ML19329F620

Responds to AEC 720107 Request for Comments Re Des.Rept Illustrating Need for Facility Encl

ML19329F620
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	02/09/1972
From:	Phillips T FLORIDA POWER CORP.
To:	Rogers L US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML19329F616	List: ML19329F615 ML19329F617 ML19329F618 ML19329F619 ML19329F620 ML19329F621 ML19329F622 ML19329F623 ML19329F624 ML19329F625
References
NUDOCS 8007030408
Download: ML19329F620 (7)

Text

.__

'e m . .

'j Y- ..

,; ;--- r. , . , , }.y . .a. . .. +- - . . -

, ( Q **F , y . d H. 8,* .

FiCDF.rtAL PC.n 's COMI.1:0310 !

W/.:mt:4nro:4. D.C. 201'G IN ferrt.Y T43.FCft tot .

Fall-Ei; I .' gy ?.

c ~ s ~s Mr. J im ter R(f.cra i....

~

.'o

c .

I (o s

Director,'1)!vinica of Radiological u. # "~ L ' ; 0 ,'.i and Envirou.tcuI:1 Pretcction gr s .. .. ,

• ", C 3 ,,.- .

U. S . At. r; e 1:aer;;-f Coctrii s r. ion v-  ! c.* t- */

W'*' ' #

t a:,hington, D. C. 20545

Dear Mr. Rop,

crs:

This is in respouse to your 1ctter of Ja.w.ary 7, ll)72, requenting, th co:aacnts of the Pcdcral Pouer. C<c,xnist ica on t.hc M.C'r. Draf t Detailed Siate:neut on Envircar..cntal Con..iderations Related La th.: Propoced I;.suance of a Construction Permi.t to the Consuucr:. Po..*cr Co.4pany for the Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2.

The encivned staf C repos.t prepared by the Connicsion's Murcan of Pouer evaluates the ;:etter neeris to be served by the facility; the availability of replacc :aut power fro.t others, if any; and the costs of such replacemaat poucr.

The report ille:strates the need for the :-;i.dlend Units 1 cud .

- 2 to provide an additional 1,301 : ecavatts of capacity for macting peak loads in years 1977 and 1978 on the Applicant's system and t.hc Michigan Pir.icr Pool which includes the Applicant. ,,

Very truly yours, n ..  !*

f **, )';&,N /;k. * *.ast'*

gfj T. A. Phillips

- c.

,> Chief, Eureau of Pouer s, .l. .I.'.l(/ ,-

..e ,- ., y.

Enclosurc IQ,, .%' .. . ,-

Staff report on the 7 ~

c. i .b . .

Midicad Plant, Units  ! *.i.  ! ,f. . , <. /-

1 and 2 a H{ *.-~ 7' t, ::s s- 4 ',<.,,j< ; .

-\ -

, w a w;Q'. . ,.* .- .

+.

, # N. . t

.. .. l l

. / s'd

/, 't' ;1 *. .s,it . . .. l-8007080 'Mi

.; . .j

.~ t--**-***

' f. ^%.

' ,. s:* .- .

1 '

/: *

/b-

.l.. . s... -,

• r

.f.. g.-

t..... .  ? , .> .-

PE1EilAh PtMER CO:';tISSION

\t U. . /.s

..'s , ff kh ' /./ . /s;/

k./ ),

s.m --

liUREAU OF FCUCR . ' - */

~R{ . _ , ( C. (W Report on the Midland Pinut Units No. 1 and No. 2 --

in Rulation to Pcr/cr !!cedo of Consuncrs Po::cr Co r.pany cnd the Nichi;u.a Poucr Pool O.. .Tanuncy 7,15//2, the Direct.c. , Divicion ' of nn liolen'icci ar.d

):nviro:r.:: ate.1 Pcetret ion, U. S. Ato.iic Energy Cor.r.insion rer;vc::ted the cc:. wen t <

of t he Pede.:r.1 Power Cc:s.:i::nica on AEC's Drnft Dctciiud State-ucnt on KuvJ ron..:2nt al Con:.iderations Rclated to the P: opot.cd Insucnce of a Constre.ction Perr.dt to the Consu:.. crc Powcr Coa.peny for th5 Midland Plnnt, Unit 1 and 2.

