ML13039A050
ML13039A050 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Issue date: | 02/07/2013 |
From: | Diec D T Division of Security Policy |
To: | Kline D Nuclear Energy Institute |
Diec D | |
Shared Package | |
ML13042A159 | List: |
References | |
NEI 06-06, Rev 6 | |
Download: ML13039A050 (1) | |
Text
From: Diec, David Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 10:36 AM To: dk@nei.org; NSIR_DSP Document Processing Resource Cc: Harris, Paul; Huyck, Doug
Subject:
NEI 06-06 rev 6 public meeting Attachments: Enclosure 2 - NEI 06-06 Rev 6_post 10-31-12 meeting_GT redline-strikeout_dave correction 1313.docx; 665p NEI 06-06 rev 6.doc Hi Dave, I want to give you a staff-review update on NEI 06-06, revision 6. As Paul Harris
communicated with you re: staff comments on the revision 6 during your previous drop-in (12/10/12), we subsequently briefed and got an alignment with our division management on the path forward for this document. I want to get your thought on the proposed one day (9:00a.m. - 4:30 p.m.) public working meeting session to go over specific staff comments later this month.
Our next step is to achieving a resolution for the revision 6 before initiating the regulatory guide development process. Please let me know at your earliest opportunity the date and who will be participating in this meeting.
Attached is our redline/strikeout comments on the revision 6. It is intended to help you facilitate your proposed meeting date with the staff to resolve our comments. These red redline/strikeout comments will be included as part of the public meeting notice once when we finalized the meeting date with you.
Lorena/Yvonne
Pls put this email and attachment in ADAMS. Note: form 665p is included above.
Best Regards
David Diec Sr. Program Manager NSIR/DSP/SPSB 301-415-2834 The information in this response is provided as a public service and solely for informational purposes and is not, nor should be deemed as, an official NRC position, opinion or guidance, or "a written interpretation by the General Counsel," on any matter to which the information may relate. The opinions, representations, positions, interpretations, guidance or recommendations which may be expressed by the NRC technical staff responding to an inquiry are solely the NRC technical staff's and do not necessarily represent the same for the NRC. Accordingly, the fact that the information was obtained through the NRC technical staff will not have a precedential effect in any legal or regulatory proceeding.