|
---|
Category:FINDINGS OF FACT/CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
MONTHYEARML20054C6551982-04-15015 April 1982 Response Opposing Citizens Against Nuclear Dangers 820402 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Requirements for Reopening Record Not Met.No Showing That Allegations Raise Significant Safety Issues.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20050D4191982-04-0202 April 1982 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Based on Important New Info & Recommendations to NRC Commissioners & Congress.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C2701982-03-26026 March 1982 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Re Emergency Evacuation Plan ML20069B0301981-12-22022 December 1981 Reply to Parties' Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039A1951981-12-0909 December 1981 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law ML20038C0131981-12-0303 December 1981 Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl 1982-04-02
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20209H6691999-07-12012 July 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Elimination of Requirement for Licensees to Update Inservice Insp & Inservice Testing Programs Beyond Baseline Adition & Addenda of ASME BPV Code ML20203G6131998-01-26026 January 1998 Affidavit of RG Byram Justifying That Redacted Portions of Pp&L,Inc Corporate Auditings Interim Rept 739459-97,dtd 971015 Be Withheld from Public Disclosure ML20203G6031997-12-0404 December 1997 Affidavit of RG Byram Justifying That Redacted Portions of Pp&L,Inc Corporate Auditings Rept 739459-1-97,dtd 971201 Be Withheld from Public Disclosure PLA-4330, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements Associated W/Containment Access Control1995-06-0808 June 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements Associated W/Containment Access Control PLA-4193, Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-9-2 Submitted Ocre Requesting That NRC Revise Regulations to Provide Public Access to Info Held by Licensees But Not Submitted to Nrc.Urges NRC to Deny Ocre Petition in Entirety1994-08-31031 August 1994 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-9-2 Submitted Ocre Requesting That NRC Revise Regulations to Provide Public Access to Info Held by Licensees But Not Submitted to Nrc.Urges NRC to Deny Ocre Petition in Entirety ML20046A9531993-07-20020 July 1993 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171, FY91 & 92 Proposed Rule Implementing Us Court of Appeals Decision & Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery,FY93. Opposes Rule ML20045F7971993-06-21021 June 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Supports Rule in Part & Opposes Rule in Part ML20045D7461993-06-21021 June 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Disagrees W/Maintaining 100% Rate for Contractor & Vendor Employees ML20044F8361993-05-24024 May 1993 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171, FY91 & 92 Proposed Rule Implementing Us Court of Appeals Decision & Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery,FY93. Opposes Rules ML20044F7511993-05-24024 May 1993 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171, FY91 & 92 Proposed Rule Implementing Us Court of Appeals Decision & Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery,FY93. PLA-3744, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 & 52 Re Training & Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant.Expresses Concerns of Potential for Inconsistent & Inappropriate Application by Individual NRC Inspectors & Examiners1992-03-0909 March 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 & 52 Re Training & Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant.Expresses Concerns of Potential for Inconsistent & Inappropriate Application by Individual NRC Inspectors & Examiners PLA-3568, Comments Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Incorporating 1986 -1988 Addenda & 1989 Editions of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section Iii,Div 1 & Section Xi,Div 1,by Ref Into 10CFR50.55a1991-04-0808 April 1991 Comments Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Incorporating 1986 -1988 Addenda & 1989 Editions of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section Iii,Div 1 & Section Xi,Div 1,by Ref Into 10CFR50.55a PLA-3462, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Proposed Rule,W/Enhancements Recommended by Numarc,Will Provide More Stable Basis for Util Planning & Development of Future Power