ML061980115
| ML061980115 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 01/27/2004 |
| From: | Teator J NRC/OI |
| To: | Barber G, Vito D NRC/OI |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2005-0194 | |
| Download: ML061980115 (1) | |
Text
n*,fi~~j iSALiEM JjfTdatcfr #jj*jdj.I#
=d %IOd*.d d SJ CH[2014VALVE
- #-t to*Z d X +1 #1 &1~iSSJE
+d IIIIIIIIIdIAdddIa14#
jZ*#+ IdI 1d~ ~ Zd.%#.%1
- 1. 1 #.1#f4 I+ 01+0# # ##+ 0 #I +f d "#I +11.d 111 of1 '. I,it1#ldttdEd,, to*t~d'fit1##1##0~
, 0-If d# #10-Id# %I+d L'd#
- a a aa aVda aa a ad * .ca I C *i a a a Ed a
, e d 'aa4 S a la e a a a a a aa d.a aaa ad a a d d a a a a a ad Ca a.
From: Jeffrey Teator I0 To: David Vito; Scott Barber Date: 1/27/04 11:51AM
Subject:
SALEM SJ CHECK VALVE ISSUE Dave, Steve Pindale and I Interviewedon 2 issues on 1/22/04. During the SCWE portior, of the intervie aid that he believes the Salem SJ valves in question were declared operable (after leaking was detected) without a sound technical basis oes not believe the conservative thing was done and he does not believe that technical specification compliance was met with how they handled the issue. §said that at artificial island, Operations made operability conclusions and pressure/pushback on the SJ valve issue came froI Specifically old 1that they were not in tech spec compliance on this issue an responded tha.
engineering had done an evaluation - and pushed back o fte*!aft told him he believe It was inoperable.
Eileen and I heard a similar concern raised regarding these valves by Saler Wkwii during a 12/16/03 interview. We have now heard this from 2 high level sources - with th transcript indications that there may have been a violation of tech specs. I will not receive for about 10 days - but wanted to get this info to you so that a formal determination can be made thru the allegation process on whether a violation occurred here. If it did, there are clear indications from estimony that it is potential deliberate misconduct Jeff CC: Eileen Neff; Ernest Wilson Informati0o: in this record was deleted inaccordance wyit the Freedom of Information Act, exemptions .C.:
(V L "--