Expresses Indignation That Facility Salt Water Tower,Which Will Emit 280 Lb Particulate/H,Is Even Being Considered When EPA Max Limit Is 30 Lb/H.Majority of Residents Object. Requests Assistance in Preserving Health & EnvironML19269C596 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
05000363 |
---|
Issue date: |
01/20/1979 |
---|
From: |
Jozwiak J AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
---|
To: |
Ohern D NEW JERSEY, STATE OF |
---|
References |
---|
NUDOCS 7902060195 |
Download: ML19269C596 (2) |
|
|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20209B4831999-06-25025 June 1999 Requests NRC Approval of Six Relief Requests from ASME Code Requirement for Containment ISI Exams.Six Relief Requests, Provided as Enclosures 1-6,are as Listed ML20235B3081987-09-21021 September 1987 Responds to FOIA Request for Documents,Including AEC to ACRS Forwarding Safety Evaluation Re Zimmer.App a Documents Cannot Be Located.App B Documents in Pdr.App C & D Documents Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) ML20235M4251987-07-13013 July 1987 Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents Re Acrs. Forwards Documents for Categories One & Three of FOIA Request.Review of 21 Addl ACRS Documents Continuing ML20126L3111985-07-22022 July 1985 Provides Further Update to 840330 Submission Re Soil Erosion Control & Stabilization Projects Per Insp Rept 50-363/80-02. Revegetation of Banks of Oyster Creek Divided Into Two Portions,W/Eastern Portion Completed in 1984 ML20087P5531984-04-0202 April 1984 Forwards Responses to 840307 Questions Re full-term OL Conversion Environ Review. Effects of Salt Drift on Land Dwelling Vertebrates & Terrestrial Environ Program Annual Rept,Mar 1978 - Feb 1979 Encl ML20084M2941984-03-30030 March 1984 Updates 820728 Response to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-363/80-02.Corrective Actions: Stabilization & Revegetation of Dredge Spoil Slope North of Firepond Completed on 830615 ML20077J0861983-07-20020 July 1983 Forwards Amended Complaint Filed in New Jersey Middlesex Superior Court by Jf Laird,Et Al & Companion Suit Filed by M Ginda & B Keene,Et Al Re Alleged Injuries Resulting from Identical Radiation Exposures ML20083P0791983-01-20020 January 1983 Responds to NRC Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-363/80-02.Corrective Actions:Soil Erosion Control Project at Barge Unloading Facility Completed ML20076B8331982-10-0404 October 1982 Forwards Info Resolving 14 Tech Spec Open Items Discussed at 820913 meeting.Marked-up Tech Specs Encl IR 05000363/19800021982-08-0909 August 1982 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-363/80-02 ML20062H7921982-07-28028 July 1982 Responds to NRC Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-363/82-02.Corrective Actions:Soil Stabilization Work Began 820504 & Should Be Complete by 820830 ML20004C7751981-04-23023 April 1981 FOIA Request for Psar,Drawings & Specs Re Facility ML20003G3121981-02-27027 February 1981 Responds to NRC 810203 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-363/80-02.Corrective Actions:Slope to Be Regraded & Contoured to Decrease Erosion Potential & Amount of Concentrated Rainwater Runoff Washing Slope ML20003A8131981-02-0505 February 1981 Submits Fee for Class III Request Re Delay on One Fire Protection Mod ML20003A9041981-02-0404 February 1981 Responds to NRC 810114 Ltr Re SEP Lead Topic Approach Proposed by SEP Owners Group.Licensee May Not Have Adequate Time to Comment on Safety Evaluation.Written Notification Will Be Provided to Request Addl Time ML19327A3271980-07-14014 July 1980 Informs That IE Bulletins,Circulars & Notices Requiring Review &/Or Response for Facility Are on Hold Due to Postponement of Const Activities.Current Action Files Maintained.Schedule of Responses Will Be Forwarded ML19309D0151980-04-0303 April 1980 Forwards Supplementary Financial Info in Support