ML20126H459
ML20126H459 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Issue date: | 05/30/1985 |
From: | Thomas C Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
To: | Racquel Powell NUS CORP. |
Shared Package | |
ML20126H463 | List: |
References | |
NUDOCS 8506100340 | |
Download: ML20126H459 (2) | |
Text
_____ _______ _ __________,
o . .
May 30, 1985 Mr. Raymond H. J. Powell, Jr., Directnr Solidification Services Corporation NUS Process Services 1501 Key Road Columbia, South Carolina 29201
Dear Mr. Powell:
SUBJECT:
ACCEPTANCE FOR REFERENCING OF LICENSING TOPICAL REPORT PS-53-0378 REV. O. "NUS PROCESS SERVICES CORPORATION TOPICAL REPORT ON RADWASTE SOLIDIFICATION SYSTEM" We have completed our review of the subject topical report submitted by the NUS Process Services Corporation (NUS) by letter dated April 27, 1983. We find the report to be acceptable for referencing in license applications to the extent specified and under the limitations delineated in the report and the associated NRC evaluation, which is enclosed. The evaluation defines the basis for acceptance of the report.
We do not intend to repeat our review of the matters described in the report and found acceptable when the report appears as a reference in license applications, except to assure that the material presented is applicable to the specific plant involved. Our acceptance applies only to the matters described in the report.
In accordance with procedures established in NUREG-0390, it is requested that NUS publish accepted versions of this report, proprietary and non-proprietary, within three months of receipt of this letter. The accepted versions shall incorporate this letter and the enclosed evaluation between the title page and the abstract. The accepted versions shall include an -A (designating accepted) following the report identification symbol.
Should our criteria or regulations change such that our conclusions as to the acceptability of the report are invalidated NUS and/or the applicants referencing the topical report will be expected to revise and resubmit their respective documentation, or submit justification for the continued effective applicability of the topical report without revision of their respective documenta tion.
Sincerely.
Original signed by
@lglg C og Cecil 0. Thomas, Chief Standardization and Special Projects Branch Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated DISTRIBilTION 4 eetrel f vie S' DCS HBerkow h y, '
M @f 4'>
~'
SSPB Reading PNoonan RDiggs f PDR JLee, DMoran CThomas hg [ >f [(
Q nan:dk DL ran S
HBer L) s
/85 /85 5/ S /85 5/J485
I .
' " I -2 s g
, *' . UNITED :T/.T :
i
^*
'*1 NUOLEAR REGULATORY CC:?. AlC010 J j , E WASHit:G TO N. D. C. 20%5 e ~ ~
e t c
'" , ,, ;;.# May 30,1985
r.
a re,"~c-d H. J. Dm' ell , Jr. , Director i r'ici'ict +1c . Sa vices Corcere' ice ,
- r, - - e. , go-.<,e;
[ v. 3 ct 7.t ro H r a hs:C1 u - f**. *creli:
- cr- . ;;;e: : Ty c; r- ERFPCi'M 0 L!CEFF" 3 Tor!B'l r?T3rT :5-53-0.-'C.
m , r , om :er rys s SEc'/ ICES C00103/ TIo T7'ICM. "'"'T 0" .
. - e , ..... - . rn. .y. .. , m. . .r. . ..
"c h:ve cc--A:ted eur revia'.' c' the subject toeical recort suY ittad 5." the l f.U! Frecess Services Corcoration (MUS) by Tetter dcted April 27, 1903. L'e
'i-d the err-t te be acceptable for referencir.c in license arnlicctices ta he extent sr.aci'ied and under the linitatiers delineated in the renert and t*e assceisted ':00 evelvation, which is enciesed. The evaluatier dafires the tesis for acceptance of the reDort, ,
te do not interd to recett cur revier' of the ratters described in the *erert ard found acceptable when the report appears as a reference in license aorlicatiaat, exceS+ te essure thet the rateriel presented is errlicatie to i
the scecific plant involved. Our acceptance apolies only to the ratters res-"ibed in the racert.
!" cece*dtace vith nrecedures established in N" REG-0390, it is reouested that NUS publish acccoted versions of this report, pronrietary and non-oroprietary, withir. *bree renths nf receipt of this letter. The accented versions shall leececerete this letter and the enclosed evaluation between the title page and th! abstract. The accepted versions shall include an -A (designatine '
tccaptedi following the report identification synbol.
Should our criteria er regulations chance such that our conclusions as to the accantebility n' the report are invalidated, HUS and/or the epplicants re'erencire *he tnpic81 rernet will be expected to revi!* and resn5rf+ their resrective de:urantation, or submit justification for the centinued e##ective acclicabi14 ty cf the topical repnet without ravision of their respective decu~er*ttien.
Sincerely,
~
W* Vrrs Ay), w/{ + w :v.:
Cecil 0. Theras, Chief Standardi:ation and Specitl Projects Pearch Division of Licorsing Enclosura:
At stated L