These cot:.1.:nt: update thou nubmitted by the Peacral Po.7cr Conraission on Sept.;cher 23, 1970. We u..dny:t.m::1 froa cas.licr cc,rrccpondence cud enviro::cattal docmranta filed by the Applicant thct the environr: ntal c:.pectn of i:hir, picnc : rc currently underp,oi.ng suppler sacal analysin in which tho M;C viches to considcc such fcetors as: the offect of delnya ,

in facilit.y operction upoa '

i necdu to be nerved by the

~"d ic int erent, particularly the pc icr

,, the cynilability of citernativa i acurece, if cuy, to :nct

.a der.'anda .on c tiraely baci.s ; and delay

{t costs to th: 1.icensec cud to couruit.cra. Thus, our cea=:.:ats cro directed to -th: i.c po!ntn in a rci/ica of the need for tha ft.cility cs conce:ra the

' cdequacy end relivbilJ ty of the Appliccut'c clectric sy:: tem can tha

-Michi;'.cn Pc.:er. Pcel, e cubrec,ioa of the E::ct Central Area heliability Cevucil O: CAR) of which the Applicant is a :.nr.hcr. This is in cecordt.nec

.with tb %tional Enviro:wcatal Policy Act of ;969 and the Guidelinc of the Pre 3id nt's Cocncil on Environ:.: ental Canlit.y dcted April 23, 1971.

-lu propering this report, t$c Burcou of Pciter st.cff has considered the AEC's Dccit Datailed St.ctement.; .the Applict.nt's Enviro:nr.cutal Report and Sup;>1euent thereto; the Monthly Pcaer State::ents cuh:nitted to this Comincion by th? Applicant; ralcted reports t.. ado in response to the Cor.r iu::iva's Sectccient of. Policy n Adequocy cad Rc1!.chility of Electric Service (Order no. 383-2); cod the FPC stcff's indcpendent analysis of thcse docu::.: uts together uith related infornetion from. other FPC reports.

y!eed for th' Pacilition The l11d'hmd Plcnt vill have tuo units. The 486-mencurtt Unit 1 is schet'uled for co:rcrercial service in early 1977, and the 815-megavatt Unit 2 it. reheduled for co::::cretal service in ently 1970. In additioa to :the plant. 's 'ulectric~ out.put, the Midicud Plant is decinned to furnish 4,050,0'"i Cu.pc. v. ent'.c per l. cup of precces sec..:.: for cel.. to the Dz Ci n-d e..1 ^

-~

s =py c t,. c.

• P

, .. ' ~ " "

F

, n.

,s $,.* '

'ibe fulle..-l.y: tahals: tion t,0<.t t h.: c h.c t ri: :,yr t:.a loads t o be rect . e? by ..;:e / ppl icct.t sat.1 th Ilichir, n Po.fer Pe:.1 'a chici tim. / ppliccat in a i.2./,er, na,! the reic:

smit , to t he .

Je:h i" of t!'a ch.c' . jOe c 1 o.n.put of the l' idle.nd

.r.. ele z er erv.: c r.pr.cif ics on f.L<. trint r.v pc Af uy- /.p;ilicat 's v ed L .. :.or: :: c -p., ;ic..,,

1977-7D s nt.r, th: M7G ctu.

heal 's .;yr. tc..a t t th:. tit. : of t ive i t'77 rw 2:c , the Co.u.on . ra P..

r . n : thc.17/ r:-79 t:Ir.t ne pet.h per ioh. The er Cte .;p. r.y .:nri Pc.cr Po..). fr.c per ': lor d p rio::s unntioned Detroit Ed!r.ca Cr ronic co;. . rite Ll.c Michigen i:rc t ha ca.t!.cipated initit 1 rcryice pcrieda of the n c.r unit.s, but tha lif:n of t' 2r 6:cita 1:; c::pected to be son. 3's yera er t are, :.cd t hey cec c::pecte/. ta ec.'.t.itut e a pro-per t. i oac.1 p ;r t ot the Applictr.t ' , : ';t a l i.e.no/n tin c:.pc. cit'/ throur,hout thc.t p: r. 9d.

