ML20079B493
| ML20079B493 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Saint Vrain  |
| Issue date: | 04/03/1990 |
| From: | PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF COLORADO |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20079B487 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-93-600, FOIA-93-610 NUDOCS 9501060144 | |
| Download: ML20079B493 (29) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:,
/. ',.y..: : . ~ ::': . .u.
. Fg.;. i .[j:t . ..:,,
. ,..;g.w. ; STATION _. .- .
j j FORT ST. "kh0 CLEAR GENERATWG R NO. M #~N
- u c., , .f a,n n..<.<, w ....-- .. . -
~.
; . !v .;. ;JY" goo a PU. BO c,C R VICE COMPANY OF COLORADO . spggE I ' f0F a . . . : . . w . . .a gy'yp 'i.. .:..- 3>' -..
p.-. e am en.m . . . . . .. 1:. !.'.. INCIDENT EEOftT -
~
'FSVS~ FORM .11 3 %.. .'.. . ;
Q s- M MAND -
*1 ?. h)$-hjl.r--l$rbr~Yr?l* $$ &l[
N Y $~ - - - - NN'W '
""f* $lX*/, x, " "
' ") : M W * " '
., ,_,m . ,-
Kn.). iso
- -- ), nsM As: r - I - k ner/ *1~o
- M G .-:.*T7s4 Y . 1 wAs a s 7" - in - ~n o - "22 h t.3w e' ,'-rfA E l#A . N .7h O ev $ E- W !
' e/ 77tr / Mare (% /lso -Lo e .. A r ./.2 'l/s 1 r. + % e o a AS </ isnN'dA 'rf
- YM ~A'A e M a' kf Qh '
Ub b Y bnYh l
/ ,'< es M - As J ;& c u re/ --px>vr--w . T. p Pss G, ivy ~rm.m (
1r WsuiJ & r.r: wrr / ' % A a/a.s n- ,* w 7 h w
- 11 2 ) E~ A > s su N af ~TA s - As b>" N . ~12 on tJA e . 12 D in AufkAs" $9eJ u ce s.l-:-vit,' . As .La s . -- . -..
. . . - - - _ . . . . . . . . . . . . ~. .J... ...... _,
m
- r. . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i
) ;~,,
i, . . . . _ .. - . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . _ . . _ . . . _ . . . _ . . . . _ . - - . . _ .
. . . ~ . . . . . . _ . _ _ _ . . . . . . . - . . . _ . . . . . _ _ _ = - - - -
. . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . - _. . 1 . . . . _ _ . _ _ . . . . _ .
1 1 9501060144 940411 4 PDR FOIA -. -_-._ _ ___. . . O'.MALLE93-600 ... . .. _ ... PDR l,
' itEVIEW (Signat.ures) .; ' ? '. ?'f~ V' ' ! ,
.- Le - !
.@ cara -- -
w naront couraito si ) [_ .vr -_,r f._ ,, __ _..__. ggn -
.s @
cart < - ; se.nmony Arenova. . . . .. . - y . s. .. .. .. . . ,.;.g ,,y , , . . ..g g . . a m G, 1 FOLLOW' UP'(Print Namest. - e f' ." ' - it ty ATitNTION DEPAnTMENT f * /)A A R* ' D/l If as ATitMTICM DEPARTtENT .
,, S h -
O YES O NO Fonow-UpRequirx l 2S >v, ~ i
~i -
i
.E e 8
- FORWARD COMPLETED MCIDENT REPORT FOLLOW.UP TO PSCO SECURITY SUPERVISOR.
5 $lI A . I . hWE.1491WElfmlM:f: Mil.150m:TATMmnNNMEM
.(., . PSCO SECURITV'USE ONLY f: 8M ~<[4 scNATunt '
5c .M .v ".o 5 0 YES Jh NO Maintenance Related f - A t = .
