ML20073F882
| ML20073F882 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 03/13/2020 |
| From: | NRC |
| To: | NRC/NRR/DNRL |
| References | |
| Download: ML20073F882 (9) | |
Text
From: Habib, Donald Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 9:27 AM To: Vogtle PEmails
Subject:
FW: Audit Discussion Topics for LAR 19-019 Follow Up Attachments: Audit Closeout Q5.pdf; Audit Closeout Q3.pdf From: Arafeh, Yasmeen N. <YNARAFEH@southernco.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2020 4:05 PM To: Habib, Donald <Donald.Habib@nrc.gov>
Cc: Patel, Pravin <Pravin.Patel@nrc.gov>; Lehman, Bryce <Bryce.Lehman@nrc.gov>
Subject:
[External_Sender] Audit Discussion Topics for LAR 19-019 Follow Up Hi Don, To address the audit discussion question 3, we are proposing to modify Note 1 in UFSAR Table 3H.5-9 Sheets 1, 2a, and 2c, so that Note 1 becomes a clarification to the table instead of it being misinterpreted as an additional 2%. Please see attached for the markups from Q3 to Note 1. It was also noted during the discussion call that the footnote in the UFSAR should not be deleted, and I wanted to clarify that the markups in LAR-19-019 are an excerpt from the UFSAR, and that the footnote will remain during incorporation of the updated table values.
Additionally, after further consideration on audit discussion question 5, we believe that Change 3 in LAR-19-019 is not a change to the current methodology, and that updating the UFSAR to reflect the element size change would be an excessive detail. However, to address the Staffs concern, we are proposing to add the following statement to the technical justification for Change 3 (as shown in the attached PDF for Q5):
The seismic design of the AP1000 nuclear island relies on the analysis methods and FEA models described in DCD Chapter 3.7 and related appendixes. These ANSYS models (i.e., NI-05, NI-10, NI-20, etc.) are sufficiently detailed to capture global and in-structure response at key equipment and building locations. However, for detailed design, local FEA models with a refined mesh size different than the global seismic models are sometimes utilized to capture more detailed response needed to evaluate the effects of local demand and localized stresses to design reinforcement in localized areas. These subsystem models utilize the seismic inputs and boundary conditions consistent with the nuclear island model(s). The seismic analysis methods for local models are the same as those used for the Nuclear Island models and are described in DCD Section 3.7.2.
