|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20210B8491999-07-21021 July 1999 Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50.54(w),for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 2 to Reduce Amount of Insurance for Unit to $50 Million for Onsite Property Damage Coverage ML20206D4141999-04-20020 April 1999 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Section III.G.2 Re Enclosure of Cable & Equipment & Associated non-safety Related Circuits of One Redundant Train in Fire Barrier Having 1-hour Rating ML20206T7211999-02-11011 February 1999 Memorandum & Order (CLI-99-02).* Denies C George Request for Intervention & Dismisses Subpart M License Transfer Proceeding.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 990211 ML20198A5111998-12-11011 December 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65 Re Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rulemaking Details Collaborative Efforts in That Rule Interjects Change ML20154G2941998-09-17017 September 1998 Transcript of 980917 Public Meeting in Rockville,Md Re License Transfer of TMI-1 from Gpu Nuclear,Inc to Amergen. Pp 1-41 ML20199J0121997-11-20020 November 1997 Comment on Pr 10CFR50 Re Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommisioning Nuclear Power Reactors.Three Mile Island Alert Invokes Comments of P Bradford,Former NRC Member ML20148R7581997-06-30030 June 1997 Comment on NRC Proposed Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1, Control Rod Insertion Problems. Licensee References Proposed Generic Communication, Control Rod Insertion, & Ltrs & 961022 from B&W Owners Group ML20078H0431995-02-0101 February 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Lowpower Operations for Nuclear Reactors ML20077E8231994-12-0808 December 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Rev to NRC NPP License Renewal Rule ML20149E2021994-04-20020 April 1994 R Gary Statement Re 10 Mile Rule Under Director'S Decision DD-94-03,dtd 940331 for Tmi.Urges Commissioners to Engage in Reconsideration of Author Petition ML20065Q0671994-04-0707 April 1994 Principal Deficiencies in Director'S Decision 94-03 Re Pica Request Under 10CFR2.206 ML20058A5491993-11-17017 November 1993 Exemption from Requirements in 10CFR50.120 to Establish, Implement & Maintain Training Programs,Using Sys Approach to Training,For Catorgories of Personnel Listed in 10CFR50.120 ML20059J5171993-09-30030 September 1993 Transcript of 930923 Meeting of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-130.Related Documentation Encl ML20065J3461992-12-30030 December 1992 Responds to Petition of R Gary Alleging Discrepancies in RERP for Dauphin County,Pa ML20065J3731992-12-18018 December 1992 Affidavit of Gj Giangi Responding to of R Gary Requesting Action by NRC Per 10CFR2.206 ML20198E5581992-12-0101 December 1992 Transcript of Briefing by TMI-2 Advisory Panel on 921201 in Rockville,Md ML20210D7291992-06-15015 June 1992 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR70.24 Re Criticality Accident Requirements for SNM Storage Areas at Facility Containing U Enriched to Less than 3% in U-235 Isotope ML20079E2181991-09-30030 September 1991 Submits Comments on NRC Proposed Resolution of Generic Issue 23, Reactor Coolant Pump Seal Failure. Informs That Util Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARC ML20066J3031991-01-28028 January 1991 Comment Supporting SECY-90-347, Regulatory Impact Survey Rept ML20059P0531990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal ML20059N5941990-10-0404 October 1990 Transcript of 900928 Public Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Studies of Cancer in Populations Near Nuclear Facilities, Including TMI ML20055F4411990-06-28028 June 1990 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to FSAR ML20248J1891989-10-0606 October 1989 Order.* Grants Intervenors 891004 Motion for Permission for Opportunity to Respond to Staff Correspondence.Response Requested No Later That 891020.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 891006 ML20248J1881989-10-0303 October 1989 Motion for Permission for Opportunity to Respond to Staff Correspondence in Response to Board Order of 890913.* Svc List Encl ML20248J0301989-09-29029 September 1989 NRC Staff Response to Appeal Board Order.* Matters Evaluated in Environ Assessment Involved Subjs Known by Parties During Proceeding & Appear in Hearing Record & Reflect Board Final Initial Decision LBP-89-7.W/Certificate of Svc ML20247E9181989-09-13013 September 1989 Order.* Requests NRC to Explain Purpose of 890911 Fr Notice on Proposed Amend to Applicant License,Revising Tech Specs Re Disposal of Accident Generated Water & Effects on ASLB Findings,By 890929.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890913 ML20247G0361989-07-26026 July 1989 Transcript of Oral Argument on 890726 in Bethesda,Md Re Disposal of accident-generated Water.Pp 1-65.Supporting Info Encl ML20247B7781989-07-18018 July 1989 Certificate of Svc.* Certifies Svc of Encl Gpu 890607 & 0628 Ltrs to NRC & Commonwealth of Pa,Respectively.W/Svc List ML20245D3651989-06-20020 June 1989 Notice of Oral Argument.* Oral Argument on Appeal of Susquehanna Valley Alliance & TMI Alert from ASLB 890202 Initial Decision Authorizing OL Amend,Will Be Heard on 890726 in Bethesda,Md.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890620 ML20245A5621989-06-14014 June 1989 Order.* Advises That Oral Argument on Appeal of Susquehanna Valley Alliance & TMI Alert from Board 890202 Initial Decision LBP-89-07 Authorizing OL Amend Will Be Heard on 890726 in Bethesda,Md.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890614 ML20247F3151989-05-22022 May 1989 NRC Staff Response to Appeal by Joint Intervenors Susquehanna Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert.* Appeal Should Be Denied Based on Failure to Identify Errors in Fact & Law Subj to Appeal.W/Certificate of Svc ML20246Q2971989-05-15015 May 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20246J6081989-05-12012 May 1989 Licensee Brief in Reply to Joint Intervenors Appeal from Final Initial Decision.* ASLB 890203 Final Initial Decision LBP-89-07 Re Deleting Prohibition on Disposal of accident- Generated Water Should Be Affirmed.W/Certificate of Svc ML20247D2761989-04-20020 April 1989 Transcript of 890420 Briefing in Rockville,Md on Status of TMI-2 Cleanup Activities.Pp 1-51.Related Info Encl ML20244C0361989-04-13013 April 1989 Order.* Commission Finds That ASLB Decision Resolving All Relevant Matters in Favor of Licensee & Granting Application for OL Amend,Should Become Effective Immediately.Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890413 ML20245A8381989-04-13013 April 1989 Transcript of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 890413 Meeting in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-79.Supporting Info Encl ML20245A2961989-04-13013 April 1989 Transcript of 890413 Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Affirmation/Discussion & Vote ML20248H1811989-04-0606 April 1989 Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert Motion for Leave to File Appeal Brief out-of-time.* W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890411.Granted for Aslab on 890410 ML20248G0151989-04-0606 April 1989 Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert Motion for Leave to File Appeal Brief out-of-time.