ML20154A880

Forwards Commission Biweekly Notice of Applications & Amends to OL Involving NSHC Published in Fr on 880810,for Info

ML20154A880
Person / Time
Issue date:	08/23/1988
From:	Murley T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Breaux J, Sharp P, Udall M HOUSE OF REP., ENERGY & COMMERCE, HOUSE OF REP., INTERIOR & INSULAR AFFAIRS, SENATE, ENVIRONMENT & PUBLIC WORKS
References
NUDOCS 8809130120
Download: ML20154A880 (31)

Text

-

Aup,ust 23, 1988 IDENTICAL LETTERS SENT TO:

(See attached list of addrcssees)

The Honorable John B. Breaux, Chairman Subcomittee on Nuclear Regulation Comittee on Environment and Public Works United States Senate Washington, D. C.

20S10

Dear Mr. Chairman:

Public Law 97-415, enacted on January 4, 1983, amended Section 139 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 to authorize the Nuclear Regulatory Comission to issue and make immediately effective any amendment to an operating license upon a determination by the Commission that such amendment involves no significant hazards consideration, notwithstanding the pendency before the Comission of a request for a hearing.

In addition, the legislation requires the Commission to periodically (but not less frequently than once every thirty days) publish notice of any amendments issued, or proposed to be issued, under the new authority above.

Enclosed for your information is a copy of the Comission's Biweekly Notice of Applications and Amendments to Operating Licenses involving no significant hazards considerations, which was published in the Federal Register on August 10, 1988.

Sincerely.

Original Signed By:

Thomas T. Martin

'k1homas E. Murley, Director l

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosure:

Federal Register Notice cc: Sen. Alan K. Simpson DISTRIBUTION w/o enclosure:

Central File?

NRC PDR Local PDR PDI-2 Rdg.

VStello NS!C TMurley Program Support, NRR JSniezek BGrimes SVarga M0'Brien 0GC SECY Mail Facility

}

(V T GPA/CA(3) j 0:PDI-2 g A

I/II RP /II

'N E DD: R D: b/

WButler B

gW JS/ ME T uflef~

i Q /p/88 86 l86

//8 g //r' 8 77/r]88

• "Q p

,g')f,~g-3 If188 ja

\\

\\,C 1 eso?!301co 000023

%,p fY PDR OHC NRRDenu

e-e cc:

The Honorable Morris X. Udall, Chairman Subcommittee on Energy and the Environment Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs United States House of Representatives Washington, D. C.

20515 l

cc: Rep. Manuel Lujan i

The Honorable Philip R. Sharp Chairman Subcommittee on Energy and Power Committee on Energy and Commerce United States Houso of Representatives Washington, D. C.

20515 cc: Rep. Carlos Moorhead

)

i i

agens

__ w asshe.e / v.4. ss. m tse / wean.edey. Auswet te. toes / Nodcas Biweekly Notice Appucati:r.s and Amendments to Operat!ng Ucenses involvity No Significant Hazards ConsideratRma f

1. Bxk ground Pursuant to Public Law (P.Ll 91-415.

the Nuclear Regulatory Commistan Che Commission)is putAtshing this regular biweekly rotice P.L 97-415 tevised section lare of the Atemic Energy Act of 1Et as amenJrd (the Act) to requre the Cominisoon to putelrsh notice of any a.tendments Hsued or proposed to be issued. under a new riovision of section 189 if the Act.Tks provision trants the Comrnissien the authorstv to issue and make nnmediatel) effective an) amendment to an operati.ig license upon i

a determination b) the Commission that such amendment invok es no signtricant hasards considesalic a notwithstandir g the pendency before the Commission of a request for a hearma frorr. am person This Liw<dly notiu inrasas all notices ci amendments naut d. or propoW to be issued from luly 14.1984 thr9ueh luly 29 1944 The last biweekly sotk, wee pob#ebed on lelp 27, twe fSS FR ;8:42) l l

t

e FeMb gisese ] Vol M. No m /cWediseedagi Ammet it. 4ese Meeceso i

NOTICEOF CONSWERAT10N OF '

date, the Com:stasian

• an Alonuo firial delsemineHon welserW te decMe * -

IS$UAMCE OF AMDeOMENT TO Safety and ucennng Hoerd. desypisted when the hvaregtis held.

FACitJTY OPEAATING LICENSE AND by the Corerneman er by the Chairman if the Ftrial determinatnn h that the PROPOSED NO htGeslHCANT of time Asemic Safety and lxmisms amsideret requeet involves no H AZARDS CM68053tATION Board Panet will rule on the request sansfacant nasarde mesideration, the MNLMNTIN M60 andfee poesHea and the Secretary or the Commiasson may inaue the amesids,ent OPPDAWNffT FOR HEARING designated Atusnic Safety and Lics.nsirgi. and make if Immahately effect>ve.

The Comm&eWeei hee nede a prepneed floard wul tasaae a riodoe of heartne or notwithstanding the requeat For e deterrotaattem tiud the following en appropeiate order.

hearing Any hearmg bekf would 1416e arnendment c4ersts involvw no As required by le CHt 2114. a phee after auuance of the amendment.

orgmhcant hereeds cmedrenbon Undo petiHort for lewva to inwrvene shall set If the faral cieterminalmn is be the

(

the Corums sedart's m gelmne in to CHt forth with petticularily the Lnrerest of amendrnent myrAes a nienificant g

Sne2. this mearte that ermaton et the the remmee la the proceedms. and hasarde ennsidecatiosi. any hearing held f aciliry he aceredame with the pmpneed how thet snsefeet may be affeced by t5e w ould take pbce before the isswance of amendmente endd not IH meu4ve e resalts of the pnrseding "the petihon any amendme nt sigmiscant increeee in theprobabibty ur shnuld specJfindly emplain the reanoria Nontally. the Corrwiuno mit not cossequerm s4 en awadent previetiety wbyintervention should be peemitted Nue the emcodareas untd she ev ehzated: or (21 efam the poewtwhey of wHb perterutar reference to the e ipiration of tiet 3> day nonce permd.

a new or difbwn! k e*f eccM nt trem iollumns factors:(1) the natune of the h wcier, shou.J urtumstano s change any escadrat preewesty evalued of f.Il petiWonce's rwha under the Act to be du vs the notice peruismiiitut fadure involve e omrnficant rerdton 6n a made a ptrty to the proceed 2ng: (2) the to A hn

• Lamurly way would n.selt, for margm of safety. The bevis foe shle natson and extesitet the petitioner's esancte. io dmbrs or sbuidon n of the gevoted detrem6aaHeirtet eesk -

reercety. Anandal, or other ke!creet la.

I4c36't the toesathsien may isswe rhe, license a e dment tWore the omsndiment rnrest ts ohne below.

the precemhng; and (2) the possNe The Cwmba en is oce4 me p4he effest of any order whid may be eupstahon $ th Eday not ce petiod.

comrnents nn ins ptspoed ens. red in the petuwding on the provided that us final deternan.tton is determinataost Any comsvents ret 6beel p,ottenet s 'nterest. 'lhe pebtion shoukj that b a Wa.cf todbt s no wubin 30 de o aher the Juls of alsoidenfify the spedSc aspectie) of the significant f.asards consideratiarL The i

final duesonnatwa wilkurmdct all pubhcadiun of this nistce *Un be sobert saaties of the proceeduas as to censWered in radina any feet whd petitioner ensbes M intervene.

ghlec and State comasents received fot' detmranaMn 1he Corrrussion will e e4 - Any parson =ho has fik d a petuien for Comreu'C8'on is taen. Should the sioo (de this action,it wi!!

mornnily ma'ae a final de Lerwoeuca less, ta tra,rvene ce who has been urdess it reutus e ter,tml fw a admitted as a patty cup amend the puMob a nWce of isse and provide for opportunity lot a beennt afier heahng petitKn without rvquesting leave of the issuance. The Conumssiuri e ets that V rittee mentnents tuay be owbnulbed Doard u}n to itficen (15) days prior to the the need w tde tWs ac%n w W wcw by meil to the Rules and lYoccJeres first pre seerma conference edeiluled hs Dranch. IMision of Rult 5 and Eecords, the procectists, but sd an ammded gnykfrscen$.

A request for a haannq or a petreson Offwe of Adm:nistraHan and Resourte pehuon must satisfy the spectfiuty far leave to irners ene most be Ided with Managernent, U.S Nudear Regulatecy requirements desmted above.

the Secretary of the Coms.uassn. US Cornmnetm Washirton, f)C m%5 Not later titan Ofteen (15) days prior to Nucteer hyd. story Commission.

and should are the pubMtion d4*eand P

• " N C#"I * "'#

Washegion. DC MM. / P ention:

1 pe numter c4 this Fedml F.esistee in N pmedm2. e penonn Dockehna and Sarske BraruA et w,ay l

nont e Wntten cr#m..ni, may also be MO"Mb"MN@b*

be debiered to.be Cc numswn a puRc I

debuted to Rmwn p 21n 1%)tipe emt.c which mest include a list 4 Document ihm.1?)? Il het N*m t

thnidart ?TO Node Awine.

Se cetenbons which 6tv sonigtit to t*

Washiegio.t. IE t y the above dme I

Dethesda. Ma r$nr;.'tc14 freci M S a.ca.

I'totated in the rnetter, and the bases for WW peth inte fibad dm the M to 5 E p.rn. Copics of write rint,anmnts each contendon W M dih ten (tel days of the notwe wel. o is e

receimi roay ter e u e.fned at the filtC reasonabee specificity. Contentione shalt g,p,4,.at N prier ppW ec Pebbe Dmemer<t Roars.1717 H 51reet.

hmHed to puum wh Wi swise d infom alpe Cam.esace 'y a tnU-Iree NW, Washmaton. DC. 'l tm fihng of N amen t undn wsis,nces A g,q ggn, g,ig,, w,,,em Unre et 1 I

requnte for hennng n%i petabans Ice pe**onn wM fsh M W ed a gag,g gwig g,, g,,,,, g.g3,)j 3 g;.

p leeie to 6nimene is dmueal belew.

8"PF *'nnit =hkh satisfies thne q, g g,,,, on;,3,,,,g l

I Or Septeer q 1; eel tM brmee a ey requimewres = tth respect to at leeit or" shodd be gh eo theiar em imentifWon We e rwrieet (ov 3 Nv.nry woh respec, C0"'#"U *$ 80' N ""3dL#d M Number 3N arid the bhewmg vessage Io esserna of the emendment to the P

i tub ni laciuty qveshag inense and pathetent as a panF a<4drened to pedei t 0.rw tM i

any rmon whose miemt reay be Those perwined to intm ena beoorne pehtsoner a name and tekpbune affe.1ed try this proceedirq sad who tuca to the proceeding, cubact to tiny number; date pehuon w es r9aded plant wishas to partiupele as a party in the smitehons in the order granhng leave to narne and pubhcahoe d.ste and page i

proceedd.maet file a wnttee petiten intervese, and have the opporturut) to number of this Femieral Revoter nusce for lease to meseveue Metarets for e Peticapete fudy an the conduct of the A copy of the penhon should also be hesnes and withoc, for leave to hearma,60cludme the oppnetunity to sent to the Offia nf the General inte nene shallle Med m arodnr e present ev%icine and cross enandne Cmmael. U R Nurber H-d statory with the Gemousen's "149ks of nitnesses Cientn.stmn. Washgtuh DC 20MS.

IMtag lee Dwnesbc Lhensiet if a he artigt is requested, the and to the othene) for lhe hierare.

Piw_WJe no GKPost & lie Cmeussies well make e final NnnMmely Web of petihana lot be massebe a hesnme ce pesdine fee ".

determveedwmwt ow waar of tw -

to interverva, amare sd pent:oes.

e bevg 9 aree,vene te(ded by she sheve. o sispobeene bsuwds comaidweimerb ourtkmeeta5nnene err %ir requeses -

s i

30128 Fedeest Redette / Val. S3 No.154 / Wedn:sday. August 10.'19s8 / NoHees:

for hearindt will not be entertained Consequences of an Accident provide the proper flow ep!It between -

absent a determination by the Previously Eeoluoted miection pomte in gecordance with the Commission, the presiding ofncer or the The proposed amendmenta involve -

eesumptions used in the ECCS4DCA presiding Atomic Safety and Ucensing revising the acceptence criterie for the analysesc and (3) provide un saeptable Doard, that the peution and/of request 1f51 now belance test of Surveillance level of tota.! ECC8 flow to allinloction should be granted based upon a Requirement 4.5 2.h. The ISSI subeystem pouits equal to or above that seeemed to balancing of factors spacined in to Cm la used. In conjunction wi6h the other the ECCS LOCA analysea"11seee beees 2.714(e)(1HI)-(v) and 2.714(d).

ECCS subsystems and the Safety requirements are sationed for the For further details with respect to this iniection Tank s (SITS!. to proside proposed amendment as foHows. (1) cction. see the apphcation for sufficient core cooling now duriaA pump rurmt conditions e/o prevented cmendment which is avadable for pubhc postulated Loss of Coolant Accidents by mattitatning the mastmum LPSI inspection et the Commission's Pubhc (LOCAs). This change to the U>SI nowrote allowed by Techmcal Document Room.1717 H Street. NW.,

nowrates has no impact on the Specaficatior>s. at 5000 ppm. (2 end 3) the Washington. DC and at the local pubhc probability of occurrence of a LOCA proposed amendment was ev olusted document room for the particular facility esent or any other desian besis asa not the esisting ECCS.LOCA involved.

accident. Additionall) the proposed snaisses and it was determined that the Arlaone Public Service Company, et al.,

Techmcal Specification change wdl not LMI nowrg,te change will not adversely Docket Nos STN $0 528. STN 50-529 increase the cons,equenen of any impact the anai> sis results.

af rHent preuouth esaluated m the end STN 34530. Palo Verde Nuclut SAR. The design basis accident most lhe staff has reuewed the lKensees' Generating Station (PVNGS), Units 1,2 no significant herards consideration and 3 Maricopa County, Arizona impacted by the reused LPSI nowrotes determmation and agrees with the is the large break LOCA. The most ig,nu,g.n.tj,.

Dole of ornendment reques te bla rch 16.

hmiting larti break LOCA is the doubi' Accordmsly, the Commission has 1%8. es supplemented by letter dated ended guillotine break of a Reactor 2

proposed to determine that the a < s luly 0.1E8 Coolant Pump (RCP) discharige line An change does not imohe a sninific.

De scription of omendment &questi esatuation was perforrned to determine hazards consideration.

The proposed amendment consists of the effects of the LFSI nowrote thanges local Pub!,e Document Room changes to the Technical Specifications on this limiting event. It was determ ned (Appendis A to Facihty Operatme that the nowrate chanites would not locoton Phoenis Pubhc Library, License Nos NPF 41. NPF 11 and NPF.74 Impact the es ent consequences since the liuoness.end Saence Di.ision.12 Fast htrDowell Road. PWoenn. Antona for r\\ NCS Un:ts 1. 2 and.1) rniund now h st.ll suffgient to keep The proposed change will reuse the reactor sessel downcomer annulus g

Surveillance Requirement 4 5 2 h which full fal lowing discharge of the STTs Amenyforlyencer Mr Arthur C.

specifies now requirements that the Low Therefore, this proposed Technical Gehr. Snell & Wilmer. 3100 %; alley Pressure Safety injection (U'SI)

Spec.ncation amendment does not U'*

• • ^*"'#

subsystem must meet dur ng now invohe a sigmficant increase in the

. NRC Preect Detector-George %,.

balance testing The cunent requirement probabihty or consequences of an ILnighton states tha' each lfSI injection toop must aceHent prestously es aluated.

Arkansas Powet and Light Company, be capable of dehserina a total flow StandJtd 2

• C& ole te / ossib//ity of Dodet Nos.43-313 and 50 363. Arkanue equi to 4mo : In0; rpm and that each a New or DF/crent Amd of Accident Nuclear One. L' nits 1 and 2 Pope iniection leg shall be within ItV gpm of from any A ccident Prevwusly Ero/ voted County, Aska9sas the other. The resise the totabroposed change wdl nlection loop now to The propcsed Technical Specificahon Datu/omt ndraec request; loly 1.

4MU t 200 spm and the injection leg amendments will not create the N

"asimum des tation to No spm.

nf a new or different kind of O'"Cf'PhU" 0b'"#"N"#' #C0'#8'#

pestibihtfrom any accident prctiously Oasis for Proposed No Swmhcort occident The proposed ainendinent.vould evise f

//ciards Conssderation Detaaninormni analysed. The change only allows for a Facihty OptraP.ns Licerse Nos DPR.51 The Comenission has prosided shghdy letter vanation in LPSI nowrate ana NPF 6 for Ar).enso Nudear Ona standerds for determinma whether a to account for the senabdity of throttle Units 1 and 2 (ACO.li2) to authorite significant haurds consideration esists vehe powiens The IPS! pumps are the S> stems Enern Es sources. Inconcrateu, an' stated in to CW 50 92. A propo*ed only equipmer,t imputed by this (SERI)(3 act on behalf of Arkansas owndment to an o;ciatms I cense for a prepond emendment. Weh the cham;e.

luiirn sN tight ( M u). *ith facii' imohes no sisalfi;ent hatards the I PSI pumps wdi std) te ope rated resPonsibihty for and control ovet the i

consi trations if operation of the facihty within their design enseMpe. Therefore.

phs sirsi con siruction. opera tion, and m accordance with a proposed the change wil'.. sot create the possibihty mentenence of the facihty. Thts sation amendrnent would not: 11) Invch e a cf a new or different kind of accident.

is Pfr*0'8 t u r.oniuncaon mth Sirpg e4gmficant increase m the probabihty or Stondord J. /m c/> e o S pr/n ont becoming the operat.:t of Waterford consequences of an accident preuously Reductwa in o Sfayr of Sofety Ste n Elecinc Station, t> nit 3 as well se evaluated. (2l Create the possibihty of a The proposed Techmcel Specifkation continuma as operator and owner of new or different kmd of accident from amendinents will not ins olve a Grand Gulf Umts 1 and 2, any accident prestously evaluated, or (3) sismficant reduction m a matsm of 808ts for proposed rio sym/sconi Invohe a sigmficant reduction in a safety. Techn>r al Specification bases hororde com/deration determleotione rnarein of safety, sertion 3/4 5 2 states that. ' hf amtenente The Cr,mmission has prouded The hcensees Lage prouded a of preper now resistance and pressure sunderde for determimns whether a discussion of the proposed changes they drop in the pipmg s> siem to each srgmf cant hasards considesation esist.

as relate to these standards. the injection point is r>ecessary to: (1) es stated in 10 CM fo.92. A proposed discussion is presented below, prevent total purnp now from et(eeding amerwiment to an operstmg hcense foe e i

Standord f. /n ro/re o Sgtnsf cont runout conditions when the rystem is in fanhty insches r o sign /ecant hasards i

/ncrease in lAs trubobility or its m nimum resistance conf;swrato n. (2) consideraNon tf operation of the facinly 1

Federcl Rcit!stee / Vol. 33....154 / Wednesday. August 10. 1984 / Notices 30127 in acc xdonco with a proposed proposed amendment. With the Technical Specification and/or Bases amendment would not (1) involve a exception of suministrative changes to for clartAcation. These changes. as well significant increase in the probability or reflect the role of SEKl. plant procedures as the numbering changes. are consequences of an accident previously are unaffected. As such. the plant considered to be administrative in evaluated. (2) create the possibiiity of a conditions for which the destan basit na ture.

new oc different kind el accident from accident analyses have been performed Basis forpropued ao significont i

any accident previously evaluated. (3) are stdl v0id. Turefore, the proposed borords consideration determicotiom involve a significant reduction in a arnendment cannoi crede the possibliity The Commission has pro $ided margin of safety. APAL has evaluated of a new or different kind of accident standarda for detertnimns whether a no the proposed change to Facihty than previously evaluated.

siamficant hazards consideration esists Operahni; Ucenses DPR41 and NPF-6 Plant safety margins are established as stated in to CW 50 9:'(c) A proposed i

and has deter nined the following.

for and reflected in Umiting (.,onditiona amendment to an operahng beetise SERJ presently ovrns and operates for Operahon. Umibng Safety S3 stem involtes no significant hazards Grand Gulf.The employees of AP&L Settings. and S.ifety Umats specified in consideration if operahon of the facdity presently engaged in the operation of the Technical Speedications. Since there in accordance with the proposed ANO.142 will become employees of wdi be no change to the physical design amendment would not:(1) involve a SERI. The arganisational structure of or operation of the plant, there will be synincent increase in the probabdity or SERI will provide for clear management no channe to any of these or any other control and effectige lines of authority martins. De proposed amendment cJnsequences of an accident prniously and communication etnot g the therefore w113 not lavolve a reduction in et aluated, or (2) create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from organizational units involved in the a maratn of safety, management, operation, and technical The staff has reviewed the licensee's any accident prenously es aluated, or (3) support of the facihty, evaluation and agrees with the insolve a signLficant reduction in a l

As a result of the prvposed c neluai ns. Therefore.bued on the margin of safety.

amendment, there will not be physical above. the staH proposes to detumine Commonw ealth Edisor: has n aluateJ changes to the facihty, and all bmihng that the proposed bcense amendinent this propoacd amendment and Cond.!1ons for Operation tmiting does not involve a significant hasards determined that it involves no sictificant hasards consideration. In Safety System Settings, and Safety Tb$c Document Rxm acc rdance with the criteria of to CFR C

Umits specified in the Technical Specifiestions tvill remain unchanged.

gjg.Tdu LW Arbu

$0 92(c). a proposed amendment to an With the oce T&M hm4 Rwh A P* II8 I A"" I"'

I* "' 'I ";II'd "'

8 changes to re.ftlon of administrata e g

I2 hatards considerations lieperation of A'gg*,",['nfy fh,n,,,. Wu S.

the facd6ty,in accordance with the

>ect the role of SERL the quahty aseurance program, security plan, and treining progtam ar' R eynold s. Esq-. 84 shop. Lbertnan. Cook, p.op aed amendment, would not-unaffected. With regard to emergency Purcell and Repolds.1200 Soesteenth (1)Involte a signmcant lacmisein plans, certain phy sical and personnd Street. NW.. Wa shington. DC 20n3a the probability or consequences of an NRCI'rpfect Di vetor: Jose A. Calvo accident prniously valuated becaum resources. limited to suppc<t in (al Power operation is presently administrative areas but not inclusive of Comenonwealth Edison Company, permitted with containment osgen decialon makir:g euthority. will cocunue Docket Nos. STN 50-2.77 and STN 30 cortcentration greate# than 4 4 for only to be provided by APaL in support of 2M. Deosdeo Nuclear Powor Station, 24 h>urs subsequent t4 goirg to run :nd thess activities. The licenses s'atas that Unit Ph*. 2 and 3. Gewidy County.

14 hours1.62037e-4 days <br />0.00389 hours <br />2.314815e-5 weeks <br />5.327e-6 months <br /> prior to a reactor shutdown.

decisional rwsponsibdahes related to IIUDoi8 The change permita 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of poner accident recopit4?n anj cjassMcation.

Dore of opphcot/ots/bruvendmed operation wi'.h the prfmary contJament mitigation and corrective actions.

req /eth March 18.19M deinerted unte ated to reactof st&rtLp or rad 91ogicil assessmont and protective Descripuon o/acae tdment rmpest-shutdown to a!!ow person.tel to enter schon recommendations and The proposed amendment would clanfy the drywell at poiver Drywell einrie coordinatios with st.ste and local the applicabahty of the containment are made lo iderlify any w ater luk age.

autNrities will rest witt. SERJ osygen concentration and drywell torus affect minor repairs and enablo personnel. AP&L corporate nianagement differential pressure umiting Conditions eqispment lubncauon. Drl = ell enMn svill provide direction to other non-of Opersti<,a (LCOI and Surve&nce oinee than during etartup ere t6te The t

nscleet Ap4L fecihtles for support to Reqvtremews. n, chanpa that are chann in tLne that tar eynft wdl riot ANO.142. Operant.g agreemtr(ts wdl desertbed in this proposed r.mendment be trierted during power opersuc'i eature cetsaued cump.lanca with are antended 19 provide a clear action allowed by this proposed chanpe is emotta other% Central Design Cntnion statemet should the osygen sma!L Additionally, there are ct.trently

(

17 of Appedes A to to Cm Part 50 on concentration or torue drywell sevnel other Mark I BWRs that are Eler,trical Power Systems. The refore, the defle*ential pressure LCOs be esteeded.

hcensed for operatiose with a deinerted proposed chanAos will not incre see the The action statement would p*oside 24 conta4rinaeal for penods greater 'ha. 24 probabihty or enrtsequer.ces of an hours to either restore the LCO or be in

hours, l

accident previously evaluated.

startop/ hot standby in the subsequent e Power operat on is pruently The desigo and design basu of ANO.

hours and cold shutdown in the permitted with dsyneu or torus 142 remain the e erne. Therefore, the follewins 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. There are enetal differential peessure less se i t paid lot

}

current plant safety analyses remain adtnmistrative charges associated with only 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> subsequent to goint to run complete and accurate in addressing the this amendrnent where the effected and 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> pnor to a reactor licensins basis events and anal rang os) gen concentrat4 ort or torus dt)well shutdow rL The change pertruts 24 hows t

blant response and consequences The ddferential pressure Technic 4l of power operation without 1 poi miting Conditions for Operation.