Please let me know if these follow up actions address the Staffs concerns from our audit discussion call held on 3/11.
- Best, Yasmeen Arafeh Nuclear Development, Licensing Work: (205)992-7190
ynarafeh@southernco.com Hearing Identifier: Vogtle_COL_Docs_Public Email Number: 546 Mail Envelope Properties (BN8PR09MB35249CDCDD00E6C024CE413497FA0)
Subject:
FW: Audit Discussion Topics for LAR 19-019 Follow Up Sent Date: 3/13/2020 9:27:24 AM Received Date: 3/13/2020 9:27:27 AM From: Habib, Donald Created By: Donald.Habib@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Vogtle PEmails" <Vogtle.PEmails@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: BN8PR09MB3524.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2467 3/13/2020 9:27:27 AM image001.png 1703 Audit Closeout Q5.pdf 136782 Audit Closeout Q3.pdf 141275 Options Priority: Normal Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
1';;;;;;
(QFORVXUH
5HYLVHG5HTXHVWIRU/LFHQVH$PHQGPHQW5HJDUGLQJ5HFRQFLOLDWLRQRI(QYLURQPHQWDO
&RQGLWLRQV,QSXWVWR&LYLO6WUXFWXUDO'HVLJQ/LFHQVLQJ%DVLV /$5 5
&KDQJH+/-6SHQW)XHO3RRO:HVW:DOO&ULWLFDO6HFWLRQ7DEOH8SGDWH 7DEOH+
7KH6)3ZDOOVDUHPRGXOHZDOOVZKLFKDUHORFDWHGRQWKHVRXWKVLGHRIWKHDX[LOLDU\EXLOGLQJIURP
HOHYDWLRQ WRHOHYDWLRQ HQFORVHGE\FROXPQOLQHVDQGDQG/DQG.DVVKRZQ
LQ 8)6$5 )LJXUH 6KHHWV 7KH 6)3 ZDOOV DUH VLPLODU WR WKH PRGXOH ZDOOV LQVLGH
FRQWDLQPHQWZKLFKFRQVLVWRIVWHHOIDFHSODWHVVWHHOWUXVVHVVKHDUVWXGVDQGFRQFUHWH7KHZHVW
ZDOO RI WKH 6)3 DORQJ FROXPQ OLQH / LV D FULWLFDO VHFWLRQ DV GHILQHG LQ 8)6$5
6XEVHFWLRQ+8)6$57DEOH+VKRZVWKHGHPDQGVDQGFDSDFLWLHVRIWKH6)3ZHVW
ZDOODWVHYHQFULWLFDOORFDWLRQVZKLFKDUHGHILQHGLQ8)6$5)LJXUH+8)6$57DEOH+
VKRZVIRUFHVDQGPRPHQWVXQGHUFULWLFDOORDGFDVHVLQFOXGLQJGHDGORDGOLYHORDGK\GURVWDWLF
ORDG QRUPDO WKHUPDO ORDG DQG DFFLGHQW ORDG DQG VKRZV PRPHQWV DQG IRUFHV XQGHU
UHSUHVHQWDWLYH ORDG FRPELQDWLRQV VXFK DV JUDYLW\ ORDG FRPELQDWLRQ JUDYLW\ DQG VHLVPLF ORDG
FRPELQDWLRQDQGORDGFRPELQDWLRQVZLWKVHLVPLFDQGQRUPDOWKHUPDOORDGVFRPELQHG8)6$5
7DEOH + DOVR VKRZV UHTXLUHG VWHHO SODWH WKLFNQHVV ZLWKRXW WKHUPDO YHUVXV SURYLGHG VWHHO
SODWH WKLFNQHVV PD[LPXP SULQFLSDO VWUHVV YHUVXV \LHOG VWUHVV DQG PD[LPXP VWUHVV LQWHQVLW\
YHUVXV DOORZDEOH VWUHVV LQWHQVLW\ 7KLV DFWLYLW\ SURSRVHV WR UHYLVH GHPDQGV LQ 8)6$5
7DEOH+WRPDWFKWKHUHYLVHGHVLJQHYDOXDWLRQRI6)3ZDOOV
6)3 ZDOOV DUH VXEMHFW WR ) RI DFFLGHQW WKHUPDO GXULQJ 6)3 ERLOLQJ $V SDUW RI GHVLJQ