of TMI-1 Restart Proceedings ML20126D4901980-03-21021 March 1980 Responds to & 800104 Petition to NRC for Public Hearing Re Application for Extension of Cp.Opportunity for Public Hearing Should Be Afforded.Fr Notice of Opportunity Will Be Forwarded Upon Publication ML19320C8141980-03-11011 March 1980 Requests Documents Containing Info Needed for Fuel Cost Study ML19322E6141980-03-11011 March 1980 Responds to IE Bulletin 80-03 Re Visual Insps of Charcoal Adsorber Cells.Equipment of This Type Has Not Been Purchased to Date ML19296E0101980-03-0505 March 1980 Responds to IE Bulletin 79-28 Re Replacement of Top Cover Gaskets on Stem Mounted Limit Switches.Namco EA180 Switches Not Installed in safety-related Equipment Inside or Outside Containment.Assigned Electrical Equipment Being Purchased ML19294B1421980-02-20020 February 1980 Responds to NRC 791226 Ltr Re Estimated Evacuation Time for Plume Exposure Pathway Around Util.Evacuation Time Essentially Same as Oyster Creek,Submitted on 800131. Evacuation Time Estimate of 13.9-h Conservative ML19305C0101980-01-25025 January 1980 Opposes Protracted & Expensive Study of Jcp&L Financial Condition,W/Followup Hearings & Court Battles.Study Would Block Constructive Activity for Yrs.Consumers Will Pay for Delays.Ltr Dtd 800125 to Nj Ofc of Public Advocate Encl ML19257C1711979-11-28028 November 1979 Responds to NRC 791026 Ltr Re Violation Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-363/79-08.Corrective Actions:Venting of Air Bldg Per FSP-1-12,Revision 1,immediately Reinstituted.Field Personnel Instructed to Follow All Approved Procedures Until Revised ML19256F2701979-11-14014 November 1979 Responds to IE Bulletin 79-25, Reactor Trips at Turkey Point Units 3 & 4. No Electrical Equipment Purchased W/ Installed Westinghouse Bfd Relays.Will Request Ae to Identify Type Relays If Bfd Relays Selected ML19256E8251979-11-0707 November 1979 Requests Expansion of Environ Monitoring Program to Include Intensive Mortality Studies of Impinged & Entrained Organisms & Reduced Efforts Re Species Composition & Abundance Sampling ML19210D7121979-10-22022 October 1979 Responds to IE Bulletin 79-24, Frozen Lines. Heat Tracing & Freeze Protection Sys Design Incomplete ML19309H0281979-10-22022 October 1979 Requests Info Re Encl Freeholder RA Gasser 791009 Ltr Discussing s Van Ness Request to Suspend CP ML19254E8341979-09-28028 September 1979 Responds to IE Bulletin 79-23.Emergency Diesel Generator Field Exciter Transformer Not Yet Purchased.When Equipment Is Purchased,Util Will Ensure Design & Testing Meets Items 1 & 2 of Bulletin ML19254D1331979-09-27027 September 1979 Notifies That De Facto Continuation of CP Has Served to Exempt Facility from Complying W/Most up-to-date Safety Sys. Requests Public Hearings Re Safety Issues & Financial Qualifications ML19249D8641979-09-20020 September 1979 Responds to 790821 Ltr Re QA Program for Preservation of safety-related Equipment,Components & Structures During Suspension of Const Activities.Program Will Be in Accordance W/General Requirements of QA Plan ML19254E0631979-09-20020 September 1979 Responds to NRC 790823 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-363/79-07.Corrective Actions:Preventative Svc & Storage Program Procedures & QA Surveillance Program Procedures Revised ML19249D5201979-08-24024 August 1979 Responds to IE Bulletin 79-15, Deep Draft Pump Deficiencies. Facility Design Currently Employs Vertical Turbine Pumps in Nuclear Svc Water Sys only.As-built Vendor Data Not Yet Available ML20126C5091979-08-16016 August 1979 Opposes Restart of TMI-1,const of Nuclear Plants in Nj & Nuclear Accidents Due to Health Hazards & Risks to Public Safety ML19242A7021979-07-30030 July 1979 Requests Deferment of NRC Action on 780831 Request for Extension of Facility Completion Date.Financial Effects Stemming from TMI-2 Incident Will Preclude Recommencement of Const