-. rsemc- , e v m o m o. .. m fy,,,
,m m y150106O M
I MI S A S IGLSSICAL CDETtOL, SEC. dew +I I ney N see5 N / Omfluuss mEmmTMIE REMRT to to Ceept er lite Roragers / AL/ Esploye L.cet ., SW
,i,et .e ,. orts.
Peelti
- Ot.e, i t mm .
u . . _ . .
- m. _ _ . _ . .
sSAscu pet sePanAfts i pistaang l VOLamTAff ant ' 91 tult without settes 12 Seenteeles teralmget T / 5 W tuit for 9ther septeysset 13 Tardiness . Warslaget T / 5 M t to tell / se hee M Yleistien of toepony ey l 96 tutt pleestlefled with Jeb ($lve llatales tot Pelley)* G5 tuf t - se le sehest 15 leaderdinati tapleted M Gutt . Newed / Left Ares 14 Di teamene er cult . married / Deenstle seessrs 17 I / Ibsetlefactory Job Perfereense . OS tult + pedlest leases 18 to Ipsetlefactory performenee W tuf t Persenet / Transportetten Probles the influense of antaalcone 14 felled to seturn free Leeve (stw symptese, witnesses & Detalte>* 11 Other (Emptoln) ,4/ 30 ' Theft / Bloheneet Arte (Slwe Detalte) VOLWTAaf gult sittana A LEAvt er Anstatt FRGE Code Code le Leyeff8 Peraenent 1 tettromantt Volwitary Comqsutsery
" Describe the el tences (Detes, tulee vieteted, irlsperire event)
Properor's Signature ,
~ M, "*" *** **"*" * .
- pj b sw -
Attendense a fiteneroper / Date
- RiwihAA ugo
- MCe
.e. .,s.ie Wert thality v
% es, te .
7 Leedorehlp-Attitude V_ Sehowler
" BEttpet e G FOR KelMT I Tit W
/j *e - rte fred for lasetlefactory or facettent, PAfscLL teFausitics
- Leet Check Sent 10:
^ 0. t/btin Als_wonAG Ls mi!wmL -
T * . >
~
% ffr>evfnh4F n J E\ldnPirin7E hit JAA. n} n ./
As il ratinun 2% 11A f / _ _' 1 a! /s " I/ M_/EA'UAM/AAL/ phones / M- [_ uit t=cour Deelectry espesure estleste in hard (carry to nest job)
- Terelnetlen m ete Bedr taunt
- Turn in cespenr property (hard het, esfety glas, , ,etc.)
i update (See back page)
- Dieaume job ptocesant with torporete of flee Trevet voucher sospleted
*fellwe to asuplete the parti of the market with an (*) esy roeutt in a detey of your first psyshest amtit to worit tr your statue with plant.
I certler the ee'P(eted the above recpired eheckwt. tapteyse sigrature information in this record was deleted y in accordance with the freedom of information 1 Act, exemptions Mcd F0iA. 9 3 - k e ,Tc k p
Font sr. en utnm osumm swa OPublic
$6fVIC9' Pusuc samncs coMPAM OF COLORADO UNESCORTED ACCESS DELETION F5YS FORM 3 The individual (s) listed below is ( re) to be denied 3 /J./ unescortld / 4 1,.
