ML20054G372

From kanterella
Revision as of 11:55, 14 March 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
LER 82-053/03L-0:on 820508,personnel Performing Logic Sys Functional Test Failed to Obtain Shift Foreman Signature. Caused by Personnel Misinterpreting Procedural Controls Applicable to Temporary Procedure Changes
ML20054G372
Person / Time
Site:  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 06/04/1982
From: Sumner H
GEORGIA POWER CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML20054G366 List:
References
LER-82-053-03L, LER-82-53-3L, NUDOCS 8206210494
Download: ML20054G372 (2)


Text

I CONTROL BLOCK: l 1

l l l l l l@

6 (PLEASE PRINT C3 TYPE ALL REIVIKED INF!RMATl!N)

O i I G l LICENSEE A l E COLT. l I l H l142 l@l 15 0 l 0 l- l 0LICENSEl 0 lNUMBER 0 l 0 l 0 l- l0 l250 l@l4 26 l1 l1 l1 l1 l@l47 car LICENSE TYPE JO l lg

$8 7 8 9 CON'T l0l11 $$RCl60l L Ql61 0 l 5 l DOCK 0 l ET 0 NUMBE l 0 l R3 l 6 l 686 @l 0 l EVENT 5 l 0DATE l 8 l 8 l 742 ]@l 75 0] REPORT 61 01 4l 8l 21@

? 8 69 DATE 80 EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROB ABLE CONSEQUENCES h lo l2l lOn 5-8-82, with Hatch Unit 2 in cold shutdown for the refueling outage, I lO la l l personnel performing a Logic System Functional Test on the LPCI mode of l o 4 lRHR, HNP-2-3153, inadvertently violated procedural controls by 'failing j o s I to obtain the Unit 2 Shift Foreman's signature on a temporary change to l j o is l l the LSFT procedure they were using until af ter completing the procedure. l l 0 l 71 [ Hatch Unit 1 was not affected by this event. This is a non-repetitive l i o is i levent. The health and safety of the public was not affected. l 7 8 9 80 C DE CODE SU8C E COMPONENT CODE SLBCODE S DE O 9 I cl Fl@ y@ {@ lZ lZ lZ lZ lZ lZ l@ y@ g Q 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 18 19 20 SE QUENTI AL OCCURRENCE REPORT REVISION LE R RO EVENTYEAR REPORT NO. CODE TYPE N

@ REPg l218 22l2 l g l 0l 5l 3l y l 0l 3 l ]

30 g l ($.l

_ 23 24 26 27 28 29 31 32 l

33 34 Z

@ 35 1 0 lh 37 l

40 41 42 43 l l 44

$lg 47 CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS h li l o l lThe involved personnel misinterpreted the intent of the procedural con- l

[i,,i ltrols applicable to temporary procedure changes. The involved personnel i

,,,,,g h ave since been instructed in the correct methods to effect temporary  ;

,,,3, l procedure changes. l li l41 l l 7 8 9 80 STA S  % POWER OTHER STATUS DISCO R DISCOVERY DESCRIPTION NA { @l Review of procedure li Is l d@ l0 l0 l0 l@l l l ACTIVITY CONTENT RELEASED OF RE LE ASE AMOUNT OF ACTIVITY LOCATION OF RELE ASE NA NA IileI8 W 7 9

@ W @l 10 11 44 l l 45 80 l

PERSONNEL EXPOSURES NUYBER TYPE DESCRIPTION NA l i l 71 1 010 10 l@l Zl@l "

l PERSONNE t iN;uWiES NuvRtR 7

i s 8 9 l0l0l0l@lDESCR#riON@ NA 11 12 80 l

TYPE DESCR PTION i 9 NA LZJ@l _

l PueSTY 8206210494 820604 nneuseonty PDR ADOCK 05000366 7

2 o issue D 8 9 LnJ81 DESCR'PTION @

16 NA R PDR l 68 69 llllllllll lll:} 80 E H. L. Sumner - Sunt. Plt. Eng. Serv. W4MM NAVE OF PREPARER pg gy g . {

l LER 4: 50-366/1982-53 Licensee: Georgia Power Company Facility Name: Edwin I. Hatch (

Docket #: 50-366 l

Narrative Report for IER 50-366/1982-53 On 5-8-82, with Hatch Unit 2 in cold shutdown for the planned I refueling / maintenance outage, engineering personnel were i performing a Logic System Functional Test of the Low Pressure Coolant Injection Mode of RHR, HNP-2-3153 revision 7 "LPCI LSFT". While performing the LSFT the personnel effected temporary changes to the procedure to resolve procedural errors and inadequacies, the personnel performing the LSFT f ail ed to obtain the Unit 2 Shift Foreman's signature on the temporary change to HNP-2-3153 revision 7 until after completion of the LSFT. This oversight is in violation of HNP-9 revision 19 " Procedure Writing, Use and Control".

The involved personnel misinterpreted the applicable procedural controls of HNP-9 revision 19 and have since been obtaining temporary instructed in the approved methods of procedural changes.

not a There was no effect upon Hatch Unit 1. This is repetitive event. The health and safety of the public was not '

affected by this event.

. . _ . . -- . -