Specifications have treen tenurnbend as daf terectal preasure unrelatea to reactor

{

umillog Sefety Syatem Setunas, and a result of thts change. Floally, seueal startupor shetdown to aUuw pwtunnal Safety Umits an not affected by the changes have beca made to the to eeter the drywou as power. Dere is.

I 1

I r

30128 Faderst Resistee / Volc 53. No.154 / Wednesday. August 10, 1988 / Noticu no change m consequences of relasing 1hc staff h : rniewed The Commission has provided the 1 pse differeniial pressure betause Commonwcalth fLon's no significant standards for determmma w hether a the torus was anal)aed for 00 pas barards anah sie and concurs with its sigruf4 cant haards consideration esista presure differential as part of the MARN conclusions. Therefore, the staff as stated in to CFR M 92(c) A proposed I Contaminen* Short Term Program and proposes to determine that the amendment to an operatmg license for a was found to meet the NRC staffs' requested changes do no invohe a fatihty imnhes no sieruficant har.ards acceptance enteria, sigmficant heards consideration.

considerateur:s if operation of the facihty Therefore, these chanses do r,ot La n.' Puble Document Room in airordante with the proposed sigmficantly increase the probability or

/mution: Morns Pubhc bbrar). ro4 amendment would not:( )involse a conseqwnces of previousJ) esaluated bbrrty Street Moms, hhnois raw s,gmficant inuease m the probabihty or ac udents.

A trarrey for bren3ers M4hael I.

runsequences of an arcident preuously (b) The other char ses to the lechnical Mdl r. F3 quire. Sidle) and Austm. One naluated.12) create the possibihtv of a Specificatmns include the renumbenng hrst National Nara. Chicago. llknms new or different kmd of aciident from of other inter.related portinns of the IN aav accident previously eutuated, or(1)

Technical Specifications (whkh wcr, NRC I'emect Direc tor: Daniel R.

insohe a sy:nificant reduchon m a effected by the proposed change) or are Muurr marsm of safet).

changes that are being soust t for Commonwealth Edison Company, l he licensee addressed the abos e clarihcation purposes. These chanfrt a

!)ockel Nos. 50437 and 50 249. I)reeden three st.andards in the amendment sie considered to be admirnstrathe in Nuclear Power Station, Unit Noa. I and appbcation as follows:

nature 3 Grund) Count).ll!4nois ItlThe proposed changen do not j

inwhe a sigmficant increase in the (2) Create the possibihty of a new or gg g

4g d:fferent kind of accident from any probabihty or consequence of an 8

I accidero peniously evaluated because:

1. yse r[n fo ndwnt tvwest:

accident prniously evaluated because ful The effects of short term dernetting The amendment would make chanen to the changes rene t the addition of instnamentahon which serves similar have been analped in the FSAR.

the Dresden Nuclear Power 5:ation Addihonally, the torus was analyzed for Units 2 and 3 Technical Specifications to P "'PO' 8 ' ' ' h " 8 I" 'U * '" '

• h "

% here rances have been slightly 0 0 psi dry w ell to torus differential reDett instrumentation enhancements pressure as part of the Ma'k i for post. accident momionng completed mdified, the paramt ter will continue to r

Containment Short Term Program,and by tu bcenser as per guidance le momfored in a range that cosers its contained in Regi.latcv y Guide 197 and design weratmg span pane!!ocattoos was fvund to meet the NRC staffs for the instruments are hated in the acceptance criteria.

NUREG4?37 Supplement 1 Technical Specification tables for Consequently, the possibdity of creaties a new or different hind of "K,"p$p7 sed revision to the inf rmational purposes so that updat,ing,

the hst to reflect additions or relocations accident from any accident previously Technical Specincations for Dresden Umts 2 and 3 intohes changing ranges Nhu inemate redundancy or serve to evaluated is uuhanged' hanges noted lb) The other ty pes of c and panellocahons for urious types of enhann viikahiy for the operator.

in the proposed amendment are instrumentahon associated with post.

respectrsel)) has no delnmentalimpact acodeni and contairment mom.c y.

on avident probahahty or admitustrutne m nature.

(3) Invoke a sg.nificant redaction be lhe changes wluch are dmnbed 1:eJ<ve. (00imces Sirri arly, clar4Dcations t

the margin of saiety because:

pnmanly affect Tables 3 2.6. 4;f.1 a.sd onmethons oD)pographical trrors (a) FSAR ana?>ses hue shown that 4 2 4 and also Sections 33/4 7 o( the em administratis e chants a which f.t deSQn basis accider ts. the lons term Technical Specifica tions.

tmprose Techn ca? Specifica! ice combustible gas control sytem ( ACAD/

It) The dry well tempereture tradout reha oih'y ar.d therefo's can have no CAM l can prnent a corrbustible pas is ation is changed from a back panel to deinmencil in' pact misture of 4% hydregen even with a a front panel m th rcntel roon'.

A The proposeJ cSanan do not damerted contalnment. Therefore. puk (2) The drywell preis er rarge for the create the possibibt) of a new or containtnent pressure is bounded by thc

+ 70 mid range pen nrt trenmitter 6, diberent hind of accident from any FSAR lOCA anal sta The maram of changed frc<n "O ?S pais" to NS to ?0 accident previnasly n eluated bet 4use f

chanSr A she Technical Spenfie ntior : to safety for the tore dr>well dif'erentiel ps.g.

pressure is not d' paced n a result of g3) A r,duMoni wide re. e reuto.

r7fler1 'rarros ed instreent rango, th a char;se beuwse the 19n s was gen,t preme ir,j,ravor he beeis red Meancy, er y silaht) de ros affnt snal) sed for 00 psi drywell to torus added cri paneW20)-)

ut change da.agn o,atsund senitt. u?

differ mtial prnsure as part el the M..rk (4) A wide ran49 Nacint troef 'ew!

proter taJ satposts. The new ratises

! Cntitainment Short Te m Progrsm and p,n in,bcator has twe 6, ple;cd en a aid panel channes cemimwe te allow the was ivund to meet the NRC staff >*

• mp;4 reco3a r,,hw h menes va parameters to tv momtor:0 dun.w a ocu pta ru cnteria. Therefore. tm icput from one of the n.shng md, pmt.aasdent situahon at durins normal f ressure suppremon is msintemed and rentwIn elchaneePa.

operahor. No new or ddlerent modo of the chansa s do not reduc e the rnargin cI 151 The torus a ater in e4 sight glass opershon are allnwed by these chaneo

'*f'ly-tange it thenred from *14' to "40*

of the proposed admi.ustratne changes Ib) These channes are admimstietn e inches Also the <.wo narrn ranges %2S. Nor will they affect any systems or med therefore do not impact the rr.argin to + ;g ir. ;hes and %F ta 4 3 inches" equepment whic.h could tmtista as of safrty.

are being combined to form cine rang,

su ident.

1herefure, si.nce the propwed h< ense 10 to. m inches.

13) The propoed c%nge do nut amendment sataries the cntene in additmn eneral admmistratae knsolve a significant redxtion ir a specified in to CPlt 60 92.

changes hue been irkluded in the rrurgm of safety becaust in no 8 %e Commonwealth Fdison has determined reqwsted amendment.

do thne rente change s. f ane 9

r that a no allmficant hasards boers forporoseil no arsmfiront or admitustrateve changes a. a

• corwideratson esitt for these 6tems Assori/s consideration determanotam Technecal Speeification safety ic i

l

Federal Ros6 ster / Vol. 53. Ns.154 / Wedn:sday. August to.1988 / Notic:s 30129 The desien operat ng hmits and/or set requirementa necessary for safe setpoint and Tava channels require an points are sufficiently contained within operation have been retained in the TSt.

18 months channel cabbration.

the new ranges. Additionally, the range The changes do not ehminate or alter Cahbration of the delta.T channels is thansras have no effect on the functional the functions previously reviewed.

required at the beginning of each cycle test of cahbration freq';encies required (21 The changes do not create the upor. completion of the precision heat by these Technical Specification tables possibihty of a new or different kind of balance of Surseillance 4 2.3 5 RCSloop

'r All parameters will continue to be accident from any accident previously delta.T s alues shall be determined by monitored as currently required es aluated (10 CFR 50 92(c)(?)) because precision heat belance measurement'at 1he staff has res timed the hcensee's the plant operation and design are not the beginning of each c le in no sigmficant harards anal)sie snen effected by the change. The changas conjunction with Surseillance 4 2 3 5" ebose D4 sed on this review, the staff create no new accident mode.

Change 5 %ould change action proposes to determ nc that the proposed (3) The channes do not invohe a Statement 7 in Table 3 31. *Reartor Trip amenJments meet the three 10 CFR signifaant reduction in a margin of Ss stern Instrumentation." from "Delete" So 92Ici standards and du nui involve a safets (to CFR 50.921c)(3l1 because, as to "Delet ed."

siunif aant hazards consaleration.

stated m Genenc letter ma and in {1)

Fam for proposed no srgm icaet r

Locall'ubin Don, ment Room abose. requirements necessary for sefe batank consideration de:erminati.w

/m orion Morris Pubhc hbran.fo4 plant operatien hoe been retained in The Commission has prouded Law rt> Street. Morris. Ilhnnis vaso the TSs Further, the changes are standards for determimns whether a A t!orno for /,cene Ma hdel I conmtent with the requirements significant harards consideration cuve i

ht.ller, byuire. Sidle) and Austin. One estabbshed in preuous or 4nirational (10 CFR 50 W2(c)). A propo<ed b, rst ta nal Pla ra. Che ago, lHinois culuations amendment to an operating hcense for a i

fe

/svo/ /5b/sc Documer I Roorn facihty ins ch es no siemficant harards NHC P. rov <t D;ru for Daniel R.

locahon htonroe County Library consideration if operAon of the facild) r Muller Ss stem. 3?m South Custer Road.

In accordance with the propowd

"'" M'. h wan 4 a 161' amendment would not:(1)insohe a Detruet I;dison Compan) l)odet No. 50-0 significant increase in the probabihty c.

3 81. f ermi 2. Monroe Count), hikh pn F

d C

C " "D '"'" I'"*Cd'"'E""*"'b b

D* e/omendment trwnt june 24-Second Asenue. Detroit Michigan 4823 eutuated or (2) create the possibihty of 1*

ARCPro;oct D, rector Martin j a new or different kind of accident from 4

D. % reteo, o/ crwdmt et quest.

Virr ho.

any accident preuously esaluated, or (3) ihn prened brense amendmen, would modify the 'e'ermi.2 Technical Duke Power Compan). Duclet Nos. 50-insohe e sign ficant reduction in a 309 and 50-370. McGuire Nuclear margin of safety.

Spectf utions (TSel to remos e the ornimrawn charts following the Statim L' nits 1 and 2. Medienburg Changes 1 and 2 restate th+ setpoint udf arve prosided in the Commission's Count). North Carchna equtions for Overtemperature delta T Generic Letter Moi The p<oposed Dute of ameridvient regrest May g, and Overpower delt4.T. but do not amendment woukt also make varsves 1w invohe any technical changes to the admmisirsine c hanges to Section 6 0 M Descriptron of amendnvet request; equations themwhes (i.e. both sides of 6e N The proposed amendmerts %uld make the equations are daided by the same n u Depnyuwd co twm/ cant fa it changes to the Technical factor, delta.T.1 The changes make it i

/ oronh corsaferutw, c nerrmnat;on.

Specifications (TSI slated to the clearer that the reactor trip setpoints vre T h a Commumn has presided determi. nation of reactor tr:p setpoints eve

• sed in terms relatne to the deha-standards for determinna whether a for Os trtemperature delta T and T values at full e mwer (i e. delta.T,1. so a sfo ant barards cons.deration esists Os erpower delta.T. Change 1 v:rould as to be consistent with the manner in (1u CfR '.n 92k)) A poposed rewt ste tr e equation in Ete (1) cf Table which delt.s T is indicated by the phnt nrnJment to an oprating hcense for a 2 21,' Rnctor Trip S> stem instrumentaton. Since thne facMS msches no sanificant hasards Instrumentation 1 rip Setpointe in an amendments Msohe no changes to consofer4 tion if operation of the facihty algebrairally equivalent form to espre.s plant equipment, setpoints. c perating I

in m ardance w:th the penposed the Oserternperature delta-T setpoint hmitt.or procedures they base no I

arnandment would nnt:(1limohe a condition in terms of the percent of full adverse effect on any accident or safeti mnifont increau in the put stahty or power d*he.T vathir than in terms of marsins and they meet the ihn e to CFR eonw hemes of an wibnt peci.nush the 4Wute valoe of me o&cated v 92f el standards stred arme aututed. oe 12) crue the possib.hty cf delta.1 between t6e hot and cold laes prop > sed Chana* 3 requres the a new or different kmd of uciden* frwn Chme 2 would be e simdt,r determination of RCS iotal flow rme end ans acc6 dent preucwsly m elvated. or (3) tot itement of the eq atton in Nou (2) delta.T at fu'l power by pre @on he C ens uh e a spifiunt 4dr. tion in g of taw 2 21 fut the Ontoower deha.

balance measurements at the bemnnm l

l ren of safety T Ch.nse 3 wouid revise Surveillance of each fuel c>cle The bcensee ho 1 he konsee ho et aluateti the Requirement 4 2.3 5 to state that the RCS obsersed that actuel ulues of RCS lbv l

l prormed charse asamst the atme total flow rate shall be determined by ar.1 del:a.T differ from one fuel rule to standards as rented by 10 CFR precision heai balance measurement at the nest it is, therefore. deur*ble to l

50 911al The Commission's staff has the beginmns of each fuel cycle rather perform the precision heat be!.nt e reviewed the hcensee's eutuation and than at least once per 18 months measurements as soon as posuble efler agrees with it The hcensee concluded Change 4 would add Note (15) reachne full power in a new fuel cu le t

that p+ rt aimme to the Overternpor sture delta.

rather than perinrmm t%m cuts in til lhe cnenses do not insuke 4 I and Os erpower deli 4.T oems in T ble n onths presenth e.wel M m mnificant incnate in the probabihty or 4 31. ~ Reactor Trip histem the time inters al be%en rnuturrments s

consaquences of an accident preuousl)

Instrumentation Surs eillance is shortened the rewd TS is more i

es aluated (to CTH So 92tcMill twause.

Requirements " Note 115) would etste:

restrictae. Untd the n cle-spafic fWl l

I l

as stated in Generie Letter sue, those "Os ertemperature setpoint. overpow et power value for each laop's delta.T is 1

I J

[

)

33133 Federal Regnaler / Vol 53, No.154 / Wcdneedry August to 1een / Notices deterramed, b Lacenace ensures the administrahve charque to Techmcal in acwedance w,th the promoed conservatiya eeeeprecktaan of reacser Spectficaimona. For esasipla. a chaneo to amendrneni would twt. (1) Involve a power by sestrat time full power deita T achieve temaistency throtshovt b signafscant increase to the probabihty or rea&as to be l' F lower ha ior the TechruceJ Speubcalions, corraction of consequeices eI en accideni pres noosly prevsons cyde.

en error, or a channe m normenclaterre."

evalested. (2) create she possibihiy of a ne proposed Change 3 la ese TNe cassiple spybes to the proposed mew or different hmd of acendent leurn appropriate beconne it reeres t)w' Chargne 5 an accident previously evaluated, or (3) l performance of the proclaman heel On the besia of the above intohe a segnshcant redscswei in a l

balance measurennenta at a tisw consederations the Corusru anon marstn of safety.

1 (bestaraDE of a cych) when by s.ouM proposes to determrne that the proposed Decane the comps.ments are l

be most hhely to detect a char se in RCS amendinents would involve oo permancati connected to estential I

flow and fmu power delta-7. There are significa it hatards ccenaderations.

power, the function of these comporents no changes to piant proudwu or locolftd>he Docwnent Acorn is unaffected by deletion of the hardware.nerefore Change 3 does riot /ecolion: Athisui Ubrary, Untversity of suretillance reqotrveient, and the icvolve a ognificant bctease in the North Casol.na, Charlour iUNCC change, thceefore, woeld not (1)in,olve probabihty or cansegaeacas of an Stattenk North Carchna 2A43.

a signiftunt incresee in the probability accident previously evabated, nor A12cincy for haenser:Mr. Albert Carr, or conseqvmees eJ an acndent l

create the posibdsty of a rww or Duke Power Company,43 South preverdy evusted (2)creau abe i

differnt saident frots any auslent Church Sitwt. Charlotte, North Catchea pn,sebehty of a new or different kind of previously eoskated. Champe 3 afeo 28242 doca act inudse a signAfic. ant reduction NRC Pro /ect Dsterfor Doid B accident frem any acudent previously in a surpo of safety because it does not Matthews evahrsted, or (3} myo)ve a significant relas e tatlas requitessanta, rather. lt is reduction in a margsn of safety more consers atsv. and restrictive

• Duke Power Centpany, Dosaet Noo, n Accordmsty, the Commtssion preposes 349 and 47"1. McGuire Nurjear to determme that the proposed because the curvest spw.ificat6ons d not specdcolly require rescalung at b Station, Units 1 and 2. MesAlonburg aimendasants wouW invoh e no besmrums of each fuel cyde or Lf more County, North Carolina sigmhuat hazards cowdersuuns.

than one c)cie ocaurs wiskin an 13 Date of coiandaent regseit luce 24.

Adih Qal ch*]" P'{'yd

• g l

g r e4r wires the period fer De8crVition of amendment request.

outside the scope of thta nota.

caffbration of an of the delta.T The proposed amendments would resise WMic Danient Acom the Technica! 5pecificanons (13} b lation Atkms Lbrary Univeruty of instrumentation channels to be at the bestnnfrig of each cycle after colapleion deletmg inappropriate eurveillane,yNorth Ca rchna, Chartette (UNCC of the precision heat batance requiremenf 4 4 3 3 and 4 4 4 3 m+ilch Station). North Carshna 24221 measuremente As with the Change 3 regard manual transfer from normal to Aterreyforlatisse Mr. Ahrt Can, I

measurements,it is des!rable to perfonn emersecy power sepphee for the Duke power Cosspany,422 Sout) these calArauons at the bernofn3 of a pressuruer heaters, the power operated Church 64reat. CMrictie, North Carvhrba cycle, nther than every 13 months a:

rehef valves (TORVsk and the PORV M42 presert?y revired. because actual block valen.

NRCfreect D. rector David B.

values of detta.T et 1911 power have Basis for picposed r> sip:ficant Ma tthews l

been observed to dJffer from oc.e cycle hosords svnedersdort deferrruncuont l

lo t'io cest. Tts r.hs.tnel enhbretions TS 4 4J 3 reqwes the estergency pw.:

Duquesne IJght Company Dod.et No.

I etid ilmt prettica heat balana supply for the pressuruet heata v W e m gy,, yg,y 7,,,,s ution, s

eneasuremes/s of the begfrming of a demetstreted operat4e period.criff by Oo;t No. 2. Ship pinsport. Penns)h an&a l

cy& et,eure that the assameiens in the asawaW tNasferfir41 Nwer froM tt e Dote of amendment.ir pe**. Jun e 22.

I safety a. gal >e.s restn valid Cahbtstlen nomal to the emerger.cy powtr supply 19se of the deltr T ritanneid to the navr f, a and energfrang the heates Simtleriy Ts Deectrphon of omendmes.' nguest.-

powet vefues eMsid only be nweetar

• 4 4 4J ressares the emerrocy power The prope:44d aWr trat we ald rnise at the bejir:rdng of each eyefe. Se the s jpply for the FORVs and block vvh e, the allowable pressertter and er im I

hcansee eyeN that off diffts and to be efeewnstratal epersbne sitam aefety valve setecir.t teierance

% ts effona over ths etvroe of a tycfe perud) cal *y by mana a:tw tneof&rtint frovn t 1% to

• 15..p. Th6 doald ferocin '.cithn the allow exe, rnotive end cevitrol pow er frans tne cuneet 21% Wey vsive tcJerence i

eeremed in the selety ens'ym fer that nonnel to the eme rpeg 'en e.' mM/

w$tl te re*a6rmiist vshe testitig end cyc!v.

and operating the valve throus't a stustrrnr. how awr o tolerance c.f + 14,.

l bha Chenge 3. prtrweed CWge 4 le compHe 87ch of full tre vel.These 3% wouW auvw ruote flesibdity desmg swa a ansopriate end mon regsares,mvas are tawcunaary and plant opers.wes arma patenhally reu i,crservsliv% aid nweis the three inapyrvpetale tecsese each of these the number of heensee es ent rvsorts sterw6de f.f 10 C4 !422(c) for the cour;ptements la pery:anently cannected (LDs) that reeuh w%en valve seipoints 1

same rusoes as seven above for Chargee to an ereerssecy power sound. The NRC are foi.nd wtode of the tcmance. The 3

hae prevweely revtewed the deapna for new Ioierancea wceW prvvide a wider Change & le Iriseended le catoct Acsh:m power segpey Io these corymeets and allowsk4 rmatre to ectornmaiste 1

Staseewes y to stase that is has been has found these to be occsptable.

setpoent dith without camper mistna the i

l "deletad* Irves Toble 3.1 L Then channe The Cominese,en has provvied anatysed safety vehe relaef capatoy.

g l

le pusely edreassearettve amt mee'eea so s4andards for detefeunma whether a The reoposed chamees meuld te simder l

. safesy commeerum. The Commaescas he a sisedgaaet hasarda cama *tetion esista ta those approved so Arr.endment No pawvided esempise el amendmente (10 CyR !4 92(c)k A peopeaed 115 for Seaver YaHey Omt 1 1

l likely to eseehe no mens 6sant hasarde amendraent te en cperettra lkanse for a 1he eteential foncta e ni the safety l

i:ensidseettees (H P1L y144L One fauhty treM,ee no e anaticant basarda s alves to the pertert;en rif the prianary norepie ed thne type le lek "A pace 6y ecceedevotares icyerelasi ed the sacahry and essotmaary entesa tross l

Federal Realeter / Vol. 53. No.154 / Wednosday. August 10.19M / Notices 30131 overpressure,if the proposed flow ever. Table 4 31 only requires signals for the musiliary feedwater amendment is issued. the safety margin cource range inp thannels suneillance system. The hcensee stated that the would remain imchangea since the in Mode 2. and Modes 3. 4 and 5 with subject signal only serves as backup and upper limit ( + 1%) where the valve Mll the rs actor inp breakers closed. This has not been credited m safety analyses, open would remain unchanged The erroneously imphes that no sunedlance and proposes to delete its requirements reduced hmit of the lower tolerance.

is required on the source range channels from the abose tables howeser. would reduce 'he frequency of with the reactor trip breakers open The (c) Suncillance requirement 4 41.3.1 valves found outode the specified range. proposed amendment would correct the of boih units' TS would be reused to thus resultmg in reduced worker error m both units' Technical ehminate the requirement to test the radiological esposure associated with Specifications, and is thus a purely residual heat remoul (RHR) pumps on vehe testing and adtualms administrothe change.

recirculahon The requirements of pump Basis for prvposed no signsficcol The proposed amendment also testig urider normal s) stern borords censiderotson determit otson:

corrects tmgraphical errors in Table configurahon tn accordance with The pnmary and secondary coolant 3 31 in the Unit 2 Technical Specihcation 4 0 $ would remain and overpressure limits are not changed by Specifications should sen e to assure operabihty of the f

the proposed amendment smce the Bous for proposed no signi econt RiiR pumps The hcense stated that upper hmits of pressure will still be borottis considerotron determination-testina the purrps on recir.ulation memtained by safety vahe settings of The Commission has prouded guidance causes hish ubration leu ls and

+ 1% Furthermore, dunns testmg. the concermns the appbcation cf these therefore unnecessary pump valves wdl be adjusted to a tolerance of standards by proudmg certain degradation ilt The less restricti e tole!ance esamples ($1 FR 77511 One of these.