ML19249A4981979-07-30030 July 1979 Responds to IE Bulletins 79-02 & 79-02 Revision 1,re Pipe Support Base Plate Designs Using Concrete Expansion Anchor Bolts.Pipe Support Base Plate Designs Are Not in Use at Plant ML19242C7061979-07-30030 July 1979 Responds to IE Bulletin 79-14 Re Seismic Analysis for as-built safety-related Piping Sys.No safety-related Piping Sys at Plant ML19225A8601979-07-13013 July 1979 Confirms 790713 Telcon Requesting Summary of NRC Meeting W/Util Re Renewal of Facility CP ML19242B2051979-06-29029 June 1979 Forwards C-E 790608 Ltr Responding to IE Bulletins 78-12, 12A & 12B Re Atypical Weld Matl in Reactor Pressure Vessel Welds ML19242B2921979-06-25025 June 1979 Responds to IE Bulletin 79-11 Re Use of Westinghouse DB-50 & DB-75 Circuit Breakers in safety-related Sys.No Circuit Breakers of This Type Have Been Purchased ML19242B2141979-06-0808 June 1979 Forwards C-E Rept, Info Requested by IE Bulletin 78-12, Atypical Weld Matl in Reactor Pressure Vessel Welds, & Certification That All Matls Used in Reactor Vessel Fabrication Are Discussed in Rept ML19241A7901979-06-0606 June 1979 Responds to IE Bulletin 79-07.Version of Adlpipe Computer Program Which Includes Algebraic Summation Technique Has Been Used for Final Design of Support for Containment Spray Sys ML19246B9371979-06-0606 June 1979 Partially Responds to IE Bulletin 78-12B Re Atypical Weld matl.C-E Will Submit Generic Rept to NRC by 790608.Final Response Will Be Provided by 790629 ML19242B4201979-05-29029 May 1979 Responds to IE Bulletin 79-03 Re Weld Defects in 304 or 312 Stainless Steel Pipe Spools.Spools Used in Containment Penetrations M-43 & M-44.Corrective Actions:Welds Radiographed & Defects Repaired ML19289F4581979-05-0101 May 1979 Responds to IE Bulletin 79-04.Swing Check Valves Not Installed in Facility ML19289F4571979-05-0101 May 1979 Responds to IE Bulletin 79-09.No GE Type AK-2 Circuit Breakers Purchased to Date ML19289F6141979-04-20020 April 1979 Responds to NRC 790312 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-363/79-02.Corrective Actions:Initiation of Program for Daily Monitoring of Equipment Pressurized W/Inert Gas ML19256F4131979-04-0909 April 1979 Notifies of Concern Over Use of Nuclear Generation & Operating Similarities in Design of TMI-2 & Other Nuclear Units.Requests Meeting W/Nrc to Identify Strategy to Reduce Probability of TMI-incident at Facility ML19289F2061979-03-15015 March 1979 Responds to NRC 781214 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-363/78-15.Corrective Actions:Theodolite Was Serviced & Two Tachometers Sent for Recalibr ML20104A7271979-03-0505 March 1979 Forwards Design Info,Submittal 2,Structural Reorientation, W/Current Design Features Reflecting New Licensing Concerns of post-CP Period 1999-06-25
[Table view] Category:EXTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML19269C5961979-01-20020 January 1979 Expresses Indignation That Facility Salt Water Tower,Which Will Emit 280 Lb Particulate/H,Is Even Being Considered When EPA Max Limit Is 30 Lb/H.Majority of Residents Object. Requests Assistance in Preserving Health & Environ 1979-01-20
[Table view] Category:EXTERNAL LETTERS ROUTED TO NRC
MONTHYEARML19269C5961979-01-20020 January 1979 Expresses Indignation That Facility Salt Water Tower,Which Will Emit 280 Lb Particulate/H,Is Even Being Considered When EPA Max Limit Is 30 Lb/H.Majority of Residents Object. Requests Assistance in Preserving Health & Environ 1979-01-20
[Table view] |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:a ','. SD - %3 January 20, 1979 R.R. # 1 Box 155J Waretown, New Jersey 08758 Commissioner Daniel J. O'Hern Department of Environmental Protection P.O. Box 1390 {g ji Trenton, New Jersey 08625 J J RE: PROPOSED SALT WATER COOLING TOWER
Dear Sir,
I am writing to you with ref erence to the proposed salt water tower to be errected in Forked River Generating Station.