- access to Fort St. Vrain as of // hours on ,
/A Access is no longer required due to:
() Tennination for cause effective hours on / / . was verbally notified of this () LSO hours on situation, in aavance, at / / . OR () Verbal notification was received from , at hours on / / . () reduction in force or layoff () resignation / retirement () still employed but no longer requires access () medical leave of absence - - ( l non-medical leave of absence ~ K investigation in progress . L) f ailure to complete G.E.T. PPC- - () other, specify I R Ils
~ nafIllsdas/
(printed'name) tll}(signature) L C W 2 21i41 - (date) I j TO BE COMPLETED BY L50 0 This fonn or verbal notification received prior to required time of gs deletion. (44 yes ()no. If no, enter Incident Jg .E_ access 4E Report i . r5 , ED k Badge (s) inactivated, removed from the Badge Cube or otherwise
\% controlled at r3is hours on A /.71 / 41 . - ]g$
e g g - gs Security Clearance Index checked and termination briefings arranged. g j g\qe ()yes (6t~no Coninents: 0 Access lists corrected, FSYS FORM 59's pulled, FSB Access Fonns 3hk4 _E 3y@ pulled, Visitor Access Requests pulled. VAdA776 (L50 printed name)
//
(signature) 3 12 / ft (date) L
)
Rk' OC.&
. . a j Interoffice Mems
~
e51519515146 . hasseenemoconvenroom ' I i DATE: April 1,1991 ' T0: Mr. L. R. Sutton, Supervisor, QA Auditing, Fort St. Vrain
. FROM: P. F. Moore, Supervisor, QA Technical Support, Fort St. Vrain
$UBJ: QA MONITORING CONDUCTED IN AUDIT AREA: ERCN QA monitoring activity, QAMP-RAP-08-91-03 (Radiation Work Permits),
was performed during March 1991. This monitoring activity: o Identified problem (s) in area (s): . I l for which corrective action was initiated. Refer to I CARS /QDRs: . o Identified minor inconsistencies and/or requires follow up, inarea(s): for which corrective action was not deemed necessary. a[ Indicated compliance /conformance to monitored area's requirements. o Indicated outstanding / exemplary conformance to monitored area's requirements. The subject monitoring report is available for your review in the QA Monitoring File, maintained by QA Clerical. If you have any questions regarding this or other QA Monitoring activities, please ; ist me know. , ) 1 h . P. F. Moore cc: QAMP-RAF-08-91-03 Flie I sonucosa Information in this record was deleted t ex m t on - M ' m anyas 72 par, % i
~
! o w -aAP-os- 9 .g t j, , Page f_ of 0A MONITORING PROGRAM REPORT i ow - RAP # -f] j Monitoring Category - Area Number TITLE: RADIATION WORK PERM!k(RWPs) Prepared #* I/ // Date .f-//L 9/ Revie b Date 7-//- D Performed & Afd Date .0-/Y-4/ S'N-fl Date Date l 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this monitoring is to review and evaluate the following plant activity or functional area activity to determine the effectiveness of the activity. Verify by performance based monitoring that the aufdelines for estabitshine Radiation Work Permits and the apsitcable , procedures coverning Radiation Work Permits are adhered to and properly implemented. l 4
M - QAMP-RAP 9/ -g
'I ' Page g of [
t
.i . ,
2.0 SCOPE i This monitoring activity will include direct observation and/or I review of the following specific items / attributes (e.g., work i perf oriaance, procedures, technical specifications, radiation protection, QC) of the subject area. I Review of active RWPs. Observation of persons entering, working in, and exiting I the RWP area to verify compliance to:
- Adherence to RWP instructions
- Standard HP practices v - Standard safety practices 3.0 METHODS The following methods were utilized for development and/or performance of this monitoring activity:
3.1 A review of the following previously completed QAMP(s) was p formed to determine trends or recurring deficiencies. CM/ ( 3.2 l[ A standard checklist (attached), or l[l The specially developed checklist (attached) was utilized for direction and guidance for performance of this monitoring. 3.3 The following personnel were contacted in conjunction with o/
}', [ j . iti;
- j ggqp. w .08- / - N Fate L of
. i
4.0 REFERENCES
l The following documents were ottitzed durfag development or ) performance of this monitoring (List appitcable issue number or i rev.) l
'/M, f
/4)b //.s19 t
//69 ~
//bW ~'
s
5.0 CONCLUSION
S F) W 4_ ./ Y f /2/ Y _ _j k A A-4-a MEM,Let . sb4/11f / dLdd MJw > 1 hYhl - W 4/-#19 i-C f Signatuft h a e j/// Date 8.##/
ow-w-os- 97 _p1 ~ ,
, . Pee._V_er.A. 1 i 6.0 FOLLOW-UP . l 6.1 Follow up Required: Yes __,,, No _._,; if Yes, by Date
\
~
l r l l 1 6.2 Corrective Action Initiated -(QDRs/ CARS /NCRs): l All& i Approved by W Date V-2. 4 / Approved by 1 & v. Date 4 4 h v ' 4 Approved by Date e l
y RADIATION WORK PERMIT (Rwp) i i ColNENT ~ YES NO N/A No.