Basis forpreposed no sNni iront f

of +1% 3% mainly senes to pros 6de Esemple (i). Involving n > significant barels emhhon 6t'erminalmn-operational fleubihty and to reduce the hasaf de considerations is % purely The Commisuon ho prouded number of LERs Since parameters that administratne change to technical standards m 10 CFR 50 92trl for could effect safet) would not be specificahons. ' The requested determ ning whether a sigmficant

' hanged. the proposed amendment,

amendment ins oh es changes that all hazards conodershon custs A vould not increase the probabih*y os match this esample. Accordingly. the proposed amendment to an operating currence or the consequences of staff proposes to determme that this license fnr a feethty tr.sohes no

-e

<cidents preuously evaluated Since no change does not myohe a signihcant signihcant harards considerdhon if hardware modifications or changes in hazards considerahon operahon of the fariht) m accorJanc e operation procedures would be made.

Local Pubhc Document Room with the proposed amendment would the proposed changes would not create

/xotion: B F. iones Memonal I.ibrary, m':(1)invohe a sismfiennt increase in the possibihty of a new or different kind M3 Frankhn Avenue. Ahquippa.

,p, e,obabihty or consequences of an of accident from sny accident previously Pe nnsylv ania 15001 awdent prenously es atuate_d (2) create evaluated ne safety matam is Anorney for heensee. Gerald the possibihty of a new o* different kmd controlled by the upper tolerance hinit.

Charnoff. Esquire. lay E Silberg.

of accident from any accident previously which is not chang d therefore there in Esquire Shaw. Pittman Potts. &

evaluai d. of(3)insohe a sigm7icant no decrease in the :>afet) margin.

Trowbndge,23no N Street. NW.,

reduchon in a margm of safety.

i 1

On the basis of the abose discussion.

Washmston. DC M3E the staff proposes to uctermine that the NRC Pmfect Dsrector lohn F. Stnl

^sjyed te o amendment mvones no significant Dvquesne Ught Company. Docket Not, sun cillance. and testing requirements of 50-314 and 90-412. Beaser Valle) Power the umts These changes do not oli ument Room Station. Unit Nos.1 and 2. Shippingport.

ads ersely affect the current capabihty of location B F. lones Memonal Ubrary.

I'""' ) I' * "i"

'h' P 8"' ')uems Therefore. Ihe I

063 Frankhn Avenue. Ahquippa.

Pennsyh a nia 15001 Date of amendment erquest. lune 27, proposed amendment does not insch e a sigmficant incre.se in the probabdity or Attorney for heensee: Gerald 19M Charnoff. Esquirs. lay E. Silberg.

Description of amendment request-consequences of a preuously evaluated sce dent Esquire. Shaw. Pittman. Potts. &

The proposed amendment would result TrowbnJge. 23m N Street. NW m the following changes to the

't he proposed amendment does not Washincon DC 2tm7, Technical Specifi 4tions (U)-

h ad io or fouow an) equipment or N9Cirwert vervctor John F.Stolz (a) Tr.e Unit 1 suncillance frequeney derian change Thus.no adserse safety for Table 4 A1 Item 19. Safety injection considerahons are mtroduced by the Duquesne Ught Company. Docket Nos.

Input from ESF. wouW 1: s changed frcrn change Therefore the probabihty of an i

50-316 and %-412. Beas er Valler Fower monthly to es ety refuehng for accident or a malfunction of a different Station. Unit Noa.1 and 2. ShipgRagport* clefication of the required I)pe then preuously eu!aated would j

Penos)hania instrumentahon testing frequenc)..rhe not be :reeted-Date of amend:nent erguest. lune n.

certeat T'S already spec.fies such nis proposed amendment will not i

19M firquency but la en indirect way. The affect the assumptions or consequences Drscriptwn of amendment request; proposed change would only clanf an of any safety analvos presented m the 3

The prepose/i amendment would resise costmg requirement. and is not a FSAR Therefore. the change will not l

l the source range channela suncillaace change 6n substance insohe a sigmf cant reduction in a requirements of Table 4 311or both he (b) Table 3 3 3. 3 3 4. 3.3 5 and 4 3 2 of maron of safet>

Unit I and Unit : Technical both units' TS would be modified to Ac4 nrJ nsly ibe staff propo*es to Specificehons. As currently antten, an delete one of the auuhary feedwster determine that this change does not l

inconsistene) eusts betwes - Table 3 31 actuation signals (turbme drnen pump ins oh e a significant hazards I

and Table 4 3-1. Table 3 31 *equires the discharge pressure low with steam sahe consider hon l

source range inp channels to be open) The curnnt TSr provide an loco / Pubhc Decument Room j

operable in Mades 2. 3. 4 and 5 eshaustne httmg of all the actuahon

.xcDon. B F jones Memonal Librar).

I 4

30132 Feder:l Regist:r / Vol. 53. No.154 / Wedntsday August 10. 1988 / Not;ces (A1 Frankhn Asenue, Ahquippa, insobe a sisnif. cant meresse m the NRC Project Dsre ton lierbert N.

Penns)) vama 1'ldut probabdity or enrsequences of an accident Berkow V'"'0'*I eniset&

Attorney forhcensee Ceceld F

Removmg uw reference to Ahbl $sanderd Georgia Powet Company Oslebrpe Charnoff. Equire. Jay F. Silberg.

m a m2 wiu anew inen cent smess ia Power CoeperatsoaMun,cipal Eled i

Esquire. Shew Plf tman. Potto a to te used m deiereunins the ownner in Authority of Georgia. City of Dalton, Tr,owbridge Noo N Street. NWa which the leakage rate te:Mata are anab i Georgia Docket No. b0 321.Edwin L R

ec / re to'r Jnhn F. Siola c oe,EnI,'r uIaee e).Nthn i,'i r II*h Nudeer Plant. L' nit 1. Appling h"

g

'a6 *" '" * ** *"< ca***

rand. re,.or..d u.hi Consp ns et ai.,

Docket Nos. 34435 and $0 3as. St. Lucie

[c'c',

,,[)

' "I 0#"###'"## # W"'

• I""' Ed t

U Plant. Unit Nos.1 and 2, St. Lucie probatol ts or conseq ernes of en eund,nt O* "I'"* N #"""O*'" N U County Florida preuously eu4.ted w.U mot in6tua.

lhe amend nent would modify the (2l Operstaen of the lacJlsty in accorderne Date of amendrnent trevesta lune.*3, i.ith the propoud emendment wooW not Tec hnical SpecificeHens (TS) for llateh treate the possibilit) of a new or different Unit 1 trr (1) add Ateesse Planar unear De scriffen cf oriendment reque sis:

kind of euident from any arcident pres ewely llent Generation f:ste ( AP'!!CRIlimits The St Lurie Pisnt Technical es atuaied for new General Electrie yEl CF eseFB ecifirat6cne (TS) currently require the No che pee to plant openstion or fuel and Advanced Nudear Fuels ( ANF) 5p}crida Power and Light Company (the

}

survesttence accepeance creena are es9 Lead Fuel Assembbes itIAsl:(2) bcensee) to determine containment reques'ed in this proposed ha nee add a Unear }{cet Cencration Rate amendment. The unptetrdstr of leeksee tala lesere rates by usma the methodology

" d*'* '"d'8

• wl remem wr hused.

(UfCR) hmit for the CF ess Ell fuel, and and p trvisions of ANSI N45 4-1972 (TS hkC-spproved rnethoda elleakase rate (3) tesise the Minimum Critical Pow er 4 61.2L Dis standard provides for one hetens are ut4. wiry We W N R

W ud hMeh of te.o acceptable methode for leekage y,,, pn,ni me,w,e recernised as an APLilGR hmit multipher (MATTAC,)

raic testing the Totel T6me enetbcd and i,nprosed eh,,na,,,n,,siod of calculattr g figures to show their applicabtht tathe tM iomt to Pcant method. Adunces m cor.tainment leakeye rete,

"'" I"'I 'li ""d ' * '"'" "' OD I'I' leah age rate testma solteequent to the There are ne new failere modes sesocated information regarding fuel t) Pes that are issusace of ANSI N45 44972 have with this c> sense end thee,4cre. ehe poestbility no longer used at the plant.

of a new er diffewee kmd of m4+nt wd! not prosided improved teit methodi,,

Bas /wpr sea s@ubmt howds wsfcretion deternor urson:

be meied includies e newer method of evaluating M U ** A ** **0#*4 '**"I'"'*cn m uuu -

teet data called LVe Maas Vosnt method.

The Maes Point n.ethod 64 descnbod in

• • ' ""' *)* 'rsemif.cean r hn in a The Co amioneon has prosided u

standards for determining whetha a ANSI /ANS $&61981. "Containe>ent

• No" ro f armandment includes 5 sta en 14akage Testing Requ6tements."

surudance pequirement snethodoigy sieruncant hetards corWerabon esists 3

(10 CTR 60.Qcll. A proposed atto as c onsidered to be more occarate in thantee and shere se na eespect on the reecter amendment to an operstmg burise for a deterrmmns conaemment leakage rates.

conia* ment er led ese rese accepeet>gny The propoeed amend:sents would i'mds The leisewed esat>tical niethe.6 doer facihty involves no significant haurds modif) TS 4 8.12. "Containment provides se addbtsanal modned bw wordysag consideesticsms if operation of the facihty

'h*' 'h' *** ****' 485rsPF and m accordance eith the proposed Lesk a, e for the St. L.de Plant. Und untemnwnt oisn lee 6 eer rotes me Jd te amealment would not:111 ms uhe a Nos.1 mal L The rsquirement to ne

,,gnificant irtenase in the probaNhty or ANSI N 45.449"2 wosJd be deleted, and

$"hned re dana ned m

,, 9c

.,9,pp consequences of an actident prenowly the uw of the Mau Point method wodd er.et,ty u a reedt of he pro,eeed beenee

*I"'d O' III '"*L' 'h' P'"'bihty of be avihonted,10 addinon, the %6ee a mendme nt.

a new or different kmd of acc6 dent from stateme nts wodd be changed Beeed on the eben m e haie determered accordingly.

that the amendment request does not it) any awdent preuously evaluated. or p)

B@s /orproposed po agruficoat involve e assmficenhectene m the invohe a significard ted ction in a hatorda consodcrotwn de farman0Lwn:

probebany or eeneenansee of en scadent mergin of ufety P""***'? e**lueid til mote the The hcensee states that The Commission has prouded 1ienene hind of

, The proposed APUlGR and WICR d

pr t y of a new standards for n etermining whether a i

sigmficant ha:Ards consideration esiets

,'$ne.,,d$,[.,oin. f.,,'r timHs for mse fuel ype MA w etc es aluated by CE osms NMC.

(10 CTV So Mc)L A proposed reduci,en m e

,gm er rery.nd ih,,,r.r, amendment to an operatng hcense for a does not invehe e signdicant herard, approsed methods documented in the facihty invAes no sigmficent hazards consideretiert

%eneul F.1ettnc Standard Appbcation

)

cons 6derateor.s if operation of the facildy The staff has made a prehmmary for Reactor FweL" NEDC.:4011 P-A a l

in accordance with the propoud review of the hcensee's analyses of the (CESTAR.fi) Comphance with those amendment wo4d not. lt)invohe a proposed changes and agrees with the Omits willeesere that DD:9CA f,sel signifkant increase m the probabety or hr.nsee's conetosices that the three meets specified acceptable fael duWn conseqwences of an acakat previowly standerde in 10 Cl3 to sC(c) are met.

hmits tri the Unit 1 reactor. ATI fuel esah.ated, or (1) create the possib61ay of Therefore, the etoff proposes to safet) design basee in the Pfent II. etch a new or different kind of accident from. dencfmtne that the proposed Urut 1 Fmal S.fety Anal) sis Report any accJdent presiculy evaluted or p) arnendments do not intohe a sign!ficant (FSARJ are met by CFAstF11 fuel The tns oh e a sisad. cant reduction in a hasard ceneiderskon proposed APIDGR hnsit for BD 29rt A margin of ufety.

loco / Pubhc Document Am fuel were calculated using SAIFR/

l The bcensee hee eulasted the Ixchot Indian River l5ner Co!!cge GES11t-tOCA which demonstreied that t

proposed amendmenta againtt *he Lbrery. 32nB Virsirds Avenee. Fort the power les el of Crnerat fuel types etandards prodded abou and has made Pterce. Florsda mto ogratmg 6n the Unit 1 core wm not be the foUo*ung detununation.

it*"ner /er heeemet Hardd P. Rete, brasend by LOCAces=& ret &ms se ks g

. It)Deerooms et the tanh4pe escs dence

.Illegars. Nee.manand Hohmain f,tm L _ 4.s approwns L}tCR herits are aset. The m 6* *e privened ementaneet W nor.... Street. NW. W aabengecm, PC *on3b propused U KM lernet for the GENEB

Fedesel Itagluter / Vol 33. Ms. tM / Wedewdmy. Aussi M. tems i Nashed BBBE I'ai eleme6mmana anch the quep med saletf andreas en e gameric and 64es eiusoitetnr W crueie the SeesMEhey el AFfifCit hast ursE esaure shna the Hsichymude be. In ahteen she a arw or ddhee st kind cui securet fremi specifed -. i fund mensk sumi specific nucie.sr daswas addrnsed by any accadset yteeiously eesde saad: artal design firmts etven in CESTML 44 are he proposed chseege are add cleasiy involw a manussent seshua tkm se a

't**

siedat to apreeed nedser demsne metipoedsedety.

The 8as lead (e.J anasumMane have beme ened at ceher S W E 4 psmes. The The hcaron haa peonded Su=

h(rn evakated by ANF for ame as tie posubtht) of a new bnd of accadvest se follomna hederuseHon h asppet of the liatch reactnes These fvH weenhance not crnted.

repseed cheers w t te dwed to he tieveroasu.Ilv

3. The p opu=ed chanse does rwit Ipsed Charge tc sirr.dat to d.e CE D/PSDRitml J !ael invohe a eagida.ane rists.crun m due Ptammatt emi eded die e me etemsce n

soch etw,4.!ht esMrw AMJICR knd4 rr agte elsmarty lur the same teeuns wari durwoe IM i t t4pek twnes to a t

(w hei property adeuseed to euour,t for swed en Isem a Moe'-

dM W4W MWm Ihe defhsted etimhet of rud4 and hlCPR 1 he st,rfI has cuandersd b prwooed ph,mm, w,4, UM therin.1 L:suta fur B/PWRILMH IA4 chacaes ared agrees eith toe Lcemee e 1 rnein ce em is4asma enh,g (MRWsj m.1 be oppi;cah'e to stern as we lTlar evaluatica w.th resped to the three and the ilmit 1 ht%w stop v ih en a

MF Sta lael asse mAus ewre seemiards.

4,g g,q p'ru% apreemed by the 'GC for u,e Do th<s Gms. the Cowieasseoe hu g%,ng 4, 3,o g pgg it. llakh Utui 1 deterf9ined th ti the requesled semky (etament bruetary A renamn to &e enestmc MANAC, amend 1:'wd sneem tae three vecdanis inebks 19 e Lht i rm;sor Wddmg stee figure (Figure 1.bt. $best 8} is prep.ud ancL theredare. has roa 3e a psu;veed

% 4,, g g g g g to indicate that the knite are ap.bble detereventun EMt the erneedmeed commen Umts 1 eni t nres above the j

to all faci types iri ese at !% r t 1 Latch as appbcation does not eauhe a re W k h k M M I

w ell as its prwe d CDsfat fud are) sutmbat hatures canindersom "g"

" "P8 *g g*

• the Sa2 LFAs Coe Phcients on Mgure taal /\\h/,c Docuivret Ren in W e

ap pas tW %

locare Apphr g Coundt - Pubbe Ldeary, te htr3diry and rr. mew. tty.

3111. %eet 8 wWh refer to the elder act City thM Dewe, tia y Georgia

""" N "'E**"E D' ' '48 h7. Esa, and es.Mt Ial taes are deleted ten w 1%ne fuel ty pr.a are no Lupt m 31513 vnNse de M Han h 1 Artrwr/ rr ficersre thce W.

TerWeal S;ireficatons pertMcIng to j

f une at f%et flate.Wre(m. to sephfy &c TerheksM dbrunt, au r.'h arthil. F.wTn!re. Sh aw. mi m a n.1*utts secondary c ntainment bed ary fuel type tabels onM be eted fross the andTrr Wore. 2W N 5%et. NW, mueemtesh cham 4 censh M M/C,fere Washington IX' arry t*o ads d secca 1% entsinunt to S nct b 70 fu.4 tytua h ne losgere in NRC Frwer.t Octrmr-Dand (L fastate ses danns nutap use at Maat thW relevevices to t%s Matthews sanah PnormaP secWay cider feel type are deletr d ha Gmpa Poa er Cornpeny. DaleMurpe cmtsinment rnade wit be toaintalnnd Spectfotiern U411 A 3/411 C esed the Powee Corpora!1on. MunkJpal EWtric during mmt plant con?tlant, and a M

ms[1Ikand Au&oruy of Georgia. City of Dalton.

innhf.ed* secendary cosL& ment c[r 7

Gemps.De Jie No.58 331, Ednie L confHruration may he established if fuel. are also ed llatch Nuclear Plant. Unit 1 AppMng cert.un cond.tians are a:et wMe theunit The tepaeH c+ arv do rut invedee Cany, Georpa is shutdou Spectnca14. th prgosed a siendic.mt kneeds crinsakvation lar tea faenere e,amans-Ne oloav= heat remit )=ly it.

chanse wdl mod.fy Luuuv,4 ConJirions

1. Use af CHtasem fuel and Aug omg 1988 for Operation SpecaScathes U C 1 and l

Lf'As ews not W,e a siresfkant u m W annsa/eeseadsmait v e4 31.CJ., the esaocialeJ emedt nce i

ine ro.i:== to the prehe4mlety of na This arrue Amrod samW anodsI iw requirecwala (SpesAhess U C1 and F

...r tant previemely evolmaced tascasse Ter nowaJ Sentica' aman (154 4 7.C *.) the Do'si Featoene Smma l

4 no wn furent chamase 6n yleet deesqui or requeenwaa reeanimg the Ley 5ML2 and the appbc.able bases.

prtsxdiern we eccese se e russeh M thbe amatasement heimJary, as li.dhme:(tl A 5Jahr(cftporar) c.LWee were cheage. Any future care % unede nuvenet esc =tary contaammaire appros ed by & h. lear Ra gainwr) posiMe 'sy the proposed cbsiste eAme 1,,oundary se resw epsufied as ahe 13 Corntmsuon (MCI m e et s aswma of I

hn e hacia tw wd he eve 4uate=L umme vrould be unaseassed dennst nimet pleas Amendmca nt1 to it.e Und 1 Tn. hem:4

~

NaC-appmeed metissadscarut shee,, to emads6smes, het a omruMed senwidery Specthcations. That smeadment n act the omrwed actreseca crworse can4mmigene tusesidery wedad he pros e hl a tea.carery rm6.ast 6a che j

l f.e amatyeis d the lhestung acudrote eunen eased isMe the inut ie abeesdirma, eeJuy comanamret rue.anL premen4 eve 4enated herefore, she provsdnd certain onmeMeena a re amit med Technd Spenthnaca ahnv4 the 1982 j

cmassveeriree of an escadret wenM net (2) he classer ajoe a enid rude newrud ref.eleg cusage de tatume inans he sen.f.o+ nth terrensed me a mesh of editortal cmicAiwis m the 1s.

mdficatron wert asescasted we sh, I

the us.e of the are fund typsgo ihasse for prtyw ed au swee/wat Mark i Cant.arutent ime Team i

2. Th rompead cheesse dame sees Aoiartis nesaperouse cd curmawrc Prearm The mtres d the chareee e

<mse de puss.b.hy af a era ce The Cassee* ion has pne wind hn%J herein is sia partnam enil; s

dJieneet bail af atsadreht levan any standas de fur 4 rte'rressung ersu taee a im;im swit se esenprary thangtt pre,mmedy anaaput because no chasure sqrtuficant hountes osnudoesteen eGta amtnined in Arieerdovet et is pannt deseen or nyeretsasi is invadge1 (600R 54sticli A prepowd Itoposemi Chamee i does not sawdve a l

eisps f ar runsawty smimw chasses inn anusedunent to an operatact hcense Le a soem6 cast hasarda usandwarme bar the 3

tisc Id Jr svn.

lacdssy uru h to rue or@ans h.itaras (M!rre.,ree tea sirs Uur Ch. stW.W fuel types preped c onsntenams if ge, stun ciime facuiry 1 la don ase enredse a see4 cant for Lee a Ua A 1 have eurent sc4wncauy m acoedanue erith tame prm, sed increase m te prthabdir) or redew ed and approged be the USpetsC.

assuadimmsel weeW ore pl urados a esserarmenose of aa acr3 ee et terweisney l

11e imoact of Ihe : ene ha4 types has nyinftcans asawame si st.e teskahaty te enemated.tareaee ese basa fwrechee of been evaieased a ge&ast the evdeverit camisequmumme of ses acc>toat regtesuty the Hume 1 secon% c=atanusene i

i i

d 1

l 1

i i

i

- -.- --.w--. --

t 301$4 Federal Register / Vol. 53. No.154 'l Wednesdzy, August 10. 1988 / Notices system. which is to maintain a 1/4 inch from any previously evaluated, not a new or different kind of accident from negative pressure on the commun Unit 1 invohe a reduction in the margin of any accident prestously evaluated. or (3) and Unit 2 area above the refuehng safety.

Invohe a significant reduction in a noor, remains unchansed in the The staff has considered the proposed margin nf safety.

modihed conheuration Therefore, changes and agrees with the hcense(s The hcensee's May 13.19n submittal refuehng activities and Unit 3 reactor evaluation with respect to the three provided an evaluation of the proposed operation are permitted to continue standards.

changes with respect to these three without insohng a hmihng condition for On this basis. If e Commiss)on has standards operation ILCO) determmed that the requested Basis forProposed Change le 2.11 does not create the possibihty of amendrnents meet the three standards thstoncall the suppression pool a new or different kind of accident from and. therefore. has made a proposed terrper.ture b,mit has been chosen any prruously es aluated, because the determmation that the eniendment based upon the maumum espected modified conhguration wdi endude the appbcation does not ins ohe a service water temperatue. For most Unit 1 reactor budding area below the signdicant hasaron conside*ation-DWRs. this hmit is in the range of 90' F refuehng door and $tandby Gas Loco / Pubhc Document Room to er F. For Plant lietch, the hmit 6s 99 1 rr atrns nt 55 stem (SG15) sudeon to 44ction Appbrg Counts Pubhc Library.

F. Many bcensing analpes use this pool th.it area so ' hat secundat) containment 3n1 City tiell Drne. Dedey. Georgia temperature as the inital conihtion-integrity in the rommon area abuse the 31513 Genenc es aluations performed for the refuehng Deor can be rnmintained This Attorney for hcersee: Druce W.

Dmhng Water Reactor Om nets Group condition 6s permissible only under Churchill. Esquire. Shaw Pittman Potts conditions specif.ed by 3 7 C.2, smce and Trowbridee 7100 N Street NE (DWROG) suppresuon pool temperature hmit (SF'TL) Committee show t!'at the Unit 1 actiut.es that may lead to a Washinston. DC 2(su?.

postulated telease of rad.oactiuty ORC Profett Director Deu.d D normal suppression pool temperature dur ng a Unit 1 ri fueling outase will be Matthew s limit for BWRs with Mark i containments can be reised to 110' F confined to the common refuehns Door arte Thersfore under tettein Georgia Power Company. Oglethorpe with no adserse impact on plant safety.

conditions. 5GTS seruce is not required Pow er Corporation. Munidpal Deeric A propn.tary General Electric report, Authority of Georgia. City of Dalton.

EAS IS 03c& prouded as an endosure in the L nit 1 reactor buildmg area below Genorgia. Docket Nos. 54321 and 50468 to the hcensee's May 13.1988 subrnitial.

Edwin 1. llatch Nudear Pla:.1 l' nits 1 discusses the impact of raising the pool 3 he pos change does not insohe a reducti(>n in the margin of DND D'

M U

"M** ".N N W D M safety anal)ses These eselustions sefety beense secondary containment Ihte of omrndment requot: May 13.

inteant) for the modined tonhguration 1988 include assessment of Anticipated will continue to maintain the capabihty Description of omendment reewsg.

