ML19327A817

From kanterella
Revision as of 21:48, 6 January 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ro:On 891005,failure to Perform Reactor Checkout Prior to Operations Results in Reactor Failing to Fulfill Surveillance Requirements in Facility Tech Specs Sections 4.2.3.a,4.2.3.c,4.2.4.a,4.3.3 & 4.6.1
ML19327A817
Person / Time
Site: Breazeale Nuclear Reactor
Issue date: 10/11/1989
From: Hosler C
PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV., UNIVERSITY PARK, PA
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 8910180188
Download: ML19327A817 (2)


Text

~- ~*

p Q- Q ~ -

Q

,

v .

y~

E4 3 qE

[ ; f, .m[ Q -(

- -

, ,

. (814) 865-2$16 .

Charles L. Healer 114 Kern Graduate Building.

~

Senior Vice President for Research . ,.The Per.asylvcnia State University >

  • __ aad Dean of the Graduate School, ' University Park, PA 16802

,

'

,

,;

U

-October 11', 1989.

m

, -

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory,Conrnission h ' ATTN:- Document Control Desk

= Washington, D.C. 20555-

,

'

, Re
Tech Spec Violation License R-2, Docket N0. 50-5

'

1 '

Dear Sir and Madame:

,

.

During .the: morning _ reactor. checkout.of 0ctober 5, 1989, it was discovered that.a reactor checkout was'not~per_ formed prior to' reactor. operations on October 4,

~

1989..~This failure to_do a checkout prior to operations caused the-Penn State '

  • IBreazeale. Reactor to-: fail to fulfill the surveillance requirements of_ sections 4.2.3.a 4.~2.3.c, 4.2.4.a. 4.J 3. , and 4.6.1. of the facility technir.a1

. ' spec ifications- (t. s. )~. This failure to do surveillance requirements is a- .i

+ ireportable occurrence:under section 1.1.33.e of-the facility t.s. . This letter

-issto. fulfill' the requirements of section 6.6.2.a of the facility-t.s. to _ follow >

-within 14 days with a report of the event.

LThe reactor' checkout- on October 5,1989 found all checks- to be within t t..

limitseand there'it nu reason to believe that the reactor was operated outside -

of t.s. limits on-0ctober-4.-

'E0ne cause of the event was a' confusion between personnel; each assumed the other >

bad done'the checkout. Other causes of the-event were the failure of operating personnel'to read the' reactor log prior to startt.p as required by the facility '

,

" operating procedures and'the fact that entries in the log denoting checkout

completion are not delineated in any manner different than all other entries.

,

Inynediate action was to have all licensad operators present on October 5 sign (off on a training procedure that explained the-event. Other licensed operators

. signed. off on. the procedure as .they returned to work'the. following days. To

'

- prevent the recurrence of this event in the future, the checkout procedcre will

-be changed to require the use of a colored stamp to . indicate when the checkout

. i s : done.- The absence of this-stamp in the log should remind the operator that the checkout has not been done, i

~

8910180188 G91011 ,

'

PDR ADOCK 05000005 S PDC

,

un,,e,.e,

- 9  ;

% _ 1 t

f

. .. ._ -- -

~

Q}%ig '- '

b

,

c.:: E.;p -

,

. .

. ,

F I[ ~

  • U.S! Nuclear Regulatorys Connission-p

'

=Page 2-

. October.: 11, :1989 -

-

,

ii ,

NRC Region'I'was notified on October 5 by phone contact with Noel-Dudley. A

,,~ .

follow-up: letter: confirming the phone call also went to Region I on October 5: ,

with- a copy to:your of fice.

~

'

'

Sincerely, WW/ l '

Dr.' Charles L.' Hosler, Jr. .

Senior Vice President-for Research and Dean of the Graduate School

.

CLH/TLF/skr

'

.cc: Region'I Administrator E T. A.-Seliga ,

M. H..Voth *

.

v

,

>

,

l

  • I Vis , --

. -