ML21057A261

From kanterella
Revision as of 09:48, 14 March 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Response to Nuclear Energy Institute Supplemental Industry Comments on Draft Drg Instrumentation and Controls for Non-LWR Reviews (Docket Id NRC-2020-0072)
ML21057A261
Person / Time
Issue date: 03/01/2021
From: Mohamed Shams
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Nichol M
Nuclear Energy Institute
References
NRC-2020-0072
Download: ML21057A261 (3)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 March 1, 2021 Mr. Marcus R. Nichol Senior Director, New Reactors Nuclear Energy Institute 1201 F Street, NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20004

SUBJECT:

RESPONSE TO NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE LETTER REGARDING SUPPLEMENTAL NEI COMMENTS ON DRAFT DESIGN REVIEW GUIDE:

INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROLS FOR NON-LIGHT-WATER REACTOR REVIEWS [DOCKET ID NRC-2020-0072]

Dear Mr. Nichol:

By letter dated February 11, 2021 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML21057A261), you provided the Nuclear Energy Institutes (NEIs) supplemental comments related to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs draft Design Review Guide (DRG): Instrumentation and Controls for Non-Light-Water Reactor (non-LWR) Reviews (ADAMS Accession No. ML20238B943). Specifically, NEIs supplemental comments focused solely on section X.2.2.1.3, Diversity in Support of Defense-in-Depth to Address Common Cause Failures (CCFs), and Appendix B, Cross-Cutting Issues and Interfaces, and intended to further clarify the guidance related to CCFs. We appreciate the supplemental comments received from the NEI that are intended to clarify the option for a risk-informed and performance-based approach when considering diversity in support of defense-in-depth to address CCFs.

The staff has reviewed the detailed comments provided in the attachment to your February 11, 2021 letter and believes that at this time, it would be premature to revise the DRG to incorporate the proposed revisions for the following reasons.

1. The DRG, as currently written, provides the flexibility for the staff to review an approach such as the one discussed in the NEI letter. The DRG supports a risk-informed and performance-based regulatory framework and aligns with the NEI 18-04, Revision 1, Risk-Informed Performance-Based Guidance for Non-Light Water Reactor Licensing Basis Development (ADAMS Accession No. ML19241A472), methodology for selecting licensing basis events, classifying structures, systems, and components, and assessing the adequacy of a design in terms of providing layers of defense-in-depth. Therefore, the staff believes that addressing the proposed DRG revisions at a later time does not impact the staffs readiness to review the instrumentation and controls portions of non-LWR designs, including the use of risk-informed, performance-based approaches.
2. The staff determined that some of the concepts discussed in NEIs supplemental comments (e.g., consideration of likelihood as part of the CCF assessment) are currently

M. Nichol being reviewed by the staff as part of pre-submittal activities related to NEIs Technical Report, NEI 20-07 Draft B, Guidance for Addressing Software Common Cause Failure in High Safety-Significant Safety-Related Digital I&C Systems (ADAMS Accession No. ML20245E561). Similar to NEI 20-07 Draft B, the staff believes that the proposed DRG revisions would require a fulsome technical and policy review. Therefore, the staffs pre-submittal review of NEI 20-07 Draft B provides an opportunity to evaluate these technical and policy considerations. There may be additional lessons learned from the pre-submittal review of NEI 20-07 Draft B that could eventually be incorporated into the DRG.

The staff intends to issue the DRG as currently written and will capture any lessons learned resulting from its use in support of the timely staff review of potential near-term, non-LWR applications. In addition, the staff continues to work on the industry-led Technology-Inclusive Content of Application Project (TICAP), the NRC-led Advanced Reactor Content of Application Project (ARCAP), and other advanced reactor initiatives such as the guidance development on construction permit applications. As these efforts progress, there may be opportunities to further augment the DRG for instrumentation and controls reviews.

If you have any questions regarding the status of the DRG, please contact Jordan Hoellman by telephone at 301-415-5481 or by e-mail to Jordan.Hoellman2@nrc.gov.

Sincerely, Signed by Shams, Mohamed on 03/01/21 Mohamed Shams, Director Division of Advanced Reactors and Non-Power Production and Utilization Facilities Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

ML21057A261 NRR-106 OFFICE NRR/DANU/UARP: PM NRR/DANU/UARP: BC NRR/DANU: D NAME JHoellman JSegala MShams DATE 2/26/2021 2/26/2021 3/1/2021