ILQDOL]DWLRQ WKH DFFLGHQW WKHUPDO ORDG LV FRPELQHG ZLWK VHLVPLF ORDG DQG RWKHU ORDGV LQ
DFFRUGDQFHZLWK8)6$57DEOHVDQGDQG$&, 7KHPRPHQWVDQGIRUFHV
XQGHUFRPELQHGVHLVPLFDQGDFFLGHQWORDGVDUHDGGHGWRWKHPDUNXSVRI8)6$57DEOH+
7KH RULJLQDO 6)3 ZDOO DQDO\VLV XVHG ILQLWH HOHPHQW PRGHO ZLWK DSSUR[LPDWH E\ PHVK DQG
IL[HGIL[HG ERXQGDU\ FRQGLWLRQ 7KH GHVLJQ ILQDOL]DWLRQ UHILQHV WKH ILQLWH HOHPHQW PRGHO E\
FKDQJLQJWKHPHVKVL]HWR E\ DQGFUHDWLQJWZRILQLWHHOHPHQWPRGHOVZLWKIL[HGIL[HGDQG
IL[HGSLQQHGERXQGDU\FRQGLWLRQV7KHVHLVPLFGHVLJQRIWKH$3QXFOHDULVODQGUHOLHVRQWKH
DQDO\VLVPHWKRGVDQG)($PRGHOVGHVFULEHGLQ'&'&KDSWHUDQGUHODWHGDSSHQGL[HV7KHVH
$16<6PRGHOV LH1,1,1,HWF DUHVXIILFLHQWO\GHWDLOHGWRFDSWXUHJOREDODQGLQ
VWUXFWXUHUHVSRQVHDWNH\HTXLSPHQWDQGEXLOGLQJORFDWLRQV+RZHYHUIRUGHWDLOHGGHVLJQORFDO
)($ PRGHOV ZLWK DUHILQHG PHVKVL]H GLIIHUHQW WKDQ WKH JOREDO VHLVPLFPRGHOV DUHVRPHWLPHV
XWLOL]HGWRFDSWXUHPRUHGHWDLOHGUHVSRQVHQHHGHGWRHYDOXDWHWKHHIIHFWVRIORFDOGHPDQGDQG
ORFDOL]HGVWUHVVHVWRGHVLJQUHLQIRUFHPHQWLQORFDOL]HGDUHDV7KHVHVXEV\VWHPPRGHOVXWLOL]HWKH
VHLVPLFLQSXWVDQGERXQGDU\FRQGLWLRQVFRQVLVWHQWZLWKWKHQXFOHDULVODQGPRGHO V 7KHVHLVPLF
DQDO\VLVPHWKRGVIRUORFDOPRGHOVDUHWKHVDPHDVWKRVHXVHGIRUWKH1XFOHDU,VODQGPRGHOVDQG
DUHGHVFULEHGLQ'&'6HFWLRQ7KHSLQQHGFRQQHFWLRQLVXVHGDWIORRUWRZDOOFRQQHFWLRQV
ZKHUH WKH ERWWRP GRZHO LV ORFDWHG DERYHWKH ERWWRP:7 VWLIIHQHUV RQWKH IORRU WR FDSWXUHWKH
SRWHQWLDOURWDWLRQ7KHUHVXOWVIURPWKHWZR)($PRGHOVDUHHQYHORSHGWRFRQVHUYDWLYHO\FDSWXUH
SRWHQWLDOEHKDYLRURIWKHIORRUWRZDOOFRQQHFWLRQ7KHUHVXOWVIURPWKHUHILQHG)($PRGHOVDUH
DOVR DYHUDJHG EDFN WR WKH RULJLQDO HOHPHQW VL]H 6)3 :DOO / LV GHVLJQHG XQGHU ORDG
FRPELQDWLRQV ZLWK VHLVPLF DQG DFFLGHQW WKHUPDO ORDGV FRPELQHG E\ XVLQJ UHVXOWV IURP UHILQHG
)($ PRGHOV 7KH PDUNXSV RI 8)6$5 7DEOH + VKRZ WKDW WKH UHTXLUHG SODWH WKLFNQHVV
H[FOXGLQJWKHUPDOLVVPDOOHUWKDQWKHSURYLGHGSODWHWKLFNQHVVWKHPD[LPXPSULQFLSDOVWUHVVIRU
WKHORDGFRPELQDWLRQVLQFOXGLQJWKHUPDOLVVPDOOHUWKDQWKH\LHOGVWUHVVDQGWKHPD[LPXPVWUHVV
LQWHQVLW\UDQJHIRUWKHORDGFRPELQDWLRQVLQFOXGLQJWKHUPDOLVVPDOOHUWKDQWKHDOORZDEOHVWUHVV
LQWHQVLW\7KHGHVLJQRI6)3:DOO/UHPDLQVLQFRPSOLDQFHZLWKWKHDSSOLFDEOHUHTXLUHPHQWVLQ
$&, DQG$,6&1 7KHUHLVQRUHGXFWLRQLQPDUJLQRIVDIHW\IRUWKHVWUXFWXUHEHFDXVH
WKHGHVLJQRIWKH6)3:DOO/FRQWLQXHVWRPHHWWKHDSSOLFDEOHFRGHV7KHSURSRVHGFKDQJHV
GRQRWKDYHDGYHUVHLPSDFWRQWKHJOREDOVWUXFWXUDODQDO\VLVRIWKHQXFOHDULVODQGEHFDXVHWKH
3DJHRI
1';;;;;;
(QFORVXUH
3URSRVHG&KDQJHVWR/LFHQVLQJ%DVLV'RFXPHQWV+/- /$5 5
Revise UFSAR Table 3H.5-9 (Sheet 1 of 3), Shield Building Roof Reinforcement Summary (Tension Ring) as shown below.