/ 1. Is the RWP form properly filled in?
(NPAP-10,4.1) l / '
- 2. Are the protective clothing requirements cletrly marked? (NPAP-10, 4.1)
! 3. If applicable, are any special instructions clear and easily understood?
(NPAP-10,4.1)
/ -
- 4. Is the protective clothing specified by the RWP being properly worn by the personnel in the RWP area? (NPAP-10, 4.2.2.c)
/_ 5. When existing, is the protective clothing properly removed? (NPAP-10,4.2.3) l
_/ 6. If coverage applicable, for does H.P. provide job the controlled area? (NPAP-10,4.2.3) I l l l I
\
1 Completed b - "A i B _ Date M f 7
COW 4ENTS: ! -(k s/xkn>6dAA srnose/ , asd2R An w n M ~ d e n saks M u ~% %iA
- 0hans/w'- !A. Ej M YN refts~4 /Avht Lb d&&-n h n J- A d nt '
/k2.13/EVA R W :
KwhJZAX- - ( _ / Ga_?damw ll b516-11~LAf MAL) AA36sdAd ~ , J >i h as A c M G V) K l A&jd4M1s r21 1 A dj_'. L i % ~ Lu4- ~ l _ k n k's . Arm-M LA (EitaMM,4/as) ,
/6 :
l COnp1tted b ~ /2// J Date 8 -;ff f / y.r, -
~ ~ ~ ~
f. uma Interoffice Meme
, ,, l . . PublicServloe' ,,ur,rai.,- !
penseenancompear,40seme> ' i , L DATE: April 1, 1991 - l T0: Mr. L. R. Sutton, Supervisor, QA Auditing, Fort St. Vrain l 3 l g FROM: P. F. Moore, Supervisor, QA Technical Support, Fort St. Vrain l [ $UBJ: QA MONITORING CONDUCTED IN AUDIT AREA: ERCN l 1 1 - l j QA monitoring activity, QAMP-RAP-15-91-02 (H.P./ALARA Practices), was
- l
. performed during March 1991. This monitoring activity:
I e Identified problem (s) in area (s): for which corrective action was initiated. Refer to CARS /QDRs: .
! Identified minor inconsistencies and/or requires llow up, in area (s): A d /Ae j' 'd !MA=_ '
fo ich correc ve action was eemed necessary. o Indicated compliance /conformance to monitored area's requirements. c Indicated outstanding / exemplary conformance to monitored area's requirements. , The subject monitoring report is available for your review in the QA Monitoring File, maintained by QA tierical. If you have any ; questions regarding this or other QA Monitoring activities, please l let se know. P. F. Moore P slw cc: QAMP-RAP-15-91-02 File ' information in this record was deleted I " * '"'" in accordance with the Fregdom of Information Act, exgmptions 74 / 77cy t I/ J rnem '
- n. ..
.. u QAMP-RAP-15-91-d21
'"" # C# A l8 ,
p .. 0A MONITORING PROGRAM REPORT 1 I QAMP - RAP 91 - #1 Monitoring Category - Area Number l 1 TITLE: H.P./ALARAPRACTICEk Prepared W - 1 Date J- N- 9/ .- Reviewed h Date 7"#-4 / Perf rmed b > > /4 Date 8"8 f/ Date (' Date 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this monitoring is to review and evaluate the l following plant activity or functional area activity to I determine the effectiveness of the activity. Performance based monitoring activity to evaluate l Health Physics (H.P.) and ALARA practices relative to activities associated with Controlled Areas.
