ML21357A002

From kanterella
Revision as of 02:13, 19 November 2024 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Uncompleted ITAAC Notification Checklist (UINC) 2.1.03.06.i for ITAAC (Index No. 75) for Vogtle Unit 3 Combined License (VOG3)
ML21357A002
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 12/22/2021
From:
NRC/NRR/VPOB
To:
Mike Webb, VPO
References
ITAAC 2.1.03.06.i
Download: ML21357A002 (2)


Text

UNCOMPLETED ITAAC NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST (UINC)

A Lead Reviewer in concert with other reviewer(s) assigned to a n uncompleted ITAAC notification (UIN) review will complete this form for the ITAAC under review.

Docket No: 5200025 Plant Name: Vogtle Unit 3 Combined License Licensee Name: Southern Nuclear Operating Combined NPF-91 Company, Inc. License No:

ITAAC ID No: 2.1.03.06.i ITAAC Type: Targeted

ITAAC Family Designation or 05A enter N/A:

Uncompleted ITAAC Notification (UIN) ADAMS ML No: ML21355A357

Name of Lead Reviewer: Webb, Michael

Enter Yes in the blank at the beginning of a statement below if the whole statement is true, No if the whole or part of the statement is not true, and N/ A if the statement is not applicable.

a. Yes The UIN identifies all of the following: (1) licensee, (2) plan t site name, (3) unit number, and (4) plants docket number.
b. Yes The ITAAC as stated in the UIN matches the ITAAC as stated in t he combined license.
c. Yes NRC personnel with the requisite technical and engineering knowledge has/have determined that the ITAAC Completion Description (ICD) of the UIN contains sufficient information, including summarizing the methodology for performing the ITAAC, to demonstrate that the l icensee will successfully perform the inspection, test, and/or analysi s stated in the ITAAC if the licensee uses the methodology described in the UIN.

The methodology described in the ICD of the UIN either was revi ewed and approved by the NRC, or is acceptable based on sound scient ific, mathematical, and/or engineering principles, and is repeatable, if necessary, without any significant change to the reported resul t.

d. Yes NRC personnel with the requisite technical and engineering knowledge has/have determined that the ICD of the UIN contains sufficien t information to demonstrate that the licensee will be able to sh ow that it has fully met the entire acceptance criterion stated in the ITA AC if it performs the ITAAC as stated in the UIN.
e. Yes For ITAAC specified as being performed on as-built structures,

systems, or components (SSCs): If the UIN indicates that the inspections, tests, and/or analyses of the ITAAC are being perf ormed at

Page 1 of 2 UNCOMPLETED ITAAC NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST (UINC)

location(s) other than the final installed location, then the U IN, based on the guidance in NEI 08-01 either summarizes a technical justifi cation or provides a reference to a generic technical justification in th e ICD of the UIN that establishes why it is acceptable to perform the ITAAC at location(s) other than the final installed location. [Enter N/ A if the ITAAC is not being performed at a remote location or if the ITA AC is not specified as as-built.]

f. No An additional reviewer was assigned to the UIN review with his or her name entered into the blank at the top of this page based on hi s or her expertise being required

If the NRC reviewers determine that a UIN has sufficient inform ation, this is based on the UINs description of the proposed methodology for completing the ITAA C. The UIN review is not based on consideration of actual performance of the ITAAC, the acceptance criteria results, the completion of NRC inspections, or the resolution of NRC inspect ion findings, if any. These matters will be addressed during the NRCs review of the later ITAAC closure notification (ICN) for that ITAAC. The NRC staff plans to rely on a UIN review in its review of the later ICN to the extent that the ITAAC completion methods described in the UIN a nd ICN are the same, subject to new information that might arise between the UIN and ICN rev iews.

Lead Reviewer: Webb, Michael Date: 12/22/2021

Lead Approver: Welch, Christopher Date: 12/22/2021

Licensing PM: Armstrong, Garry

Page 2 of 2