It is my understanding that the Department of Environmental Protection has set a regulation of a maximum of 30 lbs. of particulate which may be emitted from any plume.
The new Salt Water Tower, as proposed, will emit 280 lbs. of particulate per hour, causing numerous health hazards, destruction of vegetation, property corrosion; such as destruction of aluminim siding, automobiles, etc., and possible cloramine toxins which may 'ae produced in the olure and be emitted into the air.
Since the Department of Environmental Protection has already set a maximum limit of 30 lbs. of particulate per hour which lawfully can be emitted into the air; why should these rgations even permit this water tower to be considered, when it is a known fact thi.t the new tower will emit 280 lbs. of particulate per hour and which would destroy our local environment.
Within recent months, numerous town meetings have been held, and it has been made ouite apparent that the majority of residents in the immediate area of the po :ar plant have strong objections to the construction of this new Salt Water Tower, primarily because this would be the FIRST TU.lER errected of it's kind which uses SALT WATER for cooling.
However, during the course of these meetings, the Nuclear Power Plant representatives smugly answer the questions the residents are seriously asking, by stating that there are currently numerous cooliny towers now operating causing no ill side effects; however, NOT k OF THESE TOWERS ALREADY IN OPERATION USES SALT WATER FOR COOLING.
THIS WOULD BE THE FIRST ONE OF IT'S KIND.
There is presently a Fresh Water Cooling Tower in Pennsylvania which currently has many legal suits now pending againsi, it, due to the affects caused by the emission of water, in cold weather, that freezes and ruins some of the surrounding vegetation, breaking limbs on trees, etc., none of these effects havina been investigated prior to the tower being errected. When questioned regarding these ill environmental effects ncw taking place with use of the Fresh Water Tower, New Jersey JCP&L states that a situation such as this does not exist. However, we know differently from eye-witness accounts of personnel that actually worked on this tower,itself.
79020601TE Q
*
, .
Also, there has never been a Medical Dotter present at any of the town meetings regardinq the Salt Water Tower, to advise what affect this emission of salt into the air would have on the human body.
It is also most disturbing that President Carter has appropriated millions of dollars to the State of New Jersey to preserve the pine lands. Why then, is this tower being imposed when it would dastroy the pine lands, New Jersey JCPAL has already stated that they will need to cut into the pine lands for their transmission lines, which will be added, once the new Salt Water Tower is built.
In the January 13, 1979 edition of the Asbury Park Press, it was printed that JCP&L Nuclear Plant faces a $26,000.00 fine for alleged violations that are a THREAT TO PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY, and to the physical security progran; these restrictions being imposed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Why should a Company like JCPAL be charged with these offenses if they operate as efficiently as they clain? We all know that radioactivity is very dangerous to the human body; yet they do not makE any dttempt to measure or linit concentrations of airborn radioactivity, As questior.. by residents are nacified by the renrerentatives of JCP&L, the impression lef t is that there is no doubt that the pronosed salt Water tower will be built, and that there is nothing we can do to nrevent it.
Therefore, "!e ask for your assistance in this matter, with the hope that State Regulations will be upheld and that human, animal, and niant life will take precedent over corporate expansion, This is a most serious problem for us livina in this immediate ai i, and we ask for your help in preserving our environment and health, I thank you for your early reply, and I remain, SINCERELY, ,
_
k [[
JOHN E. J0ZWIAK Concerned Citizen Ocean County cc: Governor Byrne Environmental Protection Aqency - Secy, of th Interior vNuclear Regulatory Conuission Editer & Chief - Asbury Park P.ess s n f' >
-
e' 1
...
.}}