CLI-86-13, Responds to 860725 Ltr Re Decision CLI-86-13 Concerning Facility.As Part of Formal Adjudication Conducted Under Administrative Procedure Act,Decision Must Be Based on Consideration of Only Matls in Adjudicatory Record

From kanterella
Revision as of 12:26, 28 December 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to 860725 Ltr Re Decision CLI-86-13 Concerning Facility.As Part of Formal Adjudication Conducted Under Administrative Procedure Act,Decision Must Be Based on Consideration of Only Matls in Adjudicatory Record
ML20206Q065
Person / Time
Site:  File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 08/22/1986
From: Bernthal F
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To: Damato A
SENATE
Shared Package
ML20206Q071 List:
References
CLI-86-13, NUDOCS 8609040006
Download: ML20206Q065 (1)


Text

.

f* %e,k UNITED STATES E i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

$ WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

\...../

CHAIRMAN August 22, 1986 The Honorable Alfonse M. D'Amato United States Senate Washington, D. C. 20510

Dear Senator D'Amato:

The Commission has received your letter of July 25, 1986 '

regarding CLI-86-13, our July 24, 1966 decision concerning the Shoretam Nuclear Power Plant. In that decision, we held only that as a matter of law the license applicant should be permitted the opportunity to show that lack of li. ate and local cooperation at this time does no: absolutely preclude a findir.g, based on the facts adduced in the evidentiary record, of reasonable assurance that adequate measures can and will be taken to protect the public in an emergency. We did not make such a factual finding in our decision, and we did not say that we would. Commis.sioner Asselstine expressed a dissenting view which was attached to the Commission's July 24, ISR6 order.

As you know, the decision n s part of a formal adiudication being conducted under the Administrative Procedur: Act, which mandates our consideration of only thcse materials that are part of the adjudicatory record. Accordingly, while the Commission appreciates your concerns, we hope that you will understand that we must base our decision on the adjudicatory record of the Shoreham proceeding. To avoid the perception that we are engaging in prohibited communications, we are serving your letter and our response on the parties to the adjudication.

Sincerely, v& 3 L l !. .,G Frederick M. Bernthal Acting Chairman 8609040006 860822 PDR COMMS NRC C.oryc5 PondenceC PDR L.