TXX-6036, Interim Deficiency Rept CP-86-48 Re Adequacy of Nonconformance Dispositions.Initially Reported on 860616. Review of Nonconformance Rept Samples Conducted to Determine Safety Significance.Next Rept Will Be Submitted by 870715

From kanterella
Revision as of 15:13, 10 December 2024 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Interim Deficiency Rept CP-86-48 Re Adequacy of Nonconformance Dispositions.Initially Reported on 860616. Review of Nonconformance Rept Samples Conducted to Determine Safety Significance.Next Rept Will Be Submitted by 870715
ML20197B348
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  
Issue date: 10/20/1986
From: Counsil W
TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
To: Johnson E
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
References
CP-86-48, TXX-6036, NUDOCS 8610280389
Download: ML20197B348 (2)


Text

'

l Log # TXX-6036 File # 10110 10110.1 TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING COMPANY SKYWAY TOWER e 400 NORTH OLIVE STREET. LB. 88. DALLAS. TEXAS 75301 October 20, 1986

..I_LLIA M. G C.O.U.N.S.IL.,

W 0.

7--

OCT 211986 Mr. Eric H. Johnson, Director

[

["L Division of Reactor Safety and Projects U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission MW-i 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, TX 76012

SUBJECT:

COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION (CPSES)

DOCKET NOS. 50-445 AND 50-446 ADEQUACY OF NONCONFORMANCE DISPOSITIONS SDAR: CP-86-48 (INTERIM REPORT)

Dear Mr. Johnson:

On June 16, 1986, we verbally notified your Mr. C. Hale of a deficiency involving the adequacy of nonconformance dispositions. This is an interim report of a potentially reportable item under the provisions of 10CFR50.55(e).

We have submitted interim reports logged TXX-4916 and TXX-4997, dated July 16, 1986, and September 5, 1986, respectively.

The specific issue involves the revision of the disposition of a Nonconformance Report (NCR). The evaluation of this issue involves: 1) an assessment of the adequacy of NCR dispositions, and 2) programmatic problems in the revision to NCRs.

A review of a random sample of NCRs has been conducted to determine the safety significance of actions resulting from completed dispositions. This review has provided a high degree of assurance of the adequacy of the dispositions of NCRs at CPSES. To further ensure that safety concerns do not exist, a review program encompassing technical review of all previously closed NCRs with

" void", " repair" or "use-as-is" dispositions is planned.

This effort will be completed by June 30, 1987.

In order to maintain a high degree of confidence that NCR dispositions will not result in safety concerns, an interdiscipline review effort has resulted in new corporate procedures for controlling nonconformances and deficiencies.

The implementing procedures and the training of personnel will be accomplished by December 22, 1986.

po2nanBGih' fga7 gg g

A,,,,_,_,,,,,,,,m.,m.,_

t I~

TXX-6036 October 20, 1986 Page 2 Our next report will be submitted by July 15, 1987.

Very truly yours,

$1 W. G. Counsil JCH/mlh c - NRC Region IV (0 + 1 copy)

Director, Inspection & Enforcement (15 copies)

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 i

i f

4 l

f l

!