|
|---|
Category:Regulatory Analysis
MONTHYEARML12017A0772012-05-31031 May 2012
Regulatory Analysis DG-1288
ML12017A0592012-05-31031 May 2012
Regulatory Analysis DG-1287 - an Approach for Plant-Specifc, Risk-Informed Decisionmaking: Technical Specifications
2012-05-31
[Table view]Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "".
Category:Regulatory Guide
MONTHYEARML23110A0022023-04-18018 April 2023
Public Meeting to Discuss Revision of Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.200 and Updates to Technical Guidance Related to Risk-Informed Activities
ML22041A2342022-02-0909 February 2022
Document to Support ACRS Subcommittee Meeting Redline RG 1.200, Rev 4, Acceptability of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Results for Risk-Informed Activities
ML22041A2252022-02-0909 February 2022
Document to Support ACRS Subcommittee Meeting Redline RG 1.174, Rev 4, an Approach for Using Probablistic Risk Assessment in Risk-Informed Decisions on Plant-Specific Changes to the Licensing Basis
Regulatory Guide 1.1742018-01-31031 January 2018
an Approach for Using Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Risk-Informed Decisions on Plant-Specific Changes to the Licensing Basis
ML12017A0772012-05-31031 May 2012
Regulatory Analysis DG-1288
ML12017A0762012-05-31031 May 2012
Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1288, (Proposed Revision 2 to Regulatory Guide 1.178, Dated September 2003) an Approach for Plant-Specific Risk-Informed Decisionmaking for Inservice Inspection of Piping
ML12017A0592012-05-31031 May 2012
Regulatory Analysis DG-1287 - an Approach for Plant-Specifc, Risk-Informed Decisionmaking: Technical Specifications
ML12017A0542012-05-31031 May 2012
Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1287, (Proposed Revision 2 to Regulatory Guide 1.777, Dated May 2011) an Approach for Plant-Specific, Risk-Informed Decisionmaking: Technical Specifications
ML12012A0062012-05-31031 May 2012
Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1285, (Proposed Revision 3 to Regulatory Guide 1.174, Dated May 2011) an Approach for Using Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Risk-Informed Decisions on Plant-Specific Changes to the Licensing Basis
2023-04-18
[Table view]Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "".
Category:Draft
MONTHYEARML22041A2342022-02-0909 February 2022
Document to Support ACRS Subcommittee Meeting Redline RG 1.200, Rev 4, Acceptability of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Results for Risk-Informed Activities
ML22041A2252022-02-0909 February 2022
Document to Support ACRS Subcommittee Meeting Redline RG 1.174, Rev 4, an Approach for Using Probablistic Risk Assessment in Risk-Informed Decisions on Plant-Specific Changes to the Licensing Basis
ML12017A0772012-05-31031 May 2012
Regulatory Analysis DG-1288
ML12017A0762012-05-31031 May 2012
Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1288, (Proposed Revision 2 to Regulatory Guide 1.178, Dated September 2003) an Approach for Plant-Specific Risk-Informed Decisionmaking for Inservice Inspection of Piping
ML12017A0592012-05-31031 May 2012
Regulatory Analysis DG-1287 - an Approach for Plant-Specifc, Risk-Informed Decisionmaking: Technical Specifications
ML12017A0542012-05-31031 May 2012
Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1287, (Proposed Revision 2 to Regulatory Guide 1.777, Dated May 2011) an Approach for Plant-Specific, Risk-Informed Decisionmaking: Technical Specifications
ML12012A0062012-05-31031 May 2012
Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1285, (Proposed Revision 3 to Regulatory Guide 1.174, Dated May 2011) an Approach for Using Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Risk-Informed Decisions on Plant-Specific Changes to the Licensing Basis
2022-02-09
[Table view]Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "". |
Text
REGULATORY ANALYSIS DRAFT REGULATORY GUIDE DG-1288 AN APPROACH FOR USING PLANT-SPECIFIC RISK-INFORMED DECISIONMAKING FOR INSERVICE INSPECTION OF PIPING (Proposed Revision 2 of Regulatory Guide 1.178, dated September 2003)
Statement of the Problem This is proposed Revision 2 to Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.178. Since the last revision of this RG, the relevant PRA standard has been revised, associated or supporting documents have been developed or revised, and review practices have evolved. Therefore, revision of this regulatory guidance is necessary to incorporate these developments.
Objective The objective of this regulatory action is to improve the utility of this regulatory guidance in light of the developments identified above.
Alternative Approaches The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff considered the following alternative approaches:
Do not revise Regulatory Guide 1.178, or Revise Regulatory Guide 1.178.
Alternative 1: Do Not Revise Regulatory Guide 1.178 Under this alternative, the NRC would not revise guidance, and the current guidance would be retained. If NRC does not take action, there would not be any changes in costs or benefit to the public, licensees or NRC. However, the "no-action" alternative would not address identified concerns with the current version of the regulatory guide [or in the absence of NRC guidance, for a new guide]. The NRC would continue to review each application on a case-by-case basis. This alternative provides a baseline condition from which any other alternatives will be assessed.
Alternative 2: Revise Regulatory Guide 1.178 Under this alternative, the NRC would revise Regulatory Guide 1.178. This revision would incorporate the latest information in the PRA standard, supporting guidance, and review practices. By doing so, the NRC would ensure that the RG guidance available in this area is current, and accurately reflects the staff's position.
The impact to the NRC would be the costs associated with preparing and issuing the regulatory guide revision. The impact to the public would be the voluntary costs associated with reviewing and providing comments to NRC during the public comment period. The value to NRC staff and its applicants would be the benefits associated with enhanced efficiency and effectiveness in using a common guidance document as the technical basis for license applications and other interactions between the NRC and its regulated entities.
Page 2 Conclusion Based on this regulatory analysis, the NRC staff recommends revision of Regulatory Guide 1.178. The staff concludes that the proposed action will enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of related regulatory reviews.