Plants1990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Proposed Rule,W/Enhancements Recommended by Numarc,Will Provide More Stable Basis for Util Planning & Development of Future Power Plants ML19332G5261989-12-0606 December 1989 Comments on Draft Reg Guide DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Industry Has Made Substantial Progress Re Maint Performance as Indicated by Respective Performance Indicators,Commission Insps & Plant Conditions PLA-3175, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants1989-03-29029 March 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants ML20235V4001989-03-0202 March 1989 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Program at Nuclear Plants.Proposed Maint Rule Has Potential to Significantly Undermine Util Initiatives & Direct Limited Resources Away from Real Improvements in Maint PLA-3157, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule Not Needed & Will Not Serve to Increase Commission Ability to Ensure Nuclear Plants Reliably Maintained1989-02-24024 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule Not Needed & Will Not Serve to Increase Commission Ability to Ensure Nuclear Plants Reliably Maintained PLA-3118, Comment Endorsing NUMARC Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Rule1988-11-17017 November 1988 Comment Endorsing NUMARC Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Rule ML20247N7531988-07-28028 July 1988 Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-53 Requesting NRC Action to Review Undue Risk Posed by BWR Thermal Hydraulic Instability.Nrr Should Issue Order Requiring All GE BWRs to Be Placed in Cold Shutdown for Stated Reasons PLA-3019, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Nrc Does Not Fully Appreciate Impact of Rule as Written.Encourages Commission to Abandon Rulemaking1988-04-15015 April 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Nrc Does Not Fully Appreciate Impact of Rule as Written.Encourages Commission to Abandon Rulemaking PLA-2726, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Rulemaking to Enhance Levels of Engineering & Accident Mgt Expertise on Shift1986-09-25025 September 1986 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Rulemaking to Enhance Levels of Engineering & Accident Mgt Expertise on Shift ML20138A9521985-10-0909 October 1985 Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20027D4441982-11-0202 November 1982 Response to Aslab 821026 Order Requesting Info on RCS Leak Rate Detection.Util Preparing Tech Spec to Limit Increase in Unidentified RCS Leakage to 2 Gpm within 4-h Period ML20027D4471982-11-0101 November 1982 Affidavit of Wj Rhoades Correcting Response to Hearing Question on Leak Rates.Leak Rate Sys Capable of Detecting 1 Gpm Per Hour.Tech Specs Will Require Shutdown for Unidentified Leakage of 5 Gpm.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069D8321982-09-0909 September 1982 Original Signature Page to Sh Cantone Affidavit.Svc List Encl ML20027B2291982-09-0909 September 1982 Stipulation of Withdrawal of Commonwealth of PA 820428 Exceptions Re Supply of TLD ML20065A9541982-09-0909 September 1982 Affidavit of Sh Cantone Re Dosimetry for Emergency Workers at Plant.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20027B2231982-09-0909 September 1982 Motion to Withdraw Commonwealth of PA 820428 Exceptions to Initial Decision,Contingent Upon Approval of Util & Commonwealth of PA 820909 Stipulation ML20027B2351982-09-0808 September 1982 Affidavit of AL Belser & Rj Hippert Responding to Questions in Aslab 820820 Order & Supporting Stipulation Withdrawing Exceptions.When Stipulated Number of Dosimeters Available, Emergency Workers Will Be Protected.W/Certificate of Svc ML20027B2331982-09-0808 September 1982 Affidavit of Ma Reilly Responding to Question in Aslab 820820 Order & Supporting 820909 Stipulation. TLD Necessary to Document Exposure of Officials Helping Contaminated Evacuees ML20063A4041982-08-18018 August 1982 Petition for Reconsideration of Commission 820809 Order Rendering ASLB Initial Decision Effective.Exceptions to Decision Require Resolution.Commission Order Premature. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20062J6391982-08-13013 August 1982 Order Directing Parties to Identify Person Presenting Arguments at 820908 Hearing in Bethesda,Md.Response Requested No Later than 820831 ML20058J6651982-08-0909 August 1982 Order Rendering ASLB 820412 Decision Authorizing OL Issuance Effective.Full Power OL Not Yet Authorized ML20054L5081982-07-0606 July 1982 Brief Opposing Commonwealth of PA 820428 & Citizens Against Nuclear Dangers 820421 Exceptions to ASLB 820412 Initial Decision.Pa Fails to Prove Dosimetry Issue Timely Raised. Citizens Failed to Comply W/Procedure.W/Certificate of Svc ML20054L2841982-07-0202 July 1982 Brief Opposing Commonwealth of PA 820428 Exceptions to ASLB 820412 Initial Decision Authorizing OL Issuance.Commonwealth Fails to Justify License Condition Imposition Re Availability of Dosimetry.