Transients Nthout Scram (ATWS) to obtain a 1/4 inch water gauge The amendment would modify the egents and Emergency Procedure negain e pressare in secondar, Technical Specihcations (TS) for Units 1 Guidehnes (EPGs). esen though these containment. Therefore. the radioimcal and 2 as follows. (1) For each unit. the areas are be>ond the histoncal design conwquences to the enuronment esisting requirements to maintain besis of the plant.

following a postulated refuchng accident suppressinn pool tunperature at or The GE report F.AS 19 0388. detols are not increased.

below 90 F, to initiate pool rochng if the results of the Plant flatch revrosed Choge 2 the temperature esceeds 95' F. and to es atuahons and proudes the technical F.sistina 'l echnic al Specincations shut down the reactor if the pool b.ses for the proposed Technical 4 7 C 1 a and 4 7.C 2 a require that a lemperature cannot be restored to g5' F Specihcatlon changes The evaluations preoperational secondary containment within a 24. hour penod would be consider the effect of the proposed capabiht) test be conducted The word deleted anG replaced by a requirement changes on safety rehef sabe(SRV)

• preoperational" conseys a preeperating that suppression pool coohng be loads, containment response. and hcense condition carry.oser whoch is not initiated if the pool temperature reaches emergency core coohns system (ECCS) intended By deleting the mord 100* F.The eutting TS requiremests to performance and show that the changen "preoperational" from be scram the reac;or when the pool are acceptable.

specihutions. confusion,itt b, temperature reaches 110' F and to

1. These changes do not insohe a ehminated, depressunse the reactor sessel when the signihcent increase in the probab ht) or Specihcstion 4.7 C 1 b page 3 713.

pool temperature reaches 120* F remam consequences of an acudent preuously should be deleted since the identical unchanged (2) The Unit 2 T3 would be evaluae because apphceble accident matenalis stated on page 3 712 modihed to delete references to the anal)ses that could be impacted by Specihcations 3 7 L 2 and 4 7 C page water s olume in the suppression pool.

raisms the suppresitoit pool operating 3 713, are numbered incorrectly, b' eyBasis for proposed no s ynsficont hmit hase been esamined and found to should be numbered 3 7 C.3 and 4 7 C 1.

borottis considerution derremmation be acceptable.The seram and respectnel), since Specihcations 3 7 C.2 The Commission has p.ouded depressunsation hmits are unchanged i

and 4.7 C 2 are properly located on pase standards for determining w hether a 2 The possibihty of a different kind of 3 712a lhese numbenna errors were significant hasards consideration e sists accident from any anal) ed preuously inadserlenth introduced when the plant (to CFR 60 92(c)) A proposed is not created b) these changes. since Haich Unit i Technical Specincetions amendment to en operating Lenne for a the proposed changes would only revis.

Amendment No 100 was issued.

faciht) insches no synificent haastd.

an opera'ing hmit on permissible pool bnce these changes are editorialin considerations if operation of the faciht) temperature This charse does not nature, they do not insche a signihcant in accoedence with the proposed msche the poter.tial for a new acc Jet t increase in the probo tubi > or amendment would not:11)invohe a 13 pe. since plant design and function are consequences of an accident preuously sigmheent meresse in the probabiht) or unchanged evaluated, do not create the possibihty consequences of an accident previously 3 Marpns of safety are not i

of a new or different kind of accident evaluated, or (2) create the possibility of aisnincantly reduced by these changes.

L

l' adoral Repeter / Vol. 43. W,154 / Wedmeeday. Aaaast 10 Idis / Notect s 33135 bmaase the Lays ca of ne p%s med pool Trmhr% 1 Spmficeoena for 1,uda Unit i Ihe noJetson pmet ss is acti.sted onir by temperat.are has kan evolusk4 rdain e and Unit 2 to delete all reknam.es to de chlorme detects att TNrebet, there is no to sale <3 analpas (CE report EAS 19-main centrol twei(MCRj cWrwie need for the MCA cWnne detectoss in Ostet ar.d esaritans have been showw as detesters na.A to automat 4c laoka e of rem.iin in sersire.

be amniaser.c=stJp i=rW SnJficaed Ihe maio created ruuan enewaan -ital Basis for Ao Sssas/ scant /#crorth heat capaul) temaks in llc contst4 oretea (MCAJILl on high cons 6& rot,on lHermmosson supprtau.,a puel ice canapleie chierone ass el The p opuesd annendowtai clocs not c on Leentnas d amuy and sen t0Je hi.41 Basis fwfvpartino ser e/amwit inn,M e werdcant haeards foDoi.Las.a ecc &at to seaetar Aea.eak unan 6 egg,tw derara wwwwec conuJrea Avn ior the Ic4)cmine re.ma sh eidowa.

The Comm.6ean hea prevkh d 1 The cAenge doce not iraoive a Bau/ inch mascd O eve.1 standarde for daermaneng whether a

,,gnihcant increase in the protabahr) r4 The scoposed (Aacce tri the UaW 2 significant hasards== d-retsen e t**

occurrence or consequences of an Tedmical Spaiaticellana ds6ctWt OcCERJesacn A prig,rmed actident previsualy evah.akd. becasse tefrrences to supprenamen puset water amendowet to ein opersensus usease tw a' remm al of cbriru cyhndm 1*v **wly solume is edaserial. since weh r les t1 fscihty eenrulves no asyndicant hasard*

stored on sue w6tl ehminate the nd r4 4 rnorutorand will still be ee 3uiret con:ideratames eIeyerotsen of the lecils43 chloriae rehane te MCR op6tatuis.

I Obviously.the attual votems of w ates in nocardene een the preposed y Ib W h M Me A-was newr inoa.43 red; teywred water afnendesma eniaM est. it)imesh e a of a new or differena L6J cf passibahifrors any previoimly euleated levets corregwd to a Rsed water signihones ensneee si the preisebd.ty e' accident vohne unksi sdratardial vendtfkations consequences of an aumeset preenemif because the reaseel of ermite chrum-l to ee seber parties at the 1orve are ei siented; ar tal arvete lhe ;

4 of chminates the and far nelesnatic perferinet vuth modificaiians are a new te ddlerent hand el ecr assest l"

isolation of the MCR due to chrine l

Jfonced le I the Med 1 Coatstarrtent an) accident provisedy evahn4ed. er (34 retesee %e todavna bypochlarite tanks Tvein Premnim3, the tmpeci of #m invonwe a soundicaan rechsatwa is a will belocated in a :afety dae in the chasses na rdege nt imisey evnin=1 tons neripsi e(endsty.

cMorination budJar4 Even ta the e6 eat are aasensed.

Tae imamane e jeae m itsas nebeettet

• pen il 1a i

The dete*e of the tderuncre to Ibe -

provided she eeBowhui eveksaan of the h',8" gj suppression taA era 9er v dome ate progened charges enth foiquect no these MCA pm d me W editorialin nature and hsw two impact three standardr

' N "

4 pmpard h,,w"#'d on plant safc4y.%e tequiv*d Mies Jlor nspasd Dimyrr signifsc'an]t )

l surgureenlee penal w awr levde vemein The WCRACS for Units t ead 2 heista y

since the proposed change etniales a urwhegrad. The ab Istien is consisemat the amount of chksnne entense she with the 'Y. maw, des td Ameerknente that common MCR in the esent of a cidwane POI'"U *I '"M 8^'#A*

The ahdihas tarul the seteerd i

are coneH%1 f4ot LAety to Irwdeo tank rupttee(Reienece shr Usut t Feeg Sigaificant Harnds Cr.asiseretters?

Safety Analyme Report).The cauwat changes and agrees with the hcensee a hsted on pop,1 estm d the Apre m Plant Haedi dween bases amtedes the e aluanon w oh rus;ws e de thm i

standerde.

lati 6 ease e4 the Federal taplease.

tank repture of two 14ee et neders d On tMe beste. the Co'wmh skv1 hat Time Seeff bt cuesMeeed 19se proposed chhwane ass. The current droge been af determined that the repested l

changen nad eews wit the 1ksme's the chlivme desmeints is se enh e evaluahons w4 rk respect to itse these signal for the ensmedia teend time ornandmeats toest ne Nu standarJa j

standsede.

MCR outside air intake dampers basere

• • 't haluta.ha chade a pvpueJ On tee 6e bois, the Cnewtelen bee th ancardra4 son of tekvine evertte a determmahon that the ameadawi determined that the re.gsessed he,tardous level inside the MCR.

appheatioe Jaea saad stiah e a aswedessede suced eb 46rmieenderde A l' tant Desan Change Request is 828o.l.aat hazards wammineratton.

laamswar hammer Assen l

and. 46wev4ree has me4e a proposed beins r repared ter jt) remove all locotwr Awhru t ausly hsGac bestery, detere4answei the t the amendoesnt c&rire t@ndm tmn 'bv site. t!)

apphcatbre does one tow,1,, e replace 1% present cMorinstitin eptem 301 Oly Hau Dnee. Iisajey. Geo:apa significwt ba nnis cmaiderstiisi, with a sodium hypochlormation wysiem.

31583 laust Aihhc ZArvesent Aerwg and (3) che, mate the awtomatic isola tm At!orner /iadmac *r arnce W.

location: App 4<=a Cowety Poh4ac IJbrary. mode of the MCRECS. including the Chersh iU. E meent e. Sha w. rsitan o a. iwt e 3010ty lladi Drn e, fle sleay. Gecry'i MCR chionne detectars Once ou the and Trowbraise Laaj N St Pet. NW 31313 chhanne tanka have twen asnpiwd. the Washington. DC Om3?.

Attorney Mvvis.w trece W.

threat to MCR habitabehty, reest:Los NRC /htwt D rntsr: Oneid it Churc hill F agews, Senew. tweman. Powts from chrwie relosas. wMi le Matthews and t ecedsidee. rsuit N Smeeet. NW.

ehdaatei Ilhnols Ponte Counpan), Smlend Pow er W ashmeten. tac 'unar.

toWewenst the proposed charun no Coopereth e. Inc., Western tho's NRC hourict lkmssu-Des ad 1 ganeens tbkutoe wiu le =tored er used P

e e, hMt%e licenseest Matthew a on wta, tieth the cirwlatstg en atet lC% l Docket No. 50-881.Clinton Power Georgia Few et Carepan). Oglethorpe i,','

Station. Unit No 1.DeWitt Cotanty, gj Power Carperha. Munin.ipiel Electrk (PSWl spiems = iH tse ittotet'. with Aubority of Georgia. CW) of Delion, sodium hypa.Jdonte. Likewtoe. Ile lane g c,Wohun /w o remismt Geersla. fu mi Nos. :a 321 am130 364.

sanit.ary water saJ plans semge Februars :3.1988. as u44eeseented Edwh 1. Hatch Nuclear Fisnt Uaks 1 spteena wild tse trswed b) sti March M time and 2. Appfang Courit3.GeorgU alternetne method Ika rown o/ ca'e*= 80eWr5C lb:e gossen.(e.erv nyeseg. }.no aa The popoacd cham e9 We time This preposed essend.ww waru reru 3;nns onsete.4 nrage e( a ean.ve tWnew Tecencad Siunihcation M aure 8J.! 1 Are a,.waa gd enAlerneat aquesst effectnel) ehementes the need ice a nd Sectuens 6J I and 631.3 ces:aruusivi Tbe emess.Amnewe in mil ene hly she -

ai.iorm.uc is.eLeisen el edne WCA. swnse the C14nvue Ibwer Saa tem onsmee

3P136 Federal Register / Vol. 53. No.154 / Wednesday, August 10, 1988 / Notices organizational structure. The propoud (3)Invahe a significant reduction in a significant hazards consideration exista changes are the result of a proposed margin of safety, as stated in to CFP 50.92. A proposed organisational restructunna by the The proposed amendment does not amendment to en operating bcense for a licensee.

involve a significant increase in the facility involves no significant hazards This amendment includes preposed probabiht) or consequencu of an considerationif operation of the facihty changes to Figure 6.2.21,"Un i Onsite accident prevbusly evaluated.This is in accordance with a proposed Organization " Specificahon 6.3.1. "Unit an administrative change that does not amendment would not (1l involve a Staff Quahncations," and Specification affect curnnt accident analy ses.

signincent increase in the probability or 6 5.1.2,'Tacihty Review Group (FRG)

The proposed chenees to Figure 6.2 21 consequences of an accident previously Composition." The following chang.:

and Sections 6.3.1 and 6.5.1.2 are esaluated. (2) create the possibility of a are propoud to the onsite adrnteletrative changes that clanfy but new or different kind of accident from orgenlaauonal structure:

do not change the intent of the any accident previously evaluated,(3)

-ne poohon of Techrucal Adusor Specifications. The proposed changes do involve a significant reductionin a to the Plant Manseer is no longer not create the posbbihty of a new or marytn of safety. LP&L has evaluated lustaed and should be de'eted different kind of accident from any the proposed change to Facility

-The posinon of Director.Ptant previously evaluated, The proposed Operating Ucense NPF 38 and has chan[u am administratne chang e only determined the following.

As stan M g Plan ad at and us do not involve any design p,,,,,,,,3, I

-De poot on of Director Plant changes. new requirements, or new SB1 presently owns and operates Techrucal should be reutted Assistant modes of opershon.

Crund Gulf.The employees of M&L Maneter. Plant Te haical The proposed changes do not involve presently engaged in the operation of

-The positions of Semoor-a significant reduction in a margin of y aterford 3 will become employees of Chemistry a*d SupemeceRed=este safety. ne intent of the existing SERI. The organisational structure of d eyrt to the Ass stant Manater-Technical Specification requirements SERI will provide for clear management

-De peenhonIcl Supervisor-w uld remem unchanged. no proposed control and effective Imes of authority uter and sunmoor Spiems changes to Figure 6.2.7.,1 ad Seebon' and communication amora the comdd be transfernd to the NucJear orpninonal unas involvd in N obo 6.3.1 and 6.5.1.2 are ada..tretis e Stat 3on EcstrMnris department and ar, changes that do not aflut a margin of management operation, and techal al ng a art of the Unit Onsite sa ety.

support of the facility.

no the renons statd above, the staff As a result of the proposed

-The position of An'atant believes this proposed emendment amendment. there will not be physical Supemoor Plant bupport Services should involves no sigruficant hazards changes to the facility, and all Umiting be established and the pootion of considerebons.

Conditions for Operation, umiting Adnuaistrahve Supemoor should be localrtiblic Documerit /kiem WW D* M"8' dMN Umits specthed in the T' 'chnical deleed

-The pomu'on of sepervino

locotion: Vespasian Wa ne Pubhc e

leaver.at safety should reoort to the Ubrary,120 Wut Johnson Street

• Spuineauons wm nmain @nged, Chnton, flunois 61727 With the esceptier, of administrative

-A noYeEld edNio Atrorneyforheensee Sheldon Zabel, chantes to renect the role of SDt!. the pootion cf Au.stant Manaaer, f1:nt Esq., of Schiff,liardm & Waita,7:00 qualuy anurance program, suuruy Operations to indicate that this poete a Sears Tower,233 Wacker Drive, plan, and trsining program are i

requtrue the momdual to have had a

'S Chicago Illinois 60006 unaffected. Wl'h regard to emergency SRO bconee N)tc Project Director Daniel R.

plans, certain physical and penonnel The position of Director Plant Muuer neourco, hmned to support in Radiahon Protection should be changed administrative areas but not inclushe of to Assistant Manager Plant Radiation Loulslana Power and 'Jsht Comp 3ny.

decision making authonty, will continue i

Protection in Specifica tion 4.3.1. The Dodel No 344e2, Waterford Steam to te provided by &&L in support of positions of Director Plant TecArdcel Doctric Station, Unit 3, St. Charlee these activities. The licensee states that and Director Plar.t Radiation Protection Parbh, blelana decisional responsibilities related to should be changed to Assistant Date of amendment requeste July 1, accident recognition and clauification, Manager Plant Tec.hnicaland Anistant 1968 mitigstion and correcthe actions.

i Manager Plant Radiation Protecuon in Description of amendment request; radiological assessment and protecthe l

Spectf cation 6.51.2 The proposed amendment would ievise action recommenda tions and Basis for ProposedNo Significcat Focihty Operating beerse No. NPFsa coordnne' ion w1th state and local i

Hosards Consideration Determination for Waterford 3 to authonse Systems authonties will rest with SERI The staff has evskated this propond Ene gy Resources, incorporated ($"RI) personnel. LP&L corporate management amendment and determined that it '

to act on behalf of thuisiana Power and will provide direction to other non, involva no significant hasards Light (U)&L), with responsibtlity for and nuclear LPal facilities for support to 1

I cusiderations. Accordmg to 10 CR control oser the phpical constructioa, Waterford 3. Operating agreements wiu i

50 92tc). a proposed amendment to an operation, and memtenance of the ensure continued comphanca with i

i operstmg hcense involves no sign /icant facihty, This actaon is proposed in er song others. General Design Criterion hasards considerations if operan a of conjunction with SERI becoming the 17 of Appendis A to 10 CHL Part 50 on

)

the facshty in accordance with ib cperator of Arkar sas Nuclear One, Elec tncal Power Sp tems. Therefore, the amendment would not:

Units 1 and 2 as well as contmums as proposed changes wdl not incnese the (1)!mohe a nigruficant increse in operator and owner of Grand Gdf Units, probabihty or consequences of an the probabihty or consequence. of an 1 and 2.

accident previously etaluated.

acudent previously evaluaud, er Boses forproposed ao str><ficant The design and design bases of o

(2) Create the poWbtheyof a new or hosords consideration desseminetire, Weterford 3 remain the esais.Therefore, different bnd of accadent from any The Commjuion has prosided the current plant safety analpas remain acudent previculy evahisted, or standards for detennmarig whethee a complete and accurate in address ng the 1

1

.-. l

i Federal Register / Vol. 53. No.154 / Wednesday. August 10, 1988 / Notices 30137 bcensing basis nents and analyms amendment would not (1) msche a how the facihty is operated Therefore.

plant response and consequences. The significant increase in the probability or the change will not create the possibility IJmiting Conditions for Operation.

consequences of a. accident prestously of a new or different kind of accident Umitmg Safety System Settings, and evaluated.(2) creat< the possibihty of a from any accident previously evaluated Safety Limits are not affected by the new or different 'J.,d of accident from The hcensee'e lune 192 request proposed amendment. With the any accident i.esiously evaluated. or (31 resulted in the approval to raise the fuel esception of admmistratne chan ;es to invoh e a sigmficant reduction in a enrichrr.ent lesel from 3.7 to 4 0 weight ter.ect time role of SERL plaM procedures margin of safety, percent but the evaluation for that are unaffected As such.the plant The licensee'a lune 24.1986 request change found that 4 to weight percent conditions for which the design oasis included. among other thmas. increasing w as acceptable and within the accident analyses have been performed the level of ennchment for the fuel estabbshed enteria. The beensee's are still vahd. Therefore. the proposed storane areas to 410 weight percent U-current request is to amend the amendment cannot create the possibihty 235.The licensee was requested at that Technical Spectheation to the presious of a new or differer.t kmd of accident time to accept an ennchment of 4 0 acceptable level of 4 to weight percent.

than previously evaluated weSht percent because the assessment The decrease m safety margin from 3 7 Plant safety margins are established of the generic environmentalimpact of to 4 0 weight percent w as presinusly for and reflected in Umsting Conditions increased emichments on the fuel c)cle found not to be sigmficant and this is for Operation. Umit.ng Safety Sistem and fuel transportation outhned in borne out by the NRC safety evaluation Se'tmas. and Safety bmits specified in Tables S 3 of to CFR Part 51 and S.4 of to 4.to weight percent. The proposed the Techrical Specifications Since there to CFR Part 52 mas not complete. De change does not invoh e a significant will be no change to the physical design lune 24 1988 request was therefore reduction in a margm of safety.

or operation of the plant. there will be noticed on September 11.1986 (51 FR Dased on the abos e considerations.

no change to any of these or any other 3:381) with a htmt of 4 0 weight percent the staff proposes in determine that the marsms. The proposed amendment U 2;5 proposed change does not insoh e a therefore will not invohe a reduction m The notice published m the Federal sigmficant hazards consideration.

a matam of safety.

Register on February 29,1988153 FR LocalPubhc Document Room lhe staff has reuewed the licensee s 0054). states that the NRC Lahon: Umversity of New Orleans esaluation and agrees wah the ens tronmental assessment of estended bbrars. Louis;ana Collection. Lakefront.

conclusiuns Therefore. based on the burnup fuelis complete and that New Orleans. Louisiana ?01:2 abose. the staff proposes to determme ensironmental impacts summanned m Aterney forheensee Bruce W.

that the proposed hcense amendment Tables S-3 of to CFR Part 51 and S-4 of Churchill Esq., Shaw. Pittman. Potts and does not insohe a signific. ant hazards 10 CFR Part 52 bcund the correspondme consideration.

Impacts for burnup lesels up to 60 Gw dl T@idg 2300 N SL NE Loca/ Pubhc Document Room MiU and ennchments up to 5 0 weight cfD

'R tor Jose A. Calvo Locatmn Unisersity of New Orleans percent U.:35. This bounds the Ubrary. Louisiana Collection, t.akefront. hcensee's request for ennchments up to Mississippi Pow er !, Ught Comyany.

New Orleans. Louisiana tot:2 41 weight percent U 235 for burnups up S) stem Energy Resources. Inc., South Anorne) for he ensee: Bruce W.

to 60 Gwd/MiU. As such. the licensee is Mississippi Electric Power Association.

Churchill. Esq. Shaw. Pittman. Potts and requestmg their onginal request and Dodet No. 50-418. Grand Gulf Nuclear Trow bndg*,2xio N St., NW.

anal)see be accepted Station. Unit 1, Claiboma Count).

Washmgton. 7C 20037 1.s bcense amendment number ?

Mississippi MC rnyect D. rector: lose A. Cah o issued on October 16,1986, the NRC toulslana Power and Ught Company, performed a safety esaluation for Dore of amendment request june 21.

Dodet No 504S2.Waterford Steam y','q,';f, * *,'

'""'h * ',"f*'

gw Descriptron of omendment trquest-Elettric Station. Unit 3. St. Cha.les I*

• I"'I ' "'

percent U 235 and found all analyses The amendment would ehminate daily and proposed changes acceptable. The functional tests of the rod pattern Dore of emendment request: July 18.

amendment was issued at 4 0 weight control sptem setpomts. retsimns the 1N percent but the findings of 410 weight tests to be performed monthly dunns Description of amend +ent request percent remam sahd and support the opnation and ptlor to startup The proposed amendmer't would change following determmation of no sigmficant Addihonally, the apphcable operatienal the Technical Specihcatens to allow hazards consideration.

conditions would be changed for the 4 to weight percent U.:35 ennched fuel The calculated Leff values including high pow er setpoint (HPSP) from to be stored in the spent isei pool. new uncertainties mdicate that the fuel operational condition 1 to the time when fuel storate s ault. and cwisinment storage conhgurations are substantially thermal power is at or above the low terrporary storage racks This reggst sub.cntical and the probabihty of a Power setpoint it. PSP) relates directly to the prei tous request enticahty egent in these areas is not Bos'8 for Proposed no sigrufscont dated lune 24.1968 as n%ed on significantl> increased No ph)nical borords consiuctorion determination.

September 11.1M 151 FR J:381) change is bemg made to the storage lhe Commission has prouded dosis far proposedm. Mcor't areas S.r.ce a criticahts esent is standards for determmms whether a Aorards coasederchon v tremsnahon.

demonstrated to be unfeasible, there is signif. cant hasards consideration eusts The Commisim has pr%ded no increased consequences for surh a as stated in to CFR 50 92 A proposed stand.rds for deterrninu whether a postulated esent The change will not amendment to an operating hcense for a sismhcant hasards conrderation eusts msohe a signthcant increase in the facihty mvohes no signif cant h irards as stated in to CFR 50 9: A proposed probabahty or consequences of an) considerations if operahon of the f aciht) amendmera to en operses hcena for a accident preuously esaluated m accordance with a proposed f aciht) trn ohes no sigt.k int hatards The proposed change w dl not amendment would not til mgohe a considershon if operat.3n of the faciht) mtroduce an) ph)sical changes bema signif' cant increase in the probabihty or i

in accordance with a pn

• csed made to the faciht) and adi not change consequences of an accident preuausl>

M1M Federal Rarister / Vol. 53. No.154 / Wednesday. At: Rust 10.19M / Notices esakated or(2) create the possibihty of accident frten eny u4deni previcesly Missiesep5 Power & Ught Company, 4

a new er different und of eccident from es elmed.

any acdderst previooely eveloated or (3) e he functua of me system is unaffected S)slan Ewtv Reenurces. Inc., South invo}ve a pigmficant reductrort in a by th e eivnarwei.wi of daJy timetional tests Mississippi Electric Power ApocJetion,

,gg There have been no na found fadern in the Docket No. SfM18, Grand Cutf Nteclear System innergy Resources Inc (SERll paewas EN fonct smal tests of these htation, Unit 1. Clalbest>e Cs Jnly, has provided en analysit of significant c%nnW mp unds acJ ne:Ls.ble ot served M '.sstasipal hasards considerations in its request for tnp setpnat dnft oses Se serieillence a hcanet emendrnent.The hcensee has intervels bears proposed Pruper s> etem Date of crrendment req.ust. bly 12.