.) - ,
QAMP-RAP-15 472 Page 1 sf 1 o F . i 2.0 SCOPE i : This monitoring activity will include direct observation and/or '
!' review of the following specific items / attributes (e.g.,.. work
. performance, procedures, technical specifications, radiation c protection, QC) of the subject area.
Specific attention will'be given to the observation of H.P. personnel performance relative to:
- Controlling activities in controlled areas. . - Maintaining survey readings of a controlled area. ;
1
- Interaction with other departments. i l
l
~3.0 METHODS The following methods were utilized for development and/or performance of this monitoring activity: 1 1
3.1 A review of the following previously completed QAMP(s) was ' pe formed to determine trends or recurring deficiencies. GW ( 3.2 l(( A standard checklist (attached), or l[l The specially developed checklist (attachod) was utilized for direction and guidance for performance of this monitoring. 3.3 The following personnel were ntacted in conjunction with eis monitort i i
7, .
- QAMP-RAP-15 M 7 .
Page_;1,sf,f.d. j l i
4.0 REFERENCES
f The following 6cuments were utilized during development or l
. performance of this monitoring (List applicable issue number or i rev.)
HPP-105. Issue 2 [ J //.f74 //Sff HPP-120. Issue 4 //([/ /M3 , HPP-125. Issue 5 //S/S // M i HPP-130. Issue 6 //S/4 ' l 1 NPAP-10. Issue 5 l
5.0 CONCLUSION
S . . Lh Af _ /.&/ 41 JW
&dm=, 4-{ dk1 \
'52WM jab Y sd@lde%nLA ct ~
'sa A K f #
/
_ t Signatus Ass i 2 Date 3-94/
/
9= , n G w y 15 Page cf _&,,, M
- y. ,.,
t. . 6.0 FOLLOW-UP 6.1 Follow up Required: Yes No _ if Yes, by Date L 6.2 CorrectiveActionInitiated(QDRs/ CARS /NCRs): AilA-Approved by bb Date V-2.-Tl Approved by h Date 4 4 b
.]
}
Approved by Date e e G
y ,
-o- -
^ ' 04ff-RAP-1$-91-g j J, .. Pese E of A
; H.P./ALARA PRACTICES 1 -
i Radiation Work Permits (RWPs) . 1 4 COMMENT YES NO N/A No. i I 1. Were all personnel observed signed into the Rad area, signed in on the pioper RWP for g the job?
! / 2. Were the requirements of the RWP adhered g to?
- 3. Verify that prior to entering the area, workers shall:
I___ a) Be qualified to enter the area and complate' work. i
/ b) Notify Health Physics prior to entry into the area initially and prior to resuming work af ter exit. .
i I___ c) Ensure the area is adequate to support the work to be completed. l
/ ,1 d) Read and understand the RWP.
I_ _ e) Ensure sufficient radiation exposure is available to complete work. i f) Attend radiological pre-job briefing by HP which would include:
--- 1. Radiological conditions discussed with workers and applicable survey data available.
/ -- 2. Workers instructed in the use of proper radiological practices unique to job scope.
/ 3. Workers instructed in the use of respiratory protection equipment as required by the RWP. ,
Completedbk !! Date J-8-9/
/ l
( i
-' ^ -
^ f. ' , <! o w -NAP-is-si- g 4 o ,. . Page_fe,,cf./d. l r
- l. ,
; H.P./ALARA PRACTICES
- f. Radiation Work Permits (RWPs) .
COMMENT YES, NO N/A No, s 4. Health Physics involvement discussed with workers.
.: 5. Procedural review completed.
