ML18089A048
| ML18089A048 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 03/30/2018 |
| From: | NRC |
| To: | NRC/NRO/DNRL/LB4 |
| References | |
| Download: ML18089A048 (4) | |
Text
Vogtle PEmails From: Hoellman, Jordan Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 8:46 AM To: Vogtle PEmails
Subject:
SNC Responses to ICN/UIN Comment Status Sheet Attachments: UIN ICN comment status sheet for March 22 with responses.pdf Attached are SNCs responses to the staffs comments on ICN/UINs discussed at the public meeting on 3/29/2018.
1
Hearing Identifier: Vogtle_COL_Docs_Public Email Number: 243 Mail Envelope Properties (SN6PR09MB2608B3617680D3D3A66E6B1DD5A10)
Subject:
SNC Responses to ICN/UIN Comment Status Sheet Sent Date: 3/30/2018 8:46:24 AM Received Date: 3/30/2018 8:46:27 AM From: Hoellman, Jordan Created By: Jordan.Hoellman2@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Vogtle PEmails" <Vogtle.PEmails@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: SN6PR09MB2608.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 117 3/30/2018 8:46:27 AM UIN ICN comment status sheet for March 22 with responses.pdf 91334 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:
VOGTLE ICN/UIN ISSUES TRACKING SHEET ICN Date ITEM # TOPIC ITAAC INDEX # ISSUE Licensee Comment UIN 3/20 1 UIN Component 459, 72, 91, 13, These UINs credit completion of the ITAAC for The consolidated ASME UINs that SNC has been hydrostatic 220, 120, 431 hydrostatic testing of the ASME Section III submitting since Jan are formatted differently than the test and DRAFT 159 components listed in the various tables using the version that was discussed at the Dec 12 tabletop. The vendors hydrostatic test of the components. The 2018 ASME UIN submittals (459, 72, 91, 13, 220, 120, staff previously rejected the ICNs submitted by 431, DRAFT 159) utilize the specific NEI template SNC that credited completion of this ITAAC by component/piping wording in their entirety in the using the ASME required vendor hydrostatic test submittal while the version discussed at the tabletop of the components. These ITAAC are for the as- combined the component and piping discussions.
built system hydrostatic test required by the code Specifically, for UIN 13: the first 3 paragraphs in the prior to placing the system in service. Acceptance Criteria 4.a) and 4.b) discussion is the text directly from the NEI D-28 template for component hydro testing. The next 3 paragraphs in 4.a) and 4.b) are the exact text from NEI template D-31 for piping hydro.
The final paragraph (also from the NEI D-31 template) summarizes that the code data reports will contain the results of the component and piping hydro testing per the ASME code requirements.
3/20 2 UIN RCS design 13 The staff wants to understand the purpose of the The footnote in Attachment B was added to clarify and note below Table Attachment B. UFSAR Section where the ASME III 1989 Edition Code is required in the constructed 5.2.1.1 is applicable to all RCPB components and RCS piping lines. The RCS system follows the 1998 piping. Therefore, the note below Table Edition, 2000 Addenda and the 1989 Edition where Attachment B is confusing as it appears to be required. In the RCS system, there is only one line where pertaining only to RCS-L069A/B. In addition, the the 1989 Edition is applicable so that is the line structure of the note also appears to imply that designated by a + in the Attachment B table.
the 1989 Addenda to the 1989 Edition of the ASME Section III Code can be used for socket We are proposing to re-word the footnote to state:
welded connections, which is contradictory to + For girth fillet welds between piping and socket UFSAR Section 5.2.1.1 welded fittings, valves and flanges, refer to VEGP UFSAR Section 5.2.1.1 (Reference x).
1
3/20 3 UIN Functional DRAFT 159 The Tier 1 definition of inspection includes SNC noted the ITA for ITAAC 159 is different from the capability inspections of reports/documents. The ITAACs other ITAAC for piping functional capability. ITAAC 159 acceptance criteria requires that a report exists specifies an inspection will be performed verifying and conclude the piping maintains functional functional capability while the other ITAAC for functional capability. The IDB is clear the inspection was of a capability specify an inspection will be performed for the report based on the as-built piping system existence of a report verifying functional capability.
following its inspection and reconciliation with design requirements. Accordingly, this satisfies RESOLVED and discussed on 03.22.18 public call.
the requirements of the ITA and AC.
3/21 4 UIN Environme 98 The completion description for part 6d.i (non SNC will add the additional sentence Additional ntal class 1E section) does not reference the USFAR information about the methods used to qualify electrical Qualificati like the class 1E section does, and like the other penetrations supplied for the AP1000 is provided in the on UINs for harsh EQ. We have previously indicated UFSAR Appendix 3D (Reference 6) to Acceptance the need to provide the reference to where in Criteria i) (non class 1E).
the UFSAR the qualification info is located.
Since UIN 98 is already slated for resubmittal to provide a revised table (Attachment), the above change will also be incorporated in the resubmittal version.
2