1M8 gelatwn mitt be assured ky monthly concluded. with appropnate bases. that functices! tesis consWent meth testing g,,,,,,,wp 97 ump,gn ug,(qu,,,;

lhe proposed amendment meets the frequenc we S v 6dentgal inp unas in other The amendment woul(t ddete e shower three standards in 10 CFR 5092 and.

arr>'aiwma n,stred b) Technical and drying area room irom TechnicaI thertinet, taeolves no significant SMGficatmne. Addificaany, this charp does Specificat6on (T'5) Table 3 31 S t., bre g

not insche a destin change or g5ywl Detection Instrument 4 hon because the el'uated the change and therefore. does tw* thanse h control buildma kicker room will be ice e

proposed ernendment ensinst the e veiem functaon et cgerasian ce prews!)

enbred by rernoving Ihe walls standarda in to CR 50S2 and has dncebed m h CCNS t,%AR b The change to the snode orphcabilaiy of separet;ng the two rooms.

determined the folicwing the Hise es u.neateci with sni m deren Bosa foeprepcsedno swnderunt L No sisrufkant wwsease in the probabl.ty and funerson. The HFSP octuates at or twfore A####d# ##"8######'*# 'j##'d

## U#"~.

or the tonesteences of an escident m gewer end funchone to emp4cmt mon The Contnuesion he3 pnde

. preewaly evolustat ceseka fres, this chanse.

stnt: pent centrois on rod mthdrawel than standards for determining w hether a a De functauns!lesis perfor ved sirw e epe rstwo below the IU5P but abose the significant haurds consideration eusts tarmerdet operstlon. epprettmately f35 for USP. Aquirig HPSP cperab Ley pnor to as stated in 10 CFR 50 92. A proposed r,sching or vedm3 the new itmer each channel Hreater thanj 2 tim tetal Se,p ani ensaree prsyr funcnoning when amendaient to an cperstmg license for a serveasacest gere ree,emd miih no reqwed witkut unrecessary restrnons.

facility ingeltee no significant hasards tdentded as luud lawes. Additess!)y, as therefore maieterning the eterall ey staat considerations if oper.non of the facaht) fourwt mp eetgants erere n riewed for drift ar.d eare loed to show neghs.ble erne over opwetion as anaamed in the LJEAR in accordance with a proposed a three mariHe perwd between channel

c. hea. no new or d.ffereret acced nt amendment would not: [1)inbolne a scenario is intmdw*d by this revtsed signifscant incresee in the pmbability or cahbesemsa Tbs contrma h reWMty of frequency er eurmUance and clanftation el consequences of an accident previously the LJSP and iff5P ing vr.ns and awrte tive change ts thett freqwency of functional appbusty evalested or(2) create the possibility of testics to t) teys consister t enth other 3 This chante would solinsolve a a new or different und of accident from 6dentical inp as 3. he nbeMty el the e,wubcaret reducwe in the marinn of safety.

systw As #deevet& assured tg the a Tk maya of ufety remaine uneflected any accident previously es aluated, or (3) performace of the O.annel Fi.nuunal Tuts by the ehmination of t>e daily functienal test intoh e a sign 6facant reduction in a pner to etwup and monthly thereaftet for the TM UV and itPSP utpennt.e remain margin of safety.

unchaged. Wre has1r t+en no es found

$mhU hren k (SW IJ5P and HPSP Othee R%emoimt Tnp umte faderes in the pruious 2wno + functional has}provided an analysis og signigcant are serveyed at a mon @y fnquency with accepable partormaxe reestte SlJtJ has tests of these channels' top units and hatards considerations in its request for sedaned the effect oc gehaMty of chanrwn negleible observed dnft es er the ourse4flance a licertse arrtendreetit. The heensee has functional testitig frequenc> for identsal trip animals Wing proposed De nhab4 of concluded. with appropriate bases. that weits in N Ructor Preettion 5 siem the system w11 be eJequatelv enuted t,y the the proposed amendment meets the i

3 B&c6 buy. it has teen demonstrated that performance of the Channel hncilonel Tests tbree standards in 10 CFR S0 92 and.

thm is no cAsepe in the Peactor Protettet tror to startup and monthly breaftet nis therefore, involves rio significant f) stem rete.bihty when the teririg of the e is consietent wtth the preten rehaMties of hagard, congiderations, trip units is peeformed more frequently than 6dential trrp vees en e1er egplnetsons pathl)-

reqmred by Technical specificalions.

The licensee has evaluated the Tks change does not tavolse a desasa b.Th cAanse to N apphcaMty of the Troposed amendment against the l

change or ph)sical change to the plant-HPSP mn st.D ensure it is required to be standards in 10 CR 50 92 and hae Therefore. the enised sanci!!ance frepeticy crerable pnot to 6ts assumed operation in determined the follohing i

l wiu not effect (sic) the cortsequences of en r)$,sa eulysn.

1 No seen fgant intnen m the puleMty occtdeert prevteusly eneiped FaAre of thne

c. The. N margin of safet) te not or conuquences of en amdent ganwly s,pmfmtly reduced evaluated rnutis froen this charte metruments dae to the revised Prs <ruency of The NRC staff has revtewed the a ke**ul *I n** h', rated mienor suis eillance lwNch to act postulated) wow have no effect on the probsMty of an bnWs no signitcant hasards masonry waHs to weste Rwn h in e naaderation deterrriination and agrees to Rcom 0C5:4 does not etter any of the enemg6+e eud drop or se eiot enor s

leading to a tod withdrew errue No othat with the brensee e analysis, or rs of any brn previewly e= awed safety enatsees as d.uvened in L'FSAR e Accordingly, the Ccenmiseion peopek' for the efketed twma TM progeoed chanye Chapters 8 sed il tuld be effected to determine that the requested don not eher any plant fin prowtion futurn or foracisons.

b TM chann to the mode applicabit,t) of amendment doce not intohe a b De incht room embrsement dm not tae llPSP is 1 ud on actual s)steen desp significant hasards consideration re sult in the add > tion. re moval or relorsion Below NMb powee. the HI5P d<w e not funcerei and to not nqwed to funetion Loco /Pubhc Dscurrvnt Room ol en) fire detection tnstrumentation fcr Gnunating opereb lety and sune.uarice locotier Hrnds junior College, d*t*n ZMe 1 l' 0' eny fin need banm i

requiremenis foe me itM tenew the L4w M&ndon Ubrary Re>mond, D' k "I ( f '"* * * "g"n c'* P'W"'

• d Power Se4 point cannot pose arn changes in gg,,,,,, pp 393 y g

not te reduce J by the des

) ante. Also.

escade.nt usurestwas et emquesa of esents hrtev Meense Nichela e S-smo me =aus bems nmoud en not fin c Ns. then is no ancmase in the Reynolds. Esqvf re. Bishop, bberman, reied there w+U br no cheNe m an) eustarig probeMty or cweeaenceo of ar) acteJen, Cook. Purcell and Re3 nolds 120017th f re rated bemm when Rooru OCu and prevessi) etabated Street, NW, Washmgion DC 20036

% g, meorponted mto Rxm N514 j

'tys checte wooid not cn et, the NRCPmeef Directm Ehner C-ne reorn mad.f. cat;oce do not s'fect er y f.re poseeb4 hey of a new ortRecent kmd of Adaisa m area b%nder.es u desenhed m *e Fire r

La.nsi Arisk s i The petrosed Techn, cal

- ~ - -

-^

Federal Realster / Vol. 53. No.154 / Wednesday. August 10. 1988 / Notices 30139 Speufication change assigas a new room Basis forproposed no sigm/icant vnodes as a esult of the proposed change.

number to enisting plant space.

botards considerchon determination /

This administratne change maintains the

c. Therefore. thtre is no merem o the The Commission has prosided leul and quality of pSRC reuem by probabilst) or consequences of a preuously standards for determining whether a maintsimng HuntiaHy Se same Ind of analysed accident due to this chanse e spertise apphed to the PSRC renew 2 nis chann wovid nM create the significant hatards consideretton costs function po**il..hty of a new or dderent hnd of as stated in 10 CFR SOE A proposed b Therefore. this proposed change mill not accident from any pennively eselvsted amendment to an operating bcense for a nsolve a significant redation in the margin a No new eqmpment is introduced into the facihty in.oltes no significant hazards of safety ptant med no chartges to seipants or considerstions if operation of the acihty The NRC staff has reviewed the f

oper, ting mod.s.re proposed. Th4 chanP" in accordance with a proposed gig,n,,, a no significant hazards es stIn lent pa du o be amendment would not:(1)insolve a consideration determination and agrees am t remossi of n3n fire m etis in orpe,atios poom sigruficant increase in the probabihty or with the hcensee's analysis.

OCW wo floom DCate The waus to be consequences of an accident previously Accordingly, the Commission proposes remosed only seru to daide Ining space et aluated. or (2l create the possibihty of to determine that the requested and puude no o'het futwhen a new of different kind of accident from arrendment does not invoh e a b Therefore. the possib hty of a new or any accident prenously es aluated. or (3) e gnificant hazards consideration.

diftetent bnd 4 accident from any involve a significant reduction in a pres sously es alueleJ is not created rnargin el safety.

heationc limda lunior College.

3 This chsrae wo,ld not invol"

• System Ene gy Resources. Inc. lSER!1-McLendon ubrary. Ray mond.

s snifeuni redi ction iri the mergin of sefe'F-has provided er analysis of significant e Th.s change assigns a rien room number hasards considerations in its request for MI"'EE 3'I$4 I

to eustins p:ent space There are no changes a hcen Ae amendment. The hcensee has Attorney for beemec: Nicholas S.

anIf re concluded, with appropriate bases. that Reynolds. Esquire. Bishe. Uberman.

d f c t ons7o Th r en of affe aru be ndanes The m:nimum number of the neoposed amendment meets the Cook. Purcell and Re3 no do.1M)1?t smae detecnor instruments, quired to be three atandards in 10 CFR SO 92 and, Street. NW., Wastnnston. DC 2m36 oseraMe mit! not be reduced and no build.ng therefore,insolves no significant NRC Project Director Ehnor C.

spues presiously prouded with detection hazards considerations Adensam mitl base detection capability redxed The beensee has evaluated the Noetheast Nuclear Energy Company, et nokNt[d 8 "'H proposed amendment asainst the al. Dociet No. 54423. Millstone Nuclear reduc e r

standards in 10 CFR 50 92 and has The NRC staff has resiewed the Pow oc Station. Unit No. 3.New tendon i

bcensee's no significent haterds f," tha'r.

rease In the probatiility County, Connecticist

'8 consideration determination and agrees or consequences of an accident preuously Dare of amendment requestdune 21, with the beensee e anal) sis.

eutuated enutte from this charge 3933 Accordingly, the Commission proposis a This real:snment of the plant staff to determine that the requested namnns groups atu have no nenetne De8cription of amendment tr' quest-amendment does not involve a eneet on plant deslan or creenen becauee The proposed amendment would change sienificant harords consideration pan lpe6nneue a system Usinung)

Minstone Unit 3 Technical Specification tuo/ Pubhc &cument Rem win acusely I k I e mets to imprese the (TS) 3/41.14. "Air Temperature nnance e c ustmo en M ntionns " to eedefine the temperature location Hinds junior ColleF components as well es oserell p' ant eones inside containment and establish McLendon Ubrary. Raymond-perfonnance Nih responsibthty sad temE#rature hmits for these tones.

MississTp4 39154 accountabibly being asogned for desisnowd Attcrney for hcensee thcholas S plant symms. components and prosrnma.

Basis forproposedno significant Rev nolds. Esquirs. Bishop. Uberman, the knowledse of specific s>siems wit! be bosords consideration deterrmnotione Cook. Purcell and Resnolds. 120017th mhano d The same leul of opuuse Lcenss condition 2 C(3)in the Millstone Strret. NW., Washington. DC 20 06 anhed to the p5RC renew function will Umt 3 Operating Ucense NIV-49 t

NRC Proicct Director Ehnor G.

' ' * ' * *' ' P P

• l 'I ' h ' P P0 d requires that "Pnor to startup following i

chasse S nte nsentinHy the same the first refuehng outage the quahfied i

g representation miu eust there mill be no los I le of electrical equipment within the Mississippi Power & Ught Company.

y,'hNe"s ne incre ese in th, scope of 10 CFR 50 49 located inside Splem Energy Resourus. Inc., South peubakiity or coesequences of preuounty containment shall be recalculated based Minissippi Electric Power Associationa e% pd eccidents due to the proposed on the actual temperature rnonitored j

Dtwket No. SC 416. Grand Culf Nuclear

chane, inside containment donns the first c)cle Station., Unit 1. Claiborne Count).

2 This change would not create the of operation " beense Condition 2 C(3)

Mississippi possibthty of a r.ew or d!fferent Lnd of was satisfied by the hcensee by Date of amen &r ent requesteluly 15.

accident from any presiously esaluated submittal of a report dated January 21 w

a since there is no less in NC 1968 The June 21.19M apphcation I

PM w ould incorporate the conclusion of the l

• *$'$',"$g'p[n*i l [n'N,y,,

lanuary 21.1Ma report into TS 3/4 7.14 L

Drschptwn of omemimeet raNurst.

The amendment aould chanse the w ha h contains temperature hmits. and lec hnical Specifications b) changing to sopoinis or op,,,nna par,moers are the posmon of one of the nine rnembers prtiposed The same tent and quaht) of associated remedial requirements. and on the Piant Safet) Reuew Committee NC reuem is n a,nia ned.nd un.hered b>

Suruillance Requirements, for s enous (PSRC) from Technical Support this propmed o ar se plant areas that cortain temperature Supenntendent to Manager, b Therefore. ihe pon.biha of a new o' sensitive safety related.electncal Performance and 5) stem Engineering d>Herent Lnd af ecodent fre an) equiernent. Escreding the temperature T his change is necessitated b) a change PTQ',

,' *[,0 ",7, ','

hmitspf TS 3/4 714 could affect the l

of the urut organtastion to consohdate

,,gnif tcent redxt6on in the mesm of se,,g quahhed hfetime of safety related r

certon engineenns personnel and a were m m t., no p% cue #s to re occtncal eqvpment as defined in 10 functions pLni ew enent separts or opeanna CFR 50 til

• Fouronmental quahfication 1

3t140 Federal Register / Vol. S3. No.154 / Wednesday. August to.1988 / Notices of electne equspment f aiportant to safety Pennsyleasia Power and light (1) There is a decrease in the margin for nuclear power plants."

Cornpeny. Dociet No. 54 387 between the Technical Specification At the present time. TS 3/4 7.14 Susquehanna Steen Dectitc Station.

load pronte and the actual battery defines two temperature zones within Unit 1 laserse Coucty Pannepvania capacity due in this proposal. llowes er.

containment:(1) Zone C 01. "Inside Date of amendment xquest:

this change is insignificant because.t Crane Wall All Devabens." and (2)

December 15.1987 has not reached the point where it Zone C42. *Outside Crane Wall. All Description of amendment requeet, impacts the margm between octual Desations ** Both C41 and C-02 have The proposed amendment would revise battery capacity and rated capacity.

temperature tunits of 120' F.The the St'equeharma Steam Dectric Station Ba' sed on the abose considerations, proposed change to TS 3/4.7.14 would (SSES) Unit 1 Technical Specincations the Commissica proposes to determine estabhsh tour contamment temperatute ref ecting revision to the load pronles that the proposed changes involve no rones, contairdng equiprunt presently for 230 V DC bettery bank e 1D830 and 8'gnificant haurds consideration.

located in Zoneo C-01 and C-02 ae 1 Demo.

LocalPublic Dorumen? Room foll0* *:

Basis forrws.esed ne si.tnificant locotton: Osterhout Free Library, o Csm we Cnee w su. eu heroids considemtion determinotion:

Peference Department. 71 South elessisvaa esupi CS 43 and CS 04' W Cotamiselon has provided Frankhn Street Wilkes.llarre, e

42. ogte.de Crane u ati. ett standards for detenntning whether a Penns)h anla 187U1 0 CN3 crear Cutzele at; significant haurds cons 6deration esists Attornerforhcensee lay Silberg, ein.iions-(10 Cm SO 92(c)). A propeoed Esquire. Shaw. Pittman, pott: a nd e CSos. "Ins >ds Crane wall.

amendment to an c perstify bcense for a Trow bridge. 2300 N Street NW.,

elevet.on sr e

• except Csw and sta.ei feeflity involves no significant hazards Washington. DC 20037 senerator andmin" consideration if operation of the fadhty NRCfrotect Direcavr Walter R.

Tersperature Imuta for Zeno C ci. C.

in secordance mth the proposed Duller

02. and C 04 would be 120' F. m amendment would not:(1)ineohe a Penaeyh enda Power sad Usht temperature hmit for Zone C-03 would signif} cant increase tn the probabutty of Coeipany. Docist No.56-347 be 130' F. N licensee has recalculated consequences of an seetdent previous!F Su" ---- 54eesa Doctric Station.

the quahfied hfetime of safety related evaluated. (2) create the possibihty of a Uniti, laserne Cemety. Pennsylva nia electncal equipesent im Zona C43 with new or different kind of accident from acceptable reeuha as described in the any accident preetously evaluated; or (3)

Date of amendment request June 3.

hoensee's subedttal dated January 21, involve a significant reduction in a 1988 19ss.

xnargm of safety.

Description of amendment request:

N proposed change to TS 3/4.7.1, The staff has reviewed the licensee's

& proposed amendment would revise would not invohe a significant increase request and coacurs with h following the Susquehanna Stearn Dectric Station in the probabehty of an ucident basis and concluesca provided by tsw (SSES) Unit 1 Technical Specincatione previously evaluated since no change la heensee la its December la les7 requ!mmuts In the Reactw Vessel plant equipment ce operaung seodes are subsistan:

Matenal Survedlance % ithdrawal belns undertaken. W1th regard to b De pegoemd chasque does not:

Schedule, and Material Surs eillance N iew a elipecess beene te che Irsd Factor Raus.& changu to consequences of acddents h onely d

M

F 8' '*'**4"*"8"o *f ** *** mal Reactor Veeeel Maternal Surveillance evaluated, the hc

' ca show that the p temtara NeNa#

N h,,', g**

Withdrawal Schedule nflect coenphance 8"

see

• ith the latest resIsion of to CR 50.

tunits for proposed Zonet C-01 through cepeaer wie eas the chargne, w C-04 will aseore antmoed rehability for ladepe=dsady aseeir m voguired needs lo, Appendt= li and ASTM Standard E485 o

electrical equipment which le credjned four home. Tha Ted= anal Spaab.stesse

82. N resis6en to b isad Factor Ratio for operation in estettrg safety analyssa. mquim es tensnes be eunessed se demuy contwma to the SSES Unit 2 Technical in addition' a6sce safety related I 'd' ""'"8'**** "' d*d8*

SP'CIUC* t*"' '*9'I""'*L8-equipment in proposed Zemes C 01

• fe*,,*n ^,'

Et*** j'by Basis for aoripifmont w

g h###'d' #"

"'##" d####'#""#'##"'

through C/.M will cumttnae to operete the basurws hm edmeew casectey se nhably, no new or dtNerent kind etf pour the octualloade ce the rsev 13C The Commission has presided accident wt!! be credtled FinaDy. etnoe systeen wtth at rege>ed reorgin am elandarde for determinmg w hether a rio changes in the safety analpes win for-significant hazarda constdetstion eslsis nsit frees the proposed chartge to the (2) Cmew me peessba6ty of a sww or 110 CR 50.22tc)) A proposed TS. no reduction la safety usaryina will d'tferent kWe ed esesdent frore any amendment to an operating license for a 8'"" "*#**d"tticiese'"espec tsy se

^ * ' ' d 8" t itk faultty involves no et mificant hasards t

mcur-the besierne heee se consideration if operation of the facility Accordtngty, beaed upon the above pe, the acteel betwry leeds thee enabho8 in usedance wh h pmpoM es alu.ttion, the NRC sta ff propoeesio them to perkee their netmedad fasssive. Any

.deterinine th.: the requested postulated seesdeel me* lear.g true ihas anwndnwnt wagd not W moln a amendment does not invohe a danse to toundas til prneue emelyene sW4d Wm en N #aWy w significant hazards consideration'

• • *'" "dre 4 e4 corsera em conuquncH d an ahnt pp@

createdueeJ) es aleated. (2) creels tme possib6hty of a N*' M'^# A**8'

13) Involve a a6pmhcant nduction in new or different hind of accident fruem kcotaonc % sterford Pubbc bbrary. 4s the ma* sin of safety. In acceedence with any accsdent prmousry naluated. or (3)

Rope Feny Roai Waterford.

IEEE-485, b rated battery cepedry insohe a s>gmficant reduction in a Connecticaum included the marsen wiuch aflows margin of safety.

Au.waey feelaarnsee:Cereld Garfieki replacemerit of the battery when its N staff has renewed the brensee's Faquire. Day. Berry a lioward.One capacity has da4rsaamd to 80% ofits resised reyueat and concurs with the Constituhon Pian 4, liartford, rai,4 canauty (Ws dea.gn loada ha following baeu and conclusion provided Conseammtos m a gn, erg,n na mensaasned and was lectored by the Laceesee siits jurw 3. lene NMC Presect Ourctoe-John F. Seola into the os'culetwo reterred tou. Port submittal.

Federal Restatee / Vol. 53. No.154 / Wedriendsv, Aumat 15, 1984 / Notisme 33141 The proposed chanses du not.

(10 CER 50 92(c)l. A proposed snme changes to the nomenclature of I insche a ssanificant inuesse in the amendment to en operstmg bcense for a Sernon o.6.2.

'"j Iacihty inv lves n significant hatards Bosis for pmposed no syni/stant t ou ! eva a ed Both h eu d a

actor and surveillanc e capsule withdrawal consideration if operation of the facihty hatartfs considerotron determmction:

stbedole are i, sed only to monitor statsun in accordance with the proposed The Commission has prou led operaisun and do nui ur. pact on stahon amendment would not:(1)invohe a standards in 10 CW Sn 92H l for accidents Also. the locat*on of the capsules significant increase in the probability or deterrmning whelher a significant and analy ses performesj en thera =di remain consequences of an accident previous ly hatards consideration eusis A the sarre with this propused Tech Spec enaluated (2) create the possibihty of a propos..J umendment to an oper. ung c ha ner.

new or different kind of accident from hunse for a facihts involves no 11 Crease the possib. hey c,f a new or any accident previously evaluated; or (3) significant husards' considershon if different kind of accident from any acudent insohe a significant reduction in a operation of the facihty m accordance preuovsis evaluated Theaa chenars oruf margm of safety-with the propowd ame ndment would fa The staff has reviewed the hcensee's not. (Ilinvohe a significant int rease in rr do noi p u a any p.

chanses tu the re.our vessel watt Also, the nquest and finds that the propowd the pmbabihty or consequences of an locatsun of the capsules and estachmeni to changes:

accident previously esaluated, or (2) the sessel wall mdl remain the same with this (1) Do not invohe a sigruficant create the possihihtv of a new or Tech spec chanse. land) increue in the probabihty or different kind of at tident from any lli Redace the margin of plant safety The consequences of an accident previously

.ccident previousiv en aluated, or (3) lead faciur now fe!!a wohin the accepiable evaluated because au chantes hated in insoh e a significdt reduction in a rarse staied m ASTM Liss s2 and the the desenphon of the request are either marsin of safety. The staff has reviewed reused caps.le withdra w al schedule is enore corrections of nomenclature errors.

cotserutnie (thani the oryanal schedale.

deletion O( tedundsM information, of the hcensee's Frbruary 24.19M submittel as reused by letter dated June

'fes ma g m ilYe r thNad edinmistrative changes renecting 10.1988 and the staff finds that.

i Accordmgly. the Commiss'en has wganizah nal nabgninent han determined that the proposed

" [i[E{ the prniously na wated (1) The proposed amendrnent does not inn oh e a signifscant increase m the c

nts amendments intoh e no significant (2) Do n'ot create the saibihty of a pr babihiy or consequences of an hazards consideration.

accident preuously eutuated because new or different k nd o ceident from Loco / Ptibhc Document Room locotion? Osterhout Free L.ibrary, any accident previously esaluated delehon of the organizahon charts from because the changes will have no the Technical Specifications hes not Reference Department. 71 South Frankhn Street. Wdkes. Barre.

impact on the operation of the facihty as aUect plant opnaNon. As,M me past.

the NRC wd! continue to e mformed of It relates to Wiential accidents; and Pennsylvania 18M1 (3) Do not ins olve a sigmficant

88"Ili

"'I changes through other A ttornar for beenseer lay Silberg.