* Requests to File Appeal Brief 1 Day Late Due to Person Typing Document Having Schedule Problems ML20248G0261989-04-0606 April 1989 Susguehanna Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert Brief in Support of Notification to File Appeal & Request for Oral Argument Re Appeal.* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20248D7211989-04-0404 April 1989 Memorandum & Order.* Intervenors Application for Stay Denied Due to Failure to Lack of Demonstrated Irreparable Injury & Any Showing of Certainty That Intervenors Will Prevail on Merits of Appeal.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890404 ML20247A4671989-03-23023 March 1989 Correction Notice.* Advises That Date of 891203 Appearing in Text of Commission 890322 Order Incorrect.Date Should Be 871203.Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890323 ML20246M2611989-03-22022 March 1989 Order.* Advises That Commission Currently Considering Question of Effectiveness,Pending Appellate Review of Final Initial Decision in Case Issued by ASLB in LBP-89-07. Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890322 ML20236D3821989-03-16016 March 1989 Valley Alliance & TMI Alert Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief in Support of Request for Appeal in Matter of 2.3 Million Gallons Of....* Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890316.Granted for Aslab on 890316 ML20236D3121989-03-15015 March 1989 Licensee Answer to Joint Intervenors Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief on Appeal.* Motion Opposed Based on Failure to Demonstrate Good Cause.W/Certificate of Svc ML20236D2901989-03-11011 March 1989 Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief in Support of Request for Appeal in Matter of Disposal of 2.3 Million Gallons of Radioactive Water at Tmi,Unit 2.* Svc List Encl ML20236A3761989-03-0808 March 1989 Licensee Answer Opposing Joint Intervenors Motion for Stay.* Stay of Licensing Board Decision Pending Appeal Unwarranted Under NRC Stds.Stay Could Delay Safe,Expeditious Cleanup of Facility.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20236C2441989-03-0808 March 1989 NRC Staff Response in Opposition to Application for Stay Filed by Joint Intervenors.* Application for Stay of Effectiveness of Final Initial Decision LBP-89-07,dtd 890202 Should Be Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20235V2641989-03-0202 March 1989 Notice of Aslab Reconstitution.* TS Moore,Chairman,Cn Kohl & Ha Wilber,Members.Served on 890303.W/Certificate of Svc ML20235V2161989-02-25025 February 1989 Changes & Corrections to Susquehanna Valley Alliance/Three Mile Island Alert Documents Submitted on 890221.* Certificate of Svc Encl 1999-07-21
[Table view] Category:TRANSCRIPTS
MONTHYEARML20154G2941998-09-17017 September 1998 Transcript of 980917 Public Meeting in Rockville,Md Re License Transfer of TMI-1 from Gpu Nuclear,Inc to Amergen. Pp 1-41 ML20059J5171993-09-30030 September 1993 Transcript of 930923 Meeting of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-130.Related Documentation Encl ML20198E5581992-12-0101 December 1992 Transcript of Briefing by TMI-2 Advisory Panel on 921201 in Rockville,Md ML20059N5941990-10-0404 October 1990 Transcript of 900928 Public Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Studies of Cancer in Populations Near Nuclear Facilities, Including TMI ML20247G0361989-07-26026 July 1989 Transcript of Oral Argument on 890726 in Bethesda,Md Re Disposal of accident-generated Water.Pp 1-65.Supporting Info Encl ML20247D2761989-04-20020 April 1989 Transcript of 890420 Briefing in Rockville,Md on Status of TMI-2 Cleanup Activities.Pp 1-51.Related Info Encl ML20245A2961989-04-13013 April 1989 Transcript of 890413 Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Affirmation/Discussion & Vote ML20245A8381989-04-13013 April 1989 Transcript of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 890413 Meeting in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-79.Supporting Info Encl ML20235N2161989-02-17017 February 1989 Follow-up Testimony Clarifying Position on Question of Disposition of Over 2 Million Gallons of Accident Generated Water.Related Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20235S9911989-02-16016 February 1989 Transcript of 890216 Public Meeting of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-119. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20206C9391988-11-0707 November 1988 Transcript of 881107 Hearing in Lancaster,Pa.Pp 1,122- 1,417.Witnesses:JA Auxier,Ji Fabrikant,Skolnik & Mather ML20235M7601988-11-0303 November 1988 Transcript of 881103 Public Hearing in Lancaster,Pa for Presentation of Limited Appearance Statements.Pp 998-1,121 ML20206C2801988-11-0303 November 1988 Transcript of 881103 Hearing in Lancaster,Pa Re TMI-2 License Amend Application.Pp 859-997.Witnesses:JA Martin, SS Yaniv,F Skolnik,S Lewis & a Bhattacharyya ML20205Q6581988-11-0202 November 1988 Transcript of 881102 Hearing in Lancaster,Pa Re TMI-2 License Amend Application.Pp 573-858.Supporting Documentation Encl.Witnesses:Gg Baker,Wj Cooper & L Munson ML20205Q6441988-11-0101 November 1988 Transcript of 881101 Hearing in Lancaster,Pa Re TMI-2 License Amend Application.Pp 288-572.Supporting Info Encl. Witnesses:K Hofstetter,Kl Harner,L Thomas & M Masnik ML20205N5791988-10-31031 October 1988 Transcript of ASLB 881031 Meeting in Lancaster,Pa Re License Amend Application.Pp 87-287 ML20205P0451988-10-25025 October 1988 Transcript of 881025 Periodic Briefing by TMI-2 Advisory Panel in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-30 ML20205G1851988-10-25025 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of GG Baker & Wj Cooper on Dose Assessments & Microorganisms (Contentions 2,3 & 5d).* Supporting Documentation Encl.Related Correspondence ML20205E5021988-10-24024 October 1988 Licensee Rebuttal Testimony of Ji Fabrikant on Health Effects of Tritium (Contention 5d).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1751988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of GG Baker & Wj Cooper on Dose Assessments & Microorganisms (Contentions 2,3 & 5d).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1531988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Ww Weaver on Accident Risks (Contention 2).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1901988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Ja Auxier & Ji Fabrikant on Effects of Tritium (Contentions 3 & 5d).* Supporting Info Encl.Related Correpondence ML20155H1661988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Kl Harner & Kj Hofstetter on Sampling & Analysis of accident-generated Water (Contentions 3 & 4b).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1401988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Je Tarpinian on Occupational Dose Assessments (Contention 2).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1281988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Dr Buchanan on Evaporation Proposal & Joint Intervenors Alternative (Contentions 2 & 3).* Related Correspondence ML20155H4751988-10-10010 October 1988 Testimony.* Discusses Environ Impact of Force Evaporation of 2.3 Million Gallons of accident-generated Water by Licensee. W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20155H4711988-10-10010 October 1988 Affidavit of Cw Huver (Contention 5):further Considerations of Biological Effects & Health Hazards of Tritium.