ML20153G881
| ML20153G881 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 09/25/1998 |
| From: | Hoyle J NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20153G885 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-10CFR9.7 FACA, SECY-98-171-C, NUDOCS 9809300258 | |
| Download: ML20153G881 (2) | |
Text
- .
, ,.coe.eeee. ............
- I RELEASED TOTHE PDR y
f UNITED STATES * *'
't NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION 9 M[ 4/ o.
{ $ WASHINGTON,0.C. 20555 000
@te WA j) ase....eeeeeeeeeeeeeees.e
/e September 25,1998 COMMISSION VOTING RECORD DECISION ITEM: SECY-98-171 TITLE: PROPOSED RULEMAKING ON 10 CFR PARTS 50,52 AND 72 REQUIREMENTS CONCERNING i CHANGES, TESTS AND EXPERIMENTS AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS ON CHANGES TO OTHER REGULATIONS ANQ ENFORCEMENT POLICY \'
The Commission (with all Commissioners agreeing) approved publication of the proposed subject rule for a 60 day public comment period and requested the staff to specifically solicit public comment on particular areas of the rulemaking as recorded in the Staff Requirements Memorandum (SRM) of September 25,1998.
This Record contains a summary of voting on this matter together with the individual vote sheets, views and comments of the Commissioners, and the SRM of September 25,1998.
/ John C. Hoylfe Secr6tary of the Commission C
/
Attachments: i
- 1. Voting Summary
- 2. Commissioner Vote Sheets ;'
- 3. Final SRM ~
h4 L cc: Chairman Jackson Commissioner Diaz Commissioner McGaffigan OGC L EDO PDR DCS 1
4'73 c11 0
~
9009300258 900925 PDR COMMS NRCC CORRESPONDENCE PDR
VOTING
SUMMARY
- SECY-98-171 1
RECORDED VOTES NOT APRVD DISAPRVD ABSTAIN PARTICIP COMMENTS DATE CHRM. JACKSON X X X 7/29/98 COMR. DIAZ X X' X 9/02/98 COMR. McGAFFIGAN X X X 9/18/98 COMMENT RESOLUTION in their vote sheets, all Commissioners approved the staffs recommendations to approve publication of the proposed rule for public comment, and use of the enforcement discretion guidance in its assessment of severity levels for violations while the rulemaking is undenway, and provided some additional comments, in particular, all Commissioners disapproved the staffs proposed margin of safety criterion (50.59(c)(2)(vii) in the proposed rule) and its definition and each Commissioner provided an option for evaluation during the comment period. The Commissioners also specifically requested comments on a number of other issues. Because of the need to finalize this rule as expeditiously as possible and because SECY-98-171 has already been publicly available since July 29,1998, the Commission agreed to a 60 day comment period, and that the staff complete the revised 50.59 rule by February 19, 1999. Subsequently, the comments of the Commission were incorporated into the guidance to staff as reflected in the SRM issued on September 25,1998.
i