Therefore, t hey vili ha depended um,a tra cupply pct. c.r to utect future deconds ovct : p;:riod of ..nay yci.rn 14.ycud t he initial service need:s diceusscJ in this r;,pos:t.

1977 Stur. r Per.h I.oed Peric d Censur. Orc Detroit Michigan Pt .? cr }:dison Pu.te r Com.nny

- ~ . _ .C_o_r_.,ne n y Pool '

With MJdi:nJ bait ?!o . 1 (l. !:r. e c.. r..e t : ::)

et 0.'; end:.u l t C:.;r city, Megtuctts 7,635 10,702 Peck 1.ual,1:q;: vat t 18,417 5, (. . (;1/ 8,7402./

Mer.er v:. M .rgi n, lac. a t t ,

14,3503 /

2,025 2,042 4,067 Kesetvc P. rgit., hrecnt of Pcah Locd 35.1 23.4 26.3 Witheat r.;dland Unit ?!a. 1

_ (4cp M- e..rts)

Met Dept.nciable C.>pccity, M cc.iatts 7,149 Peck Load,1:,ccustts 10,782 17,931 5,6101/ 8,7402,/ 3 Recerve Mar,:ia, W3 mntts 1,539 34,339,,,/

Reserve Margin, Percent of Ped: Lo: d 2 ,0',2 3,581 27.4 23.4 25.0 1/ liteib' .; uct ?.a l e s O f 50 L;0,S,s.t/t t t s .

2,/ Re< uced by not purchases CO,'i ti:2.e.uta t t s .

1/ Keduced by net purchases 555 tre;suctts.

-l 9

l l

9

. q . ' . - . - - . . . - . . . . . . . . . , . . . ~ . . . . .

4 .

. A "-

3

^

1977-741 \!!r.tw. Penh Pe~ !od f -

Consu:c::m D stroit 1:irchigem Power 1;dicoa Po or <

C owu:n.} C ria.newf ~ =-Pool I

l!.I ( h Mid1 a.i l U.. 2.t ::o. 1 . ,

(41:6 ::~.,c ::..:' :) -_ .

!!e t -ikpenda.,)e C.' . . city, ::agmia tto 7,635 10,762 18,417 Pech 1. cad, ::, c. .u.t.; a 5,6401/ 8,325 14,1651/

R c :.c rv. Mar:31n, ;:wm:tts 1,795 2,457 4,252 1:cacrve Ihrcin,1:. recut of l'er.k Lord 30,7 29.5 '30.0 1?ithout Midlend ihit No. I (s y.s. s ....,.. , . . . t. ...s,,.,_,

. ..r -

9 .

Het D.:pa.idchle C:preity, 'Med. watts 7 , 14 9 10,702 17,931 Pech Lo .d, ::.w..trtu: 5,84 01j 8,325 14,1651/

Re:wrve Ibegin, :: .: c.. tac ts. 1,309 2,457 3,766 Rest.rve bre.in, l'orcent of Per.h Lot.d 22.4 29.5 26.6 a

71ucludes n :t cc.lce of 50 u23cesets.

l

,i . -1978 Sur.-

.cr Peak 1. cad Period . - - -

Concuir.crs D:t roit. Michigen Pea.ic r I:dicon Pc.icr Cor;1gny Cor nen / Pool liit:a 1:1<114 ad Uni tt Nos. 1 & 2

_ Q ,30) r .ar. .-t t:0 -

Net De. pend: bic Cepecity, Megatacts 10,762 19,?32 l

Peck Lond, Mc3c,1ctts 8,450,/

6,451: 8,93C3j 15,381Af Receeve Marrin, Pg:..eatts 1,999 1,052 3,851 i

Reserve :::rLin, Percent of Peak Load 31.0 20.7 i 25.0 liithcot Mt.dlcud Units I:os. 1 & 2 *

( 1,3 01_ .m. .. .: ra t M..

Nei: D.*pendabla Cc;.acit y, Megmretts 7,149 10,702 17,931 l

' Penh 1.osd, Mo.;.aw; tu 6,451?:/ 8,9303 / 15,381N Her.erve 1: art:in, F .gu.er.tts 698 1,052 2,550 neserve 1hrcin, Percent of Pat.k Load 10.8 20.7 16.6 Applicant's Stot ed Mceded Reserve M uatt . (18 percent of paah lor.d)lI ega- 1,161 1,607 2,763 Her.erve Defleicacy, M<.;;:.we.tts 463 _ 218

.gf . . .. .; 3.  ;- . .. .

.  ; . .a e c. i t.: .: . e ser t ;. W K,purcca.: of par k lor.d r.. ce:,;s..ry to. .i. st.::n adequcto aya ter.: relichili;y.

2 / 1scludc.a act r.aica of.4813 ccchatta.  : '

S / 1.e::uc ed Ly ' net purcht.sen 1.125 rr 3ge;;atta. - ,

t

}//1; t educed by uct purchor;co 644 taesonitta. ,

. ~ -

. ,c

s. .

a. . .R r l

,4- . .

l -

l':78-79 U ini er P: .th Pt rir 1 Conanacrs Datroit Ifichigan Po'er Edir.on Pe.tcr

! .c.c..m.e,s e n y C w.v.e v Pool Ilit h ::idien 1 Uoita ::on. IL 6 2 i

f1.W. ?.t. .rc t i r,)

j ,

l liet Depc .d ble Crpmicy, Mc3.,ratts 8,450 10,782 19,232 Pen 1.ond , Lr.r.rr t rv 6,6911/ 8,835 15,5261/

nencava :::qdn, M a . rates 1,759 1,947 3,706 Re.terve 1.rirgin, Petcent of Peak Lot.d 26.3 2230 23.9

! Without M:dler..I linite Nos. 1&2 '

l

-,301 (1  : * :r ::.t t d

• l i;ct D:pendabic Cepecity, Megnv Ltc 7 ,149 10,782 17,931 l Pe t.h t wd , 1:e3.wo t t : 6,6911/ 0,835 15.5201/

! Reacrve it rnin, lin.: actto 450 1,947 2,405 l

\

necorve 1:4r;.in, Percent of Pe.:h Load 6.8 22.0 15.0~

Applier:nt ':, Statut li.'edc d Re:; cree, Maga-er.t t: (10 pcrecut <.f pcnh lodd) 1,204 1,590 2,795 lu cerve 1:criciency, M ;nwart; 746 --

390 t

1/ Includes nat 8aled of 4S1 2.n;:cwatts.

The ndeeuacy' cad reliebility of the Applicent't. cyctem and tha Detroit Ed;; on Cr,.g. cay's systo.., sihich corprisc. th' Mich.' gen Pcr.?cr Pool l

are increct.ingly depandent uten the tir.oly cad conti:v.ed operation of luene i.ccl.a.;r units. The 3,.'.50 :.ge. stts of cepecity the Applicent pit.n; to have in cparation to ::cet the 1978-79 winter pcck includei

the tuo liidland units, totaling 1,'301

q;x.rctts , and the 700-m3cuate Pal;r:ndos eni:..

The 2,00.1 ::: ;uicces., of capacity of these three units reprer.c nt. 73.7 Parcent of tha Applicant's gencrctfng capacity. Ecccuse '

of th: reint ive efficiencies cad econo::lic; of sce.lc in the' oporation of . thene .1e rgo unitn , it '.reuld n:t h; nc.ren.1 to c::pec t these units to-be schede;cd o.:t -oi-curvice for roatinq or norr.acl r.s.intenanco during t hace p.rlods, enartcquently the for:ced .outa3e of .ny of these units durin:: th.nc periods han a p; oportionally 1.:rco effcet upon the system's ths.lity to wit.hntand second or third con:.Juc.encics. '.Jhc 31.0 percent (1,9t'9 mg.r.inttc) reserve margin the Applicant indic sten for the 1973 nuatur pech is cc...pletely vested in the .two Midiat.d units and the Palisades unit.

- .- .. ._ -. ~ - -_ . _ . -. . ._ -

u

. s .

t. .

. .. E

, h ::idr;g;m p<.. ar pool 'c 197a pinnned espabili t y of 19,232 n.est..it.tts includes ebaut 10,I:!.1 u c.. watts of nce generc.tinp, capelly; S,460 : agnvatts  !

foncil-fueled, 3,l'd ~

r.:. p. ct tc uuelect- ees.c4 cud 1,072. pu,nped storene.

hyd>:ccl.cct:ric cay:P.y. Thc 2.*l.9 pcrecat ( *< ,706 ::.c;,tc. l. t t s ) res e rve r.argin e.5 tha.it ed to c?.3 ts.i n a t the ti:::o of the 1970-79 trinter penh tiill be dependent  !

upon t he ti: . ly co.aczeici c.perctica of planned neu nuclear generating capacJ ty for US p:> rect.t of cap eity recorvca.

1 The recurve t.o:1.i'us indicated in the feregoing tchulntions cud, t.cnt etc grosu OutnjuG, CVr4CS in thrt th y incle:03 cl } tr.// ne ct for Sch:'dH}Cd 7.10inten*nce, forced in } ectl Iorecce tin 3, c;.Cupt

• C.a".1 \tect'u Cr, and CPIOui"G rc:.m ve regulrc:.aatn. Leent c:;p.u ien:c trith n:.:: 1.rgo generatin; uaits,

' houcver, iv.dicates thct Iroqucnt fe::ced curenen or such units is to hc .

er.pected dtrcin ; t.hc initial :.onths of tht.ir op:.rctic.n. The /.pplicant reporta thtt the Pool considers ccps. city reccrves of 18 percent of peah load neccu:.ary to inaurc :.dcc;uate cyctem relichility. ~

.TE.g.y s ig j'iv,.5__i_ofi } ,l_tL3

. .

• Aro 2.3 piin, sini;1c circuit, 045 Itilcyoit linea vill deliver the '

cuerp,y P.enerate.1 by the !!idicnd Picnt 4

point na ti c c:<intir." 1.ulh  ; pc.'e. ne ta. h.to c the%c Titt.bre.c.accc Subatetica,

/.ppliceat secten the route a in ovec icud principully cuand by the pcw Chuical Co:..pany, and dec:: not por:+ thre.gh noca stIth netic,nol, hictbric, scenic or recreational valuc.

The /.ce).<er.nt further statea thet all trannn:iccion linas ascceinted with the p: oject hcve been routed,- do.igned and vill be constructed and nacintain:d nccordin:, to Environr:ntal Crf teric for Electric Trcns:aission Systdro de.velcrc:I by the United Str.tes ibportn ants of Interior and

/.griculture; Scenie , cud P.rnd nun..: Juid:.lince for the Prot <etica of 2:nturci, Historic ,

Licual Valuca in the Ecsign cud .T.ocation of Rir. hts-of-

.Ucy and Trancmincion Facilitics publiched by the rederal Pcuer Ccw:nirsion.

Alt eracten to tha prm.oted Fr.cil.itice i .

In picaning and beyond, to rect 1.ts p::nor neads for the 1977 c.nd 1978 peri.od tim /ipplicant considered that there vere no citos for bnce lond hydroelectric

,coc.t ly to operat.c cod rhnt it <1<v 9 develop..ent availabic, that conhustica turbines are not ec.nider th:::n ca bccc load .

genart.LinL facili tics , and that it did uce foresec purchaced 1cuar availnble at a cost cowparable to its own baso load gencration.

The /.pplicant studied the econoc.ics of nuclear vernus fossil-fired base' lond generation and states that the econcmic benciits fr.vored the

. nucle tv-fueled for.ilitics to mtet its incroccin; lond oblisstions. In orcivin;; ct this decision, it considered natural gas to be onavMicbte in tha' cas..u.I;;y u @..d cod oil to 12 :a. ore ce t 1: . nl 1r 07 te

_ ..a l

l 1

... - - . . . . - - . ~ . - - --

\

(, .

m..

> n

- 6 .-

s ubjs.c t. rc nventer prteurenant difticultica th.a cc.cl. 'jhc Midiced Plant ja a dual perpe." na:1rar p.anc, recHe:: cupplyin, :.sch-:medcd baru J oad .

gensation, it f r. Ac.i;,ned to cl .o supply pro: cts st er.m for the Do.t

.I Cl.et.:len t Oc.qcof. Thia prtriision vill en.-bic Doa Che: icel to cortplctely c lor.u du.in irr r:uch Ic s offic! cut, fonoil fuel..barnin; pl:.nt. Comparl. son by the Applict.nt of ;. mn1 cos t:, (pensent wrth :.t 0.75 percent :.unval discot.nt) el epara-ir..'. coup::rnb)c.. sized, ningh. purpoco, plc.nts over cn

. cut Iv.c:cd life of 40 >ct.rc indiccted for thr* nucler.r p!':'.t . tocc.1 cporal in0 cor.tn of ;.Na,rs.'s,000, :.nd for the cuni-fired pinnt totr.1 oparctin*; costs o f $703,0X',000. ,

ou tuci.;h i t !. hiM:er De.,e 1caerc uop:r.:i:iua cc.p3Lrl re. cc str. for the v.ucicer plant graatly u .cd for .meleer plcuts a fu:.1 cost of 1.% uillt.Tha Applicut, in c'v.".lepin ; total co:ts, 0.50 uti):4 per hilowctu hour plu:,

par hilc.natt hour for operating t.nd T..aintcucnee capcuces. For coal-fired plcnto, it used 5.70 Lad 0.80 rni)1s pc r hilcr.:ct.t hour, respectively.

Act urdig thr.t the Mid1nna Pict.:

p)nat hr.d i.een decisned no a cingle purpoac cremu, for nupply:n.; 1,301 v.ctsustts of electrieni capacity and no process the entit.} ctate are cctin.ated by the Applicaut to bc about

$466,000,000 (abwt $300 per hihnenct) including a coolire. tewer. The capital co.:t of a cecoc:cble-nited cocl tu::ig, plant is entir.:sted to ho

$390,0t:0,000 (c. bout $300 per hilwatt, including $35 per hilowctt f nulfur dioxide rcr..ovel cegui;>:acnt) . .

or rangeThese of costs ccpitcl, fucl,toand ri.!. creed the.opcrating Feccral Po: unit costs :.re vJthin the general 7 r Cor.::ission by others for co.nparable nit.untivuc. .

These costs r.uzt ultiuntely be borne by 1.hc concur.ar c:On th3 bcsis, tb they becomo a pert of the cout of cicetric energy. Also cny inercacco in costs which might result siullerly fro::, del .ys.

borne by the f u consuinrc.

constrection of the propocc.d :? cilitics would be was not subniitted by the Appliccat, Info =Ation on coti:nated costs.of delays regnrd. therchre, no ce2.:. cuts are made in thr.:

_ Conc lu: !ons I andThe 2 isst4.if considers i,cnded to assist th:t. the capecity repeccented by the Midland Unitc' Pool'8 in rcctin3 the Applicant's and the Michigen 1977 and 1973 :.uu: car and uinter packs and to provide rearonabic res:in :nt?.:..

f'r (..'cpaey c.nd relichiiity of electric service. prudenc and rc . pens-:. hic operations of a pvrec syntea unct includc provisions for loan of capacity Jua to screed out:3c of generating capreity, occurence of lon.In bi.ht.;- chen those forecast, oparrting mart. ins required to fulfill

, obligt.tions to pr.rticipant in the interconnected 1.yster., cnd oparnting laarnins to prov.'.rie for fic.sibility in the ellocation of lord to c onc::cting teceurcer, becce.:c of abnormal bulh power system conditions . The neu Midland units vill be.1.p to steet those chjectiven of tbc Mich!nen syste:: 3.

. . . L.' +, . ! .. -

.*.e , .. . .

j,

. , , . .......