-- / ~'~ 6. Job briefings performed for jobs which excess the limits set in NPAP-10, 4.1.2.N. will be documented on Attach. NPAP-100.
l NOTE: The signature indicates RWP 1 has been read and understood, job briefing by HP has been given, and the j Individual will comply with ! all requirements of both.
/ g) Sign the RWP sign in sheet j similar to Attachment B, and complete !
applicable data.
/ h) Dress in protective clothing and wear dosimetry as required by the RWP.
N / 1) Report the presence of open or untreated wounds to Health Physics.
- 4. During work in an area controlled by an RWP, Health Physics personnel shall:
/ a) Take action to prevent the spread of contamination including maintaining .
good housekeeping.
/ b) Periodically read self reading dosimetry, if provided.
I _ c) Wear protective clothing properly as required by the RWP. , Completed .- * > Date 8-J/-9/
/
.F
' '~
~
. . .,A,.1,.,,. Page 7 of * ..g ., . H.P./ALA,A PRACTICES l 1 Radiation Work Permits (RWPs) , I ~ COP 94CNT yES N0 N/A No. [ d) Limit the amount of material that has l to be decontaminated or disposed of as radioactive waste. O - e) Leave the . area if conditions . unexpectedly deteriorate ! 8 significantly. '
/ f) Obey instructions from Health Physics , including "stop work orders."
g) Decontaminate the area or equipment as instructed by Health Physics. ' h) Properly remove protective . clothing when exiting the area.
- 1) Inform HP of changing work scope or radiological conditions. .
- 5. During work in an area controlled by an RWP, Health Physics personnel shall:
/ a) Provide job coverage as required by the RWP.
- b) Conduct radiation, contamination, and airborne radioactivity surveys as necessary to determine changing radiological conditions.
! c) Update the RWP survey results if '
radiological condittors change significantly. For example, contamination levels change by a factor of ten or more; radiation levels change by a factor. of two or more, or; airborne radioactivity levels change by more than 25% of the applicable MPC or approach 25% of the - applicabit I?. . Completed : Date.8.24f/ ' 7 - f <
e .
. g H.P./ALARA PRACTICES c Radiation Work Permits (RWPs)
COMENT YES @_ N/A No. .
)
/ d) Prepare revisions to the RWP or issue a new RWP if radiological conditions warrant a change.
~
I e) Trend exposure per Section 4.5 informing the HP Supervisor and worker if administrative exposure Itaits are a being approached.
> 6. After exit from the area workers shall take the following actions.
_ _ a) Frisk or be frisked for contamination as required by the RWP. b) Sign out on the RWP.
/ - - c) Return the RWP to the Health Physics Office if work is to be discontinued for more than one shift.
/___ d) Notify Health Physics completion or cancellation.
of job
- 7. After job completion, cancellation, or RWP termination date Health Physics shall terminate the RWP by the following actions:
/ _ 1 a) Complete the RWP log for the activity type.
! _ _ ,,[ b) Destroy the pink and yellow copies of the RWP.
2 _ l c) Review the RWP and sign in sheets for accuracy and errors. Sign and date the termination blank. _ 1 d) Forward the RWP for an independent review and signature prior to filing. - Completed b - -
/- -
Date 3@9/ .. 7-
' ~
p . gap.15 o f Page f of fg_ l. l 1 j4 COMMENTS: l DL**- " LM L ,+ ^ >n i . ~ A -~ s .m ,/_, l '/62/s/ & . US-4 L E A
\ $A 221_A/A e k f /s l L d w "2%j' f f -~: - ,a 4
~
1 ffm_'. J.
' A-6 f >->Wxfn- .
L,Ms /m t mso wl" AA - ad R wwd2
, f ( /
Adhis M / 2 h _A ~ A b _l
% 2 o r d 'A s M M x ,
' - A' YA!b
- _ 2 A ->
sh4W122s&"1: .
^ - 4 A / ,." A '^
_ &/
// s a d_ w a /: ' E X<> ~SC,. A q
- D /At/A. '^4 s..
