ML20150D918

Notice of Violation from Insp on 880606-10 & 19.Violation Noted:Licensee Had Not Submitted Required Annual Exposure Rept to Commission

ML20150D918
Person / Time
Site:	Rancho Seco
Issue date:	06/24/1988
From:	Scarano R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML20150D911	List: ML20150D908 ML20150D918 ML20150D923
References
50-312-88-17, NUDOCS 8807140232
Download: ML20150D918 (1)

Text

. _ _ _ . .

APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Sacramento Municipal-Utility District Docket No. 50-312 Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station License No. DPR-54 During an NRC inspection conducted on June 6-10, and 19, 1988,- one violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1987), the violation is listed below:

A. Technical Specification 6.9.2.1.2 states "The Annual Exposure Report shall be submitted to the Commission within the first calendar quarter of each calendar year in accordance with the guide contained in Regulatory Guide 1.16." Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.16 provides a format for reporting personnel exposures by work and job functions.

Contrary to the above, as of June 7,1988, the licensee had not subaitte.d the required Annual Exposure Report to the Commission.

This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement IV). ,

Pursuant to the provision of 10 CFR 2.201, Sacramento Municipal Utility District is hereby required to submit a written statement of explanation to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region V, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice. This reply should be clearly marked as "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation if admitted, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the licen3e should not be modified, suspended, or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Consideration may be given to extending the response time for good cause shown.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l

/m e f

,/Ross A. Scarano, fcting Chief '

I Emergency Preparedness and Radiological Protection Branch Dated this j day o 388 at Walnut Creek, Calif .

8807140232 880624 PDR ADOCK 05000312  :

O PDC

. . . - . . . , _ . - . - - . - . - - - - . - .,, --,