Tension Ring - Axial Force and Bending Verification Seismic Maximum Maximum Location Stresses Maximum Steel Area [Design Limit(1) for Seismic Stresses Fy Required(2) [Steel Area Ratio Max Section Angles L/C fa ksi ksi ksi (in2/ft) Provided]* Required/Provided]*
ORZHU
[Liner 1 1/2" =
18 (in2/ft) [0.51 + 2%1.00]*
ORZHU
(Min)]*
Tension Ring - Shear Force and Torsion Verification
Seismic Maximum Maximum Location Stresses Maximum Steel Area [Design Limit(1) for Seismic Stresses Fy Required(2) [Steel Area Ratio Max Section Angles L/C fa ksi ksi ksi (in2/ft) Provided]* Required/Provided]*
ORZHU
[Liner 1 1/2" =
18 (in2/ft) [0.31 0.36+ 2%]*
ORZHU
(Min)]*
Notes:
- 1. [Two The two percent of the ratio value that may be added to the design limit as is an allowance for minor variances in analysis results.]*
7KHUPDOORDGVKDYHEHHQFRQVLGHUHGLQWKHGHVLJQRIFULWLFDOVHFWLRQV7KHUHTXLUHG
UHLQIRUFHPHQWYDOXHVVKRZQGRQRWLQFOXGHWKHORDGFDVHZKHUHVHLVPLFDQGQRUPDO
WKHUPDOORDGVDUHQXPHULFDOO\FRPELQHGDVWKHQRUPDOWKHUPDOORDGVZHUHDVVHVVHG
WR EH LQVLJQLILFDQW :KHQ WKH VHLVPLF DQG QRUPDO WKHUPDO ORDGV DUH QXPHULFDOO\
FRPELQHGWKHYDOXHRIUHTXLUHGUHLQIRUFHPHQWPD\LQFUHDVH KRZHYHULQDOOFDVHVWKH
UHTXLUHGUHLQIRUFHPHQWLVOHVVWKDQWKHSURYLGHGUHLQIRUFHPHQWDQGWKXVWKHGHVLJQRI
WKHFULWLFDOVHFWLRQUHLQIRUFHPHQWLVDFFHSWDEOH1RWXVHG
3DJHRI
1';;;;;;
(QFORVXUH
3URSRVHG&KDQJHVWR/LFHQVLQJ%DVLV'RFXPHQWV+/- /$5 5
Revise UFSAR Table 3H.5-9 (Sheet 2a of 3), Shield Building Roof Reinforcement Summary (Air Inlet) as shown below.
AIS Reinforcement Summary - Horizontal Sections Location Required - Seismic Load Maximum [Design Limit(1) for (Figure 3H.5-11) Combinations (in2/ft)
Required(2) [Provided]* Ratio Max Seismic Section Angles Values (in2/ft) Required/Provided]*
L/C
[Liner 1" =
12 (in2/ft) (Min)]* [0.20 0.42 + 2%]*
[Liner 1" =
[0.15 0.30 + 2%]*
12 (in2/ft) (Min)]*
Notes:
>Two The two percent of the ratio value that may be added to the design limit as is an allowance for minor variances in analysis results.@
7KHUPDO ORDGV KDYH EHHQ FRQVLGHUHG LQ WKH GHVLJQ RI FULWLFDO VHFWLRQV 7KH UHTXLUHG
UHLQIRUFHPHQW YDOXHV VKRZQ GR QRW LQFOXGH WKH ORDG FDVH ZKHUH VHLVPLF DQG QRUPDO
WKHUPDOORDGVDUHQXPHULFDOO\FRPELQHGDVWKHQRUPDOWKHUPDOORDGVZHUHDVVHVVHGWREH
LQVLJQLILFDQW:KHQWKHVHLVPLFDQGQRUPDOWKHUPDOORDGVDUHQXPHULFDOO\FRPELQHGWKH
YDOXH RI UHTXLUHG UHLQIRUFHPHQW PD\ LQFUHDVH KRZHYHU LQ DOO FDVHV WKH UHTXLUHG
UHLQIRUFHPHQWLVOHVVWKDQWKHSURYLGHGUHLQIRUFHPHQWDQGWKXVWKHGHVLJQRIWKHFULWLFDO
VHFWLRQUHLQIRUFHPHQWLVDFFHSWDEOH1RWXVHG
3DJHRI
1';;;;;;
(QFORVXUH
3URSRVHG&KDQJHVWR/LFHQVLQJ%DVLV'RFXPHQWV+/- /$5 5
Revise UFSAR Table 3H.5-9 (Sheet 2c of 3), Shield Building Roof Reinforcement Summary (Air Inlet) as shown below.