Esquire. Shaw Pittman. Potts and reduction in a margin of safety because required controls In accordance with to the changes do not affect the safety O R WM N ap@nt s Tmwbridge,2Vio N Street NW.,

marsms of the plant and its s> stems.

wganirahonal structure is required to be Washineton. DC 2n037 Based on the above review, the staff included in the Final Safety Anal) sis NRCPnwet Dirrefor Walter R-concludes that the pmposed changes do Report Chapter 13 of the Final Safety Dutler not insohe a sigmficant hazards

^"'l) sis Rep rt prosides a descriphon Penne)h anla Power and Usht considershon.

of the organization and detaded Company. Dodet Nos. 30447 and 50 localptibhe Document Room organizanon charts As required by to saa Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, locotion: Osterhout Free ubrary, CFR 50 Tite). the hcensee submits Units 1 and 2. Luzerne County, Reference Department. 71 South annual updates to the FSAR. Appenda Penns)hanla Frankhn Street. % dkes. Barre.

D to 10 CFR 50 and to CFR 50 54(a)(3) governs changes to organitahon Date of omer.dment regn:est-t)tne or consce: lay Silberg, d**'b'0'"'h' Q**h'Y ^***'**

December 18,1987 Fsquire. Shaw, Pittman. Potts and Pmgra m. Some f tbne wgamzahond Description of amendment request Trowbndge,2300 N Street NW.,

changes require prior NRC appros al.

The propesed amendment would revise Washingtors. DC 20037 Also, n is the hanso s pracha to the Susquehanna Steam FJectnc Station NRc project Djrector-Walter R.

inform the NRC of organisahonal ISSES) Umts 1 and 2 Technical Butler channes effechng the nuclear faciht es Specifiunons as follow s; pnor to implernentation The proposed

1. correction of errors in the Pennnhania Power sind Usht changes to Section 6 a 2 are changes of nomenclature to make the Technic 41 Company, Dodet Nos. 50-387 and 50-nomerictature only Specificahons consistent with the 388 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station,

(:) Tye propn.ed amendment does not faciht) drawings.

Units 1 and 2. Lureme County, create the possibdd) of a new or

& delchon of redundant informahon Pennsylvania different kmd of awdent than wbich w as introduced m the Techncal Date of omendment trvuest February preuously eututed because the Speufianon due to en error m the Unit 24,1968 as revised June 10,1983 proposed changes are admmistrahve in 1 Amendment No 55. and Drscription of amendment request-nature. and no phuical aherahons of

3. a change m the orgamzahonal The proposed amendment would revise plant configurahon or r hanges to nomewlature to teDect the reshanment the Susquehanna Steam Eleetnc Staunn setpoints or operating parameters are of the bcensee s beensing orpamnat6on.

(SSES) Umts 1 and 2 Techmcal proposed B.2 sis for propwed no sym/, coat Specificahons by remoung the onsite (3) The proposed ana ndment does not Actorsia mnsideretson determmotsonc and offsite orgamration charts from the insohe a sigmficant reduction in a The Commission has provided admmistratne control reque ments m marsm of safety because the hcensee.

standarda for determmang w hether a accordance with the gu> dance of the through its Quaht) Ass.,rance programs, sigmfic ant barerds considerahon eusis NRC Cenenc Letter 8641, and make its commitment to mamta n only

30142 Federel Restister / Vol. 53. No.154 / Wednesday. August 10. 1988 / Notices quahfied personnelin positions of esisting 14 members to the proposed to appropnata approver may be a vice responsibihty and other required members, the follomms steps hase been president. manager. or superintendent. This controls. assures that safety functions taken to ensen that continuity of menbus is change is for clanncation only and will has e will be performed at a high level of

"ned from one meetins to the neit no affect on the lesel of reuew the procedure competence. Therefore, removal of the

• • 7,8 g wer NRC meetmas one per meek Yproposed change to Specificauon AC organization charts from the Technical Specifications and changes in the s er... on, p,, day or three per week

? s 1 e (Monthly Operations Reporti updates

A trainin, pro,ra.n for att pORC the addresa in accordance with NUREG4325.

nomenclature of Section 6.8 2 will not members (including alternateel has been dated February 61987. Reference to the affect the margin of safety.

meta wd D1 rector. Office of Inspection and Accordingly, the Commission

3. All pORC members (includins n!#ernates) F.nforcement has been eliminated to reneet proposes to detctmme that the proposed h* '"'C' full > corrpleted the trainma recent USNRC organisshonal chanees.

changes insoh e a no significant hazards pasram Bned on the abose. Pubhc Seruce consideration.

4 Only those personnel destanated b Cornpany of Colorado concludes the Local Publac Document Room

"* *' # '"p' ORC-"*"'****"I'***'*

• V"**"

• U *" S' **'"'"

• *'d*"'*

• en e on the milh the proposed chanyo will not (1) lo. cation: Osterhout Free Library.

5 m of a:1 pORC meeness are chored b) inu.h e a signincant increase in the Reference Department. 71 South the Chairman probabilit3 or consequences of an accident Frankhn Street. Wilkes Barre.

Specificahon AC ? 121 IPORC preuous!) eialuated. (2) create the Penns) h ania 18701 Membership). The intle of Shift Superusoe riossibility of a new or different kind of AIturneyfor Nensee: jay Silberg.

Administration has been changed to accident from any accident preuously Esquire, Shaw. Pittman. Potts and Administratne Shift Superusor. There is no esaluated. or 13)insche a s'anintant T row bridge. 2300 N Street NW significant cheese to me responsibihti s/

reduction in a margin of safety. Therefore.

Washington. DC 20037 ciuana associated with this posinon-this change will not create an undue nok to NRCProject Ostector Walter R-8"I'catan AC 7.12 2 f Alternates) has the heahh and safety of the pubha been res tsed to clar:f that no more than two 3

Based on the abos e es aluation, the alternate members shall participate ' as Public Sonice Company of Colorado,

• es members in FORc actiuties at any lict'itee h,g gas concluded that operation of Fort St' Vrain

• "*'*P'*Pd'h*"8'""'

ggg g, g g Docket No' 50 267'g Station. Plattesille, Nuclear Generatin mith the auidance prouded in the Standard proposed changes willinvolve no l echnical Specification s (STS) significant haasrds consideration.

Colorado Specification AC 712 3 (Meetms The staff has reviewed theIW see's Dole of amendment request. February Fiequenc)) has been reused to allow the no significant hazards consider lion S,1(488 as supplemented lune 23.196&

"dgneted alternate" mRC Chairman to determination. Based on the review and Description of omendment reqvest; cumcne NRC meetings The proposed the abos e discussions, the staff 1he amendment would make certain

' *"8M';"["hj'TS ith the guidance t

proposes to determine that the proposed p,

changt.: to Section 7 of the Technical Spearication AC 7.12 s a (Respons1bilities) changes do not intoh e a significant Specif ations, concerning hu been reused to add Spearicarica "? a(dl-hazards consideration.

Administrain e Controls. The proposed

.hich was inadser,entir omitt,d in a Loco / Public Documettf Room changes reDect organizational changes preuous Technical Specification submiital location: Greeley Public Library, City to the NRC. the licensee. and the Plant W proposed chante is consistent w,th Comples Building.Greeley Colorado Operations Reutw Committee, procedure reuens presentl> performed by gfyng./M licensee:Dpant Bosrs forproposed no significant poRC.

barurds consideration determination:

bP'*I'C*on AC 913 \\%VSC O Donnell. Public Sersice Company of The licensee has anal)med the proposed Membership) hu bun mused to ind,cate gogu,,do p 9. 90, 649. 9,n\\,7*

i amendment request for significant that consultants miu be appomted "m wntmg Colorado 80201-Ot40 harards consideration ustng the by the %ce president. Nuclear Operations".

NRCTroject Director Jose A. Calvo Ths clanficaison is consisterit mth niandards in Title 10. Code of Federal Specificat,cn AC r t.3 3 and 7.13 4 fo, South Carolina Electrk & Cas Company, Regulition. Part M92. The hcensee has appomtms Ahernate Members and South Carolina Public Senica Authority, concluded that the proposed amendment Chairman / Attemate Chairman. ntpecinely.

Docket No. 50 395, Virgil C. Summer request insches no significant hazards Figures f 11 and 7.12 hate been updated Nuclear Station, (Jnit 1, Fairfield County, consideration based on the following to reflect the abose desenbed organ 9ation South Carolina a nal) sis and the words "Fort St Vram" thminated for The proposed charers in See tion 7 ar.d

• • • *im p rs of amendment request luly 6.

Fieures ? t 1 and 712 are es atuated as Speorication AC 7 4 a 1 is reused to delete 1987, as supplemented May 16,1968 fc. nom a en mcortect reference to Rreulators Gude Descriphon of omendment trquest The pusiemn of Supenntendent of Trainmg 113 and add Safety Guide 33. Nosernbe' The July 6.1f ?? submittal proposed to has been elemmated The Nuclear Trauung te'2. Regulatory Guide 113 did not esist in redse Technical Specthcation (TS)

Oganisation mill now report to the new e Nosember ten posaan of Nudear Training Manneet mho Socofications AC 7 4 b and 7 4 c hoe bon Sectiona (Lt. "Organization " and 6 4.

m dl report direett) to the %ce president of reused to aHom f ar certain procedure

,'Trainin8 " This reusion proposed to hicar Opernimris This change is reuem a to be performed by the FORC. 'or a delete the orgarnaation charts from the admastratae onis and the Tramma progrem subcommit'" thervor. pnor la the foRC Technul Specifications and to revise m di conimee to meet et esceed the reuew required m Speurication AC 71.2 5 a the retr ining and replacement program.

a ergw.rements of Section S S of A%I is t.

This pewooed change mil rebese the PORC The bly 6.1987 submittal was noticed in 1**1 and Append a "A" of to Csit part 55 of mne of the m-depth procedure reuen s the Federal Register on September 9.

Spealicaimn AC 71.31 (PORC and anom more time to be spent on o,h*'

1987 (52 FR 34019) On March 22,1988 Membersh6 The proposed changes to this esswes thereb enhancma oserall PORC section m d6 etmmate love perwns from conimety mh>de memtam.ns the qwahty ofGeneric Letter 88m "Removal of membership of the PORC. TKs action is tn rocedwre reuems The procedure mdi then Organization Charts. from Technical response to the NRCs request foe additional approged by the "apprepnate Specifications Administrain e Control Requirements. was issued by the mformation NRC lenoe Heitner to % dhams.

mana3; ment" pewnnel (creuoal3 dated December 5.19a6 in add.mn to "apprepnaie Menner' i l he PSC Commission As a result of the issuance lonenr,g commilice mernbership frorm the rnanagtment strsciure is such that the of this Generic latter the hcensee

'--'~

Federal Restister / Vol. 53. No.154 f Wednetday., August 10.1988' / Notices.

30143 modified their proposed amendment South Camlina Electric & Gas Campany.

(5)The ANSI /ANS 5,119'9 decay request in their May 16.1988 submittal.

Soutf Carolina Public Seedce Authority, heat model for non.LOCA accidents and Spectiscelly. e new sectlan 6.2.1 Offsite Docket No. 56 393. Virgil C. Summer transients:

and Onsite Organizations", was added.

liudear Station. Unit 1 Fairfle6d County,

16) Related AxialOffset Control Basis forproposedr o signihcont South Carohna (R AOC1-horords considemtion determination:

Dates of amendmentrequesL May 20,

(?II<,(r) Sun eillance; and The Commission has provided 1988. June 20.1988. and July 8,1988.

(8) Anal) sis basehne changes as standards fcr determining whether a no Drsenption of omendment tswest:

outhned 6n the May 20.1988 submiti.nl.

sigmficant h :ards consideration esists On May A 1988 the licensee proposed As a rnuh ofib.bove. changes to as etsted in to CFR 50.92(c). A proposed an amendment to revise numerous the foHomins Technical Specificanoru, amendment to an operating license sections of the Technicsl Specincations an proposed involves no significant hasards (TS)in support of tefuehng and (1) Com Safety Limits (TS 21.1. F,pur,-

consideration if operation of the facihty operating the Virgil C. Summer Nuther 2110 in accordance with the proposed

'itation. Unit No.1 (Summer Stahon or (2) Reactne Conlant flow A%w bh-amendment would not;(1) involve a VCSNS) with the VANTACE 5 (V.51 Y"lues l'1S 3/413).

significant increase in the probabihty or impros ed fuel design. Presenti), the (3) Overtemperature delta T Renu.or consequences of an accident presious!

Sunmr Stahon is operahng with a Tnp Setpoints (Table 2 21),

evaluated. or ( ) create the possibiht of Westinghouse 1?X17 low parasihc fuel (4) Overpower delta T Re.ctor Trip a new or different klnd of accident from core. On June 20.1988. the hcensee Setpoints (Table : 211 any accident previously es aluated, or (3) modined their May 20.1968 submittel to

15) Shutdown Margin for Modes 3. 4 involve a significant reduction in a reflect an aserage coolant temperature and 5 (Figure 313).

margin of safet).

(Tml of E4' F. The Technical (6) Modera tor Ternpera ture Specificationa affected by this change.

Coefficier t (TS 3/4.1.13).

The beensee has determined inat the TS Figures 211 and 3.2 2 and TS Tables P) Rod Drop Tin e (TS 31.3 4).

addition of the "Onsite and O!! site

11. 2 21, and 3.21, ware rs'placed in (8) Asial Flus Difference (TS 3/4 2.11 Organtsation Section to the Technical the lune 20,1988 submittal. On July S.

(9)llest Flus llot Channet Factor.

Specifications does not affect the 1968. the hcensee rev4ed the Ma Fels)(TS 3/4 2 2. Figure 3 2 2. TS 410 :).

Signincant lissards Determination 1968 submittal of TS 3.116 and ) 00, (10) Nuclear Enthelp) Rise 110t presented in the July 6,1987 submittal.

proposed a new change to TS 31.2.5.

Channel Factor. F

,,(TS 3/4 : 3.

The staff has reviewed the May 16.

~ Borated Water Services. Shutdown.a Figure 3 :.3):

1988 submittal and has determined that; The July 8.1968 changes w ere proposed (11) DND Parameters (Table 3 21).

1 The proposed amendment does not to make allowances for the amount of (12) Reactor Tnp(s) Response Time involve a sismficant tncnase in the borated water which is unasailable for (Table 3 3-2t reobab6hty or consequences of an accident injection and which was not accounted (13) ECCS Accumulator Water p*euous.y evaluated becaun addinon of the for in the May 20.1988 submittal.

Volume Range (TS 3 51h onsae end offsoe orgamistion to the The proposed amendment would (14) Borated Water Sources shutdow n Techrocal Spectneation does not a%ct piani change the Technical Specincehons to (TS 3.12.5);

c peration in any manner support the Cycle 5 core reload to permit (15) Borsted Water Sources for Modes

2. The proposed amendment dws not operation with the V.5 fuelassembhes, 1-4 (TS 31.2 6).

creair the pose 6hty of a neve or ddferent in addition to the Weshnghouse Low (16) Reactor Tnp System hind of ecodent than previously evaluated Parasitic (LOPAR) assembhes remaining Instrumentation (Table 2 21t tense the penposed change le in the core from C)cle 4 and subsequent (17) Allowantes for Determinatinn of administrotne 'a narur, and no phys ral operating cycles with up to a full core of Operabthty (Table 2 2,1t and altersbons of plant conn urei.on or changes V.5 fuel Design features of the V.5 fuel (18) Charging Pump Flow Dulant e e

to seipoints of openbre parameiers are include assembhes with up to Surs elllance (TS 4 5.2),

proreaed-approximately 4 25 weight percent U.

Also, Figure 3.21. As!.I Flus Lamits as 3 The adddion of the Onsde and Offade 235. a sial blankets, integral fuel a function of Rated Thermal Power is Orsannunon Sechon lo the Technual humable absorbers. Intermediate flow proposed to be deleted.

Speofication proudee additional support to maers, reconstitutable top nottle5 and Basis for proposed no signinocer ufet, b> dennms the bnea of authoni),

estended burnup capabihty. A debris krords considerolion determiratiom enpons&ta, and communicahon The filter bottom notale (DFDN) will be The Comminion has presided proposed amendment does not mvolve a introduced to replace the standard V 5 standards for determining whether a no sisminarit reducten m a maagtn of safety, bottom ner.tle to reduce the possibihty sigm6 cant hazards consideration esists Ac4ordingly, the Commissign of fuel rod damage due to debris.

as ststed in to CFR 50 9:(c) A proposed proposes to determine that these induced fretting Changes to the amendment to an operahng hcense changes do not ins oise significant Technical Speci5 cations are required insch es no significant hasards harards consideration due to the use of the V.5 fuel and use of consideranon if operation of the far ilos Loco / Ptibhc Document Room the following analyheal methods and in accordance with the proposed Aication: Fairfield County Library.

anumhons.

amenJment wou!J not:(1)intohe a Garden and Washington Streets.

11) The improsed Thermal De sign synifunt increase in the probabiht> ur Winnsboro, South Carchna 29180 Procedure (ITDP):

consequences of an accident presiuus!)

Attorney for hansee. Randolph R-(2) The WRB.1 and WRB.2 departure esaluated. or (2) create the posubihi> of Mehan. South Carchne Electne and Gas from nucleate boihrg (DNB) a new or different kird of accident fium cornlations.

any accident preuousiv eulaated. or 131 Company P O Bos *S4, Columbia.

(3) The BAstilarse break loss.cf.

insolse a significant reduchon in a South Carchna 09:18 coolant accident (LOCA) model riarem of safei)

MC Aunct Daewr E.hner G.

(4) The NOTWMP small break LOCA The herssee has evalu ated the Ade nsam model.

proposed changes associated with the

30144 Federal Register / Vol. 53. No.154 / Wednesday. August to.198a / Notices transition to V 5 fuel agatast the The NRC staff has resiewed the relatn e to the reactor mode switch significant hasards criteria of to CFR heensee's no significant hazards position.

50 92 and against the Commission consideration determinatiort The atoff

2. Dehnition 1.0.S Core Alterations.1:

guidance concerning application of this has concluded that whi!e the margins changed to:

standard The licensee has concluded

} us e been reduced and esent a Specify the specific core that the pruposed changes do not consequences has e been increased.

components w hose addition. remosal.

insolve any significant hazard because:

these impacts are insignificant because:

relocation or mosement within the a The probabibly or consequences of an (1) the enre reload uses V.5 fuel which is reactor s essel constitutes a core acadent preuounl) es olunted is no' not significant!) different from presious alteration.

reload f$e numbbes are cores at the Summer Station: 12) the

b. Specify that handling of these core mechanicalh and hdrauhcat!) corepetible changes to the Technical specifications components only constitutes core with the current LOPAR fuel assembbes.

are as a result of the core reload and not alteration when there is fuelin the comrol rods and rector internals interfaces because of any signif; cant charge made reactor sessel.

Also. implemenianon of V.s does no+ cause a to the acceptance criteria for Technical

c. Permit a core alteration to be s.inficarn thange in the ph> sa:

Specifications; and (3) the analytical completed as necessary to lease the unit a baracteristna of the VC5NS cores beyond methods used in the required reload in a safe. consersative condition when the normat raese oh anauon seen from cycle anal)sie have been pres tously found suspension of the core alteration is to rule lhus. both fuel h pes sabsf) the d a sn bas s for the % CSNS as proposed Ivr acceptable by the NRC. Therefore. the required.

M rees with the conclusion of the

3. Defit.itions t o H 10.L 10 J.1.0 K.

1 himble plus remos el has a nest e'ble licensee's determinatiort. Accordingly.

1.0 L and 1.3 X are changed to make urp et on the suiem and component the Commission proposes to determine these definitions consistent with the structural adequao but does cause con that these changes do not tm ols e a definitions of 1.0 M.10 M 1,1.0Af 2.

bans fium to increne TN reused core signincant hazards consideration.

10 h13. and 1.0 M 4 w hich knk the mode

'h"**I h**"h' d"'en and safets amah s's LocrIPubhc Documenf Room of operation directly to the reactor mode rNa'[obe'thIt e p we o mo thaY '

I#######' I*I'I' Carden and %, eld County Ubrary, switch position, and improg e the clarity i

ashington Streets.

and consistency of these dehnitions.

uthet by the increase in DNB maron resuhir g from the use of the ITDP and Vs Winnsboro. South Carchna 29180 a A new definition is added which f uit Attorneyfor bcensee: Randolph R.

defines startup as "The withdrawmg of The prop %ed char ses base been assessed hiahan. South Carohna Electric and C&s control rods to make the reactor from a core des an and safety ana!> sis Company. P.O. Bos ?64. Columbia.

critical."

standpoint No meresse in the probahibty of South Carohna 29218 occu rence of any ace,dani e as idennfied but b Administrathe changes are made r

NRCPro/cet Director Ehnor C.

to the hmiting conditions and Na'nNoIs$,'s fIa'iu Uon a r[qu$rYd to Adensam surveillance requirements to litvoke the demontuaie enerph.nce to the reus*d Tennessee Valley Authority, Dockets terms defined in a concise manner.

\\ Cns l ed na al specif.c anons. Thes' Nos. 50 259. 50 200 and 50-298, Browns BWs forproposed no significont reanah us apphed methods which hage been prenoush found acceptable by the NRC. The Ferry Nuclear Plant. Units 1. 2 and 3, hmds consideration deterrmnatione results w hich in,tude transehon core effects.

Umestone Contb Alabama The Commission has provided Standards for determining whether a show chanus m consequenus of accidents Date of amendment requests hiay 31-significant hazards determination esists p*euouth anah ted Homeser. the retutts ar' 1988 (TS 240) as stated in 10 CFR 50 92(c).10 CFR c uer$a Ne obe$"thIpYant s Descripuon of amendn#nt requests:

50 91 requires that at the time a heensee cas atutd> io operaie safely at loos power.

The proposed amendment would modify requests an amendment. it must provide i

lhus it is concluded that there is no the Browns ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN) to the Commission its analpes. using sp.ficant increase in the consequences of an Units 1,2. and 3 Technical the standards in Sec. tion 50 92. on the att ah nt preuousti es aivated Specifications (TS). by revising the issue of no significant hazards

t. The passitut.n for an accident or following TS definitions.

consideration. Therefore. in accordance enaffuncnon of a different 4pe than a")

1. Definitions 1.0 ht.10 h11.1.0 h12.

with 10 CFR 50 91 and 10 CFR 50 92, the es alusied prenoush in the safet) anah sis 10 M.3. and 10.h14. hiode of Operation.

hcensee has performed and provided the "P"" 's not ensied are changed to:

following analysis:

s.gn I ant flect t e o er methud and

a. Directly knk the mode of operation NRc has prouded standards for enanner of \\ CsNS opershon and can be to the pos. tion of the reactor mode determinine w hether a significant hasards artommodated m dhout compromisms the s witch.

