ML22319A124

From kanterella
Revision as of 12:07, 27 November 2024 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NRC Slides for November 15, 2022 Public Meeting on Part 52 Lessons Learned
ML22319A124
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/15/2022
From:
NRC/NRR/VPOB
To:
References
Download: ML22319A124 (1)


Text

Framework for Discussion 1

W HAT REGULATORY SUBMITTALS, SUCH AS THE ITAAC COMPLETION SCHEDULE REQUIRED BY 52.99(A), COULD BE REMOVED BECAUSE OF REGULAR NRC-LICENSEE INTERACTIONS AND MEETINGS?

HOW COULD THE LICENSE AMENDMENT PROCESS BE OPTIMIZED TO ACCOMMODATE THE FASTER CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULES OF SMRS, AND AVOID DELAYS IF THE AVERAGE AMENDMENT REVIEW TIME IS 6 MONTHS?

AN SMRS 52.103G MIGHT BE DELAYED IF A LAR IS REQUIRED FOR ITAAC-RELATED ISSUES BUT HAS LOW SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE.

W HAT W OULD BE THE MOST HELPFUL DATA FOR POSTING ON OUR PUBLIC W EBSITE TO COMMUNICATE HOURS SPENT BY THE NRC?

W ITH SMRS AND ADVANCED REACTORS NOW ON THE HORIZON, HOW CAN THE NRC MAKE IT EASIER FOR THE LICENSEES TO NAVIGATE A FIRST-TIME LICENSING PROCESS AND BETTER ACCOMMODATE CHALLENGES THAT A FIRST LICENSEE MIGHT ENCOUNTER?

HOW CAN THE NUMBER OF ITAAC IN A COL AND THEIR SCOPES BE OPTIMIZED FOR A GIVEN DESIGN?

HOW CAN THE SIGNIFICANCE DETERMINATION PROCESS, LICENSEE-IDENTIFIED FINDINGS, AND THE LOW-SAFETY-SIGNIFICANCE-ISSUE RESOLUTION (LSSIR)

BETTER ACCOMMODATE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION AND MANUFACTURING?

W HAT W OULD THE INSPECTION PROGRAM LOOK LIKE FOR NEW VENDORS OF SMRS AND ADVANCED REACTORS, W HEN THE ONSITE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD IS MINIMAL COMPARED TO THE MANUFACTURING TIMES AT A VENDOR LOCATION?

SCHEDULE The staffs lessons learned charter (ADAMS Accession No. ML21160A031) contains the milestones for this effort.