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054J5611982-06-25025 June 1982 Brief Opposing Citizens Against Nuclear Danger 820421 Exceptions to ASLB 820412 Initial Decision.Exceptions Fail to Comply W/Commission Regulations & Raise Issues Not Presented Before Aslb.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20053D2191982-05-28028 May 1982 Brief Supporting Commonwealth of PA Exceptions to ASLB 820412 Initial Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20053D0801982-05-28028 May 1982 Brief in Support of Exceptions to ASLB 820412 Initial Decision Authorizing Issuance of Ols.Shortage in Supply of Dosimeters for Emergency Workers Clear & Uncontroverted. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052B7461982-04-28028 April 1982 Exceptions to ASLB 820412 Initial Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052A2751982-04-21021 April 1982 Exceptions to ASLB Initial Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054C6551982-04-15015 April 1982 Response Opposing Citizens Against Nuclear Dangers 820402 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Requirements for Reopening Record Not Met.No Showing That Allegations Raise Significant Safety Issues.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20050D4191982-04-0202 April 1982 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Based on Important New Info & Recommendations to NRC Commissioners & Congress.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C2701982-03-26026 March 1982 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Re Emergency Evacuation Plan ML20042C2781982-03-26026 March 1982 Motion for Order That Applicants Conduct Complete Retest of Emergency Plan W/All 20 Communities Participating.Testimony on Contentions 6 & 20 Should Be Reviewed to Identify Perjury by Fema,Applicants & State of Pa.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069B0301981-12-22022 December 1981 Reply to Parties' Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039B0791981-12-16016 December 1981 Proposed Transcript Corrections.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20062M2141981-12-0909 December 1981 Proposed Transcript Corrections ML20039A1951981-12-0909 December 1981 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law ML20038C0131981-12-0303 December 1981 Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20038A8891981-11-17017 November 1981 Motion to Take Official Notice of Existence & Content of Listed Documents Relevant to Contention 21.Validity of Info in Documents Could Be Subj to Dispute.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence 1999-07-12
[Table view] |
Text
'
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA M NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION rggg Jvc Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board In the Matter of '81 DEC -7 P4:20 AA4.
PENNSYLVANIA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY n and Docket Nos. 50-387 Wi$gf/dj I,_,
ALLEGHENY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC. ) 50-388 M *4AF H
(Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, ad G Ul.//%
Units 1 and 2) \ .
huvL INTERVENOR ENVIRONMENTAL C0ALITION ON NUCLEAR POWER'S ISBW '
DECJ FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW .
g$go. N
\g S
.,iW I Introductory Comment
'.fplg y f
- 1. In the tortuous co0rse of this operating license proceeding, the Intervenors have sought a fair opportunity to litigate the issues raised and accepted by the original Board prior to the accident at Three Mile Island, Unit 2, in the licensing of which these same Inter-venors participated. The Inter"enors were denied a protective order equal to that granted the Applicant in the early stages of Discovery in this proceeding. At no time during the long discovery process that followed were the citizen Intervenors allowed a sufficient period of
. time in which to respond to the excessive number of interrogatories served on them by the Applicant. Nor t.t any time did the Board specify to the Intervenors what precisely constituted an " adequate response" to interrogatories, beyond the statement that Intervenors were not expected to engage in extensive research in order to comply with requirements.