(Ontidirahun eusta as stated in 10 CFR performance or quahfical on of safetprelated

b. Permit the position of the reactor 50 %) A peoposed amendment to en equipment Thus the creehon of a nem or mode switch to be temporanly changed opnanns bucu imohes no signacant different bnd of accident from any e

for Performance of a test or other

"*d' '

• d "*"*"'

• P'"""

preuoush es atuated arredent is not fachu m ucordance adh the propoud

&nu& red a possildty operati n while the unit das not change

,,nenJment would not 01 msone a c The seattns(sM of safen as defined m its inode of operatior s gnificart meresse in the probabilty or the bases for lechnical Speoficanons is not

c. Make these defitutions appbcable cowqaenus of an accident prenoush sien fourb redxed onl) w hen there is fuelin the reactor, esalasied orl21crea e the possitat3 cf a s

The es atuaimes and anah cs described The unit would be considered not to be nr= or d fittent h *d of noden'Irom na here n show some choses in the in any defined mode of operatmn or an Ant prenoush esalwa'ed or Olinsohe a rnesequesret of preuoush anahted operational condition without fuel in the 8'amficant redwenon m a mugin of safety accidenis in some cases an increase in esent reactor g estel' 1 The proposed chanees du not result in a cnasequeckes occurs and may red. ice mars n Dejete ntranms in{ormatwn charp in the plant cunt'guratmn Rather then Humesee. in au casea the resuha of the

,,,,mpi i,, ppg, cow,en, set of der ninons chaps are cJearly mithin all perbnent which describes the selection functions aml reference lhem throughuat the bod) of dwin and safe 4 acceptame crueria Thas of the reactor mode switch Speofy the ictknir.il spearin nes ince the o

there is no s gmbri redxbon in the marg,n esceptions to the dehnitiens of modes of prormed there durs not effect tre manner of afey as a res.h of the propos(d charges operation and operational conditions m m Nh the pani was designed to operate

Federal Reithter / Vol. 53. No.154 / Wedni sday. August 10. 1938 / Notkes 30145 tN re is not an intresse in the probabda> or tequests an amendment. it must provide Paths to the Auuliary Duilding? to add entes of an accident prenounty to the Commission its anal) ses. usina four potential bypass leakage path:

con the standards in Section 50 92, on the associated with the penetrations for the

2. The proposed change does not affect normi or emerrency operahns procedures issue of no significant harards hydrogen anaf>ter s) stem.

for the ptant. These charses are mnsig consideration. Therefore,in accordance D isis forproposedno significant admirniteatnie m nature and mdl not crut, with 10 CFR 5091 and 10 CFR 5092, the hirards consideration dete emination: In the p.*Lihts of a new or diffe'ent kind of hcensee has prosided in its application its amendment request. TVA prosided aci sdera from any amdent preuouth the following analysis; the following discussion on the es Ased TV A has rulostro the prvoerd 15

1. E#"d ch'"E' 3 The proposed changes actually increase chese an t determ.ried that it dm not the oserall safety of the plant b) euphcitly represent e e,eeificaint hasards consideration nonce (DCN) issued to enhance the h der $en 3

def+ns phresas in the technical based on the the cri erta estabisshed in to i

f

"""P""""

speci.cahons that mere preuoust) open to CFM Sn 90c Opershon of SQN in ucordance cbscostred shal the current sy stem design in'erPu ls hon with the propnsd amendment will not conimned a potenhal pathw..) for the relcaw The staff has reuewed the hcensee~s 1 inuilse a sesn.firent ini ti.ise in the

• I '* *""d"'" * '" " '"" '"#" ' I"U""

• 8 no significant hasards consideration prohalaty or consequences of an acnde nt k d ""' ' *"' H D

[',',"*",,',M,',[,) dy,R*" "

$'h deterrnination and agrces with the preocus!) nalusied The proposed change licensee's analysis. Therefore, the staff adds requirements for response time teshng

,d e3 s proposes to determine that the of me containment untilshon isolation

goggn, 3,,,

,,,j,, m, apphcahon for amendments insolses rio funch n Das inbra is currently performed.

This prnposed inhnical specification significant hasards considerations.

p,'th[ s chwge is needed for unit 1 to idenhfy the q

n me e ng of b pan a ese pams to de Amhan Locoll%bhc Document Room isolanon funchon, the plant is ensured of 8"d'"8 I^" " 'I 'h"' P

"'i'I l'* h '

location: Athens Public Library, South bems bounded by the accident anat> sis paths in Isbie 3 6-1 of the um 1 terheical 8

Sttset Athens. Alabama 35611.

2 Create me possibihty nf a new or spni6cah no ensures thet these bypass A ttorney for bc ensee: General d.fferent Ond of acudent from any accident N'I h ' "'" 5 '"

• C' f,Q,^g" I,*"d 'g'd"' "hIy'*$"g Counsel. Tennessee Valley Authonty, preuousl> esaulated The addihon of the 4no mit Sarnmit 11:11 Dns e. E11 B33.

requirement for response bme teshns of the Knou ille. Tennessee 3?901 cent 8:nment sent:fa' on isMation ensures

.pp,,,,o i,chn, cal speaf, cation charse las NRC Ass,stant Director: Suzanne that SQN is bounded by its FSAR accident

46) for unit 2 that was submnted to NRC on Blad analysis Since the response time testmg is y,,3 %

presently performed. the requirernent dxs Tennessee Valley Authority.Dodet not chante the function or opershon of the

,,,!od;I**[,$,fp%d[Q, b

3,,,3 Nos. 50-327 and 50 328. Sequo)ah eqaipment-ebwnste the potential b> pass leaksee in the Nuclear Flant Units 1 and 2.llamilton 3 insohe e sisnificant reduction in a environment. In order to comply w nh County. Tennessee margin of safety. The proposed testing speaneshon 3 e 41 for operable hydrnten

^ ' "

p rY

';'j '

', 'j"g' f,'f

• • d Date of amendment requests:

tes tstnt o i s to September 14.1987 (TS 8L38) conduaed By perfornuna the response hme def.ciencies mere also reported to NRC in Descript on o/cmendment requests test of the containmemt untdation isolation Wnon Nnt Report URI Ws'on The Tent ensee Valley Authonty (TVA) fancuon. the current marons of safety for the P *t

• re,,rif,,d The Commission has pri sided l

proposes to change Table 3.3 5 of the Sequoy ah (SQN) Unita 1 and 2 The staff has reuewed the licensee's Standards for determining whether a Technical Specihcations (TS) The DO 5'gnificant hazards consideration significant hazards determination eusts proposed change will add requirements deterrnination and agrees with the in 10 CFR 50 9 (c).10 CFR 50 91 requires to the response time test of the licensee's anehsis. Therefore, the staff that at the time a licensee requests an containment sentilation isolation proposes to determine that the amendment. it must provide to the function when inihated by a high apphcation for amendments ins ob es no Commistic'n its analyses. using the containment pressure signal or a low significant hasards considerahone, standards in Section 50 92, on the issue Lua/Pubhc Document Room of no significant hatards considerat on.

pressunzer pressare signal.

Basis forpreposedno spi iccat locanon: Chattanooss Hami\\ ton County Therefore. in accordance with 10 CFR r

and 10 CFR 50 92. the licensee has Aarards consderatien determinotion: In Library,1001 Broad Street. Chattenoega. 50 91,ded the following anal > sis.

Tennusu 37402.

prou its submittal TVA prosided the followin8 reason for the EtoEosed Attorney for hcensce: General TVA has esaluated the proposed Inhnul 0hdNP-Counsel Tennessee Valley Authonty, speakanon charge and has deternuned that 61 does not represent significant hasards 5cchon 1a 4115 of ike SQN heel Safety 4m West Summit Hill Dnse. F.11 B33, iders%n based on entena esiabbs%J in Anaha-a Wport if 5ARi deschbes the effert KncMille. Tennessee 37902 to C)R So s;tc) Opershon of SQN in of *entainment prs.ns on the Loss rs NRC Assistant Director Susann' accordance with the proposed amendment Cm! ant Amdens it.OCA) anah sis. This Dlac k w ilt not-Tennessee Valley Authority, Dodet

,,[

',' * ',8j" j'.,"$d,',"/,1',,

ic 15 se on er i a 1,

,n boek The era!Ps a w assumes 6 5 setende Nos. So-3:7 and 50-3:4. Sequo)ah

,,yg,g,ea ne add.hef me for the is daten of the g r+r and lower Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. llamilton (3 ax g,n on g,,,

3,,,m bs pass conte.nment cir eaJ aien mon toes These County. Tennessee penetra ies w th N ensees in.d Ac v

asser hers are currenib serified b) resporne nme i,scrst %t not as a Date of amendments revests M> 25.

F*"m * * *

• VW'I > * *d

• 198a (TS Bam) f omerdment tvques ts:','

', " ', ', I[,N.,'

reqoressent of f eshnica19eakaton lT5) s Je

,,,,,,,,na Descrpon o sn1

,g The Commimon has prouded The Tennessee Valley Authority (T\\,A) preM eesied amdenis ne Standards for determining whether a proposes to modif) the Sequo)ah h> dresen anah rer as stem is not regarrd la s>gnificant hazards determination esists Nuclear Plant (SQN) Unit 1 Technical m.t.s.re dese basis esents hiii vied to as stated in 10 C} R 50 9 (cl 10 CFR Specificahons lu) The change is to proude mit iocA lpostless of Coolei 5091 requires that at the hme a hcensee reuse Table 3 61. "P) pass Leakage Awdntlinformahon to the operato;ia

ame Federal Register / Vol. $3. No.154 / Wednesday. August 10. 1968 / Notices l

com phance anth NURErarr37.The hydrogen loco /Pubhc theums nt Room Washington. DC 20555. Attention-l an.tynee spies don not conmbute to the locetion: ChattanoopaFamilton County Director. Disision of Reactor Projects.

Ubrary.1001 Broad Strest. Chattanooga.

co at en to t e erur.ent. The Alabama Power Company, Docket Nos.

enneun 3 2.

l remeiems potential bypass leaksie paths are 50444 and 50 364,losoph M. Fariev into the ABSCE l Amuhary Buddine Aflorney for Licensee: General Nuclear Plant. Units 1 and 2. llouston I

Secondary Containment F>iciosurel and er, Counsel, Tennessee N alley Authority' County, Alabama

• indaded in table 8 tkI es such. Elimmating 400 West Sommit Hill Dnve. E11 B33.

I the inksee pethe to the environrnent will Knosulle. Tennessee 3?902.

Date of opphcotion fnr amendmentr

)

decrease the consequences of an sotadsnt NRC Assistonf Director: Susanne May 10,1988, superceded Llay 2019A8 The onsite done anal)sa of record IFinal Black Desertphon of amendments: The Safety Analy*4 Report, ocction 15.SJ) to not amendments revise the corporate effected by movms the piennal teluse point NOT1CE OF ISSUANCE OF management position title from Senior of the h)Jrogen analysar e3 stem from the AMENDMENT TO FACILITY Vice President to Vice Prrsident Nuclear annul.a to the All5CE Dia is becane the OPERATING UCENSE throughout Section 8. Administratne total pnmary conteaunent leakage remains unchaneed, as do the assumphona that r4 During the penod since publication of Contots, it also deletes the requirement i

percent of the leakage la to the annulua and the last beweekly police, the to forward certain items to the Senior 13 percent of the leakase es to the Avadiary Commission has issued the following

%ce President, now the Vice President.

i Building The chanse 6a soientwi nlaase amendments. The Commission has Nuclear.

1 pnmte only chanen the allowable inksee for determined for each of these Date ofissuance luly 1 L 1988 l

each indmdual penetratiert The chanee does amendinents that the application Effective dote:luly 18.118a l

not impact e)stema or cornponenta used to comphes with the standards and Amendment Nos.:78.?0 r

h que of ously requWmenu d ee Atmnic Emrgy Act roc #iy @ M rg brense h V N esaluated accidents has not been altereii of 1954, e,s amended (the Act), and the andNPT4 Amendments revise the (2) Cruta the pou bdity of a new o, Commission's rules and regulations. The Technical Specificetions ddlerent kmd of acudent frorn any Comminion has made appropnate Date ofimtiolnotiec in Federal prestosely anals sed The incice on of the findms: as required by the Act and the Regkler: lune 15,19n8 (53 FR 22398) The j

hydrogen anal)ser s) stem b> pasa Commission's rules and regulations in 10 Commissio6s related esatuation of the penetrationa m table 3&l idennfies the CFR Chapter L which are set forth in the amendment is contained in a Safety penetrations as bems within the scope of bcense amendment.

Evaluation dated July 18,1988 surseillance requirement 4 IL11e The leak Notice of Consideration of lesuance of Noit.nmficont hoscrds considerotron don not es te b 1 ty pe ol Amendment to Facihty Operatmg comments received: No acc6 dent. The chanan made to the h> drogen ucense and Proposed No Sigmficant loco / Public Document Room analyser e stem do not effect the function or liasarda Consideration Determination location: George S. Houston Memonal i

I eperation of the system. Tb changes are and Opportunity for lleanns in 1.ibrary 212 W. Durdeshaw Street.

mde to ehmmate potentialle kap paths connection with these actions was Dothan. Alabama 36303 frorn contama ent to the enuronment. The pubbshed in the Federal Reghter as Commonwea% Moon Canpan),

j chaftge does not adversel) affect other indicated. No request for a heanns or Dociet Nos. STN 36454 and STN 50-systems. therefon. no new acudent f.etition for leave to Intervene was filed 455, @n StaHon. Unita 1 and 2. Ogle scenanos are enated o1 W.ng Lhis nWet 13)levolve a seemficant redact:en in e rnarsm of safety Th peopmed chant, Msa otherwise indicated. the County, Illinois l

l ensures that the h>dresen anatster system Comrr.ission has determmed that these Dcte of opplication for on endments:

l bypass penetrations are rest.nely tested amendments sattafy the cnteria for lune 22.1968, supplemented luly 14.1988 l

rader the requirements of serudlance categorical esclusion in accordance and July 18.1988.

l requirement 4 a t to This testmg ensaree with to CFR 5122. Therefore, pursuant Bnef description of amendn entse that the plant la bounded by the oftsite dose to 10 CFR 5122tb). no environmental These amendments resise 3.7.5 e (2) of anal)sie of record As described abose. the impact statement or ennronmental the Technical Specification Action

)

offsite dose anat> sis of record is not affected assessment need be prepared for these Statement concerning the ultimate heat I

I'"

amendments. lf the Commission has sink to state that the prostsions of

)

s'fe y es f d t e't e al specification taasee is not changed The prepared an environmental assessment Technical Specification 3 0 4 are not 1

modincatsans to the hydrogen analper under the special circumstances apphcable.

system ehminate a potential bypass lesh age prog ision in to CFR 51.12(b) and has Date ofissuanceiluly 21.1988 path to the ennronment and beins the system made a determination based on that Effectae date: July 21.1968 ento comphance with contamment isoletion s6a.ssment, it is so indicated.

Amendment Nos.: 20. 20 requirements Any leakare mdl te inte the For further detads with respect to the facihty Opetutetts LJcense Nos NPT-ABSCE mhen it is procened by ABCTS actioni see (1) the apphcations for 31andNPF-ad Amendments reused the I Avuhar) Buddma Gas Treatment 5)siem) amendments. (2) the amendments, and Technical Specification th en el b ass eska e a (3) the Commission's related letters.

Mhc commerits repested es to the Auultery Buddma Becape the potent.al Safety Evsluations and/or proposed no syn.fecent hosords for unprocessed b> pus leakes,,,

Ensironmental Assessments as considerution Yes ehmmated, the actual marym of safet) is indicated All of these items are Date of mitia/ notic e en Federal increased available for pubhc inspection at the Register: July 8.198d l53 FR 25710). The The staff has reviewed the beensee's Commission's Pubhc Document Room.

initial Federal Register notice prouded a no significant hazards consideration I?17 H Street, NW., Washmston. DC.

30-day opportunity for requeits for determination and agrees with the and at the local pubhc document rooms heanna on the amendment and for bcensee's analysis. Therefore the staff for the particular facihties invohed A pubhc comments on the Commission's proposes to determine that the copy of items (2) and (3) may be proposed no significant harards apphcation for arnendments insobes no obtained upon request addressed to the consideration determmation. It noted sigmficant hasards considerations U S Nuclear Reguleory Commission, that if emergency circumstances

Federal Register / Vol 53. No.154 / Wednesday. August 10. 1988 / Notices 30147 occuned, the Commission may issue the No sigmficant horords consideration rocshly Operating license No. Arr.

amendment before the espiration of the comments recen ed. No a The amendment reuses the 30 day period. prosided it made a final LocalPubhc Docement Room Technical Specifications.

no signif# cant hazards consideration locotson. For D> ton Station the Rockford Date of mitio/ notice in Federal determination Such circumstances hase Public Librar). 215 N. Wg man Street.

Register; March 9.19M N FR ?5m)'I h occurred and the Commission has made Rockford. Illinois 61101; for Braidwood Commission s related esaltiatinn vf the such a final determmation and has Station the Wilmmaton Township Pubhc amendment is contained m a Saftt3 issued the amendment. If any requests Library,201 S Kankakee Street.

FNalushon dated luly 27.10M for heatmg submitted before August 6 Wdmington. Ilhnois 6N81, 30 s rgm ront borords cow.f..w f

1 19M are granted, the heanns will be crir-merits rec ca nf. so held after issuance of the amendment.

Commonwealth Edison Company, August 8.1968 is the end of the 3Gday Docket Nos. 50 23? and 50-249. Dresden Loco / rubhc Dxuunt Room penod presided in the initial notice for Nuclear Power Station. Units No. 2 and

/wotmn: Monroe Count) Librar) submission of heanns requees

3. Grundy County, Ilhnois S) stem 3?no South Custer Road Comments Knrived No r

page o cpplicanon for amendments The Commission's related es aluation los ember 26,1980 and lanuary 14.1988 Duke Pow er Compan), et al., Dodet of the amendment,imding of emergency Brief description of amendments: This Nos 50 413 and 50-414, Catawba circumstances, fmal determination of no amendment modified paragraph 3 I of Nudear Station. Uriits 1 and 2. )ork significani haruds consideration are Prousional Operatmg License DPR.19 County, South Carolina ont ine a Safety f3atuation dated for Dresden Unit 2 and paragraph 3 H of Date of opphrotmn for onedmms Att$ney for bcensce: Michael Miller.

Facihty gnahng Ucem DPR.25 for lune 29.1987, as supplemented J

Dresden Lnit 3 Io require compliance D, cember 4.1987, and Apnl 1.1%8 Esq, Sidle and Austm.One First National Pfara. Chicago. Ilhnois po3 with the reused Physical Secunty Plan.

Bnef descrip?mn n/omendme n!> T he This plan was updated to conform to the arnendments mod:fied Technical Loco / Pubhc Document Room locaten Rockford Pubhc Librar) 215 N.

latest requirements of 10 CFR 73 55 Specification Table 4 31

• Reactor Tr p W)m en Street. Rockford. Ilbt'ois 61101.

Conostent with the prosisions of 10 CFR Sut<m Instrumentahon Sun ciliance

,3 5%. search requirements must be Riquirernents" to deleie the 1

Coromonw ealth Edison umpany, implemented within 60 days and requirernents to test the reactor coolant Docket Nos. STN 50-454 and STN 50-miscellaneous amendments within 180 flow rate in the b) pass loops in which 455. By ron Station Unit Nos.1 and 2.

days from the effective date of this Resistanceiniiperature Detectors are Ogle County. Illinois: Docket Nos. STN amendment-installed to measure the het leg and cohl 50-458 and STN 457. Braidwood Station, Dole ofissuance:]uly 22.1988 leg tem eratures Unit Nos.1 a nd 2. Will County. Illinois Effectiie date July 22,1988 paf, r,,,woh luly 27.19M Date o(orphcotton for amendments:

Amendment Nos.: n. 95 Eifec en e Jote' luly 27.19M l

lanuary 18 1988 Pronsiono/ Operating License No-A mendment Nos :49 and 42 1

Brief description of omendments:

Dra.19 androcahty Operahng lacense These amendments resise the Technical No. Dra.13 This amendment reused rocihty Opemtmg L,. cense A.os A.rr.

J3 and Arr.31 Amendments reused the

]

Specifications to. (1) change the the license.

' " " N

• N"'

shutdow n and reporting requirements Date ofinitio/ notice in Federal Dates of untio/ notices in Federal resultmg from high specific actiuty of Register: Ma) 4.1988 (53 FR 1590?) The the reactor coolant, (2) change the cun e Commission's related evaluahon of the Registen December 30.198? 152 F R 49223) and May 18.1968 (53 f R 1??88) on page 3/4 4 40 to more conservatise amendment is contained in a Safety The Commission s related es aluahon of cold os erpressure protection systems Es aluation dated jul) 22.1988 the amendments is contained m a Safet) setpoints. (3) allow other indications,in go,fgn,r, cont hosords consideration baluaan dew Juh n N addihon to the absence of alarms. to be comments recened No No signikont hmeds msdemten

[

used to senty accumulator borated LocalPubhc Dxument Rocm mmments remied No.

w ater lesel and nitrogen coser pressure

• lxotwn: Morns Public Library to4 L

I4) correct t)pogiaphical errors on D) ton Muty Street. Morris. Illmois N Loco / Pubhc Daument Room pages 3/4 6-23 and 3/4 714. (5) make

/xotion: York County Librar).138 East Table 5 71 consistent with the f5AR Detroit Edison Company Docket No,50-Black Stre et. Rock thll. South Carohna and Section XI of the ASME code: and 341, Ferml.2, Monroe County, Michigan ggrao

• 0 er f*n /0/ Sendme#

Duke Pow or Company, et al., Dodet l

enous anagem Eer o e and Nos ember 19.1987 Nos. 50 413 and 50-414, Catawba i

s s e Qu hty Srief description of amendment This Nudear Station. Units 1 and 2. York tan e rs amendment reuses the Fermi 2 Count). South Carolina Date of nsuonce ju!) 27,1968 Effecta e Dole: July 27,1968 Technical Specifications to correct g

g j, g,

$,andby Februuy 15,1968 St C

!4 s 4 j

Amei dment Nos :21. 21 for B)ron.10,

,,d d

s!

10 Brai wood i

Isolat on Deuce * " b) deletmg from Fmf dmrgtma of ammdn+m The h /7 Ta 38 1t ec' h"tdo J 7, o

r ot f cat - o r se t n f 9n j

Amendments reused the Terknis.1 eusi m the plant. The breakers that the diesel senerator 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> test run and

[

Nt oYnSt I nohce in Federal perform the isolabon funchon are st 11 m {he hot restad with F 11 Engineered the taw Register Apnl 6.1968 (53 FR t us?) Th, 00'e O '8'uco(I'l) 28 19 "

f Commission's related es atuation of the Dee ofismace Juh 27.19A8 amendments is contamed m a Safety E"ectne date July 27.128 Dfectn e date jul) 2& lum l

Esaluation dated July 27. to88 Amendment No : 22 An,endment Nos 51 and 44 i

l i

l

30144 Federal Register / Vol. 53. No.154 / Wednesday, August 10. 1988 / Notices Focahty Operating License Nos. NPF.

Facdity Operating License Nos. DiB.

Amendment No.:3 33 andNPF42 Amendments tesised the 67andNPF.tB Amendmenta reCsed the focdity Operating License No. ATF.

T *chnical SpcciLcations.

Technical Specifications.

61. This amendment resised the hcense.

Date ofinitialnotice on Federal Date ofinitic/ notice in Federal Date ofinitio/ notice on Federal Register: May t a.1988 (53 FR 17789) The Register: March 23,1988 (53 FR 9503)

Reg 6 ster: Msy 4,1984 (53 FR 15919) The Commission's related esaluation of the The Commission's rela',ed esaluation of Comrnission a related esaluation of the amendrnents is contained in a Safet) the amendments is contained in a safety amendment is contained in a letter to Es aluation dated lul) 28.196s.

Evaluation dated fuly 19.1938 the Ilhnois Power Company, et al. dated No svificant hozords ccasideration No significant horords considerction luly :s.19s8 and a Safenuards ramments recen rV. No.

comments received No.

Es aluation Report dated Jul) 26.1988 Loco / Pubhc Dxument Room LocoMic Darument Room No significant hocords consideration i

locatior York Count) Librar).138 East locotton: Indian River lumor Collese comments received No Diatk Street. Rot k 1011, South Carchna Ubrary,3200 Viramie As enue. Ft-LocalPubhc Dxument Room 29 30 Pierce. Morada 3H50-

/xchon De Vespasian Warner Pubbe Duke Power Compan), Dodet Nos. 50 Florida Power and Ught Compny, bbrary.120 West Johnson Street.

369 and 54 3*D. McGuire Nutlear Ducke4 Nos. 54 250 and 50 231.Turby Chnton, lihnois 617L.

Station. Units 1 and 2. Mecklenburg Point Plant Unita 3 and 4. Dede Count).

Loulslana Power and Usht Compan),

County. North Carolina M rida Docket No. 50 3s2. Waterford Steam D eo pp, cot on for amendwnt' kle of opphcottoit for amendments:

Doctric Station. Unit 3,58. Chasles lanuary 16.1987, as superseded Apnl 5.

Parish Loulslana 19

• Brief destnptwn of amendmerts: The Date of amendment request lanuary amendments charged the Technical Snef deschphon of omendments:De 28,1988 as supplemented May 20,1988 Specificahons by estend:ng appbcation amendments mesed the ufuelms Bne/descrrption of amendment: The of ' Estar" steam generatar tube shutdown maTn fmm to to 5 pecent amendment revised the Techmcal plueng enterion for the hfe of the (debe M cuncted a tpographical Specif cvions by deleting the erroe and made en adminatrative operabaiy and sunci!.ince Date elin:ance. lah 191n8

"@m*MS M h % M" Effecta e date: July 19,1%8

$te of Nbace: luly it.1988 Channels at power levels above 1.0E 4 %

e,,

of Rated nermal Power and adds the An endment Nos a9 and 70 Effective sloter luly 18.1948 focohts Operoung Liccnse Nos. Nrf-g Amendment Nos 132 end l':s "4 "'""** ' '* PW *""*"" # *"'*

edNT/.t? Amendments resned the fochty Opemong tscenses Nos.

requirements and operabihty upon Tuhnical Speufications.