Out of Plane Shear Reinforcement Summary -AIS Location Required - Seismic Load (Figure 3H.5-11) Combinations (in2/ft) Maximum [Design Limit(1) for Seismic Required(2) [Steel Area Ratio Max Angles Sections L/C Values Sum (in2/ft) Provided]* Required/Provided]*
0D[RI9HUWLFDO
6HFWLRQV
XSSHU
XSSHU
+RUL]RQWDO
&LUFXPIHUHQWLDO
6HFWLRQ
0D[RI9HUWLFDO
6HFWLRQV
XSSHU
XSSHU
+RUL]RQWDO
&LUFXPIHUHQWLDO
6HFWLRQ
0D[RI9HUWLFDO
6HFWLRQV
XSSHU
XSSHU [(3) 3/4 TIE
+RUL]RQWDO BAR @2.8125°
&LUFXPIHUHQWLDO (41.36") (8 1/2"
[0.68 + 2%]*
6HFWLRQ in vertical 0D[RI9HUWLFDO direction) = 0.50 6HFWLRQV (in2/ ft) (Min.)]*
XSSHU
XSSHU
+RUL]RQWDO
&LUFXPIHUHQWLDO
6HFWLRQ
0D[RI9HUWLFDO
6HFWLRQV
ORZHUORZHU
+RUL]RQWDO
&LUFXPIHUHQWLDO
6HFWLRQ
0D[RI9HUWLFDO
6HFWLRQV
ORZHUORZHU
+RUL]RQWDO
&LUFXPIHUHQWLDO
6HFWLRQ
3DJH RI
1';;;;;;
(QFORVXUH
3URSRVHG&KDQJHVWR/LFHQVLQJ%DVLV'RFXPHQWV+/- /$5 5
Out of Plane Shear Reinforcement Summary -AIS Location Required - Seismic Load (Figure 3H.5-11) Combinations (in2/ft) Maximum [Design Limit(1) for Seismic Required(2) [Steel Area Ratio Max Angles Sections L/C Values Sum (in2/ft) Provided]* Required/Provided]*
0D[RI9HUWLFDO
6HFWLRQV
ORZHUORZHU
+RUL]RQWDO
&LUFXPIHUHQWLDO
6HFWLRQ
0D[RI9HUWLFDO
6HFWLRQV
ORZHUORZHU
+RUL]RQWDO
&LUFXPIHUHQWLDO
6HFWLRQ
Notes:
- 1. [Two The two percent of the ratio value that may be added to the design limit as is an allowance for minor variances in analysis results.]*
- 2. 7KHUPDOORDGVKDYHEHHQFRQVLGHUHGLQWKHGHVLJQRIFULWLFDOVHFWLRQV7KHUHTXLUHG
UHLQIRUFHPHQWYDOXHVVKRZQGRQRWLQFOXGHWKHORDGFDVHZKHUHVHLVPLFDQGQRUPDO
WKHUPDOORDGVDUHQXPHULFDOO\FRPELQHGDVWKHQRUPDOWKHUPDOORDGVZHUHDVVHVVHGWR
EHLQVLJQLILFDQW:KHQWKHVHLVPLFDQGQRUPDOWKHUPDOORDGVDUHQXPHULFDOO\FRPELQHG
WKHYDOXHRIUHTXLUHGUHLQIRUFHPHQWPD\LQFUHDVH KRZHYHULQDOOFDVHVWKHUHTXLUHG
UHLQIRUFHPHQWLVOHVVWKDQWKHSURYLGHGUHLQIRUFHPHQWDQGWKXVWKHGHVLJQRIWKHFULWLFDO
VHFWLRQUHLQIRUFHPHQWLVDFFHSWDEOH1RWXVHG
3DJHRI