ML20148N810

From kanterella
Revision as of 02:54, 23 June 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses 781003-04 Advanced Recycle Methodology Program Users Meeting.Major Focus Was on the Advantages of the Casmo Computer Prog & the Sharing Costs Among Labs Interested in Obtaining Casmo
ML20148N810
Person / Time
Issue date: 10/31/1978
From: Dunefeld M
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Kniel K
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 7811270234
Download: ML20148N810 (1)


Text

_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

MEETING

SUMMARY

OCT 311978 DISTRIBUTION:

S. Hanauer R. Mattson/F. Schroeder R. Fraley, ACRS (16)

I&E(3)

J. Knight T. Novak R. Tedesco R. Denise D. Skovholt D. Vassallo E. Eisenhut B. Grimes J. Miller M. Ernst W. Ganmill V. Moore R. Vollmer R. Bernero W. Morrison C. Roberts J. Davis E. English C. Kelber L. Tong S. Weiss P. Check NRC PDR 78.112702-3 '

  1. 4A UNITED 5TATES y *g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g ,

j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20665 p

OCT 311978 MEMORANDUM FOR: K. Kniel, Chief, Core Performance Branch, DSS THRU: D. Fieno, Leader, Reactor Physics Section, CPB, DSS Oh FROM: M. Dunenfeld, Reactor Physics Section, CPB, DSS

SUBJECT:

ARMP USERS MEETING, OCTOBER 3 AND 4, 1978 M. Dunenfeld attended the ARMP (Advanced Recycle Methodology Program) users meeting in Westboro, Massachusetts on October 3 and 4,1978. Also in attendance were D. Diamond, J. Herczeg and D. Cokinos of BNL,~all of whom work on our Reactor Core Safety Analysis Technical Assistance Program.

A major topic discussed at the meeting was the CASMO computer program, which can be used instead of CPM in ARMP. The advantages of CASMO are that it is much easier to prepare input for than CPM, it runs much faster, and it has an automatic interface with SIMULATE, the improved nodal code which replaces EPRI-node. There is a fee of about $25,000 to obtain CASMO.

From cost savings data presented at the meeting, as a result of the first two advantages indicated above, I conclude that BNL should be allowed to purchase CASMO. Two additional things have to be done, however, before any further action is taken on this. These are: 1. BNL is preparing a definitive statement of the savings CASMO will provide, and 2. We need to explore sharing the cost with other DOE laboratories probably interested in obtaining CASMO. These are Berkeley and Argonne. ARMP is on the com-puters at these labs.

f .)LMt '

Marvin S. Dun nfeld Reactor Physics Section Core Performance Branch Division of Systems Safety Distribution:

(Seeattached)

Conta c'.: M. Dunenfeld, NRR x27577