YS _
#1 Auw:=si.-,s&AA S*Ad-WA Wd& f'n* Y ,
m 7nised.1+-d . Completed b : "Date 8 # f/ l
,; oAnp- MA/-/.r4/-g. .-
Page A of ,/f i' . . . :- . COMMENTS: _f ~ D'." L $ '4 - Taf& us71ase4fmW/w M D A '4 t s A m 7 Mnddwssas
&( mmm2eD32
~
/
Desawe,1Xs%2M/-a 4manki4 43m/D. l /Anv d)b>$_
' Yik s b Y d An&J/shuoAk L A AL A L x 22 M J A n d ,) ~
R /A g%-,X ad k /1 2,3 d- d 4zec & & k+a .4 w
, An8avN&~E l LwA2
_h' YA Y 82.- urbarA A && A Aht-Midhne4/a ' f Alw%
/
f } - A . D Completed oy 4/ > Date 4-F4/
Interoffice Memo i
~
5 6 0147 ' ressanneseconeswaradames l DATE: April 1, 1991
! 70: Mr. L. R. .Suttoa, Supervisor, QA Auditing, Fort St. Vrain FRON: P. F. Moore, Supervisor, QA Technical Support, Fort St. Vrain
$UBJ: QA MONITORING CONDUCTED IN AUDIT AREA: MCPC g . - l l
! QA monitoring activity, QAMP-MNT-18-91-03 (Maintenance Work -
Control - Fuel Deck), was performed during March 1991. This monitoring activity: o Identified problem (s) in area (s):
)
for which corrective action was initiated. Refer to CARS /QORs: . Identified onsistencies and/or requires follow-up, inarea(s). M[ N_/I A h NNAb/8k , for whic corrective action was not deemed necessary, o Indicated compliance /conformance to monitored area's requirements, o Indicated outstanding / exemplary conformance to monitored area's requirements. The subject monitoring report is available for your review in the QA Monitoring File, maintained by QA Clerical. If you have any questions regarding this or other QA Monitoring activities, please let me krow. kan P. F. Moore P .slw cc: QAMP-MNT-18-91-03 File I coau o amnee,p. Information in this record was deleted in accordance with the freedom of information Act, exempt.cns = / =
# #1'" -" -- r
w.<- - - ' 7- OmP-mi-le- #-df .5,. , Page 1 cf ,1, 0A MONITORING PROGRAM REPORT QAMP - MIT f/- #1 Monitoring Category - Area Number , TITLE: Maintenance Work Cohcol Prepared /L / Date 8 //-9/ Reviewe y Date M 4 Performed 7 _-
/#/
/ Date S//-#-f/ -
Date L Date 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this monitoring is to review and evaluate the following plant activity or functional area activity to determine the effectiveness of the activity. Performance based monitorine of Mechanical. Electrical, and I&C Maintenance pro.fect activities to verify adherence to Administrative Procedures, safety policies, and good work practices. O e G
CAMP-fMT WV- @ y, .. Page 2 of 7 l ,. 2, 2.0 SCOPE a
! This monitbring activity will include direct observation and/or i review of the following specific items / attributes (e.g., work performance, procedures, technical specifications, radiation protection, QC) of the subject area.
Monitoring of activities associated with maintenance department routine work and/or special projects. 4 Monitorino is to consist of, but is not limited to, the _ review of documentation and the observation of work in progress for 1) adherence to safety, 2) adherence to procedures, and 3) technical ability. 3.0 METHODS The following methods were utilized for development and/or perfor:aance of this monitoring activity: l 3.1 A review of the following previously completed QAMP(s) was pe to determine trends or recurring deficiencies. I 3.2 l(( A standard checklist (attached), or l[l The specially developed checklist (attached)was utilized for direction and guidance for performance of this monitoring. 3.3 The following personnel were contacted in conjunction with yg $~~
L CAW -IstT W - d *
', Page 3 Cf .f, l p ,
t
! I 4.0 REFERDICES The follodng documents .were utilized during development or l performance of this monitoring (List appitcable issue number or rev.)