* Copyrighted Matl Encl.Related Correspondence ML20154D5201988-09-0707 September 1988 Transcript of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 880907 Meeting in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-109.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20151G6951988-07-14014 July 1988 Transcript of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 880714 Meeting in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-140.Related Documentation Encl ML20196B6041988-05-26026 May 1988 Transcript of 880526 Advisory Panel Meeting in Harrisburg, PA to Discuss Decontamination of TMI-2.Pp 1-117.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20154N4101988-04-14014 April 1988 Transcript of 880414 Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 Public Meeting in Lancaster,Pa.Related Info Encl. Pp 1-100 ML20148F2351988-03-17017 March 1988 Transcript of 880317 Briefing in Washington,Dc Re Status of TMI-2.Pp 1-51.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20236Y1061987-12-0808 December 1987 Transcript of Special Prehearing Conference on 871208 in Harrisburg,Pa Re Disposal of accident-generated Water. Pp 1-86 ML20238C6981987-10-0505 October 1987 Deposition of a Beach.* Transcript of 871005 Deposition in Washington,Dc Re R Parks Allegations.Pp 1-244.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20235J7071987-09-30030 September 1987 Transcript of 870930 Prehearing Conference in Bethesda,Md. Pp 225-343 ML20238D4641987-09-0909 September 1987 Transcript of 870909 Oral Argument in Bethesda,Md.Pp 1-57 ML20238C7531987-08-20020 August 1987 Vol II to Transcript of Hl Hofmann 870820 Deposition in San Francisco,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp 208-471 & 489-494. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C7891987-08-18018 August 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vol IV to Transcript of 870818 Deposition in San Francisco,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp 551-818. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C7651987-06-25025 June 1987 Deposition of Hl Hofmann.* Transcript of 870625 Deposition in San Francisco,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp 1-206 ML20238C8041987-06-24024 June 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vol III to Transcript of 870624 Deposition in Newport Beach,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp III-1 - III-89 ML20235J1271987-06-24024 June 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vols II & III of Transcript of Rd Parks 870624 Deposition.Related Correspondence ML20238C7981987-06-23023 June 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vol II to Transcript of 870623 Deposition in Newport Beach,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp II-1 - II-263.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C7941987-06-22022 June 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vol I to Transcript of 870622 Deposition in Newport Beach,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp 1-199. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C5921987-06-16016 June 1987 Deposition of R Meeks.* Transcript of 870616 Deposition in Washington,Dc Re Allegations of Harassment Against R Parks. Pp 1-198.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C6171987-06-16016 June 1987 Deposition of R Meeks.* Corrected Title Page of 870616 Deposition ML20215L2731987-05-0808 May 1987 Transcript of 870508 Prehearing Conference in Bethesda,Md.Pp 19-224.In Camera Session (Pp 101-138) Bound Separately ML20238C7331987-04-24024 April 1987 Deposition of Rc Arnold.* Transcript of 870424 Deposition in Washington,Dc Re Civil Penalty.Pp 1-224.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20212Q9801987-04-16016 April 1987 Transcript of 870416 Periodic Meeting W/Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 in Washington,Dc.Pp 1-50.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20212Q8021987-04-15015 April 1987 Transcript of 870415 Briefing by DOE in Washington,Dc Re TMI-2 Core Exam Program.Pp 1-64.Viewgraphs Encl ML20238C6521987-04-10010 April 1987 Deposition of Bk Kanga.* Transcript of 870410 Deposition in Gaithersburg,Md Re R Parks.Pp 1-151.Supporting Documentation Encl 1998-09-17
[Table view] Category:DEPOSITIONS
MONTHYEARML20154G2941998-09-17017 September 1998 Transcript of 980917 Public Meeting in Rockville,Md Re License Transfer of TMI-1 from Gpu Nuclear,Inc to Amergen. Pp 1-41 ML20059J5171993-09-30030 September 1993 Transcript of 930923 Meeting of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-130.Related Documentation Encl ML20198E5581992-12-0101 December 1992 Transcript of Briefing by TMI-2 Advisory Panel on 921201 in Rockville,Md ML20059N5941990-10-0404 October 1990 Transcript of 900928 Public Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Studies of Cancer in Populations Near Nuclear Facilities, Including TMI ML20247G0361989-07-26026 July 1989 Transcript of Oral Argument on 890726 in Bethesda,Md Re Disposal of accident-generated Water.Pp 1-65.Supporting Info Encl ML20247D2761989-04-20020 April 1989 Transcript of 890420 Briefing in Rockville,Md on Status of TMI-2 Cleanup Activities.Pp 1-51.Related Info Encl ML20245A2961989-04-13013 April 1989 Transcript of 890413 Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Affirmation/Discussion & Vote ML20245A8381989-04-13013 April 1989 Transcript of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 890413 Meeting in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-79.Supporting Info Encl ML20235N2161989-02-17017 February 1989 Follow-up Testimony Clarifying Position on Question of Disposition of Over 2 Million Gallons of Accident Generated Water.Related Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20235S9911989-02-16016 February 1989 Transcript of 890216 Public Meeting of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-119. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20206C9391988-11-0707 November 1988 Transcript of 881107 Hearing in Lancaster,Pa.Pp 1,122- 1,417.Witnesses:JA Auxier,Ji Fabrikant,Skolnik & Mather ML20235M7601988-11-0303 November 1988 Transcript of 881103 Public Hearing in Lancaster,Pa for Presentation of Limited Appearance Statements.Pp 998-1,121 ML20206C2801988-11-0303 November 1988 Transcript of 881103 Hearing in Lancaster,Pa Re TMI-2 License Amend Application.Pp 859-997.Witnesses:JA Martin, SS Yaniv,F Skolnik,S Lewis & a Bhattacharyya ML20205Q6581988-11-0202 November 1988 Transcript of 881102 Hearing in Lancaster,Pa Re TMI-2 License Amend Application.Pp 573-858.Supporting Documentation Encl.Witnesses:Gg Baker,Wj Cooper & L Munson ML20205Q6441988-11-0101 November 1988 Transcript of 881101 Hearing in Lancaster,Pa Re TMI-2 License Amend Application.Pp 288-572.Supporting Info Encl. Witnesses:K Hofstetter,Kl Harner,L Thomas & M Masnik ML20205N5791988-10-31031 October 1988 Transcript of ASLB 881031 Meeting in Lancaster,Pa Re License Amend Application.Pp 87-287 ML20205P0451988-10-25025 October 1988 Transcript of 881025 Periodic Briefing by TMI-2 Advisory Panel in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-30 ML20205G1851988-10-25025 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of GG Baker & Wj Cooper on Dose Assessments & Microorganisms (Contentions 2,3 & 5d).* Supporting Documentation Encl.Related Correspondence ML20205E5021988-10-24024 October 1988 Licensee Rebuttal Testimony of Ji Fabrikant on Health Effects of Tritium (Contention 5d).