ML18152B358

From kanterella
Revision as of 12:50, 23 January 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits Response to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-280/98-201 & 50-281/98-201.Corrective Actions:Visual Insps Were Completed on Accessible Coatings Inside Containment for Both Units 1 & 2
ML18152B358
Person / Time
Site: Surry  
Issue date: 10/14/1999
From: CHRISTIAN D A
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
50-280-98-201, 50-281-98-201, 98-300C, NUDOCS 9910290193
Download: ML18152B358 (2)


See also: IR 05000280/1998201

Text

\I */ VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23261 October 14, 1999 United States Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

Attention:

Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Gentlemen:

VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 RESPONSE TO SURRY PLANT DESIGN INSPECTION

Serial No. NL&OS/SLW

  • Docket Nos. License Nos. NRC INSPECTION

REPORT NOS. 50-280/98-201

AND 50-281/98-201

INSPECTION

ITEM 98-201-20, UNQUALIFIED

COATINGS 98-300C R1' 50-280 50-281 DPR-32 DPR-37 In letter Serial No.98-300 dated July 9, 1998, Virginia Power provided a preliminary

scope of work to address design inspection

item 9.8-201-20.

As part of that scope, Virginia Power performed

an initial assessment

of coatings inside containment

at the Surry Power Station. The evaluation

clarified

the licensing

basis for coatings, established

coating debris zones of influence, identified

quantities

and locations

of unqualified

or indeterminate

coatings for the significant

majority of items within the zones of influence, and evaluated

the impact of coating debris on NPSH margin and sump performance.

Additionally, visual inspections

were completed

on accessible

coatings inside containment

for both Units 1 and 2. The assessments

of zones of influence

and impact of coating debris on NPSH margin and sump performance

are considered

preliminary.

The need for further analysis will be assessed following

the additional

guidance that is expected as a result of the ongoing research being done by the NRG Office of Research on inside containment

coating. As an interim and conservative

measure, Virginia Power elected to encapsulate, * repair, or remove degraded coatings identified

during the visual inspections

that are within the area of concern surrounding

the containment

sump. In addition, Virginia Power completed

a self-assessment

of its nuclear coatings program. Enhancements

identified

in the self-assessment

are being implemented

to strengthen

the control and maintenance

of qualified

coatings.

Upon issuance of further guidance from the NRG, Virginia Power will perform any additional

evaluations

that are required.

Very truly yours, David A. Christian

Vice President

-Nuclear Operations

9910290193

991014 PDR ADOCK 05000280 G PDR -I

'\ . * * * cc: US Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

Region II Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, S.W., Suite 23T85 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Mr. R. A. Musser NRC Senior Resident Inspector

Surry Power Station