ML052620049

E-mail from J. D'Antonio of USNRC to D. Vito, J. Caruso and R. Conte of USNRC, Regarding RI-2002-A-0099

ML052620049
Person / Time
Site:	Hope Creek
Issue date:	08/06/2002
From:	D'Antonio J NRC Region 1
To:	Caruso J, Conte R, Vito D NRC Region 1
References
FOIA/PA-2004-0314, RI-2002-A-0099
Download: ML052620049 (1)

Text

I David Vito - Rl-2002-A-0099 Page Paqe ii1 I David Vito - R1-2002-A-0099 From: Joseph D'Antonio '-

To: David Vito; John Caruso; Richard Conte Date: 816/02 8:37AM

Subject:

R1-2002-A-0099 I have reviewed this document. The alleger has two main complaints, H&l and improper use of Technical Specification grace period.

As he describes it, I don't think there's an issue with the TS grace period. He says that due to the way they schedule work, ALL annual and 18 month surveillances get alternately "short cycled" then extended into the grace period over a three year period. Allowing scheduling flexibility like this is what the grace period is for, reference T.S. 4.0.2 basis.

The H&l appears significant. Essentially, he provides a diary of how he was harrassed out of the company for complaining about inadequacies in a work control and tagging software tool. However, his counterpart at Salem doesn't seem to have had a problem, and PSEG will probably claim his treatment was due to the way he handled the issue and that he was expected to get his job done despite the software problem.