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1751988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of GG Baker & Wj Cooper on Dose Assessments & Microorganisms (Contentions 2,3 & 5d).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1531988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Ww Weaver on Accident Risks (Contention 2).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1901988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Ja Auxier & Ji Fabrikant on Effects of Tritium (Contentions 3 & 5d).* Supporting Info Encl.Related Correpondence ML20155H1661988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Kl Harner & Kj Hofstetter on Sampling & Analysis of accident-generated Water (Contentions 3 & 4b).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1401988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Je Tarpinian on Occupational Dose Assessments (Contention 2).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1281988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Dr Buchanan on Evaporation Proposal & Joint Intervenors Alternative (Contentions 2 & 3).* Related Correspondence ML20155H4751988-10-10010 October 1988 Testimony.* Discusses Environ Impact of Force Evaporation of 2.3 Million Gallons of accident-generated Water by Licensee. W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20155H4711988-10-10010 October 1988 Affidavit of Cw Huver (Contention 5):further Considerations of Biological Effects & Health Hazards of Tritium.* Copyrighted Matl Encl.Related Correspondence ML20154D5201988-09-0707 September 1988 Transcript of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 880907 Meeting in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-109.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20151G6951988-07-14014 July 1988 Transcript of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 880714 Meeting in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-140.Related Documentation Encl ML20196B6041988-05-26026 May 1988 Transcript of 880526 Advisory Panel Meeting in Harrisburg, PA to Discuss Decontamination of TMI-2.Pp 1-117.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20154N4101988-04-14014 April 1988 Transcript of 880414 Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 Public Meeting in Lancaster,Pa.Related Info Encl. Pp 1-100 ML20148F2351988-03-17017 March 1988 Transcript of 880317 Briefing in Washington,Dc Re Status of TMI-2.Pp 1-51.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20236Y1061987-12-0808 December 1987 Transcript of Special Prehearing Conference on 871208 in Harrisburg,Pa Re Disposal of accident-generated Water. Pp 1-86 ML20238C6981987-10-0505 October 1987 Deposition of a Beach.* Transcript of 871005 Deposition in Washington,Dc Re R Parks Allegations.Pp 1-244.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20235J7071987-09-30030 September 1987 Transcript of 870930 Prehearing Conference in Bethesda,Md. Pp 225-343 ML20238D4641987-09-0909 September 1987 Transcript of 870909 Oral Argument in Bethesda,Md.Pp 1-57 ML20238C7531987-08-20020 August 1987 Vol II to Transcript of Hl Hofmann 870820 Deposition in San Francisco,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp 208-471 & 489-494. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C7891987-08-18018 August 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vol IV to Transcript of 870818 Deposition in San Francisco,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp 551-818. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C7651987-06-25025 June 1987 Deposition of Hl Hofmann.* Transcript of 870625 Deposition in San Francisco,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp 1-206 ML20238C8041987-06-24024 June 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vol III to Transcript of 870624 Deposition in Newport Beach,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp III-1 - III-89 ML20235J1271987-06-24024 June 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vols II & III of Transcript of Rd Parks 870624 Deposition.Related Correspondence ML20238C7981987-06-23023 June 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vol II to Transcript of 870623 Deposition in Newport Beach,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp II-1 - II-263.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C7941987-06-22022 June 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vol I to Transcript of 870622 Deposition in Newport Beach,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp 1-199. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C5921987-06-16016 June 1987 Deposition of R Meeks.* Transcript of 870616 Deposition in Washington,Dc Re Allegations of Harassment Against R Parks. Pp 1-198.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C6171987-06-16016 June 1987 Deposition of R Meeks.* Corrected Title Page of 870616 Deposition ML20215L2731987-05-0808 May 1987 Transcript of 870508 Prehearing Conference in Bethesda,Md.Pp 19-224.In Camera Session (Pp 101-138) Bound Separately ML20238C7331987-04-24024 April 1987 Deposition of Rc Arnold.* Transcript of 870424 Deposition in Washington,Dc Re Civil Penalty.Pp 1-224.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20212Q9801987-04-16016 April 1987 Transcript of 870416 Periodic Meeting W/Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 in Washington,Dc.Pp 1-50.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20212Q8021987-04-15015 April 1987 Transcript of 870415 Briefing by DOE in Washington,Dc Re TMI-2 Core Exam Program.Pp 1-64.Viewgraphs Encl ML20238C6521987-04-10010 April 1987 Deposition of Bk Kanga.* Transcript of 870410 Deposition in Gaithersburg,Md Re R Parks.Pp 1-151.Supporting Documentation Encl 1998-09-17
[Table view] Category:NARRATIVE TESTIMONY
MONTHYEARML20154G2941998-09-17017 September 1998 Transcript of 980917 Public Meeting in Rockville,Md Re License Transfer of TMI-1 from Gpu Nuclear,Inc to Amergen. Pp 1-41 ML20059J5171993-09-30030 September 1993 Transcript of 930923 Meeting of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-130.Related Documentation Encl ML20198E5581992-12-0101 December 1992 Transcript of Briefing by TMI-2 Advisory Panel on 921201 in Rockville,Md ML20059N5941990-10-0404 October 1990 Transcript of 900928 Public Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Studies of Cancer in Populations Near Nuclear Facilities, Including TMI ML20247G0361989-07-26026 July 1989 Transcript of Oral Argument on 890726 in Bethesda,Md Re Disposal of accident-generated Water.Pp 1-65.Supporting Info Encl ML20247D2761989-04-20020 April 1989 Transcript of 890420 Briefing in Rockville,Md on Status of TMI-2 Cleanup Activities.Pp 1-51.Related Info Encl ML20245A2961989-04-13013 April 1989 Transcript of 890413 Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Affirmation/Discussion & Vote ML20245A8381989-04-13013 April 1989 Transcript of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 890413 Meeting in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-79.Supporting Info Encl ML20235N2161989-02-17017 February 1989 Follow-up Testimony Clarifying Position on Question of Disposition of Over 2 Million Gallons of Accident Generated Water.Related Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20235S9911989-02-16016 February 1989 Transcript of 890216 Public Meeting of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-119. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20206C9391988-11-0707 November 1988 Transcript of 881107 Hearing in Lancaster,Pa.Pp 1,122- 1,417.Witnesses:JA Auxier,Ji Fabrikant,Skolnik & Mather ML20235M7601988-11-0303 November 1988 Transcript of 881103 Public Hearing in Lancaster,Pa for Presentation of Limited Appearance Statements.Pp 998-1,121 ML20206C2801988-11-0303 November 1988 Transcript of 881103 Hearing in Lancaster,Pa Re TMI-2 License Amend Application.Pp 859-997.Witnesses:JA Martin, SS Yaniv,F Skolnik,S Lewis & a Bhattacharyya ML20205Q6581988-11-0202 November 1988 Transcript of 881102 Hearing in Lancaster,Pa Re TMI-2 License Amend Application.Pp 573-858.Supporting Documentation Encl.Witnesses:Gg Baker,Wj Cooper & L Munson ML20205Q6441988-11-0101 November 1988 Transcript of 881101 Hearing in Lancaster,Pa Re TMI-2 License Amend Application.Pp 288-572.Supporting Info Encl. Witnesses:K Hofstetter,Kl Harner,L Thomas & M Masnik ML20205N5791988-10-31031 October 1988 Transcript of ASLB 881031 Meeting in Lancaster,Pa Re License Amend Application.Pp 87-287 ML20205P0451988-10-25025 October 1988 Transcript of 881025 Periodic Briefing by TMI-2 Advisory Panel in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-30 ML20205G1851988-10-25025 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of GG Baker & Wj Cooper on Dose Assessments & Microorganisms (Contentions 2,3 & 5d).* Supporting Documentation Encl.Related Correspondence ML20205E5021988-10-24024 October 1988 Licensee Rebuttal Testimony of Ji Fabrikant on Health Effects of Tritium (Contention 5d).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1751988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of GG Baker & Wj Cooper on Dose Assessments & Microorganisms (Contentions 2,3 & 5d).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1531988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Ww Weaver on Accident Risks (Contention 2).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1901988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Ja Auxier & Ji Fabrikant on Effects of Tritium (Contentions 3 & 5d).* Supporting Info Encl.Related Correpondence ML20155H1661988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Kl Harner & Kj Hofstetter on Sampling & Analysis of accident-generated Water (Contentions 3 & 4b).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1401988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Je Tarpinian on Occupational Dose Assessments (Contention 2).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1281988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Dr Buchanan on Evaporation Proposal & Joint Intervenors Alternative (Contentions 2 & 3).* Related Correspondence ML20155H4751988-10-10010 October 1988 Testimony.* Discusses Environ Impact of Force Evaporation of 2.3 Million Gallons of accident-generated Water by Licensee. W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20155H4711988-10-10010 October 1988 Affidavit of Cw Huver (Contention 5):further Considerations of Biological Effects & Health Hazards of Tritium.* Copyrighted Matl Encl.Related Correspondence ML20154D5201988-09-0707 September 1988 Transcript of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 880907 Meeting in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-109.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20151G6951988-07-14014 July 1988 Transcript of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 880714 Meeting in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-140.Related Documentation Encl ML20196B6041988-05-26026 May 1988 Transcript of 880526 Advisory Panel Meeting in Harrisburg, PA to Discuss Decontamination of TMI-2.Pp 1-117.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20154N4101988-04-14014 April 1988 Transcript of 880414 Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 Public Meeting in Lancaster,Pa.Related Info Encl. Pp 1-100 ML20148F2351988-03-17017 March 1988 Transcript of 880317 Briefing in Washington,Dc Re Status of TMI-2.Pp 1-51.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20236Y1061987-12-0808 December 1987 Transcript of Special Prehearing Conference on 871208 in Harrisburg,Pa Re Disposal of accident-generated Water. Pp 1-86 ML20238C6981987-10-0505 October 1987 Deposition of a Beach.* Transcript of 871005 Deposition in Washington,Dc Re R Parks Allegations.Pp 1-244.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20235J7071987-09-30030 September 1987 Transcript of 870930 Prehearing Conference in Bethesda,Md. Pp 225-343 ML20238D4641987-09-0909 September 1987 Transcript of 870909 Oral Argument in Bethesda,Md.Pp 1-57 ML20238C7531987-08-20020 August 1987 Vol II to Transcript of Hl Hofmann 870820 Deposition in San Francisco,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp 208-471 & 489-494. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C7891987-08-18018 August 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vol IV to Transcript of 870818 Deposition in San Francisco,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp 551-818. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C7651987-06-25025 June 1987 Deposition of Hl Hofmann.* Transcript of 870625 Deposition in San Francisco,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp 1-206 ML20238C8041987-06-24024 June 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vol III to Transcript of 870624 Deposition in Newport Beach,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp III-1 - III-89 ML20235J1271987-06-24024 June 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vols II & III of Transcript of Rd Parks 870624 Deposition.Related Correspondence ML20238C7981987-06-23023 June 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vol II to Transcript of 870623 Deposition in Newport Beach,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp II-1 - II-263.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C7941987-06-22022 June 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vol I to Transcript of 870622 Deposition in Newport Beach,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp 1-199. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C5921987-06-16016 June 1987 Deposition of R Meeks.* Transcript of 870616 Deposition in Washington,Dc Re Allegations of Harassment Against R Parks. Pp 1-198.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C6171987-06-16016 June 1987 Deposition of R Meeks.* Corrected Title Page of 870616 Deposition ML20215L2731987-05-0808 May 1987 Transcript of 870508 Prehearing Conference in Bethesda,Md.Pp 19-224.In Camera Session (Pp 101-138) Bound Separately ML20238C7331987-04-24024 April 1987 Deposition of Rc Arnold.* Transcript of 870424 Deposition in Washington,Dc Re Civil Penalty.Pp 1-224.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20212Q9801987-04-16016 April 1987 Transcript of 870416 Periodic Meeting W/Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 in Washington,Dc.Pp 1-50.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20212Q8021987-04-15015 April 1987 Transcript of 870415 Briefing by DOE in Washington,Dc Re TMI-2 Core Exam Program.Pp 1-64.Viewgraphs Encl ML20238C6521987-04-10010 April 1987 Deposition of Bk Kanga.* Transcript of 870410 Deposition in Gaithersburg,Md Re R Parks.Pp 1-151.Supporting Documentation Encl 1998-09-17
[Table view] |
Text
wcan*0_c~ m a n eaemsst Ts 1
,/ -
O :
