & 2 Docket Nos. 50-313 and 50-368 License Nos. DPR-51 and NPF-6 Response to Inspection Reports 50-313/85-13 and 50-368/85-13 Gentlemen:

The subject inspection report has been reviewed.

A response to the Notice of Violation is attached.

Very truly yours, J. Ted Enos Manager, Licensing JTE:RJS:ds Attachment cc:

Mr. Richard C. DeYoung Office of Inspection and Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Mr. Norman M. Haller, Director Office of Management & Program Analysis U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

g. ldc W r508280314 050815

{DR ADOCK050g8

s

^

NOTICE OF VIOLATION Based on the results of an NRC inspe.; tion conducted during the period of May 1-31, 1935, and in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy (10CFR Part 2,. Appendix C), 49 FR 858?, dated March 8, 1984, the following violations were identified:

1.

Fire Doors left Open Technical Specification 3.7.11 states, "All penetration fire barriers protecting-safety related areas shall be functional."

Contrary to the above, on May 28, 1985, the NRC inspector found Fire Door 213 to be ajar at 3:30 p.m. and at 3:35 p.m. and Fire Door 235 to be ajar at 2:30 p.m. and at 3:00 p.m.

This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I.D.) (368/8513-01)

Response

As a result of the NRC Inspectors finding relating to open fire doors, Managers were instructed to inform their departments that each individual is responsible for ensuring that a fire door closes when ne/she passes through it.

An engineering evaluation of the closure mechanisms installed on these and other selected doors was conducted.

This resulted in modifications which replaced the closure mechanisms on Doors 213 and 235.

These efforts resulted in compliance on July 8, 1985.

2.

Inadequate Emergency and Abnormal Procedure Reviews by Licensed Operators Appendix A of 10CFR Part 55, requires that each licensed operator and senior operator review the contents of all abnormal and errergency procedures on a regularly scheduled basis.

Training Administration Procedure 1063.08, " Operations Training Program," has been established to implement the requirements of 10CFR Part 55, Appendix A.

Procedure 1063.08 requires licensed operators to review the abnormal and emergency operating procedures not less than twice each year.

Contrary to the above, three abnormal and emergency procedures have not been reviewed twice each year by the Unit 2 licensed operators since the procedures were issued.

This is a Severity Level IV Violation.

(Supplement I.D.) (368/8513-03)

' Response The cause of the operators' failure to review the procedures as required was that these specific procedures were not included on the procedure review sheets issued by the Training Department.

The review sheets were immediately revised to include the these procedures.

The review sheets were subsequently. removed from the general training. file and placed under the control of the Operator' Licensing Clerk.

In addition, the Operator Training Supervisors have been instructed to verify that the review sheets are current prior to issuance.

Although these three procedures were not on the procedure review sheet, the Unit 2 operators have reviewed or received training on the

-procedures in the past.

The training cycle which includes these

-procedure reviews will be completed by the end of September such that full compliance will be achieved.

-