ML20206S523
| ML20206S523 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 05/19/1999 |
| From: | NRC COMMISSION (OCM), NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| To: | |
| References | |
| REF-10CFR9.7 NUDOCS 9905210149 | |
| Download: ML20206S523 (2) | |
Text
i May 19,1999 CORR ECTION NOTICE i
1 TO ALL HOLDERS OF TRANSCRIPT FOR NRG COMMISSION MEETING - NRC RESPONSE TO STAKEHOLDERS' CONCERNS l MAY 4.1999 PLEASE REPLACE PAGE 56 WITH THE ATTACHED REPLACEMENT PAGE.
i ATTACHMENT:
AS STATED l
TiiE SECRETARIAT
\
9
@/
I 9905210149 990519 PDR 10CFR PT9.7 PDR f) d fl- h l
L 4
.. 1 l
l S- 56 1 1 from Commissioner Merrifield.
2 Mr. O'Hanlon.
3 MR. O'HANLON: Thank you, Madam Chairman. I agree 4 that the process is a good process that we're going to and 5 if the process is good, which I think it is a good process, 6 that regardless of plant operations, whether it be good or 7 not so good, that it would be a good indicator.
8 I think on the -- it's a big step toward using the 9 same standard nationally as opposed to regionally, which has 10 been a comment and you were just talking about that a moment 11 ago, that we say, well, this region versus that region, I i 1
12 think this will do away with those type of questions. l 13 I think it can compare just across one set of 14 indicators. And I think it is going to be more objective.
15 There are some discussions on particular indicators and l 16 whether we all agree on them, but I think we're talking not 17 with the overall concept so much the specific items.
18 CHAIRMAN JACKSON: Let me ask you a question. Do 19 you understand that the process is not just performance 20 indicator?
21 MR. O'HANLON: It's performance indicators and 22 core base inspections. Yes, I understand that. I believe 23 everybody else does, as well.
24 I don't think there are indicators, and I think 25 most people agree, that you can't have indicators for ANN RILEY & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
Court Reporters 1025 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 1014 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 842-0034