D?RJt ondDPR4t; Amendrnents nins atement of the Log Power Lesel Date ofin,t,o/ notice in Federal rmsed the Techrucal Spec 4 cations.

E P' Resistu: loe 15 19% 153 FR 224n01 Th, Date ofimt<o/ nonce in Federal U"II""once july 19.1988 Commission s relsted evaluation of the Register: lune 15,1988 (53 FR 22W1) De Effechs t date: July 19,1988 amendments is contained in a Safety Commission's ' elated esaluation of the Arnendment No. 40 Evaluatmn doed July 19.19M amendments is *.ontained in a Safety rocihty Operatirs License No. ATr.

No sigeh ost hotoads considerohon Esaluation dated July 18.19aa

,11 Amendment resued the Technical S 'C\\Iice'\\0nL-comments reccoved No No significont hotards consideration P

Local puM c Doci, ment Room comments recris ed: No

&te of omtic/ notice in Federal r

Locc/ Public Document Room Register: June 15.1988 (53 FR 22402) The

[

ar$o te UQ"C omtion: Emironmental and Urban Commission's related evaluation of the rt C 1ra Station)' North Carohna 28213 Ana rs Ubrary, Monda International amendment is contained in a Safety University, Miami. Flonda 33199.

Esaluation dated july 19.128-Morida Pow er and Uskt Comipany. et al.,

No significant hotords considemtion DodSt Nos 50-135 and so 3st,5t. Lucie nois Power Nyann Soyland Po*"

comments rrceis ed No Cooperahse, Inc., and libnois Pome',

Plant. Unit Nos.1 and 2, St. Lucie oralPublic Document Room Cooperatis e, Inc. Dod et No.56-441 10cchanc Uninersity of New Orleans Count), Morida Clinton Power Station. Unit No.1, Ubrary. Louisiana CoHection, takefront.

, Date of opphcotion of amendments-DeWitt Count) Ittinois New Orieans Louisiana 70122 I# $$,In$$'1Y?',$d kuke Po**e and UgM Compens r cf scr p on of amend:nents: The o

r,1 amendmerits changed Technical N

I' **

• Dee Stan"en. Unu SA Cha&s N

ber 33~ 198' Speubcations (13) 3 0 4. 4 43,4 (b4 and 5 /deserrption of amendment The 3 014 0 bases statements in resporae to amendment modified paretraph 2 E of I"

'I* "*

the Commissen Generic Letter No s7.

the 1, cense to require comphence with Dore of amendinent request May *0.

W on this subiect entitled. "Sections 3 0 the amended ihysical Secunty Plan 1 M8.

and 4 0 of the Standard Techn: cal This Plan was amended to conform to Brietdescr<ption etomendment The Specinc4tions 155) on the Appbcabihty the requirements of 10 CHL 73 55.

emendment reused the Techrucal of Umitma Conditions for Operation and Conaistent mth the provaions of to CFR Specifications by remoung the San edlance Requirements? The 73 55. searth requirements must be organizational charta frain Section 6 in assendments also upgraded the Unit 1 implernented mthin 60 day s ar.1 accordance with the ruidance prouded TS f ar TS 3 01 3.0.2. and 3 43 to S5 miscellaneous amendrnents within 1e0 m Genenc !stter &su dated March 22.

da) from the effectne date of thas 1961 This action supersedes the Do!c ofiss uonce. jul) 19.1988 amendiment hcensee a request dated December 23 T#ccta e Date-lub 19,1968 Date o'issuonce luts 26,19a8 198* and as noticed on Aptd 6.1968 (53 A r"end ve s t.Ws.:98 end 3J E%tae dere jul) 26. W&4 F R 113?31

a l'edecal Resister / Vol. 53. No.154 / Wedna.sday. August to.19sa / Natkes assee Date of 4*aeoncelluly 19.19e4 E((*cti6, dete; july 22.1Es E//ecJn e dole: luly 18,1968 Effectu e date:laly 19.1966 AmendmentM 45 Amendments Nts.:133 med 1.n6 Armalawn! No.:41 Focchty Operukas Ucense & STF.

Focihts Operatang lxense Noe. DPR.

Taci4 Operatics Ucetue & ATT-

29. Tha ameadesent enises the n andDPRM Amendments rettsed tb 33 Amet. vet tes tsed the Tednic.at Technical Spec 6ficahone and/or Ucense.

brecificatwns.

Leo:e of st:foulnota e m Federal Techmcal Specific.ittons Date ofimtealsectke in Federal Resister. June 29.1988 at 53 FR 24513.

Date o/snitiolnor/cc sa Federal Register: Im 1551988 (53 l'R 22404L The The Commission's related es atoanon of Register: March 25.198* (5: FR e*D)

Commission's related esshiatica of the the amendment is contained in a Safel)

The supplemental letter provided amendment is contalced in a Safety Es aluation dated lwly 29.19tA supporhng informahon requested by the Es atuahon dated lufy 19.1933 No slin'Scoat Aorcrifs enesukmtren staff and made rto chante to the oripnel No segmf;coct hazards considemties commente reccioruf No amendment request The Commissicm's comn.ents recened No.

Loco / rtiNic IWvn=ent Rx=n related evaluation of the a nendments k Loco //Whc (bevenent Room Location:llinds junme Celielr=..

contatned in a Safety Es atuation dated locatan l'nisersit) of New Or't ans McLendon Librar). Rapmnd.

lwly 18 19'in labrary. Loulslaca Collecr6cn. Lancfrent. M:ssissht! WIM yo s,3n;f, cunt bazorda caudrwoon New Orleans. Loumana *01::.

Nigara MM Poww QW C0cVDen'8 rec *nd No Missisappl Power & Ught Company.

Dockat No. 50-410. Mn't Mila Point bral fuNac Dorument Roots b) stem Eners) Resummm.ler Senth Nucleat Stetion Unit No.2. Sctrba, New /xcuort Gosernment Publ.c.stions Maseianspri undtnc Power Assesnaasma.

York Section.Saale Ubrarf of Pennsylvania.

Docket No. 50-416. Cased Gwlf Poesse

Date of agipigoboa foe omeodment Education Buildins. Conanonwealth and Statics, timmt 1. Cladmeme Commey, Ap,,g;g,g93.

Waltml Streets. lla msburg.

EaeassiPPI A acf dsscraps.on of emendsgar Pennsylvarua 17106 Dates of efy 8 rotice for emendmi-Eense Tschaic.al Specifahcus Table Tennessee Wiiey Aetherity. Desiets May 2,19ns as remad inne 3.19nn 3M2 to redece the allow.14e ealue for Nos. 50-259,50-242 and as-ass. Beuwes B7ef cWerrprat n of a-a, -. ? The the Fenderstee $rstun/Maan To6ne Ferr) Nedent Pla nt. Um.ts 1. I and 3.

amendment changes tb Techmeal Tr6p System Raacwr Weter Leel. ti gh Spec ficateone try repiectrig Figore 8 2.2 Lavel a trose less than or equal to ataLJ tJewstone County Alahnema

1. *Ofishe Orya nesation." and fismare inchea to ines bn or sqnal to 203 A Date of applac c!,on for ca:endaar.ats 6 2 21. "Unr1 Orgemtetion? wtth knches.

June 1. IS&8 (TS 145 T) requirements thet cephrre the essential Date ofis rucace-lJy 25.1964 af,c/descretion of aesendamente: TW aspects of ths ecpenization structure Ef'ectn e date: July 25,194 amendmesta mushfy the technical that are &f ned t,y these bywree Amendment Nx 7 speWabona by chaner.no k Datc of resvoer july 2e.1<nes focdity Opemu:'g Ucerar h.o. Nrf.

,p,,,9,;,,, 7,q,,,,,,,g, y,, gg, 9g,,gy, Effectne cbre jury :& 19sa ta Arier&ent resised h Technual Aeier'dment M 45 Specificat ama.

Gas Treatsment Sys, tem and h control facthry 4vmourg htcaar No. NPr.

D:to of uutalootwe in rederal Room Fnergency \\ entsistkon Sy stem te a This arnendment res Laes the Re:Lates: lirse IL 198a l53 FR :.24alk The aUow s) stem mMificatievn and Technical Specf.ca L6ans Ccunmiss.em's related eutuation c4 the maintenance needed loe restart to DuJe of snitial s>otice sa Federal amandswat to contained en a Safety proceed m parauel mib the feel Resister lutte 1st tens at 53 HL 24511.

Es alwatmo dated July 25.1%4.

inspecuen and recamsutohon Nam lhe Comentsston's re!ated es aluatiori ef No Sgm/scoat ha.rords coneaderot on currently in progresa.

the amendment is contained in a Swiety comments in4wesi No Date of assuance-)ely at).19ee Es alwahou dated luly 29,19NI.

loculfuMac ancwment Roos Evr tise dore'lwty M.14 Walk sed sha!!

ec No a tens'icert brirottis cceedertraum locovo/L Reference and Docurments be implemented within 60 days cen n cris twe# sed. No Departr.ent. Ihr. eld Uteary. State A meridments Nos.1151.147.122 Local 1%he EMcurnent Accwn Unnersaty of New Ycsk.Oswrect New

/scutis llanda lcrruar Coticoe, York 13124.

y,,,y,, op,,,,,,, g ;7,,,,, y,,

OPAE DPRRandDPR M McLendon Ltwary ka)mcod.

Philadelphia Electric Company Pub!Le Amendments reused the Technical

" WP'

• M Senk, Electric and Cas Compa9y Specifica tioe s.

Mississippi Power & Ught Compan).

Delmarva Power and Ught Corspany, pot,,r gg;o/oota ja r.3.g ]

$3 stem Energy Resources. Inc., South and Atlantic Ory Electric Company.

Reghten june 15,1WS IS) FR 2:40*)The Mississipp! Dectric Powas Assodation.

Docket Nos. 56 2*7 and 562"'t, Peace'.

Cocv ussion's related esalwatsoa of h Duket No. 50-415. Ctand Gulf Nbdear Bottom Atomic Power Station. L' nit Nos aniendments is rentained in a Safety Station. L' nit 1. Cabrae Count).

2 and 3. York Count). Penns)h anla Eul.nanon dated Isly 20. twa Mississippi gg,,f,pgggg f,,r ainehra M m /u unt bstards curtsadefu4 son lkte s a./ opphutwn for unie rdmeat lariuary ;0.19F as supp!ernental on g ef wrg, re. onet No Ma>

lame, ae resnord }ane 3. Ihma

) ebruar) M 1%&.

Ia d P Me Docmest A vei Ike!Jaaa.p:en of a men knent Ttse B?.e!Jes, tTten alca.twfa e nts y,,, yy, pye 997,77, gn,g amendcr.ent ch.c.sce the Techruwt T bue amendr nts owdified th

Street. Athert Alat ama 35611 Speofutants b) rep!.ung 0gare L2.1 Techracal SpecJ.c at.ons (IS) in the

1. "Offs.te Orpiusaboat," and benare areas oLlal& surs JLence

• N

," Y.

6 2 24. ' Ucut Orpnisat.on." w 6th regwee.asta for p6rmer) cool. ant sample Co nsel Tenraeuce \\ aWy Authonty reqasteasat ti.at c.4 tare the esavahal analyws. and (b) % defuubce of W D C'I S*""'I Ibd O'^ III UU' asp 6ta of the orgacus. hon SWcture suntuece frequenc) for the diesel h 6h Tennu sti m that are def ned by N e fetu.

generatees A AC Mt s W t Den l' t S***nne Octe of me <. IJ) :)L 1s.4 Octe of e sAe lJ) 16. Na B!a(k

1 30150 Federal Register / Vol. 53. No.154 / Wednesday. August 10. 1988 / Notices The Cleveland Electric illuminating No sienificant besords consideration opportunity Io provide for pubhc Coenpany Duqueen* Usht Company, comments received: No.

comment on its no sigmficant hazards OWo Edseon Company, Pennglvania Loco / Pubhc Document Room determinatinn In such case. the hcense Power Company. Toledo Edieoo location: Emporia State University, amendment has been issued without Coespany Docket No.54-448. Perry Wilham Allen White Librsty.1200 opportunitt for comment. If there has Nuclear Power Plant, Urdt No.1. Lake Commercial Street. Empona. Kansa s been nume' time for pubhc comment but County, Ohio oM01 and Washburn Unis ersity School leu than 30 da)s. the Commission nia)

Dore of application for omendment:

of Law Librarv, Topeka. Aansas proside an opportumty for pubhc October 2.1947 NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF c mwnt. If comments has e been Brief description of umendment: This AMENDMENT TO FACILITY requested. it is so stated in either es ent.

amendment revised Section 4 2.1(2) of OPERATING LICENSE AND FINAL the State has been consulted by the EPP to reflect changes in the DLTERMINATION OF NO tt!cphone w hencur possible.

samphn procedure for Corbiculo fcom SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS l'nder tis regulations. the Commissmn areas adjacent to the Perry intake and CONSIDERATION AND rnay issue and make an amendment discharge structures to samphng of OPPORTUNITY FOR llEARING imcwJwtsl> offertae. notwithstanding sediments in the Perry raw w ster (EXIGENT OR EMERGENCY the pendency before it of a request for a systems. The sampling procedures at the CIRCUMSTANCES) hearing from any person,in ads ante of Eastlake Power Plant to determine the the holding and completion of any Dunn the penod since pubhcation of required heanns. where it has presence of Corbiculo are also resised.

the last(ow nkly notice, the Date o/sssuonce July 20.19M determined that no sigmficant hasards Effectne dote: July 20,19A8 Commission has issued the following e onsideration is ins uh ed r

l Amendment No.15 amendments The Commission has l

rocshty Operutms License No Npr.

determined for each of these The Commission has apphed the stand 4rds of 10 CFR Sn 92 and has made M This amendment revised the amccdments that the apphcation for the a final determ nation that the Enuronmentalf rotection Plan.

amendment complies with the standards j

Appendia B to the hcenu.

and requirements of the Atomic Energy amendment insches no sign ficant harards consideration The basis for ihm Date of mitio/ notice m Federal Act of 19R as e, mended (the Actl. and determination is contained in the l

Register March 9.1988 (53 FR ? foil The the Commission a rules and regulations.

documents related to this actmn l

Commission's related evaluation of the Th Commission has made appropnate l

amendment is contained in a Safety in ings as required by the Act and the Accordingly, the amendments has e been Evaluation dated July 20.1968 and an Comminsmn a rules and regulations in 10 issued and made effective as indicated g

Ernironmental Assessment dated July 8.

CFR Chapter 1 whic.h are set forth in the 1

1988 (53 FR 27248 July 19 1m8) hcense amendment Ce r s ion has te n d that these i

No arsmficanthorords ccasiderotmo Decauw of nigent or emergency amendments satisfy the criteria for comments recened No

rtumstances associated with the date categoncal oclusion in accordance lot al/%bbe Docurnent Room the amendment was needed, there w ai with to CFR SL22. Therefore. pursuant location: Perry 1%bhc Library. 3753 Main not time for the Commission to pubbsh, tu lo CFR M 22(b). no enurunmental Street. Perry. Ohio 440e1 for pubhc cornment before issuance. its IS P* d 8 4 *'"' "' '" "' " *'"'*I 1

usual 30-day Notice of Consideration of assessment need be prepared for these Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Issuance of Amendment and Proposed amendments If the Comminion has i

Corporation Kansas Gas and Electric No Segmficant liarards Consideration prepared an ensironmental assessment

{

Company. Kansas City Power & Usht Determinatmn and Opportunity for a under the special circumstances 1

Compan), kansas Electric Powe Heanna For esigent circumstances the prousion in to CFR 51.11(b) and has Cs operath e. Inc, Docket No. 3H82.

Commission has either issued a Federal mad; a determination based on that Wolf Creek Generating Station, Coffey Registet notice providing otportumty for assessment. it is so ind>cated.

County, Kansas pubhc comment ce has und local media for further details wtth respect to the lbte of omendenent request.

to provide notice to the public in the action see (1) the appbcation for

'r September 17,1987 area surrounding a heensee's facihty of amendment. (2) the amendment in Brief descriptma of umendment. The the beenue's spphcation and of th, F acihty Operahng ucense, and 13) the amendment revised Technical Commission's proposed determination Commission a related letter. Safety i

Specification Figure 621 to reflect the of no sismficant hasarda consideration _

Euluation and/or Enstronmental t

remosalof the Manager Nuclear The Commission has proeded a Assessment. as mdicated All of these l

Operations Support position and the reasonable opportunity for the pubhc to items are n ailable for pubbe mspection name change of the Procurement and comment, using its best efforts to make at the Corrmission e Pubhc Dxument Materials Management Daismn in'the as adable to the pubhc means of Room.171711 Stree t. NW., Wa shtraton, Operating Corporation Organisation. as communication foe the pubhc to respond DC. and at the local pubhc document I

well as the remoul of unnecessary quickl), and in the case of telephone room f ar the particular facihl) ins oh ed detail from Figure 6 :.1 comments. the commenis has e been A copy of items (2) and (3) may be lkte of hauonce luly 15.196a recordid or transcribed as appropnete obtamed upon request addressed to the j

Effectne date jul) 15, Isaa and the brensee has been informed of U S Nuclear Resulatory Commission, i

l A mendment No.117 the pubhe comments Washirston DC 205%S AttenSon ruohiy Operotmg License No Nrr.

In circumetances where failure to act D,re: tor. Diusion of Reactor protects of Amendment reused the'lechnical in a timely w ay would hase resulted. for The Commission is also offenns an j

Specifications esarrple, m derating or shutdown of a opportunity for a hver1ng with respect to ikte of mitiol notice in Federal nucle at pow et plant or in prewntion of the issuance of the amendments D3 Register Nowmbee 4.1987 (52 FR 423?3) either resumption of opershon os of September 919tM the bcensee me) file The Commissmn'a related es aluation of increase in pow er output up to the a request for a heanng with respect to L

the aswndment is contamed in a Safet) p! ant's bcensed pow er lesel. the issuance of the amendment to the

[

Es aluation dated July 15.198a Comminion may not hue had an subiect facibs) operstmg beense and i

t

_ Fedecel Resister / Vol. 31 No 154 / Wednerday. Assest to.1988 / Nottees 30151 any persos erbase interese may be Those pemstted to irrtervene become of.offsite power in confunction with an affeded by this proceedwig and who perince to the proceedreg subtect to arry ettg.neered safety features acJustion test onehes to pernctpete as a party m the limiteticms io the order r untmp leave to sf nal-i proceedmg rnest file a wr1tlen petttym intervene, and ha e, the cypertemf y to

&te of tssucnc4lluly *21988

)

fot less e to emervene Requests Jer e participate fully m the condert of the EaVrttie dote luty 15.12s hearter ord petitione for leave to heartng tecludmg the opportumry to Amerdrept Nos 90 and 71 larerme shan be filed tn accordence prema evsdence aM cron rumme focdity Operottr$ Licenu Nos. Nrf 9 with the Commimon's

• Rules ef m tnesses andNrr.t? Asnendments resised the Prache, for Dmntre Licensing Smce the Commimen has made a Technical Specifica hons Proceedints'in 10 CF7 Part 2 If a fmal deveranation that the amendment Pdhe commer rs requestedos to

'i request for a heerteg er pehtren for

• A U "O *1mincent heurds propened no sun leant hotards lean to intenene es flW by the ebete cons 4nh if a hearira is requested.

conside etw No date. the Commrmon er en Atorme H "U 'W stav the ektmm of the The Comminson's refaled eutuation i

Safety and Licensmg Beard. destgnated amendment, Any hearms held would is contamed m a Safet) b alution i

by the Commimon or by the Chairman take place while me amndment es M dated bl> ::, M68 effect of the Atomic Safety and 1) censing Attorney for Acensee Atr. Albert Carr, Board Panel mfl rate on the request A nont fu a hones or a fehnert pyke pow er Compan). 422 South 4

fee lean to intervene mesi to hW with Church Street, Charlotte. Nefth Carolma and/or petincm and the Secretary or the e

sian c.

emim n. U S

8242 designated AtomR Safet) and Licensini Nuclear Regulatory Commionen.

Local Pdl.c Dxument Room Board millissue a nohce og haanns of Washmston. DC 205A5 Altentice

/ccoter Athms Library. L'ntsersity of an appropriate of er.

Dockeling and Servu Dranch. er may North Carolina. Charlotte (t%CC As regaired b) 10 CTR 2J10 a be dehnred to the Cornmission's Pubbe Stenon). North Carolina 287 3 petiL>on for feas e to intenana shd set th>coment Roc rn Mf H Street. NW.,

NRCPro/ect Detector David B forth with partxulartty the internt of Mohangtort. DC. by th e above date.

Mag %w, the petiboner in the proceeding and how % here pent.or.a are f. led during the last osied si Rachsue.iderpassi th,s M day that tater:6L inay be a(fected by the ten [10] day s of the ncixe period. M 6a of Aug.si 196a results of the proceelte The peution ree csted ht h peut:;ner petwpaly so for the hweiest ses.leiory Commise.c.a l

should suc ficalty explanc the reasona balcem the Cors misuon by a idt-free sieges A. Vergs, why intervenbon should be permitted telephoes call to Western Union at 1 per 3,,,, erg,ong twer, f ett J

weh partscular teference to k (00) 32140EI)(in Missowl timo) 342 r

Ot4e o Lcleer Jtcoctor /tey toi on fellowv3 fartor::(1) the eature of the 6 Man The Westeen Umon opereto' phc. as.t*aa Nod was a u a e4 petitioner s right under the Act to be should be aseen DeLyrs ro identMc.at;on

% con,,,,gg rnade a party to k proceedirig. l2) h Nurstwr 3737 and tre followrig senage nature and estent of the peut >oner's addrewed to l Protect Deectort i

~

l l

property, finanaal or other smaeut la petitioner e rume a rmi telephone the proceedma, and (3) h ponMa amtar, date ptition *a e enaaled plant eIfect of any order mbch ruy be nas6e. and puNicahon date assi page l

a l

entered in the proceed rq on h number of this Feders! Regisser notwe.

petitweier a usterest The petition should A cepy of k petition should also be 4

also ident4fy N specific upect(s)of the sent to the Office of the General I

subiect rnetter of the proceed ng a to Cour sel, U S Nuclear Regulatory 1

which pehuonet wtahes to intenene.

Commission. Wathirston DC 3155, j

Any person who has Ieled a pechon for and to the attorney for the hcansee.

leau to intenene or who has been Nontimely fihnes of penhons tot lease t

admitted as a party rnay amend the to inten ene, amended pehhons.

j i

petihon without requeshre leave of the suppkmental phnms enUn nts Board up to fifteen t151 de)s prue to the for huner mt! not be entutains l

l I

first preheanr4 w'tfererna scheduled in absent a deterrninahon t3 the l>

the proceedmg but sedb sa aW Comrnission. the preulce ff; car or N e

petition must sansfy the steal, city Atomic Safety and Lacermns Board that l

requirements d<ebed above ne pention and/or request shou!J be s'ented based seen a ta'ancing of the 4

Not later than fif teen Illi day s pior to kors sucified m to CFR 2.M4'aillMiF i

j the first preheanns confererne.

(4 and 2 r14;d) schedu!ed m the proceed.ng. a pentuner i

shall fe!e e surple neet to the petirm to Duke Power Compan). D4et Nea. 54 intenene abch Fr ast tacl6de a bet of 369 and 50 3V McCuus Nuclear the contenhons which e, eNeht to be Station. L' ruts 1 and 2. Medlenbu.rg i

j ht: gated m the etattre, and the tsases ic, County, North Carolina

[

eacA contee.ticn sea lofth mata Dee o cgcow v e y-gmc ti r

e I

renonable speobcatv. C.suenu<os shau M) 15 and 1919* as rupp+crrented be larmted to raatters mtrun the scope of py 21. t ens q

the emet.dmesi mdea cone.deunca. A b,4v vt'c, e6-e+e ts The pet 6 hoe.et uno fada to Ne such o amendmeds creded Teebmcal sur9tement w hadi Satshes these Speof canon 4 8112 e Nel to reecstse reqbirernente mth ressvc1 to at lesel one that fevr.rather than tbm dictel contenhan wiu not be pere.itted to sereraw trge a== net aatomahca!!y partacapate as a pany.

bypested daret tests smeFanry a less.

1 1

L i

.