|
|---|
Category:Rulemaking-Comment
MONTHYEARML12200A4142012-07-16016 July 2012
Comment (229) of Kimberly L. Prosser on Behalf of Brevard County Emergency Management, on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone
ML1020700442010-07-22022 July 2010
Comment (6) of Scott Boggs, on Behalf of Nextera Energy, on Proposed Rule PR-50, Regarding American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Codes and New and Revised ASME Code Cases
L-2009-230, 2009/10/19-Comment (41) of Mchenry Cornell on Behalf of Florida Power & Light Co., on Proposed Rules PR-50 & PR-52, Re Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations2009-10-19019 October 2009
2009/10/19-Comment (41) of Mchenry Cornell on Behalf of Florida Power & Light Co., on Proposed Rules PR-50 & PR-52, Re Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations
ML0929406172009-10-19019 October 2009
2009/10/19-Comment (41) of Mchenry Cornell on Behalf of Florida Power & Light Co., on Proposed Rules PR-50 & PR-52, Re Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations
ML0828909442008-10-13013 October 2008
Comment (4) of Robert J. Hughes on Behalf of Florida Power and Light Company Regarding Proposed Rule Pr 73, Criminal Penalties; Unauthorized Introduction of Weapons.
L-2006-255, Comment (8) Submitted by Florida Pwr. and Light Company, Martin Gettler, on Supplemental Proposed Rule PR-2, 50, 51 and 52, Regarding Licenses Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants2006-11-14014 November 2006
Comment (8) Submitted by Florida Pwr. and Light Company, Martin Gettler, on Supplemental Proposed Rule PR-2, 50, 51 and 52, Regarding Licenses Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants
ML0615600232006-05-26026 May 2006
Comment (13) Submitted by Florida Power & Light Company, J. A. Stall on Proposed Rules PR-1, 2, 10, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 50, 51, 52, 54, 55, 72, 73, 75, 95, 140, 170 and 171 Re Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants
L-2006-076, Comment (14) Submitted by Florida Power and Light Company, J.A. Stall on Proposed Rule PR-50, Risk-Informed Changes to Loss-of-Coolant-Accident Technical Requirements2006-03-15015 March 2006
Comment (14) Submitted by Florida Power and Light Company, J.A. Stall on Proposed Rule PR-50, Risk-Informed Changes to Loss-of-Coolant-Accident Technical Requirements
L-2005-266, Comment (71) Submitted by Florida Pwr & Light Co. and FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC, J. A. Stall, on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty Programs2005-12-27027 December 2005
Comment (71) Submitted by Florida Pwr & Light Co. and FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC, J. A. Stall, on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty Programs
L-2003-115, Comment (14) Submitted by Florida Power & Light Co., J. A. Stall, on Proposed Rules PR-170 & 171 Re Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fy 20032003-05-0202 May 2003
Comment (14) Submitted by Florida Power & Light Co., J. A. Stall, on Proposed Rules PR-170 & 171 Re Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fy 2003
ML0213300782002-05-0404 May 2002
General Notice Comment Letter on St. Lucie Environmental Impact Statement
ML0213300062002-05-0101 May 2002
General Notice Comment Letter from Jim Woodfin on Extending the St. Lucie Facility'S License
ML0212605422002-04-30030 April 2002
General Notice Comment Letter on the Environmental Issue Scoping Proceedings for St. Lucie, Units 1 and 2
ML0212605022002-04-30030 April 2002
General Notice Comment Letter from Stanley S. Smilan on St. Lucie Units 1 & 2 Relicensing
ML0212605282002-04-29029 April 2002
General Notice Comment Letter from Sidney M. Ziring on Environmental Scoping for St. Lucie Units 1 & 2
ML0212605202002-04-29029 April 2002
General Notice Comment Letter from Sara Case on Environmental Scoping for St. Lucie Units 1 & 2
ML0211904252002-04-24024 April 2002
General Notice Comment Letter on St. Lucie Environmental Impact Statement
ML0212605972002-04-24024 April 2002
General Notice Comment Letter from Mark P. Oncavage on NRC Scoping Meeting for the St. Lucie Environmental Impact Statement
ML0213300212002-03-19019 March 2002
General Notice Comment Letter from William Vogel, the School Board of St. Lucie County, on Recommendation of Renewal of the Operating License for Florida Power and Light'S St. Lucie Plant
ML0210102472002-03-19019 March 2002
General Notice Comment Letter on Renewal of the Operating License for Florida Power and Light'S St. Lucie Plant
2012-07-16
[Table view] |
Text
BriWower & light Company, 700 Universe Boulevard, P.O. Box 14000, Juno Beach, Fl3340B-0420 DOCKETED PR 73 USNRC (73FR51378)
October 14, 2008 (4:38pm) OCT 1 3 2008 OFFICE OF SECRETARY '_-2008-222 RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff Re: Comments on Draft Revisions to 10 CFR 73, Criminal Penalties; Unauthorized Introduction of Weapons RIN 3150-A131 Florida Power & Light Company (FPL), the licensee for the St. Lucie Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, and the Turkey Point Nuclear Plant, Units 3 and 4, FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC, the licensee for Seabrook Station, FPL Energy Duane Arnold LLC, the licensee for the Duane Arnold Energy Center and FPL Energy Point Beach, LLC, the licensee for Point Beach Nuclear Plant hereby submit comments as shown in the Attachment on Draft Revisions to 10CFR73, Criminal Penalties; Unauthorized Introduction of Weapons.
Please contact Mr. Scott Young at (603) 773-7240 if there are questions concerning these comments.
/ /
9 /ff ifrsl . j~
- ?2. . . /l/V~
/
e IY V~\
. "
Robert . HiJghes !
Direc r, ILfcensil1lg/~md Performance Improvement
,_/
I / '.,
Attachment
FPL Letter L-2008-222 Page 1 of 1 Attachment General Comments on Draft Revisions to 10CFR73, Criminal Penalties; Unauthorized Introduction of Weapons
- 1. Add a definition for the word "willful/willfully" [10 CFR 73.75 Posting; and 10 CFR 73.81 (c)(1 )]. Recommend text: "Willful--An intentional act which may include evidence of subterfuge, masking, or malevolent intent"
- 2. The text for required posting is identified in 10 CFR 73.75. The requirement states the text must be "readable day and night by both pedestrian and vehicular traffic..." Since the requirement is subjective, recommend specification of the size of the text to be used to ensure compliance.
