RIN 3150-AL01, Rulemaking: Final Rule: Gao Forms Price-Anderson Act Financial Protection Regulations

From kanterella
Revision as of 03:29, 27 November 2024 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rulemaking: Final Rule: Gao Forms Price-Anderson Act Financial Protection Regulations
ML23159A034
Person / Time
Issue date: 09/05/2023
From: Eugene Dacus
Office of Congressional Affairs
To:
US SEN, President
Shared Package
ML23158A165 List:
References
NRC-2023-0110, RIN 3150-AL01
Download: ML23159A034 (1)


Text

11/09/99 A.

With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an analysis of costs and benefits?

B.

With respect to this rule, at the final rulemaking stage, did your agency

1. certify that the rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under 5 U.S.C. § 605(b)?
2. prepare a final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under 5 U.S.C. § 604(a)?

C.

With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare a written statement under

§ 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995?

D. With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)?

E. Does this rule contain a collection of information requiring OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995?

F. Did you discuss any of the following in the preamble to the rule?

E.O. 13132, Federalism E.O. 12630, Government Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform E.O. 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks Other statutes or executive orders discussed in the preamble concerning the rulemaking process (please specify)

Yes No N/A 41217

11/09/99 A.

With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an analysis of costs and benefits?

B.

With respect to this rule, at the final rulemaking stage, did your agency

1. certify that the rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under 5 U.S.C. § 605(b)?
2. prepare a final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under 5 U.S.C. § 604(a)?

C.

With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare a written statement under

§ 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995?

D. With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)?

E.

Does this rule contain a collection of information requiring OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995?

F.

Did you discuss any of the following in the preamble to the rule?

E.O. 13132, Federalism E.O. 12630, Government Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform E.O. 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks Other statutes or executive orders discussed in the preamble concerning the rulemaking process (please specify)

Yes No N/A 41217

11/09/99 Final Rule Other Major Rule Non-major Rule Submission of Federal Rule s Under the Congressional Review Act Please fill the circles electronically or with black pen or #2 pencil.

1. Name of Department or Agency
2. Subdivision or Office
3. Rule Title
4. Rule Identification Number (RIN) or Other Unique Identifier (if applicable) 11/09/99
8. Priority of Regulation (fill in one)

Economically Significant; or Significant; or Substantive, Nonsignificant Routine and Frequent or Informational/Administrative/Other (Do not complete the other side of this form if filled in above.)

9. Effective Date (if applicable) 5.

6.

7. With respect to this rule, did your agency solicit public comments?
10. Is a concise Summary of the Rule provided?

Submitted by:

(signature)

Name: ___________________________________________

Title:

For Congressional Use Only:

Date Received:

Committee of Jurisdiction:

GAO President of the Senate Yes No Speaker of the House of Representatives Yes No N/A 41217

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguard Inflation Adjustments to the Price-Anderson Act Financial Protection Regulations

GD\\VDIWHUGDWHRISXEOLFDWLRQ Eugene Dacus Director, Office of Congressinal Affairs 5,1$/

David L. Decker Digitally signed by David L. Decker Date: 2023.09.05 09:18:25 -04'00'

11/09/99 A.

With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an analysis of costs and benefits?

B.

With respect to this rule, at the final rulemaking stage, did your agency

1. certify that the rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under 5 U.S.C. § 605(b)?
2. prepare a final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under 5 U.S.C. § 604(a)?

C.

With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare a written statement under

§ 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995?

D. With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)?

E. Does this rule contain a collection of information requiring OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995?

F. Did you discuss any of the following in the preamble to the rule?

E.O. 13132, Federalism E.O. 12630, Government Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform E.O. 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks Other statutes or executive orders discussed in the preamble concerning the rulemaking process (please specify)

Yes No N/A 41217