Outline of Testimony for W. A. Verrochi O
Q. Please state your name and address.
A. My name is William A. Verrochi. 'My business address is 1001 Broad Street, Johnstown, Pennsylvania 15907.
Q. By whom are you employed and in what capacity?
A. I am employed by Pennsylvania Electric Company W
("Penelec") as President, Chief Operating Officer and Director of that company. -
Q. Please describe your education and professional background.
A. A. summary of my educational and pr~ofessiona f background is set forth on Appendix A' attached to this testimony.
I Q. What is the purpose of your testimony in this proceeding?
A. The basic purposes of my testimony are to#
describe qualitatively the benefits which are expected to be achieved by, and the steps which have been taken and plans which have been developed to implemen't, the planned combined management of Penelec and Metropolitan Edison Company (" Met-Ed") and the concurrent operating division reorganizations of those two companies.
810s 1 no \9 h
( l' I show you a document which has been marked
(} Q.
for identification as PN/ME Exhibit 6. Could you please identify that exhibit?.
A. That' exhibit is the Combined Management. Agree-ment executed as of' July 1, 1980 by Penelec and Met-Ed, covering the planned combined management of those two companies. That agreement is the subject of the proceeding at Docket No. G-80070101.
Q. Will your testimony cover the quantification of any benefits expected to be achieved as a result of the 1
implementation of the Combined Management Agreement and divisional reorganization?
[]J
~
A. No. 'That crea will be covered by the tectimony i .
of Mr. F. A'. Donofrio.
4 Q. Based on.one of your earlier answers, is it correct that the scope c.' -he planned Penelec/ Met-Ed manage-ment reorganization is not limited to the matters which appear on the face of the Combined Management Agreement ,
namely the common officerships and directorships of Penelec and Met-Ed, changes in.their respective corporate names and the allocation of the costs and services to be rendered by common management for those respective two companies?
/T A. Yes, that is correct. It is also the intention V
of Penelec and Met-Ed,.respectively, to review their operating e
e l- ._- _ - ~ . _ _ _ . _ . _ _ . _ __
- ?
division alignments; in the case of Penelec, to reduce the size of certain large divisions to provide for a closer working relationship between the division manager and his service area; in the case of Met-Ed, to consider consolidation of two divisions; to close smaller, less efficient business office operations; to centralize various functions in division ,
headquarters; and to institute additional standardization of .
policies and procedures throughout the two companies. +
While the -planned Penelec/ Met-Ed combined manage-- .
ment and the reorganization of the operating divisions of the two respective companies are separable matters which could proceed independently of each other, and the reorgani-zation of operating divisions could take' place within either O
k/ Penelec or Met-Ed without regard to what takes ~ place in them other company, a coordinated approach.to the several matters has distinct benefits.
4 Q. Can you identify any such benefits?
A. First of all, the strengthened management resulting from the management combination will be able to realize more effectively the advantages of the division reorganization in each of the two~ companies. Secondly, the plans with respect to both areas of reorganization c6uld be communicated at the same time, with more effectiveness and positive impact and less confusion than if communicated
( separately. The planned divisional reorganization depends upon strengthened headquarters staff support. To proceed
s .
_ 4-with the divisional reorganization in each company separately O would require duplication of headquarters staffs. Moreover, more effective.use of the personnel selection process can be achieved by proceeding with b6th prepossis in a coordinated a
way. -
Q. What are the objectives of the proposed management combination and divisional organization? .
A. The objectives of the two proposals, as we
. have previously stated them to this Commission at the Penelec/
Met-Ed annual review on June 26, 1980, are as follows:
To continue to provide ratepayers with reliable electric service at the lowest possible cost.
O- To increase the degree of dedication t6 customef""
service and the commitment to conservation at the people-to-people level.
To enhance the center of excellence in Johnstown for GPU owned and operated coal-fired generation.
To further centralize and strengthen coal supply strategy, procurement and source development.
l To centralize Pennsylvania aspects of policy making, load management, tariff a~dministration and rate Cases.
To reduce operating costs.
l To position the companies better to meet the l0 challenges of the 1980's and beyond through maximizing the benefits of strength of scale in' management. '
v e-- -- , -
,e-
Q. Please describe briefly the planning by
() Penelec and Met-Ed to implement the decision to combine the .
managements of Penelec and Met-Ed,and to reorganize their
~
' ~
respective divisions. .
A. I would like at the outset to make several ,
basic observations with. respect tr the planned combination of managements. First of all, Penelec and Met-Ed are the subject of extensive regulation by various governmental [
agencies. Before the Combined Management Agreement can be implemented, various regulatory authorizations must be obtained. Mr.-Dieckamp has discussed such authorizations in his testimony.
Secondly, Penelec and Met-Ed have the same problems'
() in terms of meeting environmental requirements, effective ,,
operation of generating plants, procurement of coal, trans-mission and distribution line construction and maintenance, .
hooking up custcmers, customer relations, interactions with -
the PUC and so forth. So the bulk of the' management problems of Met-Ed and Penelec are similar, and are very much in-fluenced by the fact that the two companies are operating in ,
- the same jurisdiction.
- Thirdly, the formulation of plans to implement the planned management combination and divisional reorganization is a developmental and iterative process. Goals and objec-tives had to be analyzed, formulated, reviewed, revised, re
( )) reviewed, and so on as additional facts and perspectives
~ ~
presented themselves.
t
Input into the planning process came from a
() variety of sources, both within and outside the GPU system.
This process has been a continuing one thus far throughout 1980 and is still going on. .As to the sources of input into
. ,' ~~.
this, process from outside the GPU system, Theodore Barry S .