/2 d4 /7
. ff/h)/)k--~f L~2.e J_4 fMeaans/p/_roov4A
}
' A M -s M4/. M V 16 6 :~ N 2 ,.
AVAJJ-AIA y 5.0 CONCLU$!0NS
- Af_Y_ ACWif 141 _J b m A [r h A M s 'i d m LJntfm A GBs as L ~ q b _4 lb%2&JD ) sn%d X m % w m 2%t%W
( / s anatur +!
~
EDate 1-rf/ -
. / f .
! QAMP40(T-18-f/~O3 l .: Page4cf,,2.
l 6.0 FOLLOW-UP i 6.1' Follow-up Required: Yes _ No if Yes, by Date , w t
?
I 6.'2 Corrective Action Initiated (QORs/ CARS /NCRs): s/+ Approved by Date Y-L4 / 1 Approved by cM Date 4 hi 4,; , Approved by Date , I I l
. l l
l l l l
i,,
@&14/ {
4* * : QMP-MNJ-18-9f- #S
. Page L cf ,2,_
l - '! MAINTENANCE WORK CONTROL ComENT J.[$ NO N/A No. I
/__/ 1. Is the procedure the latest revision?
I_ _
- 2. Was the procedure followed 'during the course of the task?
_4 3. -Was the procedure adequate as written to complete the task?
/ 4. Were there any temporary changes in the procedure, and if so, were they properly entered and used? ,
/ _1 5. Was it a working copy / controlled or -
information only? g _l 6. If required, were all personnel observed signed in on the proper RWP for the job?
/__l 7. Were the requirements of the RWP adhered to?
_ _ _/ 8. Were instruments used in calibration?
/ 9. Is QC involvement required?
/ 10. Was portable maintenance and test equipment (ETE) used, and if so, was it's calibration current?
! 11. Was installed plant equipment used, and if so, was it's calibration current?
_ _/ 12. Was M TE used suitable to the application? _ _/ 13. Was a clearance required and used per SMAP-197
/_ 14. Was Control of Equipment maintained by Operations?
O Completedbjt A/ 1 0 ate 8" # -9/
/
e ,- -
l l '~ p h 1NY
$. *
- 0W-left-18-M- #7 Page i cf 1 1
MAINTENANCEWORKCONTROL i M . YES NO N/A No.
/-- 15. Were any unsafe conditions noted? (Safety belts, hard hats, eye protection, etc.)
i i
/ 16. Was an $$R required, and if so, was it f1 lied out correctly for the job observed?
/ __ 17. Did all documentattoe have proper l
approvals? - i j l i 1 l 1 Completed by - Date 8-##/ f .
I*. . t \ i' GkKP-#hf-//-9/*03 Page 1 of 2 ;
*~
l i
; caesus: l b l Am A kWh"+ k Lkb o/ & m A!C 4 L & 4 l; /sn%A LAR ~
_ f/ / -
- 1 ( h zM A ssL - m D _n - s
- A M R - n_,n n ,
fy; g y fr 1 c /
- s. J2 - ~ A m n. /a K J:M- '
h$&dkD_hS0!.N,,
/
w/
.a ,& dwALees-e-os
- d. t0.2 M A_s> 2% .
p- M_ (2 m a L Z & & D. a A a A o w e sSXJns u b 25dse/w w L # s
*L15_m&dlA a 3-N4P'"
%$r AEm$JddY "hN W AsdcMdA-Ks&w ofom:a
//3 W9 m A L d d d sf/ w 1/1 llmplN)s>AdmdAW
%dnh .
" L .
GM m>4-MM-MMLEd M ,PA sw-k kr-wa. 1 Completed b Date E.Ff/
/
l}}