ML20199K128

From kanterella
Revision as of 06:09, 19 November 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Revised Tech Specs,For Review & Approval
ML20199K128
Person / Time
Site: Reed College
Issue date: 06/22/1986
From: Cronyn M, Kay M
REED COLLEGE, PORTLAND, OR
To: Thomas C
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20199K132 List:
References
NUDOCS 8607090048
Download: ML20199K128 (1)


Text

e . .

y ,

, REED COLLEGE ' Fort /and, Oregon 972o2" ,

s-CHEMISTRY * . '*

  • DEPARTMENT -

5 Mr. Cecil O. Thomis, Chief . -

Standardization andSpecial -

Projects Branch ,

~ '~ Division of Licensing NRR -

. 'U. S. Nuclear Regulafory Commission Washington, D.C.~ 20555 l- .

~

Docket No. 50-288 -

' 22 June 1986 1. ~~,

Dear Mr. Tliomas:

~* .

  1. , - The Reed Reactor Facility (RRF) is stbmitting 2-notariied original cppies,and 19' .

additioaal copies of a completely revised set of technica1' specifications in the ANSI 15.1 -

format fer review and approval ~. RRF requests that the " Technical Specifications'for the' Reed College TRIGA Mark I Reactor dated July 2,1968 incorporating all changes to .

Change No. 4 issued January 17,1974" be replaced by " Technical Specificat.!ons foc th,e -

Reed College TRIGA Mark I Reactor dated June 1986, Revised ~ edition incorporating July.

2,1968 edition and dhanges issuedJuly 28,1969, Oct9b er 3,1972, August 22,1973,

. January 17,1974, and..." The "and".will be followed by the date of approval of the new edition. The new edition has been'revicwed and approved by the Reactor Operations Committee and Reactor Safety Committee in accordance with current RRF Administrative

. Procedures. -

The specifications in the new document are the same as in the existing technical l

specifications, or more conservative. In some cases, specifications requested in ANSI -

[ '15.1 did not appear. in RRF documents. The values in ANSI 1.5.1 were ~used after review and approval as long as they were conservative for RRE. In telephone conversatioris with y.

., Mr. John Dosa, it was agreed than no changes involvini; an unreview6d safety question would b6 included ~to facilitate revie.w of this editiqp. It is anticipat,ed that changes to the .

Technical Specifications will be made in the future after 10CFR50.59 review by the

. appropriate RRF committees. , ,

,.e .. Since this sulimissio'n complet'ely superceeds the request for changes to the -

l Technical Specifications submitted on 23 September 1985,RRF requests that submission '

be abandoned. -

, Sincerely, ,

e a

Prof on Prof.'M y',

Vich President-Provost ,- -Director Reed Reactor Facility  ;

  • O r- \

c 0h .

8607090048 860622 ., \ l\

PDR ADOCK O g8 P -

3203 So u t h ea s tEoods to ck so u seea rd r,o rt ra n a. o re go n 972o2 . re tap h o n e (s 03) .7 71 - 1112 . ,

.