Associates ("TBSA") (which was engaged by this Commission to make a management audit of the GPU system) has been a sig- .
nificant source of input. Many of the suggestions and #
recommendations of TBSA have been incorporated in the iterative process of preparing the plans to implement the proposed management com!ination. I have no hesitancy in stating that if any comments or suggestions were to arise during the course of this proceeding which can be factored
() beneficially into the combined management plans,-we would.he . ..
happy to incorporate them into such plans.
Q. What benefits, if any, are expected to result from the planned management combination and divisional reorganization?
A. There is quite a number of benefits expected to be' derived from the planned management combination and reorganization. It will' enable Penelec and Met-Ed, respec- -
tively, to continue to provide their ratepayers.with reliable electric service at the lowest possible cost through a plan whichi O
l
Enhances management effectiveness in dealing with increasingly complex financial, regulatory, technical, governmental and customer problems and concerns; Permits significant cost savings and cost. avoidance; Strengthens local. customer service organizations -
by centralizing qualified customer-related personnel and information systems in division headquarters locations readily accessible to the customer (i.e., division headquarters will serve, with one exception, an area .
within a 30-mile radius); -
Provides greater accessibility to local managers becadse the Division Managers (a) will generally be responsible for smaller geographic areas (.within a 30-nile radius) and.(b) will no longer be responsible for O the functione1, technica1 division operating staffs,---
which will get their technicaal direction from corporate headquarters; Enhances the ' ability to achieve conservation and i load management objectives through staff and field l personnel dedicated specifically to this activity; Retains and expands the large coal-fired, generation function in the heart of the western Pennsylvani'a' coal fields, thereby providing better local contact and I
control of all aspects of the operation;- ,
Strengthens fossil generation and coal supply r.anagement through improved control procedures knd O stenderdizetion which direct 1x effects the fue1.comeonent in the customer's bill;
( -
Improves communications with regulators, legis-e
-- , - - , - - - --,n. . .- , -_-
lators, customers, employees and the media through
() establishment ment of communications as a separate function, not directly responsible to one specialize,d function; -
.f ,
Provides opportunities to consolidate, standardize f.y.
and streamline procedures, thus achieving economies -
- -
directly affecting operating costs and, ultimately, the customer's bill'
. Increases staff support in. planning, direction and control; and Improves control of budgets, operating and main-
-tenance expenditures, facilities management and con-struction modifications.
Q. Who will be the beneficiaries of the various a benefits and cost savings and avoidance that you expect to
-result from the management combination and reorganization?
A. Clearly, the primary beneficiaries will be the
(
customers of Penelec and Met-Ed. Any cost savings and avoidance will be reflected in the respective companies' o
cost of service calculations and thence in the rates charge-able to their customers. Such benefits as improvements in service, access to local managers'and communications will i
likewise redound to the benefit of the customers.
1 Q. Will any class of customers benefit mgre than
() any other class from the proposed management combination and reorganization?
A. I do not foresee that any class of customers
!l
-g_
will benefit more than any other class. 'As'we see it, the
[} benefits will be applicable to all classes of customers.
Q. What possible negative effects do you foresee as a result of the planned management combination and
, divisional reorganization? ..-
A'. The planned combination and reorganization will a'ffect a number of corporate and operating division employees.
For some, relocation will be unwelcome. For others not re-located, there will be changes in job responsibilities. Some employees will lose their jobs. A move of the corporate headquarters may be regarded by some as a loss of prestige
~
to the Johnstown community. Some employees would be moved ,
from Johnstown to Reading. Others would be moved from Reading
(]) and Parsippany to Johnstown. It is anticipated that.the overall job loss in Johnstown will be less than.85 people.
However, as we view it,.the positive benefits to customers and employees of Penelec and Met-Ed far outweigh these negatives.
Q. Will the planned divisional reorganization v
involve the abandonment of any of the places where Penelec or Met-Ed presently have'line crews which do such things as.
repair and construct transmission and distribution lines?
A. No. It is recognized that cust'omers can best be served by maintaining Line Construction and Maintenance personnel at each of the 68 locations where the two companies now have facilities. For this reason, it is not envisioned that any district of sub-district facilities will be abandoned
by this realignment, except as work load distribution changes
() would dictate in the same evolutionary process as has been followed in the past. ',
Q. Has any chart been prepared to show what the ,
proposed combined management organization will look like? - ,
A. Yes. We have prepared, reviewed, revised and updated a chart of such organization. Its development has been part of the iterative process I have previously men- .
tioned. The present chart of such organization is .shown'on PN/ME Exhibit 2.
4 Q. Could you describe briefly the responsibilities of the various management positions reflected on that exhibit?
C A. The respective responsibilities can be described n*
briefly as follows:
- 1. The Senior Vice President-Customer Operations s
will focus on the importance of the customer / company relation-ship, and under him:
l
- a. The Vice President-Customer Services will _
have direct responsibility for the policies and pr -
cedures relating to customer needs, including business office transactions, customer requests, community services and group and individual customer contacts relating to general matters. This function will also provide liaison with the Rural Electric Cooperatives.
.O b. The position of Vice President-Conservation and Load Management gives increased emphasis to this l
important area. New federal and state legislation and l
l __
i regulation on conservation, together with the GPU System 10-year Master Plan to' effectively reduce load growth, require expert attention and 'em appropriate '
level of staffing at both the corporate and operating
^
level.; Consideration has been.given to the fact that '".'
the development of most programs will be done in the next few years, with a swarm of new activities and ,
, proce'dures (e.g., energy audits) at the start. Once established, since much of the' program will involve repetition, a decision will b6 made.at that time as to
. , y .y .
whether the position should be. continued at an officer-level.
- c. The Vice President-Division Operations
() will be responsible for Division management. Central.,
coordination and control will assure uniformity of policy application, emphasize and accomplish energy cpnservation by innovative load management, and estab-lish improved quality of all company operations involving interfaces with the public.
- d. The Vice President-TSD Engineering and +
Operations will oversee all aspects of the System-wide transmission and distribution functions, including the engineering, design, licensing', construction, operation, maintenance and allocation of resources for facilities.
The Operating Superintendents will report to this Vice O
(} President on a functional basis but each will be respon-sible to his Division Manager for meeting the service needs of customers. -
- 2. A Fossil Generation function will be headed by
() a Senior Vice President-Generation. In addition to current responsibilities related to operation, maintenance and ,
construction modifications of existing facilities, he will-also be responsible for engineering, design, licensing and-construction of new fossil generation facilities. In addition, he will focus on expanding the breadth and depth of expertise in engineering and management of performance improvement activities. The generation function will place increased emphasis on research and development in environ-mental compliance and the use of Pennsylvania coal.
