ML20081K717
| ML20081K717 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 06/13/1991 |
| From: | Mccoy C GEORGIA POWER CO. |
| To: | Sniezek J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20081K698 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9107010069 | |
| Download: ML20081K717 (2) | |
Text
- _ - _ _ - _ .
- ,,e dm
@mTI*
Q, v.,.,$.,.a w WITHHILD FROM PutLIC CeDrgla Power e,
D!$CLOSVRE PER 10 CFR $ 2.790 e,u.e eus seee June 13, 1991 ii Mr. James N. Snicaek Deputy Executive Director for Nuclear Reactor Reaulatten Re U.gioul Operations an4 Researc.h S. Nuclear Regulatory Cometasten Washington, DC 20844 Dear Mr. Safetekt On Jane'l 1991 (SpC) a Notice ef MC sont teo Enforcement is Conferenc,e ud pesand for tyInformation,the s action the MC SPC seeking to further develop the record r9tarding the actions of certain personnel 1944.
during u outage at the Vestle Electric teneratine Plant in October, individua ls at the plant.Sie lar Gemands for Infomation were sent to thre the fact that the ineuiry isOnatt11 to the sensitive nature of MC's inquiry, engeing, and the potential for vndue publicity for the f,empany and the ind viduals inwived you appropriately withheld your letters from NRC's Public Documen! Rees. qutto As was discussed with you last week on the telephone with Mr.
R. P. Mcdonald we were dlstressed to med in both the Atlanta and Kohn inquir y and of MC's confidentialAugusta that details of thenewspapers,e MC's etters had
&n attorney in Washincten. D.C. and erevided to the press.. This information was reportedly d sclosed to,the attorney by NRC offirtals.
I want to reiteette our serious concern regarding the impact of this unwarranted disclosure en the Cespany and on the individuals invel nd.
Any conclusion regarding actions by EPC er the individuals should be based on a thorough record, including infersatten provided b individuals themselves in response to your requests. y GPC and by the confidential iaformatten by NRC employees can lead to The release of Company and these Ceapany employees in the public arena. prejudgment of the writtenWith regard tobythe response Demand July for Information free SPC, you required a 3 1991.
the NRC's Nspend. Office of $4neral Counsel for an additional 60 days in which to In response to this request, I understand that the NRC will trant 1991; We app nciate this time and will utt11:e an extensten it to nyiew the portion until oJuly 31, f the record on this matter pre comptled by the NRC's Office of Investigations anilable to us) and to makt, our own inquiry into the(to matter. the extent it is M
p
$00$ N0oN24 o PDR M
F . . .. . .. .. W
i James H. $ntesek June 13,1991 '
Pete I ,
! Neetheless, in order to fully resund to the NRC's 1%uiry, a portion l
- of our effort must relate to the erlginal deveitteent of the technical .
- specificattens and thehr applicattu in the industry. This erecess is b I
- necessity 11ee censuping. In addition, I will need to be Mrsual)yy l l tavelved in the development of the Ceepuy response to the Desan for ,
Unfernation. However, due to a previously $ssigned course at Stanford -
I Uqtversity in Ca11fornia, I will be unavailable for a substantial porttu er the time provided to respond to the NRC's requess. Accordingly I would Itke to fornaltas our roguest for an utenste of time unfil August H , 1Hl.
i While we 4 H interested in sw ing this matter move forward to conclusion at a deliberate Hee, we wish to be thorough and deliberate in the preparation of our response se that the NRC has full understandine ,
of wist occurred and more broadly, e the practices and precedures in under which the this case,Ceepany perferos re aged NRC licensed activities. It should also be recognised that we are dealing with an event that occurred ever two and sne half years nee. In that light,we think that it is resseeable to extend the due date for our response to the NAC's Demand for Informaties for a sedest parted. ,
. The NRC's ection en its face contemplates the possibility of enforcement actions ainst the three named individuals. The NRC has t itself recogntred in$he General Inforcement 10 C.F.R.policyactions Part ti in l Appendix C 8ectionV.I.)thatenforcement
'are significant Mrsunel actims, which will be closely cutrelled and judiciously applied.' ! aise regard the Mtential for this type of enforcement action u see of stoest uriousness. Such actions could adversely topset the careers and reputattens of the individuals involved.
Consistent with the Inforcement Peluy,ible.ge ! ur the NRC to proceed in the mest careful and judicious fashion poss Attorneys roeresenting the individuals have indicated that the WRC will grant an extension untti ,
July al. 1991..and have indicated they will also seek an extensten until August 30, IM1.
Finally, becuse this letter addresses an on investfeation and responds to a confiduttal letter free the NRC, request! goingthat this letter be withheld from public disclosure in accorduce with 10 CFR t.190.
Since y, C. K. McCoy C10Vta cc: Filey h
_ _ _ . _ _ _ _ - . , _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ . . . . . . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ . . , _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . - . . , _ , , _ - _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ , _ . .