ML20125B912

Notice of Appeal of Pl Streilen ASLB 791119 Order Ruling That Pl Streilen 790617 Ltr Be Treated as Request to Make Limited Appearance Statement Rather than as Request to Intervene.Alleges Denial of Due Process & Fair Notice

ML20125B912
Person / Time
Site:	Allens Creek File:Houston Lighting and Power Company icon.png
Issue date:	12/04/1979
From:	Doggett S AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED, DOGGETT, S.A.
To:
Shared Package
ML20125B910	List: ML20125B907 ML20125B912 ML20125B916 ML20125B920
References
NUDOCS 7912310170
Download: ML20125B912 (1)

Text

- - ____ ____ _

• .. . . ~ . .-

\ .

Y $

cNIr D SrATES OF AMERICA

+

$ gh ,,

Y[ M 1,

g NUCLEAR FIGULNIORY CGNISSI@1

/

Co K1GiIC SAITIT AND LICENSING APPEAL LOARD Alan S. Rosenthal, Chaiman

. Dr. John H. Buck niichael C. Farrar In the Matter of 0 100SIm LIGITING & POWER UNPANY g Docket No. 50-400 (Allens Creek Nuclear Generating Station. Unit 1) Q NOTICE OF APPEAL PATRICIA L. SITEILEN, by and thmugh her attorney of record SIEPfEN A. DOGGETT, hereby gives notice of her appeal of the Order dated Novunber 19, 1979 by The Atcmic Safety and Licensing Board ruling that her letter of July 17, 1979 will be treated as merely a request to make a limited appearance as opposed to a petition for leave to intervene as a full party.

BRIEF IN SUPR ET OF APPEAL ,

1 The Atanic Safety and Licensing Doad Order dated November 19, 1979 treating PATRICIA L. STIEIIIN's letter of July 17,15r79 is erroneous l for 3 reasons:

l (1) the publication of notice in the FMieral Register only is l

i a denial of fair notice and due process; i (2) the Supplernental Notice of Intervention Procedures dated July 12, 1979 published in the Federal Register is defective in requiring Petitioners to state that they failed to file petitions for leave to inter-l - vene pursuant to the Ibad's prior notices because of the restrictions in those

' notices; the defective notices are tantar:Dunt to no notice and the requiranent of a statanent of prwf of intimidation by the restrictions in prior notices denies due process; (3) PATRICIA L. SITEILEN in fact failed to intervene because of the restrictions in the prior notices; her information was newspaper accounts which accurately set out the restrictions of the prior notices.

Respectfully sutmitted, o) L ~ c 4m 90013505 .

Stephen A. Doggett

~

7912310 gqg