- 3. A Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer will be responsible for the Comptroller, Secretary
() and Staff Counsel, Treasury and Rate Case Management functions.
While rate making will be separate for each company, a strengthened group, with the same people involved for both companies, will provide a helpful consistency in preparation and presentation of rate cases.
- 4. In recognition of the increasing importance of external and internal communications and the fact that a1d l aspects of the company operation are involved, a separate communications function, headed by a Vice President, will be established. The state government relations function will report to this Vice , President, instead of to the President, as has been the case.
O
- 5. The Vice President-Materials Management will
() assume the present Met-Ed and Penelec duties of this function and will have the added responsibilities of fuels develop-ment, coal research and development, mining engineering support, fuels quality and. mining reserve agreements, which are being transferred from'GPUSC.
- 6. The Vice President-Personnel & Services will be responsible for employee matters and administration of general services, involving a number which had been-under various functions. -
Q. Is a change in management or corporate organi-zation an unusual event in Penelec's and Met-Ed's histories?
() A. No, like most electric utility companies, bodb Penelec and Met-Ed grew through the merger and acquisition of many local or single purpose power companies beginning in the last quarter of the nineteenth century. For instance, Penelec is an amalgamation of about 125 small systems and Met-Ed, over 300. But more to the point in comparison to the presently planned management combination are the following examples:
For about a 2-year period in the late' thirties, accounting for both companies was done in Reading. The Penelec President from 1951 to 1958 was also,the President of Met-Ed for a portion of that time. Prior to the merger of GPU subsidiary, Northern Pennsylvania Power Company, with Penelec in 1956,
() that company's general accounting was done by Met-Ed in Reading. From 1954 to 1962 the field sales organizations 9
- . _ - . _ . - _ _ . _ = - _ - - - - - - _ . - . - - -
- _ _ _ _ = - -
i l
1 .
3
- lt+ - t i
of the two companies followed plans developed and monitored lO 37 a combined sterf orsenization heedauartered in Readins. ;.
- :.. : v;- " f,k ,
Why was Reading. chosen as the location for the Q.
, i
.j ,,
u i
headquarters of' the combined management staff? -
M:
!, A. Let me direct your attention first of all to
- PN/ME Exhibit 1, which is a map showing the GPU service
- _
,f-
- territory. Within Pennsylvania, the lighter shaded area is n .
Penelee service territory and the darker shaded is Met-Ed ,
i service territory. Together, they cover roughly half of the i ,
. .; - ,.
! land area of Pennsylvania but serve only about 20% of the i, state's population.
< (
As is apparent from that exhibit, plus a realization
,!O that c-t-r density varies suderantiaux thr-sh-1, it -
would be difficult to pick a truly central location for the l widely dispersed service territories of the two Companies.
5 l In terms of size, Erie is the' largest city in the combined Penelec/ Met-Ed service territories and, in fact in the GPU System. It is c1early not, however, centrally located I
within the combined service areas of Penelec and Met-Ed.e Reading is the next largest. city in the service area.
Johnstown, present location of Penelec headquarters, is the i
fifth largest city in the service area (behind Erie, Reading, l Altoona and York).
Reading was selected because of major facilities O now im 21 ace there as we11 as certain seosraPuic advantases.
which result in economies in travel costs. The extensive O GPU System Electronic Data Processing (EDP) Center is already located in Reading. Systems and methods in the necessarily .
rapid and cost-saving expansion of EDP, such as future in-sta11ation of an on-line system-wide customer inquiry system, can be more closely coordinated and the ong'oing creative process greatly enhanced if the people involved are :bs close .
proximity. The GPU System Load Dispatching and Interchange Accounting functions are also in Reading. Met-Ed's.. existing .
headquarters is located there and with the relocation o'f personnel to Three Mile' Island, has space available fer the combined management group, whereas location in Johnstown would require a costly investment in space.
O Furthermore, Reading is reasonably near GPU headI -
quarters in Parsippany, New Jersey, and relatively close to regulatory and governmental centers ;bi Harrisburg and Washington.
G l
9
. Appendix A b
?
PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS OF O v1ttlia 4. vEaa0 Cal ,
B. S.' Mechanical Engineering, h ssachusetts Institute of' Technology,-1947. ,
Licensed Professional Engineer in Massachusetts, New Jersey'and Pennsylvania.
U. 5. Army Corps of Engineers, Nebruary 1943 to June 1946; First. Lieutenant .
General Service Regiment; 30 months duty in North Africa and Italy. *
.Former member of the Board of Directors of' Jersey Central Power & Light i Company, 1970 --1976; member of the Board of Directors of Pennsylvania ,
Electric Company, elected Octobe.r 1976; member of Board of Directors -
of CPU Service Corporation, elected September 1977.
~
y .
June 1977 to date: At Pennsylvania Electric Company, Johnstown, Pennsylvania.'
In June 1977, became Executive Vice President, and in September 1977, became President and Chief Operating Officer of Pennsylvania Electric' .-
Company.-
October 1969 to Wy ~1977: At Parsippany, New Jerscy. In May 1971 became Vice President, Design and Construction, and in December 1974, Vice President,' Generation, of the GPU Service' Corporation, responsible O. for design and co'astruction of all nets generation facilities, performance improvement of existing' generation facilities, and' related -site -S$1ection, i safety,15 ceasing, environmental, quality assurance,'*and research and - '
. developm m activities'.in the' General Public Utilities System, From
- October 1969 to May 1971 on special ass.ignment assuming many of these i
responsibilities during the organization of the CPUSC.
April 1961 to October'1969: ~ At Pennsylvania Electric Compacy, Johnstown, Pennsylvania, as Superintendent of Production and then Assistant Vice Presider.t - T'echnS=1: responsible for operation and maintenance of all electric generating stations, including Seward, Shawv111e, Keystone, Homer City and conema, ugh, coal purchasing and des,ign and j construction of transmission facilities. -
l * .
July 1947 to Ao 11'1961: At Jackson & Moreland, Boston, Massachusetts, and A11 States Oasign and Development Company, Inc., Trenton, New Jersey, with project engineering and management' responsibilities in the air pollution control, power generation and test facility fields.
O e
i O '
I O
G e
e p._,. .
-e---, _ .,_.,_w_-,__-.,_,___-.y. -
, -.._m._ - , ,. , , ~ - _ - ~ . . , . _ -.y-----._----,__7 ,-__y - - _ , _ _ - , y