ML13203A082
| ML13203A082 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Purdue University |
| Issue date: | 07/18/2013 |
| From: | Joel Jenkins Purdue University Research Reactor |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML13203A082 (5) | |
Text
REPORT ON REACTOR OPERATIONS For the Period January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 PURDUE UNIVERSITY REACTOR-1 (PUR-1)
Facility Docket No. 50-182 PURDUE UNIVERSITY West Lafayette, Indiana 47907 Prepared by Jere Jenkins Facility Director
- 1. INTRODUCTION This report is submitted to meet the requirements set forth in the technical specifications of the Purdue University Reactor (PUR-1) and 10 CFR 50.59 for the period January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012.
- 2. PLANT DESIGN AND OPERATIONAL CHANGES 2.1 Facility Design Changes There were no design changes to the facility in 2012.
2.2 Performance Characteristics An series of extended unplanned maintenance outages were experienced at PUR-1 during the calendar year 2012. The reactor only available for operation for about 3 months of the year. No visual inspection of the fuel was performed in 2012 due to extended maintenance outages. Satisfactory performance of the fuel continued throughout the year.
2.3 Changes in Operating Procedures Concerning Safety of Facility Operations There were no changes to the operating procedures of the facility during 2012.
2.4 Results of Surveillance Tests and Inspections 2.4.1 Reactivity Limits The reactivity worths of the control rods were not in 2012 due to extended maintenance outages. The last measured values (in 2011) were as follows:
Shim-safety #1: 3.96%
Shim-safety #2: 2.19%
Regulating Rod: 0.229%
These values are consistent with previous reported values. The worth curves of the control rods were checked after the loading and the excess was determined to be 0.42%, and the shutdown margin was determined to be 1.77% based on these values.
The inspection of the control rods was attempted in November but aborted due to equipment malfunction, then pushed into 2013 due to extended maintenance outages in 2012.
2.4.2 Reactor Safety Systems Each pre-startup check included a channel test for each safety system, provided the shutdown exceeded 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> or if the system was repaired or de-energized.
Each reactor safety system had a channel check performed at time intervals of 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> during operation.
On 14 December 2012, the electronic calibration of all safety channels was completed.
The required 2012 irradiation of gold foils for a power calibration was delayed into the following calendar year due to the extended maintenance outage.
During the pre-startup, which precedes each run, the radiation area monitors and the continuous air monitor were checked for normal operation. During 2012, the calibration of the radiation area monitors was completed on 20 January and 25 July and the continuous air monitor was completed on 20 January and 25 July.
The rod drop times were not measured in 2012 due to the annual inspection being delayed into 2013. The last rod drop times (2011) fell between 550 and 602 milliseconds. These values are consistent with past measurements and are well within the specification limit of one second.
2.4.3 Primary Coolant System The weekly measurements of the pH of the primary coolant consistently gave readings between 4.7 and 5.4 during 2012. These values are within the specification limits of 5.5 +/- 1.0. During the weekly checks and the pre-startup check, which precedes each run, the conductivity of the primary coolant was measured and the values never exceeded 1.5 micromhos-cm. This represents a resistivity of more than 666,667 ohm/cm, which exceeds the lower limit of 330,000 ohm/cm as given in the specifications.
The specification of 13 feet of water was always either met or exceeded, according to the pre-startup checklist that was completed prior to each reactor run.
Monthly samples of the primary coolant were collected and analyzed by personnel from Radiological and Environmental Management for gross alpha and beta activity. No activity was identified in the samples, which would indicate failure of the fuel plates.
2.4.4 Containment Readings between 0.07 and 0.14 inches of water were recorded weekly for the negative pressure in the reactor room.
The semi-annual checks for the proper operation of the inlet and outlet dampers and the air conditioner were completed on July. All worked satisfactorily.
The annual inspection of the reactor did not take place in 2012 due to extended maintenance issues. Monthly testing of reactor coolant water was conducted. No evidence of fission products, which would have been the result of failed cladding, was found.
2.4.5 Experiments The mass of the singly encapsulated samples and the flux of the reactor are such that the complete release of all gaseous, particulate, and volatile components of the samples would not result in doses in excess of 10% of the equivalent annual doses as stated in 10 CFR 20.
No samples of unknown composition were irradiated in 2012.
2.5 Changes, Tests and Experiments Requiring Commission Authorization During 2012 no changes, or experiments, which required authorization from the Commission pursuant to 10 CFR 50.59 (a), were performed.
2.6 Changes in Facility Staff There were no changes to facility staff in 2012. The Reactor Supervisor position is still open.
- 3. POWER GENERATION Operation of the PUR-1 during 2012 consisted of 16 runs, which generated 43,366 watt-minutes of energy and covered an integrated running time of 5:23 hours.
- 4. UNSCHEDULED SHUTDOWNS
There were no unscheduled shutdowns in 2012
- 5. MAINTENANCE There were 7 instances of non-routine maintenance during the reporting period.
All involved standard like-for-like parts (I.C., relay, tube, input assembly and resistor) replacement, or substitution. All problems of this type can be expected in our aged equipment. No 10 CFR 50.59 related changes were made. The reactor room lights were replaced with high-efficiency lighting.
- 6. CHANGES, TESTS AND EXPERIMENTS No changes, tests or experiments were carried out without prior Commission approval pursuant to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.59 (b).
- 7. RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASES No measurable amount of radioactive effluent was released to the environs beyond our effective control, as measured at or prior to the point of such release.
- 8. OCCUPATIONAL PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE No radiation exposures greater than 25% of the appropriate limits of 10 CFR 20 were received during the reporting period.