ML20211H017

From kanterella
Revision as of 18:39, 6 May 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ro:On 970929,transient Rod Exhibited Sluggish Response to Freedom of Motion Scram Check Conducted During Fuel Movements.Caused by o-ring Seal at Bottom of Air Cylinder for Tr.Inspected,Cleaned & Lubricated Transient Rod
ML20211H017
Person / Time
Site: Pennsylvania State University
Issue date: 10/03/1997
From: Sears C
PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV., UNIVERSITY PARK, PA
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9710060153
Download: ML20211H017 (1)


Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ -

, .- OCT 03 '97 02 0TM PAD SCittfGR CCf41CR P.2/2 PENNSTATE - - -

Remon science and r.ngenes Cemer ($lal 665 6s51 Ceners of ragineenris The Fenmyiv.na sim Universo i October 3,1997 aiem ie u.cie., ne. w suiiding Unnemty Puk h 16602 2MI U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Cont 01 Desk

- Washington, DC 20555 Re: Reportable Occunence: V!olation of Tech Spec 3.2.6 License No. R 2, Docket No 50 005

Dear Sir or Madame:

his letter confirms my telephone call of this moming,3 October 1997, to Marvin Mendonca regarding an operational event at the Penn State Ilreareale Reactor Durmg that callit was determined that the event was a repostable occunence. On 29 September 1997 it was observed that the Transient Rod (TR) exhibited a sluggish response to a freedom of motion scrarn check conducted during luct movements. The reactor was immediately removed from operation and the TR scram time was measured. It was between one and two seconds; this is greater than the one second requirement of Tech Spec (TS) 3.2.6. Inspection, cleaning, and lubncation of the TR mechanism was performed and subsequent testmg indicated acceptable scram times. The reactor was then retumed to operation. On 2 October 1997 it was decided to perform a further inspection, cleaning and lubrication. Following that maintenance the scram tirnes were further improved. A weekly surveillance testing of the TR scram performance has been initiated to provide monitoring and trending so as to determine what further corrective action may be appropnate. Contact is also being made with the reactor vendor to collect more information. The cause for the sluggish response appears to be an o ring seal at the bottom of the air cylinder for the TR.

At all times the Safety, Shim, and Regulating rods were operable meeting the TS 3.2.1 requirement for a minimum of three operable conti01 rods. Analysis was performed to assure the requd rements of TS 3.1.3 regarding shutdown margin were also met even if the TR had failed to scram. The shutdown margin was assured for both actual operating rod positions as well as for having the most reacuve rod fully withdrawn. Note that at no time has the TR failed to scram. Also, prior to the observations of 29 Septembcr 1997 there were no indications of TR 7toblems. The TR scram time had been measned in June as part of the periodic surveillance and tie scrsm time was acceptable.

This letter is being faxed today,3 October 1997, to Marvin Mendonca and Thomas Dragoun. A 14 day written report, as required by TS 6.6.2, will be submitted.

Sincerely,

!d 0,9MM bM-. e C. Frederick Sears Director, RSEC M' g CFS/pjs 4052.97 T. Dragoun, NRC, Region I pc:

M. Mendonca, NRC, Headquarters hhNhhl*))

E. Klevans O_ McMurtry R. Erickson coll!gMh$ leering An ret opmung UnNenHy 9710060153 971003 PDR ADOCK 05000005

  1. \