The additional constraint of preparation for hearings relating to the D3 earlier TMI-2 licensing case and to the TMI-l Restart case consequent upon the accident at Three Mile Island, simultaneous in timing with the
)( unreasonably large discovery demands in this proceeding, resulted in the inability of Intervenors to comply with Board-imposed deadlines. In 8112090419 811203 PDR ADOCK 05000387 G PDR >
those licenses subject to the outcome of NRC and any consequent Court proceedings related to the consolidated radon proceeding currently before
-. the NRC Appeal Board.
- 5. Although Limited Appearance statements were heard by the Board oa October 8,19,.and 23,1981, many persons who had filed written re-quests to speak and had asked to be informed of the date and place of the opportunity to speak did not receive notification from the NRC.
Despite public press announcements that full day sessions would be held, these hearing sessions were concluded when no additional persons requesting't'o speak identified themselves as being present in the hearing room;. some arrived later in the day, to find that the session had been adjourned. Tr. October 8, 23, 1981.
II Findings of Fact
- 6. A radiological health hazard may be associated with. technetium-99 associated with the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle. Englehart testi-mony, paragraphs 5, 6, 7. The potential health hazard results from internal exposure. Englehart testimony, paragraphs 5, 6. The time period of concern about the potential hazard posed by Tc-99 is approxi-mately a million years, but no waste disposal repository can be guaran-teed to provide perfect containment for that length of time. Englehart testimony, paragraph 12.
- 7. No selection of the geological medium or media that will be uc:d for the disposal of long-lived radioactive wastes including Tc-99 has yet been made. Englehart, Tr.1859.
- 8. The degree of' sorption of Tc-99 varies markedly between organic and inorganic soils and the concentration of Tc-99 in vegetation also varies widely. Englehart, Tr. 1870-72. The witness had not calculated the dose to a maximally-exposed individual. Englehart, Tr.1873. His
, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I dertify that copies of INTERVENOR ENVIRONMENTAL C0ALITION ON NUCLEAR POWER'S FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW are beins deposited in the U.S. Mail, first class, postage paid, this Te day of December,1981.
As'd ll /td.cwS 30dith H. Johnsrud Secretary of the Commission - Atomic Safety and Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Board Panel Washington, D.C. 20555 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 ,
Thomas S. Moore, Esquire .
Adrinistrative Judge Occketing'and Service Section Atomic Safety and Licensing -
Office of the Secretary .
Appeal Board . U.S. Nuclear Regulatory.Co-4ssion U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D..C. 20555 -
Washington, D.C. 20555 ' r Dr. John H. Bt ck ,
Administrative Judge 'T D._,
Atomic Safety and Licensi'ng Appeal Board
'T. S . Nuclear Regulatory Commission
'81 DEC -7 P4 :20 Washington, D.C. 20555 g ,
James P. Gleason, Esquire SusquehannaEnv[rydntalAdvocates Administrative Judge c/o Gerald Schtilh , E' squire-513 Gilmoure Drive Post Office Box 1560 Silver Spring, Maryland 20901 Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania 18703 Mr. Glenn O. Bright Mr. Thomas J. Halligan, Correspondent Administrative Judge The Citizens Against Nuclear Dangers '
Atomic Safety and Licensing Post Office Box 5 Board Panel Scranton, Pennsylvania 18501 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ,
Washington, Da C. 20555 Ms. Colleen Marsh Box 558 A, R. D. 44
! Dr. Paul W. Purdom Mt. Top, Pennsylvania 18707
.dministrative Judge 245 Gulph Hills Road Radnor, Pennsylvania 19087 Jay Silberg, Esquire Shaw, Potts, Pittman, and Trowbridge 1800 M Street NW Ecbert W.-7dler, Esquire Washington, D.C. 20036 Department of Environmental Resources Commonwealth of Pennsylvania l
Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal l
505 Executive House Board Panel I Post Office Box 2357 17120 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Co= mission i Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Washington, D. C. 20555 l
James I*.. Cutchin, IV, Esquire Office of the Executive Legal Director L U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555
- e w